pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.17977 · v2 · pith:ZRZXJ5IWnew · submitted 2025-10-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Growth of Structure in Multi-species Wave Dark Matter

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords wave dark mattermulti-species dark matterpower spectrumstructure formationfree-streaming scaleJeans scalelinear perturbationscross-spectra
0
0 comments X

The pith

A framework derives the power spectrum evolution for density fluctuations in dark matter made from any number of wave-like species.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a general method for calculating how cosmic structures form when dark matter has multiple wave components. It computes the total density power spectrum by combining contributions from each species, along with cross-spectra that measure correlations between them. This approach applies to both wave and particle dark matter, accounting for effects like free-streaming that suppress small-scale fluctuations differently for each component. Such models could explain variations in structure growth across different scales and provide ways to test ideas about dark matter being composed of misaligned scalar fields or fields with spin.

Core claim

The authors derive the linear evolution equations for the density and velocity perturbations of each dark matter species independently, based on their individual free-streaming and Jeans scales. They then construct the total matter power spectrum as a weighted sum of the individual auto-spectra and include cross-spectra between species. This holds for arbitrary density fractions, initial field power spectra, and covers cold and warm regimes for both wave and particle dark matter.

What carries the argument

Linearized perturbation equations for each species evolved independently by its free-streaming and Jeans scales, then combined into the total density power spectrum and inter-species cross-spectra.

If this is right

  • The total density power spectrum equals the sum over all species pairs of the product of their density fractions times the corresponding cross-spectrum.
  • Suppression of small-scale power occurs independently at the free-streaming scale of each warm component.
  • Cross-spectra between species can be nonzero even if initial conditions for different components are uncorrelated.
  • The particle dark matter limit is recovered when the de Broglie wavelength of each wave component approaches zero.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This linear framework could be used to fit galaxy clustering or weak lensing data to place limits on the number and properties of dark matter species.
  • Nonlinear evolution or interactions between species at late times would require N-body or wave simulations to test deviations from these predictions.
  • The same approach might extend to other cosmological fluids with scale-dependent sound speeds, such as fuzzy dark matter mixed with baryons.

Load-bearing premise

Each species evolves independently according to its own free-streaming and Jeans scales without significant nonlinear interactions or couplings between the components.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the small-scale matter power spectrum that cannot be reproduced by any linear combination of the individual species contributions weighted by their density fractions would falsify the framework.

read the original abstract

We explore the growth of structure in multi-species wave (and particle) dark matter. We derive the evolution of the power spectrum of total density contrasts for an arbitrary number of component species, density fractions, and initial field power spectra. We also derive cross-spectra for density correlations across or within individual species. Our framework includes cold and warm wave dark matter, which can give rise to significant intrinsic Poisson-like density fluctuations along with scale-dependent evolution connected to the free-streaming and Jeans scales. Such dark matter components could be globally or locally misaligned scalar fields as well as multi-component fields with spin $>0$. The framework also includes cold and warm particle dark matter in the appropriate limits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives the linear evolution of the total matter power spectrum and associated cross-spectra for an arbitrary number of wave dark matter species, each with its own density fraction, mass, and initial field power spectrum. The framework incorporates scale-dependent growth set by free-streaming and Jeans scales, intrinsic Poisson fluctuations for wave components, and recovers the cold/warm particle dark matter limits.

Significance. If the central derivations are correct, the work supplies a practical tool for computing observable power spectra in multi-component wave dark matter cosmologies. This is relevant for small-scale structure phenomenology and for forecasting constraints from future surveys, as the explicit treatment of cross-spectra between misaligned or multi-spin fields goes beyond standard single-fluid treatments.

