Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Adversarial Attack and Defense of YOLO Detectors in Autonomous Driving Scenarios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.04781 v2 pith:ZO6LJ7JM submitted 2022-02-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords adversarialvisualattackdetectiondetectorsaspectautonomousdefense
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual detection is a key task in autonomous driving, and it serves as a crucial foundation for self-driving planning and control. Deep neural networks have achieved promising results in various visual tasks, but they are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks. A comprehensive understanding of deep visual detectors' vulnerability is required before people can improve their robustness. However, only a few adversarial attack/defense works have focused on object detection, and most of them employed only classification and/or localization losses, ignoring the objectness aspect. In this paper, we identify a serious objectness-related adversarial vulnerability in YOLO detectors and present an effective attack strategy targeting the objectness aspect of visual detection in autonomous vehicles. Furthermore, to address such vulnerability, we propose a new objectness-aware adversarial training approach for visual detection. Experiments show that the proposed attack targeting the objectness aspect is 45.17% and 43.50% more effective than those generated from classification and/or localization losses on the KITTI and COCO traffic datasets, respectively. Also, the proposed adversarial defense approach can improve the detectors' robustness against objectness-oriented attacks by up to 21% and 12% mAP on KITTI and COCO traffic, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools