pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12888 · v1 · pith:ZPQRC2AGnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Pinching-Antenna Enabled Multicell Wireless Systems

Yunshu Chen , Qing Xue , Meng Hua , Bingpeng Zhou , Shaodan Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords pinching antennamulti-cell communicationweighted sum rateantenna placementparticle swarm optimizationfractional programmingalternating optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pinching-antenna systems maximize multi-cell weighted sum rate by jointly optimizing precoding, power allocation, and dynamic antenna placement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines multi-waveguide pinching-antenna systems for multi-cell communications, where antenna positions along dielectric waveguides can be adjusted to create new spatial degrees of freedom. It formulates a weighted sum rate maximization problem that jointly tunes precoding matrices, waveguide power allocation, and pinching antenna locations. The nonconvex, coupled problem is solved via an alternating optimization framework: fractional programming introduces auxiliary variables to separate signal and interference, block coordinate descent yields closed-form or semi-closed-form updates for precoding and power, and particle swarm optimization searches the high-dimensional antenna placement space. Numerical experiments across multiple configurations show the approach outperforms average power allocation, fixed antenna placement, conventional MIMO, and massive MIMO.

Core claim

In multi-cell scenarios with inter-cell interference, the joint optimization of precoding, power allocation, and pinching antenna placement via alternating optimization and particle swarm search delivers higher weighted sum rates than fixed or conventional antenna systems by exploiting the additional spatial degrees of freedom from movable pinching elements.

What carries the argument

Alternating optimization framework that uses fractional programming to reformulate the objective, block coordinate descent for closed-form precoding and power updates, and particle swarm optimization for the nonconvex high-dimensional antenna placement subproblem.

Load-bearing premise

Particle swarm optimization can consistently locate high-quality antenna placements in the nonconvex high-dimensional space without excessive computation time or convergence to poor local solutions.

What would settle it

A simulation run in which the particle swarm optimizer returns antenna placements whose achieved weighted sum rate is no higher than that of fixed placement under the same precoding and power allocation would falsify the claimed performance advantage.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12888 by Bingpeng Zhou, Meng Hua, Qing Xue, Shaodan Ma, Yunshu Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the multi-waveguide PA multi-cell c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Convergence behavior of the AO iterative algorithm u [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: WSR versus transmit power max for different numbers of users : comparison with the average power scheme. ( = 6, = 6, and = 50 m). along each waveguide. To avoid coupling effects, the minimum spacing between adjacent PAs on the same waveguide is set to Δ = /2. The carrier frequency and noise power are set to = 28 GHz and 2 = −90 dBm, respectively. The waveguide wavelength is given by = /eff, where eff = 1.4… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: WSR versus transmit power max for different schemes under different side length : comparison among the proposed scheme, fixed PA placement, and conventional MIMO. ( = 4, = 6, and = 6). 10 Number of Pinching Antennas 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Weighted Sum-Rate (bps/Hz) 2 4 6 8 Proposed Scheme，D = 40m Fixed PA Placement，D = 40m Conventional MIMO，D = 40m Proposed Scheme，D = 80m Fixed PA Placement，D = 80m Conventio… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: WSR versus the side length for different numbers of users : comparison with the average power scheme. (max = 19 dBm, = 6, and = 6). antennas deployed above the service area at height , with an inter-element spacing of /2. Each antenna is connected to a dedicated radio-frequency (RF) chain, and full-digital signal processing is adopted. Specifically, the digital precoding is designed using the FP-BCD method… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: WSR versus the side length for different schemes under different transmit powers max and PA numbers : comparison among the proposed scheme, fixed PA placement, and conventional MIMO. ( = 4 and = 6). 15 19 23 27 31 35 Transmit Power (dBm) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Weighted Sum-Rate (bps/Hz) Proposed Scheme，Z = 6 Massive MIMO，Z = 6 Conventional MIMO，Z = 6 Proposed Scheme，Z = 4 Massive MIMO，Z = 4 Conventional … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: WSR versus transmit power max for different schemes under different numbers of waveguides : comparison among the proposed scheme, massive MIMO, and conventional MIMO. ( = 4, = 6, and = 70 m) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: depicts the WSR versus the side length of the coverage area . It can be observed that the WSR decreases as increases. This is mainly because a larger coverage area leads to a longer average transmission distance, resulting in more severe path loss. In addition, for each value of , user locations are randomly generated, which introduces additional channel variations and slightly reduces the averaged WSR. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: WSR versus the number of users for different schemes under different numbers of waveguides : comparison among the proposed scheme, massive MIMO, and conventional MIMO. (max = 27 dBm, = 6, and = 70 m). solely determined by the number of waveguides , and thus it lacks additional spatial flexibility to benefit from increasing the number of PAs, resulting in the worst performance among all schemes [PITH_FULL… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Pinching antenna (PA) systems have recently emerged as a promising flexible-antenna technology, which can reconstruct the wireless propagation environment by dynamically adjusting the positions of pinching elements along dielectric waveguides, thereby providing new spatial degrees of freedom (DoFs) for enhancing wireless system performance. This paper investigates a multi-waveguide PA-based multi-cell communication system, focusing on the joint optimization of precoding matrices, waveguide power allocation, and antenna placement to maximize the weighted sum rate (WSR). In multi-cell scenarios, inter-cell interference typically leads to a highly coupled and nonconvex WSR maximization problem. To address this challenge, an efficient alternating optimization framework is adopted to optimize each variable in an iterative way. Specifically, fractional programming is first employed to reformulate the original problem by introducing auxiliary variables that decouple the signal and interference terms. Based on this reformulation, block coordinate descent is then applied to optimize the precoding matrices and power allocation, leading to closed-form or semi-closed-form updates. For the high-dimensional and nonconvex PA placement problem, particle swarm optimization (PSO) is utilized to perform an efficient search and improve scalability. Numerical results demonstrate that, under various system configurations, the proposed scheme significantly outperforms baseline methods, including average power allocation, fixed antenna placement, conventional multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), and massive MIMO. These results highlight the strong potential of PA systems for large-scale multi-cell wireless communications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies a multi-waveguide pinching-antenna (PA) multicell system and proposes an alternating-optimization framework to maximize weighted sum rate. Fractional programming is used to decouple signal and interference terms, block coordinate descent yields closed-form or semi-closed-form updates for the precoding matrices and waveguide power allocation, and particle swarm optimization is applied to the high-dimensional nonconvex PA placement subproblem. The central claim, supported only by the abstract, is that the resulting scheme significantly outperforms baselines including average power allocation, fixed antenna placement, conventional MIMO, and massive MIMO under various system configurations.

Significance. If the numerical gains can be shown to be robust to the heuristic nature of the placement step, the work would demonstrate that PA technology supplies additional spatial degrees of freedom capable of mitigating inter-cell interference, thereby extending the applicability of flexible-antenna architectures to large-scale multicell networks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the proposed scheme 'significantly outperforms' the listed baselines supplies no numerical values, error bars, baseline definitions, or channel-model parameters, so the magnitude and statistical reliability of the reported WSR gains cannot be assessed from the provided text.
  2. [Optimization framework] Optimization framework (PA placement paragraph): PSO is invoked for the explicitly nonconvex, high-dimensional placement subproblem without any convergence analysis, multiple independent runs with varied initializations, or comparison to alternative global or local solvers; because the FP+BCD blocks admit closed-form updates once positions are fixed, the headline performance advantage is entirely load-bearing on the quality of the PSO solutions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be clearer if it stated the number of cells, waveguides per cell, and the precise channel model (e.g., path-loss exponent, Rician factor) used to generate the numerical results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and rigor of our work. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the proposed scheme 'significantly outperforms' the listed baselines supplies no numerical values, error bars, baseline definitions, or channel-model parameters, so the magnitude and statistical reliability of the reported WSR gains cannot be assessed from the provided text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, as a high-level summary, does not include specific numerical values or parameters. The detailed simulation results, including WSR gains, baseline definitions, channel models, and figures with performance comparisons, are provided in the Numerical Results section. To address this concern, we will revise the abstract to incorporate concise quantitative statements (e.g., approximate percentage improvements in WSR under the considered configurations) while maintaining brevity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Optimization framework] Optimization framework (PA placement paragraph): PSO is invoked for the explicitly nonconvex, high-dimensional placement subproblem without any convergence analysis, multiple independent runs with varied initializations, or comparison to alternative global or local solvers; because the FP+BCD blocks admit closed-form updates once positions are fixed, the headline performance advantage is entirely load-bearing on the quality of the PSO solutions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not include convergence analysis, results from multiple independent PSO runs, or comparisons to alternative solvers for the PA placement subproblem. This is a valid point, as the overall gains depend on the effectiveness of the placement optimization. In the revision, we will add a discussion of observed PSO convergence behavior, statistics from multiple runs with varied initializations to demonstrate solution consistency, and a limited comparison against another heuristic (e.g., genetic algorithm) on representative scenarios. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard alternating optimization with external heuristic yields independent numerical claims.