major comments (1)
  1. [multi-species evolution equations and total power spectrum derivation] The central derivation of the total density power spectrum (the section presenting the multi-species evolution equations and the expression for P_total(k)): the Poisson equation sources the gravitational potential from the sum of all species' density contrasts, so the evolution of each δ_i is coupled to every other species. It is not clear whether the manuscript solves this coupled linear system or instead evolves each component independently according to its own free-streaming/Jeans scale and then superposes the resulting spectra. The latter procedure would miss the cross terms induced by the shared potential and would therefore yield an incorrect total P(k) whenever the species have different masses or initial spectra.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the framework 'includes cold and warm particle dark matter in the appropriate limits,' but does not indicate whether the particle limits are recovered by taking the appropriate mass or de Broglie wavelength limit inside the same equations or by a separate matching procedure.
  2. [Introduction and notation section] Notation for the individual species density contrasts δ_i and the total contrast δ_tot should be introduced once and used consistently; cross-spectra are mentioned but their precise definition (e.g., whether they are normalized by the geometric mean of the auto-spectra) is not stated in the summary paragraph.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and valuable comment on our manuscript. We address the concern regarding the multi-species evolution equations and total power spectrum derivation below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [multi-species evolution equations and total power spectrum derivation] The central derivation of the total density power spectrum (the section presenting the multi-species evolution equations and the expression for P_total(k)): the Poisson equation sources the gravitational potential from the sum of all species' density contrasts, so the evolution of each δ_i is coupled to every other species. It is not clear whether the manuscript solves this coupled linear system or instead evolves each component independently according to its own free-streaming/Jeans scale and then superposes the resulting spectra. The latter procedure would miss the cross terms induced by the shared potential and would therefore yield an incorrect total P(k) whenever the species have different masses or initial spectra.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript derives and solves the coupled linear system in which the gravitational potential is sourced by the total density contrast δ_total = ∑ f_i δ_i. Each species evolves under this shared potential, and the resulting transfer functions are used to construct the total power spectrum and all cross-spectra. This procedure automatically incorporates the cross terms generated by the common potential and remains valid for species with differing masses or initial spectra. We have revised the text to state this coupling explicitly and to describe the numerical solution of the coupled ODE system. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a derivation of the evolution equations for the total density contrast power spectrum and cross-spectra in multi-species wave dark matter, grounded in the linearized Schrödinger-Poisson or fluid equations with gravitational coupling through the Poisson equation. This extends standard linear perturbation theory to arbitrary species numbers, density fractions, and initial spectra without reducing any central result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The framework remains self-contained against external benchmarks in cosmological perturbation theory, with no quoted steps exhibiting the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard linear cosmological perturbation theory and wave dark matter descriptions; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear perturbation theory governs the evolution of density contrasts in the early universe.
    Standard assumption for deriving power spectrum growth in cosmology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5635 in / 1143 out tokens · 40567 ms · 2026-05-21T20:54:02.323855+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Warm, not Fuzzy: Generalized Ultralight Dark Matter Limits from Milky Way Satellites

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Generalizes ultralight DM mass limits from MW satellite abundances to peaked power spectrum models, yielding m > 6e-18 eV scaled by k_* at 95% confidence for different k_* regimes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 120 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

  2. [2]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127

  3. [3]

    Abbott and P

    L. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 133

  4. [4]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137

  5. [5]

    Multi-species Dark Matter with Warmth and Randomness

    M.A. Amin, M.S. Delos and K. Yang,Multi-species Dark Matter with Warmth and Randomness,2510.15046

  6. [6]

    Amin, M.S

    M.A. Amin, M.S. Delos and M. Mirbabayi,Structure Formation with Warm White Noise: Effects of Finite Number Density and Velocity Dispersion in Particle and Wave Dark Matter, 2503.20881

  7. [7]

    M.A. Amin, S. May and M. Mirbabayi,Early Growth of Structure in Warm Wave Dark Matter, 2506.12131

  8. [8]

    Axion Cosmology

    D.J.E. Marsh,Axion Cosmology,Phys. Rept.643(2016) 1 [1510.07633]

  9. [9]

    Hui,Wave Dark Matter,Ann

    L. Hui,Wave Dark Matter,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.59(2021) 247 [2101.11735]

  10. [10]

    O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

    C.A.J. O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

  11. [11]

    Eberhardt and E

    A. Eberhardt and E.G.M. Ferreira,Ultralight fuzzy dark matter review,2507.00705

  12. [12]

    Antypas et al.,New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,2203.14915

    D. Antypas et al.,New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,2203.14915

  13. [13]

    Adshead and K.D

    P. Adshead and K.D. Lozanov,Self-gravitating Vector Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 103501 [2101.07265]

