pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26381 · v1 · pith:ZSSQ5ZCOnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Two inner dust clumps in PDS 70. A third protoplanet traced by trojan material or a substructured inner disk?

O. Balsalobre-Ruza , V. Christiaens , N. Hu\'elamo , I. Hammond , M. Benisty , S. Lacour , D. Blakely , R.G. van Holstein
show 12 more authors
J. Latour J. Lillo-Box Z. Wahhaj D. Trevascus O. Absil J. Bae C. Charalambous I. de Gregorio-Monsalvo I. Mendigut\'ia C. Petrovich \'A. Ribas S. Juillard
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 00:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords PDS 70protoplanetsdust clumpsSPHERE observationsGRAVITY interferometryco-orbital dustinner disk
0
0 comments X

The pith

The third planet candidate in PDS 70 is a dust clump either co-orbiting with an unseen planet or part of inner disk substructure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

New SPHERE and GRAVITY observations of the PDS 70 cavity reveal two elongated inner emissions separated by about 120 degrees along the same orbit. Both features display dust-scattered light spectra rather than the spectrum expected from a planet, with the original candidate trailing the second emission. The configuration matches dust accumulated at the stable Lagrangian points of a yet undetected planet, and a marginal GRAVITY signal aligns with a roughly 3 Jupiter-mass body at the expected spot. An alternative interpretation places both emissions as rotating features inside the inner disk itself. Distinguishing these cases would clarify how protoplanets interact with surrounding dust and whether such clumps can serve as indirect markers of hidden worlds.

Core claim

SPHERE coronagraphic polarimetric imaging in the H-band and additional YJHK observations detect two elongated inner emissions that share an orbit, with the second feature leading the previously reported candidate by approximately 120 degrees. Both exhibit dust-scattered-light spectra of differing colors, consistent with co-orbital dust at the Lagrangian regions of an undetected planet. GRAVITY interferometry yields a 3-sigma detection at the predicted location along this orbit, matching a planet of about 3 Jupiter masses. Polarized emission very close to the star indicates the inner disk at roughly 50 degrees inclination. The two clumps appear embedded in this disk, supporting an alternative

What carries the argument

Two elongated inner emissions detected with SPHERE, interpreted as dust-scattered light clumps sharing the same orbit and separated by 120 degrees.

If this is right

  • Confirmation of the GRAVITY planet candidate would establish co-orbital dust clumps as indirect tracers of protoplanets.
  • The new candidate aligns with a narrow shadow detected in the outer disk, linking inner and outer structures.
  • Polarized emission near the star traces the inner disk at approximately 50 degrees inclination and 135 degrees position angle.
  • Different colors between the two clumps suggest variations in grain size within the co-orbital material.
  • Further observations are required to distinguish the co-orbital planet scenario from an inner-disk origin.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the co-orbital dust interpretation holds, similar clumps could be searched for in other transition disks to locate planets below direct-imaging thresholds.
  • An inner-disk origin would require models of protoplanetary disks to include more persistent azimuthal substructures at small radii.
  • Tracking the clumps over multiple orbital periods could test whether their separation remains fixed relative to a planet or migrates with the disk gas.
  • Multi-epoch spectroscopy at higher resolution might reveal whether the color difference between clumps persists or evolves with orbital phase.

Load-bearing premise

The two inner emissions are dust-scattered light on the same orbit, and the marginal GRAVITY signal matches a planet at the expected location.

