Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Spectral gap of the KMP and other stochastic exchange models on arbitrary graphs

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that for a broad class of reversible stochastic exchange models on any finite graph, the full spectral gap is pinned between the spectral gap of an associated random walk and that same gap multiplied by an explicit…

desk verdict Genuine advance on spectral gaps for KMP/HP/IEM on arbitrary graphs; the central reduction is credible, but the load-bearing commutativity (Prop 3.5) is only sketched and needs a complete proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.02400 v1 pith:ZSBZKK5J submitted 2025-05-05 math.PR math-phmath.FAmath.MP

Seonwoo Kim , Matteo Quattropani , Federico Sau This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.FAmath.MP MSC 60J2760K3582C2282C40
keywords spectralgapstochasticexchangemodelsKMPmodelharmonicprocessimmediatehiddenparameterDirichletdistributionAldousconjecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper targets a long-standing difficulty: on arbitrary graphs, the spectral gap of redistribution models such as KMP has previously only been pinned down on highly symmetric geometries like the complete graph or the segment. It proves that for any reversible stochastic exchange model whose invariant measure is a Dirichlet distribution, the full spectral gap is always within a model-dependent factor of the spectral gap of a single random walk on the same graph, with the random walk's edges given by an explicit formula. For the harmonic process and the immediate exchange model, in the log-concave parameter regime, the factor is 1, so the spectral gap is exactly the random-walk gap on every graph. A curious reader should care because this reduces a hard infinite-dimensional variational problem to a finite-dimensional graph quantity, and it provides a practical route to gap estimates on arbitrary networks.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hidden parameter model: a Markov process on $[0,1]^V$ obtained by applying the same random exchange matrices to column vectors rather than row vectors, whose only invariant states are constant configurations. The argument is carried by a sequence of intertwinings: polynomial eigenfunctions of the exchange generator lift to eigenfunctions of a $k$-particle system; the annihilation operator $a$ (removing one particle) commutes with that particle generator, which forces the relevant eigenfunction into $\ker(a^\dagger)$; and the duality identity $LD_b = LD_b$ for the monomials $D_b(\xi,\theta) = \prod(\theta_x - b)^{\xi_x}$ lets one transplant the eigenfunction into the hidden-parameter model. There, the control function is the variance $\mathrm{Var}_\pi(\theta)$, and a single second-moment computation gives the differential inequality $L\mathrm{Var}_\pi \le -\gamma(L) E_{RW}$, from which exponential contraction and the spectral gap bound follow by Grönwall. The factor $\gamma(L)$ in (2.16) is the pointwise ratio $(\chi_{xy} + \sigma_{xy})/\pi_{xy}$ minimized over edges.

