Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Radiative E1 decays of X(3872)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1006.3363 v4 pith:ZSQ5U6CK submitted 2010-06-17 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords gammarightarrowcalculateddecayupsilonwidthsdataexperimental
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Radiative E1 decay widths of $\rm X(3872)$ are calculated through the relativistic Salpeter method, with the assumption that $\rm X(3872)$ is the $\chi_{c1}$(2P) state, which is the radial excited state of $\chi_{c1}$(1P). We firstly calculated the E1 decay width of $\chi_{c1}$(1P), the result is in agreement with experimental data excellently, then we calculated the case of $\rm X(3872)$ with the assignment that it is $\chi_{c1}$(2P). Results are: ${\Gamma}({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow \gamma \sl J/\psi)=33.0$ keV, ${\Gamma}({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow \gamma \psi(2S))=146$ keV and ${\Gamma}({\rm X(3872)}\rightarrow \gamma \psi(3770))=7.09$ keV. The ratio ${{\rm Br(X(3872)}\rightarrow\gamma\psi(2{\rm S}))}/{{\rm Br(X(3872)}\rightarrow \gamma {\sl J}/\psi)}=4.4$ agrees with experimental data by BaBar, but larger than the new up-bound reported by Belle recently. With the same method, we also predict the decay widths: ${\Gamma}(\chi_{b1}(1\rm P))\rightarrow \gamma \Upsilon(1\rm S))=30.0$ keV, ${\Gamma}(\chi_{b1}(2\rm P))\rightarrow \gamma \Upsilon(1\rm S))=5.65$ keV and ${\Gamma}(\chi_{b1}(2\rm P))\rightarrow \gamma \Upsilon(2S))=15.8$ keV, and the full widths: ${\Gamma}(\chi_{b1}(1\rm P))\sim 85.7$ keV, ${\Gamma}(\chi_{b1}(2\rm P))\sim 66.5$ keV.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QCD Sum Rule Analysis of Triply Heavy $(Q\bar{Q})(Q\bar{q})$ Tetraquark States with $J^P=0^{\pm}$

    hep-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QCD sum rule analysis predicts four (c cbar)(c qbar) tetraquark candidates with J^P=0+/- (4.76, 5.00, 5.04 and 5.37 GeV) and (b bbar)(b qbar) states near 13.8 to 14.2 GeV, with some expected to be narrow.

  2. Investigating triply heavy tetraquark states through QCD sum rules

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    QCD sum rules with condensates up to dimension 9 predict triply heavy tetraquark masses of 5.4 to 6.2 GeV for charm systems and 14.9 to 15.7 GeV for bottom systems.

  3. Heavy hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core couplings: a guide for practitioners

    hep-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    X(3872) is best described as a shallow D D* molecule in which one-pion exchange and a small charmonium core provide comparable attraction.

Pith tools