full rationale

The paper's core chain is an alternating optimization: fractional programming reformulation of WSR, followed by BCD yielding closed-form updates for precoding and power allocation, plus PSO as a black-box search heuristic for the nonconvex placement subproblem. None of these steps define the claimed WSR gains in terms of themselves, rename fitted quantities as predictions, or rely on self-citations for uniqueness or ansatz. Numerical outperformance is reported from explicit simulation runs against external baselines; the results are not forced by construction from the objective or from prior author work. This is the typical self-contained case for algorithmic papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities; the approach rests on standard wireless channel and interference models plus the heuristic nature of PSO, none of which are detailed or justified in the given text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5787 in / 1150 out tokens · 27254 ms · 2026-06-27T06:01:04.214847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy ef ficiency in wireless communication,

    C. Huang, A. Zappone, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. Debbah, a nd C. Y uen, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy ef ficiency in wireless communication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4157–4170, Aug. 2019

    2019

  2. [2]

    Towards smart and reconfigurable envi ronment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Towards smart and reconfigurable envi ronment: Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless network,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 106–112, Jan. 2020

    2020

  3. [3]

    Fl uid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fl uid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

    1950

  4. [4]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G ne tworks: En- compassing communication theory, optimization methods an d hardware designs,

    W. K. N. et al., “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G ne tworks: En- compassing communication theory, optimization methods an d hardware designs,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor . , vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325–2377, Aug. 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Movable antennas for wireles s commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireles s commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    MIMO capacity characterizat ion for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characterizat ion for movable antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 6234–6250, Apr. 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Pinc hing- antenna systems (PASS)-enabled secure wireless communica tions,

    G. Zhu, X. Mu, L. Guo, S. Xu, Y . Liu, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Pinc hing- antenna systems (PASS)-enabled secure wireless communica tions,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 74, pp. 490–505, 2026

    2026

  8. [8]

    Pinch ing- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, an d outlook,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, C. Ouyang, X. Xu, and Z. Ding, “Pinch ing- antenna systems: Architecture designs, opportunities, an d outlook,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 190–196, Jan. 2026

    2026

  9. [9]

    Pinch ing-antenna systems (PASS): A tutorial,

    Y . Liu, H. Jiang, X. Xu, Z. Wang, J. Guo, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, Z. Ding, A. Nallanathan, G. K. Karagiannidis, and R. Schober, “Pinch ing-antenna systems (PASS): A tutorial,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 74, pp. 4881– 4918, 2026

    2026

  10. [10]

    Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an anten na,

    A. Fukuda, H. Y amamoto, H. Okazaki, Y . Suzuki, and K. Kaw ai, “Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an anten na,” NTT DOCOMO Tech. J. , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 5–12, Jan. 2022

    2022

  11. [11]

    Flexible-ant enna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,

    Z. Ding, R. Schober, and H. Vincent Poor, “Flexible-ant enna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 9236–9253, Oct. 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    Toward flexible and intelligent indo or NFC: The role of pinching antennas in 6G networks,

    X. Fan and L. Peng, “Toward flexible and intelligent indo or NFC: The role of pinching antennas in 6G networks,” IEEE Netw., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 70–77, Nov. 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    Capacit y character- ization of pinching-antenna systems,

    C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu, H. Shin, and Z. Ding, “Capacit y character- ization of pinching-antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 25, pp. 10 387–10 404, 2026