What would settle it

Find a reversible stochastic exchange model satisfying Assumptions 2.3 and 2.5 whose invariant measure is exactly Dir(α) and compute, on a small graph, the ratio gap(L)/gap_RW(L); if it falls below (1∧γ(L)) with γ(L) from (2.16), the universal lower bound is false. Since the paper shows the bound is sharp on the complete graph for HP and IEM, the quickest check is to test a non-complete graph with α_min < 1 (HP) or α_min < 1+2κ (IEM) and compare the exact quadratic eigenvalue to the claimed constant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the two-sided inequality (1 ∧ γ(L)) gap_RW(L) ≤ gap(L) ≤ gap_RW(L) for any reversible stochastic exchange model with a Dirichlet reversible measure on a finite graph, with γ(L) an explicit local quantity built from the model's update kernel and the stationary weights. The upper bound is immediate from the polynomial grading of the generator; the lower bound is the real content, and it is proved not by Nash or martingale arguments but by pushing the eigenfunction through a hidden-parameter model and running a Chen–Wang style coupling estimate on its variance. In the three named models the constant γ is computed explicitly; for HP with α_min ≥ 1 and for IEM with α_min ≥ 1 + 2κ it is at least 1, yielding the exact identity gap(L) = gap_RW(L) for every graph — an Aldous-type spectral gap identity. The proof also gives eigenvalue lower bounds in non-reversible and degenerate settings.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the claim that the annihilation operator commutes with the particle-system generator; the paper proves this only by sketch, and if it failed the eigenfunction could not be transplanted into the hidden-parameter model and the universal lower bound would break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the KMP model the spectral gap on any graph lies within the factor $\gamma_{KMP} = \alpha_{2,\min}/(1+\alpha_{2,\min})\,(1 + 1/|\alpha|)$ of the random-walk gap, and the bound is sharp: on the complete graph with constant $\alpha$ it becomes an identity, while on the segment with $\alpha \ge 1$ the upper bound is saturated.
  • For the harmonic process with $\alpha_{\min} \ge 1$, and for the immediate exchange model with $\alpha_{\min} \ge 1 + 2\kappa$, the spectral gap is exactly $\mathrm{gap}_{RW}$ on every graph — an Aldous-type spectral-gap identity.
  • When the lower bound is not an identity, it is still attained on specific graphs; for HP and IEM on the homogeneous complete graph the quadratic eigenfunction $\sum_x \eta_x^2 - a$ realizes exactly the constant times the random-walk gap.
  • The eigenvalue estimates behind the gap bounds do not require reversibility or a non-degenerate invariant measure; they yield lower bounds on the real part of eigenvalues for non-reversible exchange models and for degenerate averaging-type models, uniformly in the number of particles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same ladder of intertwinings persists under boundary reservoirs, the open-system analogues mentioned in the paper's Section 1.3.3 would inherit a linear-statics reduction: the lowest polynomial eigenvalue should be attained by linear functions, extending the one- and two-particle identity known for related symmetric inclusion processes.
  • The criterion of Corollary 2.14 suggests a practical screening test for Aldous-type identities in any new exchange model: check a single nonnegative integral; models satisfying it automatically have gap = gap_RW, so one can scan families of beta-splitting variants for exact reduction.
  • The variance control with parameter-dependent weights $\pi$ suggests that a Ricci-curvature or modified-log-Sobolev viewpoint on the hidden parameter model might estimate the sharp constant $\gamma(L)$ locally, potentially replacing the closed-form computation in the three examples by a curvature bound.
  • Since the lower bound is proven for spectra of polynomial eigenvalues without reversibility, applying the same machinery to wealth-redistribution models with saving propensity (which are non-reversible) may produce the first spectral gap lower bounds on arbitrary graphs for those econophysics processes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a general method for bounding the spectral gap of reversible stochastic exchange models on arbitrary finite graphs, with explicit comparisons to the spectral gap of an associated random walk. The main results are stated for the Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti (KMP) model, the harmonic process (HP), and the immediate exchange model (IEM). The proof strategy combines polynomial eigenfunction structure, a hidden parameter model, an annihilation-creation operator framework, and a variance contraction estimate for the hidden parameter semigroup. The paper claims universal lower bounds of the form (1∧γ) gap_RW ≤ gap ≤ gap_RW, and exact identities gap = gap_RW for HP and IEM in certain log-concave regimes.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper delivers a genuinely useful reduction: spectral gap estimation for a large class of interacting diffusions is reduced to a random-walk spectral gap and an explicit model-dependent constant γ. The fact that the comparison constant is graph-independent, and that identities are obtained on arbitrary graphs for HP and IEM, is a strong and interesting result. The proof is largely self-contained: the key variance contraction (Lemma 4.3) is proved by explicit computation, the polynomial/particle-system machinery is developed in detail, and the examples in Section 5 are computed transparently. The main risk to the central claim is a small number of insufficiently justified algebraic steps, rather than an evident counterexample.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Proposition 3.5] The commutativity aL = La is used twice in load-bearing places: in Proposition 3.9 to pass from b=0 duality to the shifted duality Db = exp(-ba)D0, and in Lemma 4.1, Step 2, to conclude that a(CΞ_{k-1}) is L-invariant and hence that the minimal eigenvector φ lies in ker(a†). If this identity were false, the substitution b=πθ in (4.5) would be illegitimate, the bound |g(θ)| ≤ C Varπ(θ)^{k/2} in (4.1) would lack a basis, and the Chen-Wang estimate (4.9)-(4.10) in Theorem 2.8 would collapse. The proof is only labeled 'Proof (Sketch)' and refers to a direct computation or to [CGR21]/[KS24b, Appendix]. For a central theorem, this is not sufficient: the authors should either give the complete computation in the paper or cite the exact statement with theorem/proposition numbers in a published source.
