Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics for particles of arbitrary mass

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Second-order relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics is fully determined for arbitrary particle mass, with the non-relativistic limit reproducing Grad's equations.

desk verdict Solid, genuinely new set of massive 14-moment transport coefficients; the non-relativistic Grad-matching claim is conditional on an unproved asymptotic property the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.03366 v1 pith:ZS43BTJC submitted 2025-05-06 nucl-th

Semyon Potesnov , David Wagner This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-th
keywords relativisticdissipativehydrodynamics14-momentapproximationtransportcoefficientskinetictheoryGradequationsnon-relativisticlimitparticlemassdependencesecond-order
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to close a gap in relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics: transport coefficients were previously computed mostly for nearly massless particles, while realistic fluids contain particles with finite masses. Working from kinetic theory in the 14-moment approximation and truncating at second order in Knudsen and inverse Reynolds numbers, the authors compute every first- and second-order transport coefficient for arbitrary mass as a function of $z=m/T$, for a classical gas with constant cross section. They then take the non-relativistic limit and show that the resulting equations reduce to the well-known 13-moment Grad equations in the 'order-of-magnitude' formulation. If correct, the results give one framework spanning massless to non-relativistic fluids, with explicit coefficient values ready for numerical use.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the 14-moment truncation of the single-particle distribution function combined with the inverse-Reynolds-dominance (IReD) truncation of the infinite tower of moment equations. The distribution function is expanded in irreducible moments $\rho^{\mu_1\cdots\mu_\ell}_n$; the collision integral is split into linear terms with coefficient matrices $A^{(\ell)}_{rn}$ and nonlinear terms built from $C$ and $D$ coefficients; and the IReD asymptotic relations (29)-(31) express all higher moments in terms of $\Pi$, $V$, and $\pi$ together with the Navier-Stokes coefficients $\zeta$, $\kappa$, $\eta$. All coefficient formulae in appendix C are assembled from the thermodynamic integrals $I_{nq}$ and derived functions $G_{nm}$, $D_{nq}$, and $\gamma_r^{(\ell)}$, which encode the dependence on $z=m\beta$. The non-relativistic limit is taken through the asymptotic expansion of $I_{nq}$ in powers of $1/z$.

What would settle it

Compute the nonlinear coefficient $\phi_8$ at a finite $z$, say $z=1$, using an energy-dependent cross section; if its value differs from the constant-cross-section result by more than the second-order truncation accuracy, the claimed $z$-dependence is model-specific. Equivalently, evaluate the thermodynamic-integral series (C10) to next order at moderate $z$ and compare with direct numerical integration: if the leading-order truncation is not accurate at the retained order in $1/z$, the claimed reduction to the Grad equations is not a controlled limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a classical gas of particles of mass $m$ interacting by binary elastic collisions with constant cross section, the paper calculates every coefficient in the second-order relaxation equations (33a)-(33c) as a function of $z=m\beta$ in the 14-moment approximation, using the inverse-Reynolds-dominance closure. It supplies explicit values and asymptotic limits for the bulk viscosity $\zeta$, particle diffusion $\kappa$, shear viscosity $\eta$, the relaxation times $\tau_\Pi$, $\tau_V$, $\tau_\pi$, all linear second-order couplings, and the nonlinear coefficients $\phi_1$ through $\phi_8$, filling the gap left by earlier ultra-relativistic computations of only $\phi_4$, $\phi_7$, and $\phi_8$. It further claims that in the non-relativistic limit $z\to\infty$ these equations reduce to the 13-moment Grad equations in the 'order-of-magnitude' form: the only differences are the nonlinear hard-sphere terms of order $I_{\mathrm{Re}}^2$ and the neglect of a term of order $\mathrm{Kn}\,I_{\mathrm{Re},\pi}^2$ that the order-of-magnitude approach also drops.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the gas is classical with binary elastic collisions and a constant total cross section, and that the non-relativistic limit can be taken by truncating the thermodynamic-integral expansion (C10) at leading order even though the series is only 'likely' asymptotic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any classical monatomic gas with constant cross section, the full second-order transport matrix is now known as a function of $z=m/T$, so relativistic-fluid codes can include mass effects without extrapolating from massless or relaxation-time results.
  • The bulk viscous pressure vanishes parametrically as $1/z^2$ in the non-relativistic limit, so the massive theory automatically decouples the $\Pi$ equation and leaves heat diffusion and shear stress as the active dissipative channels.
  • The $z\to 0$ table values reproduce the ultra-relativistic limits, and the newly computed nonlinear coefficients $\phi_1$-$\phi_8$ give the hard-sphere collision corrections that are absent in the relaxation-time approximation.
  • The non-relativistic reduction fixes the heat-flow equation's second-order structure: the known Grad term proportional to $\pi_{ik}\partial_k\pi_{kl}/\rho_0$ is dropped as $O(\mathrm{Kn}\,I_{\mathrm{Re},\pi}^2)$, matching the order-of-magnitude derivation of the non-relativistic equations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper is right, the same thermodynamic-integral machinery should extend to energy-dependent cross sections by replacing the constant $\sigma$ in the collision matrix; a useful check is to see which coefficients change most with $z$ when the cross section varies.
  • The plotted $z$-dependence suggests that for hadronic matter near $T\approx 150$ MeV with pion and proton masses, several nonlinear coefficients such as $\phi_5$ and $\phi_8$ change sign or grow strongly, which may matter for attractor behavior and for extracting shear viscosity from flow data.
  • The successful reproduction of the Grad equations in the $z\to\infty$ limit gives indirect support to the IReD scheme's omission of $O(\mathrm{Kn}^2)$ terms, beyond the formal power-counting argument.
  • A direct testable extension is to compute the next-to-leading-order $1/z$ corrections to the transport equations and compare them with the higher-order non-relativistic Grad hierarchies mentioned in the paper's outlook, which the authors note require additional dissipative degrees of freedom.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper derives relativistic second-order dissipative hydrodynamics for a single-component gas of massive particles using the 14-moment approximation and the inverse-Reynolds-dominance (IReD) closure of the Boltzmann equation. For the explicit collision model of binary elastic collisions with constant total cross-section and classical statistics, the authors compute all linear and nonlinear transport coefficients appearing in the relaxation equations for bulk viscous pressure, particle diffusion, and shear stress, including the previously unknown coefficients φ1–φ8. Results are presented as functions of z=m/T, with ultra-relativistic and non-relativistic limits in Tables I–III. In the second part, the paper takes the non-relativistic limit of the transport equations, converts particle diffusion to heat flow, and shows that the resulting equations agree with Grad's 13-moment equations in the 'order-of-magnitude' version of Struchtrup, up to the stated higher-order and interaction-dependent terms.

Significance. If correct, the paper fills a notable gap by providing the first complete set of second-order transport coefficients for arbitrary particle masses in the 14-moment scheme under an explicit collision model. The non-relativistic consistency check against Grad/Struchtrup equations is valuable and provides a bridge between two large bodies of literature. The paper ships a Mathematica notebook with the computed data, which supports reproducibility. The authors also reproduce known results in the massless limit and the massive RTA limit, which strengthens confidence in the central derivation.