    2026

  14. [14]

    Wirel ess powered MEC systems via discrete pinching antennas: TDMA versus NOM A,

    P . Liu, Z. Fei, M. Hua, G. Chen, X. Wang, and R. Liu, “Wirel ess powered MEC systems via discrete pinching antennas: TDMA versus NOM A,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 25, pp. 12 034–12 049, 2026

    2026

  15. [15]

    Rate optim ization for downlink URLLC via pinching antenna arrays,

    T. Lin, J. Zhu, W. Huang, M. Hua, and Z. Zhang, “Rate optim ization for downlink URLLC via pinching antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., early access, Mar. 2, 2026, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2026.366895 2

    doi:10.1109/tvt.2026.366895 2026

  16. [16]

    Array gain for pi nching- antenna systems (PASS),

    C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu, and Z. Ding, “Array gain for pi nching- antenna systems (PASS),” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1471– 1475, Jun. 2025

    2025

  17. [17]

    How m any pinching antennas are enough?

    D. Tyrovolas, S. A. Tegos, Y . Xiao, P . D. Diamantoulakis , S. Ioannidis, C. K. Liaskos, G. K. Karagiannidis, and S. D. Asimonis, “How m any pinching antennas are enough?” IEEE Internet of Things J. , early access, Feb. 26, 2026, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2026.3668307

    doi:10.1109/jiot.2026.3668307 2026

  18. [18]

    Antenna activation fo r NOMA as- sisted pinching-antenna systems,

    K. Wang, Z. Ding, and R. Schober, “Antenna activation fo r NOMA as- sisted pinching-antenna systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1526–1530, May 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Rate maximizat ion for downlink pinching-antenna systems,

    Y . Xu, Z. Ding, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Rate maximizat ion for downlink pinching-antenna systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1431–1435, May 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Dynamic placemen t of pinching antennas for multicast MU-MISO downlinks,

    J.-C. Chen, P .-C. Wu, and K.-K. Wong, “Dynamic placemen t of pinching antennas for multicast MU-MISO downlinks,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 6, pp. 5611–5625, 2025

    2025

  21. [21]

    Pinching antenna placement for LMMSE- based detection in MU-MISO uplink systems,

    J.-C. Chen and T.-Y . Chao, “Pinching antenna placement for LMMSE- based detection in MU-MISO uplink systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 650–654, 2026

    2026

  22. [22]

    Exploiting pinchi ng-antenna systems in multicast communications,

    S. Shan, C. Ouyang, Y . Li, and Y . Liu, “Exploiting pinchi ng-antenna systems in multicast communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 74, pp. 419–432, 2026

    2026

  23. [23]

    MIMO-PASS: Uplink and downlink transmission via MIMO pinc hing- antenna systems,

    A. Bereyhi, C. Ouyang, S. Asaad, Z. Ding, and H. Vincent P oor, “MIMO-PASS: Uplink and downlink transmission via MIMO pinc hing- antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 5701–5716, 2026

    2026

  24. [24]

    Multiuser beamform ing for pinching-antenna systems: An element-wise optimization f ramework,

    M. Sun, C. Ouyang, S. Wu, and Y . Liu, “Multiuser beamform ing for pinching-antenna systems: An element-wise optimization f ramework,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 25, pp. 6538–6552, Aug. 2026

    2026

  25. [25]

    A gradient meta-learning joint optimization for beamformin g and antenna position in pinching-antenna systems,

    K. Zhou, W. Zhou, D. Cai, X. Lei, Y . Xu, Z. Ding, and P . Fan, “A gradient meta-learning joint optimization for beamformin g and antenna position in pinching-antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 74, pp. 1099–1112, Feb. 2026

    2026

  26. [26]

    MIMO p inching- antenna-aided SWIPT,

    H. Li, Z. Lyu, Y . Gao, M. Xiao, and H. Vincent Poor, “MIMO p inching- antenna-aided SWIPT,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 15, pp. 41– 45, 2026

    2026

  27. [27]

    QoS-aware NOMA des ign for downlink pinching-antenna systems,

    Y . Xu, Z. Ding, D. Cai, and V . W. Wong, “QoS-aware NOMA des ign for downlink pinching-antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 13 611–13 625, Dec. 2025

