Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Bootstrap for Bayesian Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.15374 v1 pith:ZP6TVQVV submitted 2022-05-30 stat.CO

Deep Bootstrap for Bayesian Inference

classification stat.CO
keywords bootstrapbayesianposteriorsinferencesamplersdeepdefinefocus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

For a Bayesian, the task to define the likelihood can be as perplexing as the task to define the prior. We focus on situations when the parameter of interest has been emancipated from the likelihood and is linked to data directly through a loss function. We survey existing work on both Bayesian parametric inference with Gibbs posteriors as well as Bayesian non-parametric inference. We then highlight recent bootstrap computational approaches to approximating loss-driven posteriors. In particular, we focus on implicit bootstrap distributions defined through an underlying push-forward mapping. We investigate iid samplers from approximate posteriors that pass random bootstrap weights trough a trained generative network. After training the deep-learning mapping, the simulation cost of such iid samplers is negligible. We compare the performance of these deep bootstrap samplers with exact bootstrap as well as MCMC on several examples (including support vector machines or quantile regression). We also provide theoretical insights into bootstrap posteriors by drawing upon connections to model mis-specification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Amortized Inference for Sampling Distributions Where the Bootstrap Fails

    stat.ME 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0

    A 'root network' trained on single simulated root draws with pinball loss gives near-nominal 95% confidence intervals for bounded maxima, infinite-variance means, Hill tail-index estimates, and 99% VaR—where the boots...