major comments (1)
  1. [§III B 2; Appendix C 2 (Eq. C10)] The non-relativistic reduction of the transport equations relies on truncating the thermodynamic-integral expansion (C10) at ℓ=j=0, i.e., using only the leading term (C11) for all Inq. The authors themselves describe the series in (C10) as '(likely) an asymptotic series' and provide no proof or error estimate. Since the same leading-order truncation is used for the thermodynamic integrals entering the collision-matrix elements of Appendix B and hence in the asymptotic values of the transport coefficients in Tables I–III, the claimed reduction to the Grad/Struchtrup equations in §III B 2 is conditional on an unproved asymptotic property. This is a load-bearing gap for the paper's second main claim. Please supply a proof (e.g., by applying Watson's lemma to Eq. (C4)) or a rigorous bound on the omitted terms, or explicitly frame the matching result as conditional on the standard asymptotic property.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'all transport coefficients' are calculated, but the computation is for a specific model: classical statistics, constant total cross-section, and the 14-moment approximation; please qualify the abstract accordingly.
  2. [§I A] The line 'c” 1”kB' is a typographical artifact; it should read 'c = 1 = kB'.
  3. [§III A (Eq. 44a)] The identity d h0 = −c_p β^{-2} dβ is used without derivation or reference; please provide a citation or a short derivation.
  4. [Appendix C 2] The step from Eq. (C7) to Eq. (C10) uses properties of complete and partial Bell polynomials that are not stated; a reference such as Comtet's book would aid the reader.
  5. [References] The publisher names are misspelled: 'North-Holand' in Ref. [28] and 'Unversity' in Ref. [2]; please correct these.
  6. [§II D] The paper would benefit from a statement that the Mathematica notebook [40] contains the full z-dependent expressions for all coefficients, not only the data points plotted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the transport coefficients are computed from the Boltzmann collision term and checked against the external Grad/Struchtrup equations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The transport coefficients in Tables I–III and Appendix C1 are explicit functions of thermodynamic integrals and of the linear and nonlinear collision-matrix elements defined in Appendix B; no parameter is fitted to the non-relativistic target, and the comparison target (Grad/Struchtrup, Refs. [15,38]) is external and is not used to determine any coefficient. The only self-cited input is the IReD closure of Ref. [14], but the paper presents it as a method choice and explicitly notes that DNMR gives the same 14-moment transport coefficients, so the central numerical content does not reduce to that self-citation. The non-relativistic reduction of Section III B2 inserts the computed z→∞ limits of the coefficients into the already-derived relaxation equations, so the matching is a genuine consistency check rather than an imposed equality. The paper’s own caveat in Appendix C2 that the series in Eq. (C10) is “(likely) asymptotic” and is truncated at leading order is a rigor/assumption gap in the z→∞ limit, but not a circularity: the leading term is not set by the Grad equations, and no Eq. X in the paper is defined in terms of the Eq. Y it is claimed to predict.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a parameter-free microscopic derivation within a stated model. The external inputs are standard kinetic theory, the constant-cross-section collision integral, classical statistics, the 14-moment truncation, the IReD closure, and the Landau frame. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced, and no data are fitted.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Boltzmann equation with binary elastic collisions only
    Eqs. (8)-(10) define the microscopic model; all transport coefficients are computed for this collision integral and not for other collision mechanisms.
  • domain assumption Constant total cross-section sigma
    Stated after Eq. (10); tables and limits are for sigma constant, so energy-dependent cross-sections would give different coefficients.
  • domain assumption Classical statistics (a -> 0)
    Eq. (11) with classical limit; quantum statistics is not covered.
  • ad hoc to paper 14-moment truncation with N0=2, N1=1, N2=0
    Eq. (15) and Section II C; this truncation determines the closure and the values of all coefficients.
  • domain assumption IReD power-counting with Navier-Stokes-like asymptotic moments
    Eq. (29) in Section II C 3; higher moments are replaced by their first-order Navier-Stokes forms, which requires Kn and IRe to be comparable and small.
  • domain assumption Landau frame matching conditions
    Eq. (4); sets delta-epsilon, delta-n, and energy diffusion W to zero, defining the dissipative currents used throughout.
  • ad hoc to paper Leading-order truncation of the thermodynamic-integral asymptotic expansion (C10)
    Appendix C 2; the series is only "likely" asymptotic and is truncated at ell=j=0 to obtain the non-relativistic limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics for particles of arbitrary mass." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZS43BTJC

@misc{pith2026250503366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics for particles of arbitrary mass},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZS43BTJC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.03366}
}
read the original abstract

Employing a kinetic framework, we calculate all transport coefficients for relativistic dissipative (second-order) hydrodynamics for arbitrary particle masses in the 14-moment approximation. Taking the non-relativistic limit, it is shown that the relativistic theory reduces to the Grad equations computed in the 'order-of-magnitude' approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.03366 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The first-order coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The second-order coefficients appearing in the equation of motion for the bulk viscous pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The second-order coefficients appearing in the equation of motion for the diffusion current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The second-order coefficients appearing in the equation of motion for the shear-stress tensor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. York's Cavity Formalism and Quantum Modified Thermodynamics of (2+1)D Black Holes

    gr-qc 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims Barrow entropy corrections reshape BTZ black hole thermodynamics in a cavity, but the free energy analysis rests on a wrong extrinsic curvature term and an incorrect zero-crossing interpretation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (19b) Due to the form of the conserved currents of fluid dynamics in eqs

    Matching fluid-dynamical variables to kinetic description The conserved currents can be written as moments of the distribution function: Nµ”xkµy”x kµy0`xkµyδ , (19a) Tµν”xkµkνy”x kµkνy0`xkµkνyδ . (19b) Due to the form of the conserved currents of fluid dynamics in eqs. (3a) to (3d), it is possible to identify the fluid- dynamical variables by n0`δn“xEky ,...

    work page

  2. [2]

    ∆µ1¨¨¨µℓ α1¨¨¨αℓ B kxα1¨¨¨ kαℓy d dτEr k F δ `∆µ1¨¨¨µℓ α1¨¨¨αℓ B Er k d dτkxα1¨¨¨ kαℓy F δ ´∆µ1¨¨¨µℓ α1¨¨¨αℓ ż dKE r kkxα1¨¨¨ kαℓy

    Equations of irreducible moments By decomposing the Boltzmann eq. (8) in terms of the irreducible basis, δ ˙fk“E´1 k Crfs´ ˙f0k´E´1 k kxµy∇µpf0k`δfkq, (22) and substituting the decomposition into the (projected) comoving derivative of eq. (14), i.e., ˙ρxµ1¨¨¨µℓy r “∆µ1¨¨¨µℓ α1¨¨¨αℓ ż dK d dτ ´ Er kkxα1¨¨¨ kαℓy δfk ¯ , the latter equation may be written as...

    work page

  3. [3]

    »” denotes equivalence up to first order in Knudsen and inverse Reynolds numbers, i.e., excluding terms of order O ` Kn2, Kn IRe, IRe2˘ . Moreover, we defined ζr

    Closing the system of equations The moment eqs. (25a) to (25c) can be used to obtain equations of motion for the dissipative degrees of freedom Π, V , and π. To achieve this, the so-called inverse-Reynolds-dominance method [14], 5 which is a relativistic version of the order-of-magnitude approach shown in Ref. [38], will be used to reduce the infinite-dim...

    work page

  4. [4]

    mc2`m ˆ e0` P0 ρ0 ˙ , (47) whereρ0

    Asymptotic thermodynamics Prior to matching the equations in the non-relativistic regime, some approximations must be made. The thermo- dynamic integral in eq. (12a) is analyzed in appendix C 2. In the non-relativistic regime, it may be written as Inq⇝Ip8q nq ” eα´z p2πq3{2βn`2zn´q`1{2 . (45) For the pressure this implies Pp8q 0 “ eα´z p2πq3{2β4z3{2 . (46...

