Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Novel and Accurate BiLSTM Configuration Controller for Modular Soft Robots with Module Number Adaptability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.10997 v1 pith:ZQMMB3SH submitted 2024-01-19 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords robotsmodularmodulecontrollernumberaccurateadaptabilityconfiguration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Modular soft robots have shown higher potential in sophisticated tasks than single-module robots. However, the modular structure incurs the complexity of accurate control and necessitates a control strategy specifically for modular robots. In this paper, we introduce a data collection strategy and a novel and accurate bidirectional LSTM configuration controller for modular soft robots with module number adaptability. Such a controller can control module configurations in robots with different module numbers. Simulation cable-driven robots and real pneumatic robots have been included in experiments to validate the proposed approaches, and we have proven that our controller can be leveraged even with the increase or decrease of module number. This is the first paper that gets inspiration from the physical structure of modular robots and utilizes bidirectional LSTM for module number adaptability. Future work may include a planning method that bridges the task and configuration spaces and the integration of an online controller.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedGUIDE: Benchmarking Clinical Decision-Making in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MedGUIDE tests whether LLMs follow structured NCCN cancer-care decision trees and finds that even medical LLMs often lag general models on this task.

Pith tools