  14. [14]

    Oscillating Spin-2 Dark Matter

    L. Marzola, M. Raidal and F.R. Urban,Oscillating Spin-2 Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 024010 [1708.04253]

  15. [15]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions In String Theory,JHEP06(2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206]

  16. [16]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530 [0905.4720]

  17. [17]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1 [2303.04819]

  18. [18]

    Alexander, T

    S. Alexander, T. Manton and E. McDonough,Field theory axiverse,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 116019 [2404.11642]

  19. [19]

    Sheridan, F

    E. Sheridan, F. Carta, N. Gendler, M. Jain, D.J.E. Marsh, L. McAllister et al.,Fuzzy axions and associated relics,JHEP09(2025) 016 [2412.12012]. – 15 –

  20. [20]

    Petrossian-Byrne and G

    R. Petrossian-Byrne and G. Villadoro,Open String Axiverse,2503.16387

  21. [21]

    The Dark Photon

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli and G. Lanfranchi,The Dark Photon,2005.01515

  22. [22]

    Caputo, A.J

    A. Caputo, A.J. Millar, C.A.J. O’Hare and E. Vitagliano,Dark photon limits: a cookbook, 5, 2021

  23. [23]

    M.A. Amin, M. Jain, R. Karur and P. Mocz,Small-scale structure in vector dark matter,JCAP 08(2022) 014 [2203.11935]

  24. [24]

    Khlopov, B.A

    M. Khlopov, B.A. Malomed and I.B. Zeldovich,Gravitational instability of scalar fields and formation of primordial black holes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.215(1985) 575

  25. [25]

    Non-Linear Axion Dynamics and Formation of Cosmological Pseudo-Solitons

    E.W. Kolb and I.I. Tkachev,Nonlinear axion dynamics and formation of cosmological pseudosolitons,Phys. Rev.D49(1994) 5040 [astro-ph/9311037]

  26. [26]

    Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: II. Numerical results

    P.H. Chavanis and L. Delfini,Mass-radius relation of Newtonian self-gravitating Bose-Einstein condensates with short-range interactions: II. Numerical results,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 043532 [1103.2054]

  27. [27]

    Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave

    H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh and T. Broadhurst,Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave,Nature Phys.10(2014) 496 [1406.6586]

  28. [28]

    Zhang,Unified view of scalar and vector dark matter solitons,JHEP04(2025) 174 [2406.05031]

    H.-Y. Zhang,Unified view of scalar and vector dark matter solitons,JHEP04(2025) 174 [2406.05031]

  29. [29]

    Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,2411.16604

    S.-Y. Zhou,Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons,2411.16604

  30. [30]

    Axion Miniclusters and Bose Stars

    E.W. Kolb and I.I. Tkachev,Axion miniclusters and Bose stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 3051 [hep-ph/9303313]

  31. [31]

    Hogan and M

    C. Hogan and M. Rees,AXION MINICLUSTERS,Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 228

  32. [32]

    Astrophysical Effects of Scalar Dark Matter Miniclusters

    K.M. Zurek, C.J. Hogan and T.R. Quinn,Astrophysical Effects of Scalar Dark Matter Miniclusters,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 043511 [astro-ph/0607341]

  33. [33]

    Eggemeier, J

    B. Eggemeier, J. Redondo, K. Dolag, J.C. Niemeyer and A. Vaquero,First Simulations of Axion Minicluster Halos,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 041301 [1911.09417]

  34. [34]

    Early seeds of axion miniclusters

    A. Vaquero, J. Redondo and J. Stadler,Early seeds of axion miniclusters,JCAP04(2019) 012 [1809.09241]

  35. [35]

    Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter

    L. Hui, J.P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine and E. Witten,Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 043541 [1610.08297]

  36. [36]

    Kolb and A.J

    E.W. Kolb and A.J. Long,Cosmological gravitational particle production and its implications for cosmological relics,2312.09042

  37. [38]

    Amin and M

    M.A. Amin and M. Mirbabayi,A Lower Bound on Dark Matter Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 221004 [2211.09775]

  38. [39]

    R. Liu, W. Hu and H. Xiao,Warm and fuzzy dark matter: Free streaming of wave dark matter, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023535 [2406.12970]