  2. [§2.3.1, Corollary 2.14] The corollary is stated without proof or derivation, yet it is invoked in Section 5.2.1 and Section 5.3.1 to conclude the spectral-gap identities gap(L)=gap_RW(L) for HP and IEM. Even if the criterion follows from a simple manipulation of γ(L) in (2.16), the authors should include the derivation, or at minimum a precise reference, so that the reader can verify that the integral condition (1-u)(2u-1)≥0 is indeed sufficient and not merely necessary.
  3. [Lemma 4.1, Step 2] The step stating that 'it is well-known that L and L† are isospectral' and then using a generalized-eigenfunction basis of a(CΞ_{k-1}) is quite compressed. In particular, the orthogonality argument leading to φ∈ker(a†) needs the eigenvalues λj of L on a(CΞ_{k-1}) to be disjoint from λ and λ*; the text asserts this from 'minimality', but does not spell out that the image a(CΞ_{k-1}) corresponds to P_{k-1} under the hat map. This is fixable with a short explanation, but as written it requires the reader to reconstruct a nontrivial part of the proof.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.4)] The summation range in the definition of M^uv_xy is written as 'jx ≥ (ξx+ξy) - (ξy+ζy)', which equals ξx-ζy; the combinatorial constraints require jx ≥ ζx-ξy (together with 0≤jx≤ξx∧ζx). Please correct the lower bound or explain the notation.
  2. [§4.4, Theorem 2.11] The assertion that there exists a c.o.n.s. of L2(µ) consisting of polynomial eigenfunctions is stated without proof. Since the finite-dimensional spaces Pk are invariant and the operator is symmetric, a diagonalization is plausible, but the completeness argument over the whole L2(µ) should be spelled out, for example by using the density of polynomials and the essential self-adjointness statement that follows.
  3. [§1.2, around Eq. (1.13)] The preliminary computation for the grand-coupling on a general graph is useful, but the displayed identity contains a factor 1/2 in front of the second sum that is not defined; it would help to state explicitly which term corresponds to [Hau16, Theorem 1] and which ordering of x,y is used.
  4. [§5.1, KMP computation] In the displayed computation of χxy and σxy, the factors cxy/|α| and cxy/|α|^2 appear after a shorthand 'B(αx,αy)'; the derivation would be clearer if the Beta-function normalizations were shown explicitly, especially because the final identity γKMP is central to Theorem 1.1.
  5. [Throughout] The notation gap1(G,α) is used for three different models in Sections 1 and 5 without a model label (e.g., gap1^{HP} or gap1^{IEM}). This is acceptable informally, but in a formal paper it risks confusion when comparing Theorems 1.1-1.3; consider adding a superscript or a sentence clarifying the model dependence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the spectral-gap reduction is proven from explicit computations, with only a minor overlapping-author citation in Proposition 3.5 that is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is essentially self-contained. The polynomial invariance of the generator is proven directly (Proposition 2.4), the key variance contraction for the hidden parameter model is computed explicitly (Lemma 4.3), the eigenfunction control is built in Lemma 4.1 from intertwining and annihilation/creation structure, and Theorem 2.8 follows by combining these ingredients with the classical Chen-Wang argument. Theorem 2.11 then uses reversibility to identify the L2-spectrum with polynomial eigenvalues. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity: gap_RW(L) is the independently defined random-walk spectral gap, and the lower bound is governed by the explicit kinetic factor γ(L) computed from the model rates. The only point at which the proof leans on prior work is Proposition 3.5, the commutativity aL = La, which is stated as 'Proof (Sketch)' and attributed to [CGR21] or [KS24b, Appendix]. One of these references is by an overlapping author, and the commutativity is load-bearing for Lemma 4.1's ker(a†) step. However, this is not circular: the cited identity is a standard algebraic fact about consistent particle systems, it is also attributed to the independent reference [CGR21], and it does not presuppose the spectral-gap conclusion. The external benchmarks cited in Section 5 (Kac walk, segment results) are used only to test sharpness, not to derive the bounds. Thus the central claim does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests only on standard spectral theory and the structural Assumptions 2.3 and 2.5. The model parameters α, κ are inputs, not fitted values. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.3 (integrability of rates: ∫βxy {(1-u)+(1-v)} < ∞)
    Needed for L to be well-defined on polynomials and to generate a Feller process.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.5 (s-connectivity: for all x,y there is a path with positive s-rates)
    Ensures irreducibility of the random walk and uniqueness of invariant measures.
  • standard math Spectral theorem for essentially self-adjoint operators (Theorem 2.11)
    Used to assert pure point spectrum and that polynomial eigenvalues saturate the L2 spectrum.
  • standard math Finite-dimensional matrices L and L† are isospectral (Lemma 4.1 Step 2)
    Used to transfer eigenfunctions to the time-reversed particle system.
  • standard math Existence of Feller process for the pre-generator L (Proposition 2.4)
    Cited from Liggett's interacting particle systems book.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral gap of the KMP and other stochastic exchange models on arbitrary graphs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZSBZKK5J