    work page

  5. [5]

    order-of-magnitude

    Reproducing Grad’s equations Inserting the transport coefficients listed in tables I to III, as well as hp8q 0 “z{β, into eqs. (44a) to (44c) yields ˙Π` 1 τp8q Π Π“ ´5Pp8q 0 6z2 ∇λuλ´ 7 3Π∇λuλ´ 2 3zπµν∇xµuνy` 2 3z ∇µqµ´ ˆ 2 3z` 7 3z2 ˙ qµ∇µ lnPp8q 0 ´ ˆ 7 3z´cp 2 3z2 ˙ qµ∇µ lnβ´ 3 40zτp8q Π Pp8q 0 Π 2` 1 10z2c2τp8q Π Pp8q 0 qµqµ´ 1 4z3τp8q Π Pp8q 0 πµνπµν...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Transport coefficients The coefficients appearing in the equation of motion for the bulk viscous pressure (33a) read: ζ“ m2 3 αp0q 0 τp0q 00 , (C1a) τΠ“τp0q 00 , (C1b) ℓΠV “´ m2 3 ˆ γp1q 1 ´ G30 D20 ˙ τp0q 00 , (C1c) τΠV “ m2 3pε0`P0q ˜ Bγp1q 1 Blnβ ´ G30 D20 ¸ τp0q 00 , (C1d) δΠΠ “ „1 3 ´ 2`m2γp0q 2 ¯ ´ m2 3 G20 D20 ȷ τp0q 00 , (C1e) λΠV “´ m2 3 ˜ Bγp1q ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    p´1qq p2q` 1q!! ż dKf 0kEn´2q k ` m2´E2 k ˘q “ 1 p2q` 1q!!eα ż dΩ d|k| p2πq3 exp ´ ´β a |k|2`m2 ¯´ |k|2`m2 ¯n´2q´1 2 |k|2q`2 . Substituting y

    Deriving the asymptotic expression for thermodynamic integrals The thermodynamic integral Inq is given by Inq“ p´1qq p2q` 1q!! ż dKf 0kEn´2q k ` m2´E2 k ˘q “ 1 p2q` 1q!!eα ż dΩ d|k| p2πq3 exp ´ ´β a |k|2`m2 ¯´ |k|2`m2 ¯n´2q´1 2 |k|2q`2 . Substituting y”β|k| and z”βm, it can be written as Inq“ 1 p2q` 1q!! eα 2π2βn`2 ż8 0 dyy 2q`2` y2`z2˘n´2q´1 2 exp ´ ´ a ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Rezzolla and O

    L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti, Relativistic Hydrodynamics (Oxford Unversity Press, 2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    G. S. Rocha, D. Wagner, G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, and D. H. Rischke, Theories of relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics, Entropy 26, 189 (2023), arXiv:2311.15063 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Shen and L

    C. Shen and L. Yan, Recent development of hydrodynamic modeling in heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Sci. Tech.31, 122 (2020), arXiv:2010.12377 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Heinz and R

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123 (2013), arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon, and B. Schenke, Hydrodynamic modeling of heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1340011 (2013), arXiv:1301.5893 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [14]

    E. R. Most, S. P. Harris, C. Plumberg, M. G. Alford, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, F. Pretorius, H. Witek, and N. Yunes, Projecting the likely importance of weak-interaction-driven bulk viscosity in neutron star mergers, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 509, 1096 (2021), arXiv:21...

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Chabanov, L

    M. Chabanov, L. Rezzolla, and D. H. Rischke, General-relativistic hydrodynamics of non-perfect fluids: 3+1 conservative formulation and application to viscous black hole accretion, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505, 5910 (2021), arXiv:2102.10419 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    E. R. Most, A. Haber, S. P. Harris, Z. Zhang, M. G. Alford, and J. Noronha, Emergence of microphysical bulk viscosity in binary neutron star postmerger dynamics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 967, L14 (2024), arXiv:2207.00442 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke, Derivation of transient relativistic fluid dynamics from the boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114047 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039902 (2015)], arXiv:1202.4551 [nucl- th]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Moln´ ar, H

