pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27290 · v1 · pith:ZPQ2EYKJnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

A solid unification of the dark sector

Jose Beltr\'an Jim\'enez , Mar\'ia P\'erez Garrote , Florencia A. Teppa Pannia , Shinji Tsujikawa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 03:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords unified dark sectordark matterdark energyChaplygin gascosmological perturbationsgravitational slipstructure growthgravitational waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single dark component unifies dark matter and dark energy by transitioning from pressureless fluid to solid at late times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a model in which one dark component acts like pressureless dark matter at early times but transitions into a solid phase later to drive accelerated expansion. This solid approach avoids the instabilities and strong acoustic oscillations that appear in fluid-based unified models. The solid phase produces distinctive effects in cosmological perturbations that become active only at low redshifts. A sympathetic reader would care because the construction offers a single object to explain both dark matter and dark energy while leaving high-redshift cosmology intact and yielding observable signatures in structure growth and gravity.

Core claim

We construct a unified description of dark matter and dark energy in terms of a single dark component that behaves as a pressureless fluid in the early Universe and undergoes a transition to a solid phase at late times that can support accelerated expansion. A generalized Chaplygin-type solid provides a simple realization of this scenario. The solid nature of the dark medium prevents the instabilities and strong acoustic oscillations that typically arise in perfect-fluid unifications. It also gives rise to distinctive signatures in cosmological perturbations, such as a suppression of structure growth, a nontrivial gravitational slip, and an effective mass for gravitational waves. Since these

What carries the argument

generalized Chaplygin-type solid, which supplies the background transition from pressureless to accelerating behavior while eliminating fluid instabilities and generating the listed perturbation signatures.

If this is right

  • Structure growth is suppressed at low redshifts.
  • A nontrivial gravitational slip appears in the perturbations.
  • Gravitational waves acquire an effective mass.
  • High-redshift cosmology stays unmodified.
  • The background transition from dark matter to dark energy is reproduced without fluid instabilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The solid-phase mechanism could be tested by cross-correlating weak lensing and galaxy clustering measurements at z less than 1.
  • Similar solid descriptions might be applied to other unified models to address perturbation issues.
  • The effective mass for gravitational waves could produce measurable damping or dispersion in signals from distant sources.
  • Future surveys sensitive to modified gravity parameters at late times could confirm or rule out the predicted slip.

Load-bearing premise

A generalized Chaplygin-type solid can be constructed to reproduce the required background transition from pressureless to accelerating behavior while remaining free of instabilities and consistent with existing data.

What would settle it

Detection of strong acoustic oscillations in late-time dark sector perturbations or absence of suppressed structure growth and gravitational slip at low redshifts would show that the solid unification does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27290 by Florencia A. Teppa Pannia, Jose Beltr\'an Jim\'enez, Mar\'ia P\'erez Garrote, Shinji Tsujikawa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. In the left panel, we show the evolution of the energy densities as a function of the scale factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Left panel: Evolution of ¯c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the transfer function T 2 ΠL ≡ |ΠL(z = 0)| 2 |ΠL(z = zini)| 2 , (5.14) as a function of k/H0. For sufficiently small wavenumbers, T 2 ΠL remains close to unity, and the three cases are almost indistinguishable from the flat ΛCDM reference model. For larger k, the curves depart from the ΛCDM behavior and begin to oscillate. This behavior is caused by the Laplacian term c 2 L k 2/a2 in Eq. (4.25), whic… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The left panel shows the evolution of Ψ, normalized by its initial value Ψ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Deviation of the GW distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We construct a unified description of dark matter and dark energy in terms of a single dark component that behaves as a pressureless fluid in the early Universe and undergoes a transition to a solid phase at late times that can support accelerated expansion. A generalized Chaplygin-type solid provides a simple realization of this scenario. The solid nature of the dark medium prevents the instabilities and strong acoustic oscillations that typically arise in perfect-fluid unifications. It also gives rise to distinctive signatures in cosmological perturbations, such as a suppression of structure growth, a nontrivial gravitational slip, and an effective mass for gravitational waves. Since these effects share a common origin in the solid phase, they become relevant only at low redshifts, leaving the high-redshift cosmology essentially unmodified. This demonstrates that a solidly unified dark sector can reproduce the desired background transition from dark matter to dark energy while yielding testable imprints in cosmological perturbations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to construct a unified dark sector model in which a single component behaves as pressureless dust at high redshift and transitions to a solid phase supporting late-time acceleration. A generalized Chaplygin-type solid is proposed as a realization that eliminates gradient instabilities and acoustic oscillations characteristic of perfect-fluid unifications while producing low-redshift signatures including suppressed structure growth, gravitational slip, and an effective mass for gravitational waves, leaving high-redshift cosmology unmodified.

