pith. sign in

arxiv: 1806.11298 · v2 · pith:ZR7N5F4Ynew · submitted 2018-06-29 · 💻 cs.AI

A General Multi-agent Epistemic Planner Based on Higher-order Belief Change

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords multi-agentepistemicplanningacdfsactionsalgorithmscalleddisjunctive
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In recent years, multi-agent epistemic planning has received attention from both dynamic logic and planning communities. Existing implementations of multi-agent epistemic planning are based on compilation into classical planning and suffer from various limitations, such as generating only linear plans, restriction to public actions, and incapability to handle disjunctive beliefs. In this paper, we propose a general representation language for multi-agent epistemic planning where the initial KB and the goal, the preconditions and effects of actions can be arbitrary multi-agent epistemic formulas, and the solution is an action tree branching on sensing results. To support efficient reasoning in the multi-agent KD45 logic, we make use of a normal form called alternating cover disjunctive formulas (ACDFs). We propose basic revision and update algorithms for ACDFs. We also handle static propositional common knowledge, which we call constraints. Based on our reasoning, revision and update algorithms, adapting the PrAO algorithm for contingent planning from the literature, we implemented a multi-agent epistemic planner called MEPK. Our experimental results show the viability of our approach.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Do Introspection Axioms Matter for Multi-Agent Epistemic Reasoning?

    cs.LO 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introspection axioms are conservative for agent-alternating formulas in multi-agent belief logics (K/KD) but not in knowledge logics (KT).