@misc{pith2026250502400,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral gap of the KMP and other stochastic exchange models on arbitrary graphs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZSBZKK5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.02400}
}
read the original abstract

We present a simple strategy to derive universal bounds on the spectral gap of reversible stochastic exchange models on arbitrary graphs. The Kipnis-Marchioro-Presutti (KMP) model, the harmonic process (HP), and the immediate exchange model (IEM) are all examples that fall into this class. Our upper and lower bounds depend only on two features: worst-case linear statistics and a kinetic factor, which is, in essence, graph-independent. For the three aforementioned examples, these bounds are sharp, and even saturate to an identity for HP and IEM in some log-concave regimes. The proof -- which yields bounds for eigenvalues even in the non-reversible context -- crucially exploits the rigidity of the eigenstructure of these models and quantitative contraction rates of the corresponding hidden parameter models recently introduced in [DMFG24, GRT25].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A universal cutoff phenomenon for mean-field exchange models

    math.PR 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Mean-field exchange models with any symmetric, non-degenerate redistribution variable exhibit a Wasserstein cutoff at time n log n/(2h) with Gaussian profile set by the size-biased log-variable's first two moments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Analysis and geometry of M arkov diffusion operators , volume 348 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften

    Dominique Bakry, Ivan Gentil, and Michel Ledoux. Analysis and geometry of M arkov diffusion operators , volume 348 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften . Springer, Cham, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    On the spectral gap of the K ac walk and other binary collision processes

    Pietro Caputo. On the spectral gap of the K ac walk and other binary collision processes. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , 4:205--222, 2008

    2008

  3. [3]

    E. A. Carlen, M. C. Carvalho, and M. Loss. Determination of the spectral gap for K ac's master equation and related stochastic evolution. Acta Math. , 191(1):1--54, 2003

    2003

  4. [4]

    Carlen, Maria C

    Eric A. Carlen, Maria C. Carvalho, and Michael Loss. Spectral gap for the K ac model with hard sphere collisions. J. Funct. Anal. , 266(3):1787--1832, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Large D eviations and A dditivity P rinciple for the O pen H armonic P rocess

    Gioia Carinci, Chiara Franceschini, Rouven Frassek, Cristian Giardin\`a, and Frank Redig. Large D eviations and A dditivity P rinciple for the O pen H armonic P rocess. Comm. Math. Phys. , 406(5):Paper No. 103, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Carinci, C

    G. Carinci, C. Franceschini, D. Gabrielli, C. Giardin\`a, and D. Tsagkarogiannis. Solvable stationary non equilibrium states. J. Stat. Phys. , 191(1):Paper No. 10, 14, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Consistent particle systems and duality