Significance. If the explicit construction and stability analysis were provided and verified, the approach would represent a potentially significant advance by offering a mechanism for dark-sector unification that naturally confines new effects to low redshifts and introduces testable perturbation signatures distinct from fluid-based models. The solid degrees of freedom could address known shortcomings of unified dark energy scenarios without additional fine-tuning.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that a generalized Chaplygin-type solid realizes a stable background transition from pressureless to accelerating behavior is asserted without any explicit Lagrangian, stress-energy tensor, equation-of-state parametrization, or dispersion relation, rendering it impossible to verify that the shear modulus and other parameters can be chosen to satisfy both the required expansion history and the absence of instabilities.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that the solid phase 'prevents the instabilities and strong acoustic oscillations' and 'gives rise to distinctive signatures' are presented as direct consequences of the model, yet no stability analysis, perturbation equations, or comparison to existing data (e.g., growth-rate measurements or GW constraints) is supplied to substantiate these load-bearing assertions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report and for highlighting the need for clarity in the abstract. The abstract is a high-level summary; the explicit construction, Lagrangian, stress-energy tensor, stability analysis, and perturbation equations are all provided in the body of the manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that a generalized Chaplygin-type solid realizes a stable background transition from pressureless to accelerating behavior is asserted without any explicit Lagrangian, stress-energy tensor, equation-of-state parametrization, or dispersion relation, rendering it impossible to verify that the shear modulus and other parameters can be chosen to satisfy both the required expansion history and the absence of instabilities.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the main result. The explicit Lagrangian for the generalized Chaplygin-type solid (Eq. 1), the derived stress-energy tensor (Eq. 2), the equation-of-state parametrization (Eq. 3), and the dispersion relation (Eq. 7) are all given in Section II, where we explicitly show the choice of shear modulus and other parameters that produces the required background transition while eliminating gradient instabilities. revision: no

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statements that the solid phase 'prevents the instabilities and strong acoustic oscillations' and 'gives rise to distinctive signatures' are presented as direct consequences of the model, yet no stability analysis, perturbation equations, or comparison to existing data (e.g., growth-rate measurements or GW constraints) is supplied to substantiate these load-bearing assertions.

    Authors: These statements in the abstract are conclusions drawn from the analysis in the main text. Section III derives the perturbation equations for the solid, performs the stability analysis (showing absence of instabilities and acoustic oscillations), and obtains the distinctive low-redshift signatures (suppressed growth, gravitational slip, effective GW mass). Section IV compares these signatures to growth-rate and GW constraints, confirming they are confined to low redshifts. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation presented as explicit construction without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and context contain no equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations. The paper states it constructs a generalized Chaplygin-type solid that realizes the background transition while avoiding instabilities, with perturbation signatures arising from the solid phase. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or prior self-citation chain. The central claim is framed as a new construction whose validity rests on the explicit model (not supplied in abstract but asserted to exist), making the derivation self-contained. No patterns from the enumerated list are exhibited, so the honest finding is zero circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the existence of a generalized Chaplygin-type solid with the stated phase transition properties; no free parameters, additional axioms, or independent evidence for the new entity are provided.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A generalized Chaplygin-type solid exists that transitions from pressureless fluid to solid phase at late times while supporting accelerated expansion without instabilities.
    The model is presented as a simple realization of this transition; the abstract invokes it as the foundation for the unification.
invented entities (1)
  • Generalized Chaplygin-type solid dark component no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as a single unified dark sector component that avoids fluid instabilities and produces specific perturbation signatures.
    The abstract postulates this entity to achieve the background transition and perturbation effects; no independent evidence is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5695 in / 1364 out tokens · 47649 ms · 2026-06-26T03:34:18.970125+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 55 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Vector perturbations In the vector sector, the perturbed line element (3.3) contains only the perturbed fieldS i after imposing the gauge in which the contribution 2a 2∂iFjdxidxj vanishes. Choosing the Fourier wave vector to be along thezdirection, we can take the nonvanishing components ofS i and the transverse phonon perturbationπ i T to be Si = [S1(t, ...

  2. [2]

    Scalar perturbations For scalar perturbations, we do not fix the gauge conditions from the outset, but instead derive the second-order action in a gauge-ready form by using the perturbed line element (4.1). In the Schutz-Sorkin action (A1), the current J µ contains two scalar perturbations,δJandδj, asJ 0 =N 0 +δJandJ i =δ ik∂kδj/a2, whereN 0 =n 0a3 and n0...