  39. [40]

    Ling and M.A

    S. Ling and M.A. Amin,Free streaming in warm wave dark matter,JCAP02(2025) 025 [2408.05591]

  40. [41]

    Long and M

    A.J. Long and M. Venegas,Free streaming of warm wave dark matter in modified expansion histories,2412.14322

  41. [42]

    R. Liu, W. Hu and H. Xiao,Interference with Gravitational Instability: Hot and Fuzzy Dark Matter,2504.01937. – 16 –

  42. [43]

    Harigaya, W

    K. Harigaya, W. Hu, R. Liu and H. Xiao,Universal lower bound on the axion decay constant from free streaming effects,2507.01956

  43. [44]

    Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations

    P.W. Graham, J. Mardon and S. Rajendran,Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 103520 [1504.02102]

  44. [45]

    Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings

    A.J. Long and L.-T. Wang,Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 063529 [1901.03312]

  45. [46]

    Adshead, K.D

    P. Adshead, K.D. Lozanov and Z.J. Weiner,Dark photon dark matter from an oscillating dilaton,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 083519 [2301.07718]

  46. [47]

    Buschmann, J.W

    M. Buschmann, J.W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D.E. Willcox, W. Zhang et al.,Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement,Nature Commun.13(2022) 1049 [2108.05368]

  47. [48]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy and G. Villadoro,More axions from strings,SciPost Phys.10(2021) 050 [2007.04990]

  48. [49]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy and G. Villadoro,More axion stars from strings,JHEP08(2024) 126 [2405.19389]

  49. [50]

    Saikawa, J

    K. Saikawa, J. Redondo, A. Vaquero and M. Kaltschmidt,Spectrum of global string networks and the axion dark matter mass,JCAP10(2024) 043 [2401.17253]

  50. [51]

    J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi and W. Yin,More is different: multi-axion dynamics changes topological defect evolution,JCAP04(2025) 002 [2409.09749]

  51. [52]

    Narita and W

    Y. Narita and W. Yin,Relativistic Axion with Nonrelativistic Momenta: A Robust Bound on Minimal ALP Dark Matter,2507.03157

  52. [53]

    Amin and P

    M.A. Amin and P. Mocz,Formation, gravitational clustering, and interactions of nonrelativistic solitons in an expanding universe,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063507 [1902.07261]

  53. [54]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, M. Galanis, L. Lehner, J.O. Thompson and K. Van Tilburg, Large-misalignment mechanism for the formation of compact axion structures: Signatures from the QCD axion to fuzzy dark matter,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 083014 [1909.11665]

  54. [55]

    Zhang, P

    H.-Y. Zhang, P. Arias, A. Cheek, E.D. Schiappacasse, L. Visinelli and L. Roszkowski,Dark photon dark matter from flattened axion potentials,2507.20484

  55. [56]

    Gravitational Bose-Einstein condensation in the kinetic regime

    D.G. Levkov, A.G. Panin and I.I. Tkachev,Gravitational Bose-Einstein condensation in the kinetic regime,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 151301 [1804.05857]

  56. [57]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    M.A. Amin and S. May,Growth of structure in warm wave dark matter,(in progress)(2025) . [58]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  57. [58]

    Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211]

  58. [59]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana and A. Gruzinov,Cold and fuzzy dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 1158 [astro-ph/0003365]

  59. [60]

    Passaglia and W

    S. Passaglia and W. Hu,Accurate effective fluid approximation for ultralight axions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 123529 [2201.10238]

  60. [61]

    Chabanier, M

    S. Chabanier, M. Millea and N. Palanque-Delabrouille,Matter power spectrum: from Ly α forest to CMB scales,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.489(2019) 2247 [1905.08103]

  61. [62]

    Sabti, J.B

    N. Sabti, J.B. Mu˜ noz and D. Blas,New Roads to the Small-scale Universe: Measurements of the Clustering of Matter with the High-redshift UV Galaxy Luminosity Function,Astrophys. J. Lett.928(2022) L20 [2110.13161]. – 17 –

  62. [63]