    Gioia Carinci, Cristian Giardin\`a, and Frank Redig. Consistent particle systems and duality. Electron. J. Probab. , 26:Paper No. 125, 31, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Eigenvalues, inequalities, and ergodic theory

    Mu-Fa Chen. Eigenvalues, inequalities, and ergodic theory . Probability and its Applications (New York). Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2005

    work page 2005

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Mixing time of the adjacent walk on the simplex

    Pietro Caputo, Cyril Labb\' e , and Hubert Lacoin. Mixing time of the adjacent walk on the simplex. Ann. Probab. , 48(5):2449--2493, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Liggett, and Thomas Richthammer

    Pietro Caputo, Thomas M. Liggett, and Thomas Richthammer. Proof of A ldous' spectral gap conjecture. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 23(3):831--851, 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    Spectral gap for the stochastic exchange model

    Eric A Carlen, Gustavo Posta, and Imre P \'e ter T \'o th. Spectral gap for the stochastic exchange model. arXiv:2504.13533 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    A universal cutoff phenomenon for mean-field exchange models

    Pietro Caputo, Matteo Quattropani, and Federico Sau. A universal cutoff phenomenon for mean-field exchange models. In preparation , 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Duality and stationary distributions of wealth distribution models

    Pasquale Cirillo, Frank Redig, and Wioletta Ruszel. Duality and stationary distributions of wealth distribution models. J. Phys. A , 47(8):085203, 14, 2014

    2014

  6. [14]

    Estimation of spectral gap for elliptic operators

    Mu-Fa Chen and Feng-Yu Wang. Estimation of spectral gap for elliptic operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 349(3):1239--1267, 1997

    1997

  7. [15]

    Ferrari, and Davide Gabrielli

    Anna De Masi, Pablo A. Ferrari, and Davide Gabrielli. Hidden temperature in the KMP model. J. Stat. Phys. , 191(11):Paper No. 150, 28, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Integrable heat conduction model

    Chiara Franceschini, Rouven Frassek, and Cristian Giardin\`a. Integrable heat conduction model. J. Math. Phys. , 64(4):Paper No. 043304, 21, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Exact solution of an integrable non-equilibrium particle system

    Rouven Frassek and Cristian Giardin\`a. Exact solution of an integrable non-equilibrium particle system. J. Math. Phys. , 63(10):Paper No. 103301, 35, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Duality and hidden symmetries in interacting particle systems

    Cristian Giardin\`a, Jorge Kurchan, Frank Redig, and Kiamars Vafayi. Duality and hidden symmetries in interacting particle systems. J. Stat. Phys. , 135(1):25--55, 2009

    2009

  11. [19]

    Grigo, K

    A. Grigo, K. Khanin, and D. Sz\' a sz. Mixing rates of particle systems with energy exchange. Nonlinearity , 25(8):2349--2376, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Duality and stationary distributions of the ``immediate exchange model'' and its generalizations

    Bart van Ginkel, Frank Redig, and Federico Sau. Duality and stationary distributions of the ``immediate exchange model'' and its generalizations. J. Stat. Phys. , 163(1):92--112, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Intertwining and P ropagation of M ixtures for G eneralized KMP M odels and H armonic M odels

    Cristian Giardin\`a, Frank Redig, and Berend van Tol. Intertwining and P ropagation of M ixtures for G eneralized KMP M odels and H armonic M odels. J. Stat. Phys. , 192(2):Paper No. 21, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Uniform contractivity in W asserstein metric for the original 1 D K ac's model

    Maxime Hauray. Uniform contractivity in W asserstein metric for the original 1 D K ac's model. J. Stat. Phys. , 162(6):1566--1570, 2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    A version of A ldous' spectral-gap conjecture for the zero range process

    Jonathan Hermon and Justin Salez. A version of A ldous' spectral-gap conjecture for the zero range process. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 29(4):2217--2229, 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    Spectral gap for K ac's model of B oltzmann equation