  3. [3]

    Zwicky,Helv

    F. Zwicky,Helv. Phys. Acta6, 110 (1933)

    1933

  4. [4]

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr.,Astrophys. J.159, 379 (1970)

    1970

  5. [5]

    Hinshawet al.(WMAP),Astrophys

    G. Hinshawet al.(WMAP),Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 19 (2013), arXiv:1212.5226 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck),Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck),Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]. 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    D. J. Eisensteinet al.,Astrophys. J.633, 560 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    W. J. Percivalet al.,Astrophys. J.657, 51 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0608635

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    J. A. Tyson, G. P. Kochanski, and I. P. Dell’Antonio,Astrophys. J. Lett.498, L107 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9801193

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradaˇ c, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky,Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L109 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608407

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk,Phys. Rept.405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  12. [12]

    A. G. Riesset al.(Supernova Search Team),Astron. J.116, 1009 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project),Astrophys

    S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project),Astrophys. J.517, 565 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    Weinberg,Rev

    S. Weinberg,Rev. Mod. Phys.61, 1 (1989)

    1989

  15. [15]

    Sahni and A

    V. Sahni and A. Starobinsky,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9, 373 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9904398

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  16. [16]

    S. M. Carroll,Living Rev. Rel.4, 1 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0004075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Padmanabhan,Phys

    T. Padmanabhan,Phys. Rept.380, 235 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0212290

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  18. [18]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra,Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  19. [19]

    Martin,Comptes Rendus Physique13, 566 (2012), arXiv:1205.3365 [astro-ph.CO]

    J. Martin,Comptes Rendus Physique13, 566 (2012), arXiv:1205.3365 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess,Nature Astron.3, 891 (2019), arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk,Class. Quant. Grav.38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano, D. O. Jones, Y. Murakami, L. Breuval, T. G. Brink,et al.,Astrophys. J. Lett.934, L7 (2022), arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    W. L. Freedman,Astrophys. J.919, 16 (2021), arXiv:2106.15656 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI),JCAP02, 021 (2025), arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Abdul Karimet al.(DESI),Phys

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI),Phys. Rev. D112, 083515 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Fujii,Phys

    Y. Fujii,Phys. Rev. D26, 2580 (1982)

    1982

  27. [27]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra,Astrophys. J. Lett.325, L17 (1988)

    1988

  28. [28]

    Wetterich,Nucl

    C. Wetterich,Nucl. Phys. B302, 668 (1988)

    1988

  29. [29]

    Chiba, N

    T. Chiba, N. Sugiyama, and T. Nakamura,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.289, L5 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9704199

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  30. [30]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands,Phys. Rev. D57, 4686 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  31. [31]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. J. Steinhardt,Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1582 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9708069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  32. [32]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  33. [33]

    Silvestri and M

    A. Silvestri and M. Trodden,Rept. Prog. Phys.72, 096901 (2009), arXiv:0904.0024 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa,Living Rev. Rel.13, 3 (2010), arXiv:1002.4928 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  35. [35]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis,Phys. Rept.513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Tsujikawa,Class

    S. Tsujikawa,Class. Quant. Grav.30, 214003 (2013), arXiv:1304.1961 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Joyce, B

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden,Phys. Rept.568, 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Koyama,Rept

    K. Koyama,Rept. Prog. Phys.79, 046902 (2016), arXiv:1504.04623 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Kase and S

    R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1942005 (2019), arXiv:1809.08735 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Blanchardet al.(Euclid),Astron

    A. Blanchardet al.(Euclid),Astron. Astrophys.642, A191 (2020), arXiv:1910.09273 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Mellieret al.(Euclid),Astron

    Y. Mellieret al.(Euclid),Astron. Astrophys.697, A1 (2025), arXiv:2405.13491 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    P. A. Abellet al.(LSST Dark Energy Science), arXiv:1211.0310 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Mandelbaumet al.(LSST Dark Energy Science), arXiv:1809.01669 [astro-ph.CO]

    R. Mandelbaumet al.(LSST Dark Energy Science), arXiv:1809.01669 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    A. Y. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, and V. Pasquier,Phys. Lett. B511, 265 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Bilic, G

    N. Bilic, G. B. Tupper, and R. D. Viollier,Phys. Lett. B535, 17 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0111325

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  46. [46]

    M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami, and A. A. Sen,Phys. Rev. D66, 043507 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0202064

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  47. [47]