    2025

  28. [28]

    Robust resource allocation for pinching-antenna sy stems under user location uncertainty,

    M. Zeng, X. Wang, Y . Liu, Z. Ding, G. K. Karagiannidis, an d H. V . Poor, “Robust resource allocation for pinching-antenna sy stems under user location uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., early access, Jan. 12, 2026, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2026.3651617

    doi:10.1109/tvt.2026.3651617 2026

  29. [29]

    Computation capacity maximization for pinching antennas-assisted wireless pow ered MEC systems,

    P . Liu, M. Hua, G. Chen, X. Wang, and Z. Fei, “Computation capacity maximization for pinching antennas-assisted wireless pow ered MEC systems,” in Proc. IEEE 102nd V eh. Technol. Conf. (VTC2025-Fall) , Chengdu, China, Oct. 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  30. [30]

    Pinchi ng-antenna systems (PASS): Power radiation model and optimal beamform ing design,

    X. Xu, X. Mu, Z. Wang, Y . Liu, and A. Nallanathan, “Pinchi ng-antenna systems (PASS): Power radiation model and optimal beamform ing design,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 74, pp. 2160–2175, 2026

    2026

  31. [31]

    Joint beamformin g for NOMA assisted pinching antenna systems (PASS),

    D. Gan, X. Xu, J. Zuo, X. Ge, and Y . Liu, “Joint beamformin g for NOMA assisted pinching antenna systems (PASS),” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 2450–2465, 2026

    2026

  32. [32]

    A stochastic g eometric analysis on multi-cell pinching-antenna systems under blo ckage effect,

    Y . Sun, Z. Ding, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “A stochastic g eometric analysis on multi-cell pinching-antenna systems under blo ckage effect,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 15, pp. 1085–1089, 2026

    2026

  33. [33]

    Robust linear precode r design for multi-cell downlink transmission,

    A. Tajer, N. Prasad, and X. Wang, “Robust linear precode r design for multi-cell downlink transmission,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 235–251, Jan. 2011

    2011

  34. [34]

    Interferen ce mitigation in multi-cell ISAC systems: A three-dimensional MIMO preco ding approach,

    Z. Wang, C. Xiao, X. Liu, M. Peng, and J. Guo, “Interferen ce mitigation in multi-cell ISAC systems: A three-dimensional MIMO preco ding approach,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2543–2547, Nov. 2024

    2024

  35. [35]

    Pr ecoding for multi-cell ISAC: From coordinated beamforming to coordina ted multi- point and bi-static sensing,

    N. Babu, C. Masouros, C. B. Papadias, and Y . C. Eldar, “Pr ecoding for multi-cell ISAC: From coordinated beamforming to coordina ted multi- point and bi-static sensing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 637–14 651, Oct. 2024

    2024

  36. [36]

    Fractional programming for communic ation systems-part I: Power control and beamforming,

    K. Shen and W. Y u, “Fractional programming for communic ation systems-part I: Power control and beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2616–2630, May 2018

    2018

  37. [37]

    Fractional programming for communication system s part II: Uplink scheduling via matching,

    ——, “Fractional programming for communication system s part II: Uplink scheduling via matching,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2631–2644, May 2018

    2018

  38. [38]

    The particle swarm - explosion , stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space,

    M. Clerc and J. Kennedy, “The particle swarm - explosion , stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 58–73, Feb. 2002. 14

    2002

  39. [39]

    Comprehe nsive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multim odal func- tions,

    J. Liang, A. Qin, P . Suganthan, and S. Baskar, “Comprehe nsive learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multim odal func- tions,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 281–295, Jun. 2006

    2006

  40. [40]

    Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communi cations,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, M. F. Iman i, and Y . C. Eldar, “Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communi cations,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7476–7490, Sep. 2022

    2022

  41. [41]

    Resource alloc ation for multi-waveguide pinching antenna-assisted broadcast net works,

    R. Zhao, S. Hu, D. Mishra, and D. W. K. Ng, “Resource alloc ation for multi-waveguide pinching antenna-assisted broadcast net works,” 2025, arXiv:2507.03915

    arXiv 2025