    Elise Janvresse. Spectral gap for K ac's model of B oltzmann equation. Ann. Probab. , 29(1):288--304, 2001

    2001

  17. [25]

    M. Kac. Foundations of kinetic theory. In Proceedings of the T hird B erkeley S ymposium on M athematical S tatistics and P robability, 1954--1955, vol. III , pages 171--197. Univ. California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles, Calif., 1956

    1954

  18. [26]

    The immediate exchange model: an analytical investigation

    Guy Katriel. The immediate exchange model: an analytical investigation. Eur. Phys. J. B , 88(1):Paper No. 19, 6, 2015

    2015

  19. [27]

    Kipnis, C

    C. Kipnis, C. Marchioro, and E. Presutti. Heat flow in an exactly solvable model. J. Statist. Phys. , 27(1):65--74, 1982

    1982

  20. [28]

    One-and two-particle spectral gap identities for the symmetric inclusion process and related models

    Seonwoo Kim and Federico Sau. One-and two-particle spectral gap identities for the symmetric inclusion process and related models. arXiv:2412.01489 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Spectral gap of the symmetric inclusion process

    Seonwoo Kim and Federico Sau. Spectral gap of the symmetric inclusion process. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 34(5):4899--4920, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Thomas M. Liggett. Interacting particle systems . Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005. Reprint of the 1985 original

    2005

  23. [31]

    Levin and Yuval Peres

    David A. Levin and Yuval Peres. Markov chains and mixing times . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017. Second edition of [MR2466937], with contributions by Elizabeth L. Wilmer, with a chapter on ``Coupling from the past'' by James G. Propp and David B. Wilson

    2017

  24. [32]

    Hydrodynamic limit and cutoff for the biased adjacent walk on the simplex

    Cyril Labb \'e and Engu \'e rand Petit. Hydrodynamic limit and cutoff for the biased adjacent walk on the simplex. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\' e Probab. Stat. , 61(2):769--802, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Spectral gap and logarithmic S obolev inequality for K awasaki and G lauber dynamics

    Sheng Lin Lu and Horng-Tzer Yau. Spectral gap and logarithmic S obolev inequality for K awasaki and G lauber dynamics. Comm. Math. Phys. , 156(2):399--433, 1993

    1993

  26. [34]

    Mixing of the averaging process and its discrete dual on finite-dimensional geometries

    Matteo Quattropani and Federico Sau. Mixing of the averaging process and its discrete dual on finite-dimensional geometries. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 33(2):936--971, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Methods of modern mathematical physics

    Michael Reed and Barry Simon. Methods of modern mathematical physics. I . F unctional analysis . Academic Press, New York-London, 1972

    1972

  28. [36]

    Generalized immediate exchange models and their symmetries

    Frank Redig and Federico Sau. Generalized immediate exchange models and their symmetries. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 127(10):3251--3267, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Mixing points on a circle

    Dana Randall and Peter Winkler. Mixing points on a circle. In Approximation, randomization and combinatorial optimization , volume 3624 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. , pages 426--435. Springer, Berlin, 2005

    2005

  30. [38]

    Universality of cutoff for exclusion with reservoirs

    Justin Salez. Universality of cutoff for exclusion with reservoirs. Ann. Probab. , 51(2):478--494, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Spectral gap and curvature of monotone M arkov chains

    Justin Salez. Spectral gap and curvature of monotone M arkov chains. Ann. Probab. , 52(3):1153--1161, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Spectral gap for stochastic energy exchange model with nonuniformly positive rate function

    Makiko Sasada. Spectral gap for stochastic energy exchange model with nonuniformly positive rate function. Ann. Probab. , 43(4):1663--1711, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Lectures on finite M arkov chains

    Laurent Saloff-Coste. Lectures on finite M arkov chains. In Lectures on probability theory and statistics ( S aint- F lour, 1996) , volume 1665 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 301--413. Springer, Berlin, 1997

    1996

  34. [42]

    A G ibbs sampler on the n -simplex

    Aaron Smith. A G ibbs sampler on the n -simplex. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 24(1):114--130, 2014

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.