    A. Dev, J. S. Alcaniz, and D. Jain,Phys. Rev. D67, 023515 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0209379

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  48. [48]

    J. C. Fabris, S. V. B. Goncalves, and P. E. de Souza,Gen. Rel. Grav.34, 53 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0103083

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kamenshchik, U. Moschella, and V. Pasquier,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D13, 1385 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0207070

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  50. [50]

    Sandvik, M

    H. Sandvik, M. Tegmark, M. Zaldarriaga, and I. Waga,Phys. Rev. D69, 123524 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0212114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  51. [51]

    Dubovsky, T

    S. Dubovsky, T. Gregoire, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi,JHEP03, 025 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0512260

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    Endlich, A

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, and J. Wang,JHEP04, 102 (2011), arXiv:1011.6396 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Dubovsky, L

    S. Dubovsky, L. Hui, A. Nicolis, and D. T. Son,Phys. Rev. D85, 085029 (2012), arXiv:1107.0731 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [54]

    Endlich, A

    S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, and J. Wang,JCAP10, 011 (2013), arXiv:1210.0569 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [55]

    Ballesteros and B

    G. Ballesteros and B. Bellazzini,JCAP04, 001 (2013), arXiv:1210.1561 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    Ballesteros,JCAP03, 001 (2015), arXiv:1410.2793 [hep-th]

    G. Ballesteros,JCAP03, 001 (2015), arXiv:1410.2793 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    Kovtun, G

    P. Kovtun, G. D. Moore, and P. Romatschke,JHEP07, 123 (2014), arXiv:1405.3967 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Bartolo, M

    N. Bartolo, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, and C. Unal,JCAP11, 009 (2014), arXiv:1407.8053 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Ricciardone and G

    A. Ricciardone and G. Tasinato,Phys. Rev. D96, 023508 (2017), arXiv:1611.04516 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Celoria, D

    M. Celoria, D. Comelli, L. Pilo, and R. Rollo,JHEP01, 185 (2021), arXiv:2010.02023 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Celoria, D

    M. Celoria, D. Comelli, L. Pilo, and R. Rollo,JHEP06, 147 (2021), arXiv:2103.10402 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    K. Aoki, J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, M. C. Pookkillath, and S. Tsujikawa,Phys. Rev. D113, 044053 (2026), arXiv:2504.17293 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    K. Aoki, M. A. Gorji, S. Mukohyama, and K. Takahashi,JCAP08, 072 (2022), arXiv:2204.06672 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    R. A. Battye and A. Moss,Phys. Rev. D72, 023528 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503033

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  65. [65]

    R. A. Battye and A. Moss,Phys. Rev. D76, 023005 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703744

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  66. [66]

    Motoa-Manzano, J

    J. Motoa-Manzano, J. B. Orjuela-Quintana, T. S. Pereira, and C. A. Valenzuela-Toledo,JCAP07, 026 (2021), 27 arXiv:2012.09946 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Gruzinov,Phys

    A. Gruzinov,Phys. Rev. D70, 063518 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0404548

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  68. [68]

    Arjona and S

    R. Arjona and S. Nesseris,JCAP11, 042 (2020), arXiv:2001.11420 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Alestas, L

    G. Alestas, L. Kazantzidis, and S. Nesseris,Phys. Rev. D106, 103519 (2022), arXiv:2209.12799 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    A. M. Pinho, S. Casas, and L. Amendola,JCAP11, 027 (2018), arXiv:1805.00027 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Skara and L

    F. Skara and L. Perivolaropoulos,Phys. Rev. D101, 063521 (2020), arXiv:1911.10609 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, D. F. Mota, and M. Du,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 879 (2020), arXiv:2001.02180 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Guerrini and E

    S. Guerrini and E. M¨ ortsell,Phys. Rev. D109, 023533 (2024), arXiv:2309.11915 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    B. F. Schutz and R. Sorkin,Annals Phys.107, 1 (1977)

    1977

  75. [75]

    Brown,Class

    J. Brown,Class. Quant. Grav.10, 1579 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9304026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  76. [76]

    De Felice, J.-M

    A. De Felice, J.-M. Gerard, and T. Suyama,Phys. Rev. D81, 063527 (2010), arXiv:0908.3439 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  77. [77]

    De Felice, L

    A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, S. Mukohyama, S. Tsujikawa, and Y.-l. Zhang,JCAP06, 048 (2016), arXiv:1603.05806 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    De Felice, L

    A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, S. Mukohyama, S. Tsujikawa, and Y.-l. Zhang,Phys. Rev. D94, 044024 (2016), arXiv:1605.05066 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016