REVIEW 1 cited by
Extension of exactly-solvable Hamiltonians using symmetries of Lie algebras
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Exactly-solvable Hamiltonians that can be diagonalized using relatively simple unitary transformations are of great use in quantum computing. They can be employed for decomposition of interacting Hamiltonians either in Trotter-Suzuki approximations of the evolution operator for the quantum phase estimation algorithm, or in the quantum measurement problem for the variational quantum eigensolver. One of the typical forms of exactly solvable Hamiltonians is a linear combination of operators forming a modest size Lie algebra. Very frequently such linear combinations represent non-interacting Hamiltonians and thus are of limited interest for describing interacting cases. Here we propose the extension where coefficients in these combinations are substituted by polynomials of the Lie algebra symmetries. This substitution results in a more general class of solvable Hamiltonians and for qubit algebras is related to the recently proposed non-contextual Pauli Hamiltonians. In fermionic problems, this substitution leads to Hamiltonians with eigenstates that are single Slater determinants but with different sets of single-particle states for different eigenstates. The new class of solvable Hamiltonians can be measured efficiently using quantum circuits with gates that depend on the result of a mid-circuit measurement of the symmetries.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Noncontextual Pauli Hamiltonians
Noncontextual Pauli Hamiltonians have support up to 2^(n+1), block-diagonal spectra, and eigenstates with stabilizer rank linear in the number of qubits.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.