    E. Moln´ ar, H. Niemi, G. S. Denicol, and D. H. Rischke, Relative importance of second-order terms in relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074010 (2014), arXiv:1308.0785 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    G. S. Denicol, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Transport coefficients of bulk viscous pressure in the 14-moment approximation, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024912 (2014), arXiv:1403.0962 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    G. S. Rocha, C. V. P. de Brito, and G. S. Denicol, Hydrodynamic theories for a system of weakly self-interacting classical ultrarelativistic scalar particles: Microscopic derivations and attractors, Phys. Rev. D108, 036017 (2023), arXiv:2306.07423 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Wagner, A

    D. Wagner, A. Palermo, and V. E. Ambru¸ s, Inverse-reynolds-dominance approach to transient fluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 106, 016013 (2022), arXiv:2203.12608 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Grad, On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases, 2, 331 (1949)

    H. Grad, On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases, 2, 331 (1949)

    1949

  15. [23]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, Landau and Lifshitz: Course of Theoretical Physics (Pergamon, 1959)

    1959

  16. [24]

    Chiarini, J

    A. Chiarini, J. Sammet, and M. Shokri, Semi-classical spin hydrodynamics in flat and curved spacetime: Covariance, linear waves, and bjorken background, (2024), arXiv:2412.19854 [gr-qc]

    2024

  17. [25]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. Stewart, Transient relativistic thermodynamics and kinetic theory, Annals of Physics 118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  18. [26]

    H.-T. Elze, Y. Hama, T. Kodama, M. Makler, and J. Rafelski, Variational principle for relativistic fluid dynamics, J. Phys. G 25, 1935 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9910208

    1999 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A. H. Taub, General relativistic variational principle for perfect fluids, Phys. Rev. 94, 1468 (1954)

    1954

  20. [28]

    Jackiw, V

    R. Jackiw, V. P. Nair, S. Y. Pi, and A. P. Polychronakos, Perfect fluid theory and its extensions, J. Phys. A 37, R327 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0407101

    2004 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hongo, Quantum field theoretical approach to relativistic hydrodynamics from local Gibbs ensemble, Phd thesis, Depart- ment of Physics, The University of Tokyo (2024)

    M. Hongo, Quantum field theoretical approach to relativistic hydrodynamics from local Gibbs ensemble, Phd thesis, Depart- ment of Physics, The University of Tokyo (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Causality and existence of solutions of relativistic viscous fluid dynamics with gravity, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104064 (2018), arXiv:1708.06255 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, JHEP 10, 034, arXiv:1907.08191 [hep-th]

    P. Kovtun, First-order relativistic hydrodynamics is stable, JHEP 10, 034, arXiv:1907.08191 [hep-th]

    1907 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Eckart, The thermodynamics of irreversible processes

    C. Eckart, The thermodynamics of irreversible processes. 3.. relativistic theory of the simple fluid, Phys. Rev. 58, 919 (1940)

    1940

  25. [33]

    W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Generic instabilities in first-order dissipative relativistic fluid theories, Phys. Rev. D 31, 725 (1985)

    1985

  26. [34]

    Agrawal, H

    A. Agrawal, H. M. Kushwaha, and R. S. Jadhav, Microscale Flow and Heat Transfer , 1st ed., Mechanical Engineering Series (Springer, 2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    S. R. de Groot, W. A. van Leeuwen, and C. G. van Weert, Relativistic kinetic theory: Principles and Applications (North- Holand Publishing Company, 1980). 22

    1980

  28. [36]

    Huovinen, P

    P. Huovinen, P. F. Kolb, U. W. Heinz, P. V. Ruuskanen, and S. A. Voloshin, Radial and elliptic flow at rhic: Further predictions, Phys. Lett. B 503, 58 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0101136

    2001 arXiv

  29. [37]

    P. F. Kolb and U. W. Heinz, Hydrodynamic description of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, , 634 (2003), arXiv:nucl- th/0305084

    2003

  30. [38]