    Garcia-Gallego, V

    O. Garcia-Gallego, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M.G. Haehnelt, M. Viel and J.S. Bolton,Constraining mixed dark matter models with high-redshift Lyman-alpha forest data,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 043502 [2504.06367]

  63. [64]

    S. Bird, M. Fernandez, M.-F. Ho, M. Qezlou, R. Monadi, Y. Ni et al.,PRIYA: a new suite of Lyman-αforest simulations for cosmology,JCAP10(2023) 037 [2306.05471]

  64. [65]

    Irˇ siˇ c, H

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, H. Xiao and M. McQuinn,Early structure formation constraints on the ultralight axion in the postinflation scenario,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123518 [1911.11150]

  65. [66]

    Boylan-Kolchin, Stress testing ΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates, Nature Astron

    M. Boylan-Kolchin,Stress testingΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates,Nature Astron.7 (2023) 731 [2208.01611]

  66. [67]

    Irˇ siˇ c et al.,Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest,Phys

    V. Irˇ siˇ c et al.,Unveiling dark matter free streaming at the smallest scales with the high redshift Lyman-alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 043511 [2309.04533]

  67. [68]

    Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory, Phys

    M.M. Ivanov,Lyman alpha forest power spectrum in effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 023507 [2309.10133]

  68. [69]

    DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest, JCAP01(2025) 124 [2404.03001]

  69. [70]

    Trost, J.S

    A. Trost, J.S. Bolton, A. Caputo, H. Liu, S. Cristiani and M. Viel,Constraints on dark photon dark matter from Lyman- α forest simulations and an ultrahigh signal-to-noise quasar spectrum, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083034 [2410.02858]

  70. [71]

    Lazare, J

    H. Lazare, J. Flitter and E.D. Kovetz,Constraints on the fuzzy dark matter mass window from high-redshift observables,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123532 [2407.19549]

  71. [72]

    A. He, M.M. Ivanov, S. Bird, R. An and V. Gluscevic,A Fresh Look at Neutrino Self-Interactions With the Lyman-αForest: Constraints from EFT and PRIYA,2503.15592

  72. [73]

    Buckley, P

    M.R. Buckley, P. Du, N. Fernandez and M.J. Weikert,General Constraints on Isocurvature from the CMB and Ly-αForest,2502.20434

  73. [74]

    Mondino, A.-M

    C. Mondino, A.-M. Taki, K. Van Tilburg and N. Weiner,First Results on Dark Matter Substructure from Astrometric Weak Lensing,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 111101 [ 2002.01938]

  74. [75]

    Gilman, A

    D. Gilman, A. Benson, J. Bovy, S. Birrer, T. Treu and A. Nierenberg,The primordial matter power spectrum on sub-galactic scales,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.512(2022) 3163 [2112.03293]

  75. [76]

    Delos and F

    M.S. Delos and F. Schmidt,Stellar streams and dark substructure: the diffusion regime,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.513(2022) 3682 [2108.13420]

  76. [77]

    Hayashi, E.G.M

    K. Hayashi, E.G.M. Ferreira and H.Y.J. Chan,Narrowing the Mass Range of Fuzzy Dark Matter with Ultrafaint Dwarfs,Astrophys. J. Lett.912(2021) L3 [2102.05300]

  77. [78]

    Delos,An analytical description of substructure-induced gravitational perturbations in stellar systems,Mon

    M.S. Delos,An analytical description of substructure-induced gravitational perturbations in stellar systems,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.529(2024) 2349 [2312.13338]

  78. [79]

    Esteban, A.H.G

    I. Esteban, A.H.G. Peter and S.Y. Kim,Milky Way satellite velocities reveal the dark matter power spectrum at small scales,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123013 [2306.04674]

  79. [80]

    Nadler, V

    E.O. Nadler, V. Gluscevic, T. Driskell, R.H. Wechsler, L.A. Moustakas, A. Benson et al., Forecasts for Galaxy Formation and Dark Matter Constraints from Dwarf Galaxy Surveys, Astrophys. J.967(2024) 61 [2401.10318]

  80. [81]

    H. Xiao, L. Dai and M. McQuinn,Detecting dark matter substructures on small scales with fast radio bursts,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 023516 [2401.08862]

Showing first 80 references.