    G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, I. Bouras, E. Molnar, Z. Xu, D. H. Rischke, and C. Greiner, Solving the heat-flow problem with transient relativistic fluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074005 (2014), arXiv:1207.6811 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Wagner and L

    D. Wagner and L. Gavassino, Regime of applicability of israel-stewart hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 109, 016019 (2024), arXiv:2309.14828 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    C. V. P. de Brito, D. Wagner, G. S. Denicol, and D. H. Rischke, Divergence and resummation of the moment expansion for an ultrarelativistic gas in bjorken flow, (2024), arXiv:2411.06267 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    G. S. Denicol and D. H. Rischke, Microscopic Foundations of Relativistic Fluid Dynamics , Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 990 (Springer, 2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    C. V. P. de Brito and G. S. Denicol, Method of moments for a relativistic single-component gas, Phys. Rev. D 110, 036017 (2024), arXiv:2401.10098 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    V. E. Ambru¸ s and D. Wagner, High-order shakhov-like extension of the relaxation time approximation in relativistic kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056002 (2024), arXiv:2401.04017 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Struchtrup, Stable transport equations for rarefied gases at high orders in the knudsen number, 16, 3921 (2004)

    H. Struchtrup, Stable transport equations for rarefied gases at high orders in the knudsen number, 16, 3921 (2004)

    2004

  37. [46]

    V. E. Ambru¸ s, E. Moln´ ar, and D. H. Rischke, Relativistic second-order dissipative and anisotropic fluid dynamics in the relaxation-time approximation for an ideal gas of massive particles, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076001 (2024), arXiv:2311.00351 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [47]

    W. R. Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.2, champaign, IL, 2024

    2024

  39. [48]

    Cercignani and G

    C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer, The relativistic Boltzmann equation, Progress in mathematical physics No. 22 (Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2002)

    2002

  40. [49]

    W. G. Vincenti and C. H. Kruger, Introduction to Physical gas dynamics (Krieger Publishing Company, 1975)

    1975

  41. [50]

    Struchtrup, Macroscopic Transport Equations for Rarefied Gas Flows–Approximation Methods in Kinetic Theory (Springer, 2005)

    H. Struchtrup, Macroscopic Transport Equations for Rarefied Gas Flows–Approximation Methods in Kinetic Theory (Springer, 2005)

    2005

  42. [51]

    C. V. P. de Brito and G. S. Denicol, Third-order relativistic dissipative fluid dynamics from the method of moments, Phys. Rev. D 108, 096020 (2023), arXiv:2302.09097 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [52]

    M¨ uller and T

    I. M¨ uller and T. Ruggeri, Extended thermodynamics of moments, in Rational Extended Thermodynamics (Springer New York, New York, NY, 1998) pp. 197–220

    1998

  44. [53]

    Wagner, V

    D. Wagner, V. E. Ambrus, and E. Molnar, Analytical structure of the binary collision integral and the ultrarelativistic limit of transport coefficients of an ideal gas (2024), arXiv:2309.09335 [physics.flu-dyn]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [54]

    R. F. Fox and G. E. Uhlenbeck, Contributions to nonequilibrium thermodynamics. ii. fluctuation theory for the boltzmann equation, Physics of Fluids 13, 2881 (1970)

    1970

  46. [55]

    Calzetta and B

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, Stochastic dynamics of correlations in quantum field theory: From schwinger-dyson to boltzmann- langevin equation, Phys. Rev. D 61, 025012 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9903291

    2000 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Mir´ on-Granese, A

    N. Mir´ on-Granese, A. Kandus, and E. Calzetta, Nonlinear fluctuations in relativistic causal fluids, JHEP 07, 064, arXiv:2002.08323 [hep-th]

    2002 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Soares Rocha, L

    G. Soares Rocha, L. Gavassino, and N. Mullins, Modeling stochastic fluctuations in relativistic kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 110, 016020 (2024), arXiv:2405.10878 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.