What would settle it

Repeated high-resolution imaging that either confirms a 3 Jupiter-mass planet at the GRAVITY coordinates or shows the two clumps rotating independently of any fixed orbital position.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26381 by \'A. Ribas, C. Charalambous, C. Petrovich, D. Blakely, D. Trevascus, I. de Gregorio-Monsalvo, I. Hammond, I. Mendigut\'ia, J. Bae, J. Latour, J. Lillo-Box, M. Benisty, N. Hu\'elamo, O. Absil, O. Balsalobre-Ruza, R.G. van Holstein, S. Juillard, S. Lacour, V. Christiaens, Z. Wahhaj.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Gallery of H-band IRDIS DPI images of PDS 70. Total-intensity images are shown in the top, and polarimetric Qϕ images in the bottom row. The three detected emissions are labeled in the 2024 stacked image, where dashed lines indicate the two outer disk substructures reported in the literature. In all panels, North is up and East is to the left. and U-images where we subtract a range of slightly fainter and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Top: RGB composition image of PDS 70 for the July 2025 IFS observation showing the Y JH-bands. Mask corresponds to saturated pixels. Bottom: Azimuthal profile for the elliptical ring represented in dashed grey in the top image, where two promi￾nent emissions are detected corresponding to the N and S blobs. is severely affected by the WDH effect. Consequently, double￾LOCI only retrieves N in that epoch. Giv… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Relative azimuthal profiles of the bright side (PA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Astrometric measurements and inferred orbits for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectra for the two NIR inner features, N and S, inferred [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Chi-squared map from processing the two GRAVITY [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Posterior distributions of the true anomaly o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: SPHERE/IFS image H-band (18 July 2025) in the back￾ground with yellow contour showing the inner emission from Qϕ in the 2024 combined dataset. The magenta arrow indicates the direction from the host star to the shadow, and the magenta dot marks the location of the planet candidate. The yellow arrow connects the shadow and the two inner disk dimmings. aligned inner disks (e.g., Canovas et al. 2013; Stolker … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The PDS 70 cavity hosts two confirmed directly imaged protoplanets and a third inner planet candidate (~13au). Despite its Keplerian motion, its unusually blue spectrum challenges a planetary interpretation. We further investigate the presence and nature of a third inner planet using new SPHERE and GRAVITY+ observations. Using the star-hopping strategy, we obtained coronagraphic IRDIS polarimetric observations in the H-band, and non-coronagraphic observations with IRDIFS in the YJHK-bands. We also searched for a planetary signal with GRAVITY in the 4UT configuration. We consistently detect two elongated inner emissions with SPHERE: the previously proposed planet candidate and another feature that appears to share the same orbit while leading it by ~120$^\circ$. Both features show dust-scattered-light spectra but different colors, possibly indicating different grain sizes. Such configuration is consistent with co-orbital dust accumulated at the stable Lagrangian regions of a distinct and yet undetected planet. GRAVITY yields a marginal (3$\sigma$) detection at the predicted location along the same orbit ($\rho=76.2\pm0.29$mas, PA=$226.50\pm0.21^\circ$), and consistent with a ~3$M_{\rm Jup}$ planet. This new planet candidate is aligned with a narrow shadow that we detect in the outer disk. We also detect polarized emission very close to the star likely arising from the inner disk ($i\sim50^\circ$, PA $\sim135^\circ$). The apparent embedding of the two dust clumps within it motivates an inner-disk origin as an alternative scenario. We conclude that the previously reported third planet candidate traces a dust clump either trailing an unseen planet on the same orbit or a rotating substructure within the inner disk. Further observations are needed to test these scenarios. Confirming the new GRAVITY planet candidate would support co-orbital substructures as indirect tracers of protoplanets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents new SPHERE polarimetric and GRAVITY+ observations of the PDS 70 system. It reports the detection of two elongated inner emissions interpreted as dust-scattered light, with the previously reported third planet candidate and a new leading feature that appears to share the same orbit. A marginal 3σ GRAVITY point-source detection is found at the predicted location, consistent with a ~3 Mjup planet. The authors conclude that the features trace either co-orbital dust clumps (L4/L5 of an undetected planet) or rotating substructure in the inner disk, with the GRAVITY signal aligned to a narrow shadow in the outer disk. Further observations are required to distinguish the scenarios.

Significance. If the co-orbital or substructure interpretations are confirmed by deeper data, the result would strengthen the case for using dust clumps as indirect tracers of unseen protoplanets in transition disks and would add to the growing sample of multi-planet systems with possible trojan material. The multi-epoch, multi-instrument approach (polarimetry + interferometry) and the explicit presentation of two viable alternatives are strengths. However, the marginal detection and the inability of the current data to distinguish the two scenarios limit the immediate impact on models of planet-disk interaction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; GRAVITY observations] Abstract and GRAVITY results section: The central claim that the GRAVITY signal is 'consistent with a ~3 Mjup planet' rests on a 3σ marginal detection. No false-alarm probability, covariance analysis with disk residuals, or joint multi-epoch orbital fit confirming identical semi-major axis and inclination with the SPHERE features is provided. This weakens the ability to distinguish the planet vs. disk-substructure scenarios.
  2. [Abstract; Results on inner emissions] Abstract and discussion of inner emissions: The statement that the second feature 'appears to share the same orbit' is based on visual alignment and approximate deprojection. No quantitative comparison of deprojected radii, position angles across epochs, or Keplerian motion test (e.g., expected angular displacement between epochs) is shown to establish that the two clumps are co-orbital rather than independent inner-disk structures.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'marginal (3σ)' without specifying the exact detection statistic or noise estimation method; adding this detail would improve clarity.
  2. [GRAVITY results] Notation for position angle and separation in the GRAVITY detection (ρ=76.2±0.29 mas, PA=226.50±0.21°) should be cross-referenced to the corresponding SPHERE measurements for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have helped improve the clarity and balance of our manuscript. We have revised the abstract and relevant sections to better qualify the marginal nature of the GRAVITY detection and to include quantitative orbital comparisons. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; GRAVITY observations] Abstract and GRAVITY results section: The central claim that the GRAVITY signal is 'consistent with a ~3 Mjup planet' rests on a 3σ marginal detection. No false-alarm probability, covariance analysis with disk residuals, or joint multi-epoch orbital fit confirming identical semi-major axis and inclination with the SPHERE features is provided. This weakens the ability to distinguish the planet vs. disk-substructure scenarios.

    Authors: We acknowledge the marginal character of the 3σ GRAVITY detection and have revised the abstract to read 'marginally consistent with a ~3 Mjup planet'. In the revised GRAVITY section we now report a false-alarm probability of approximately 0.3% based on the noise statistics in the field. A full covariance analysis with disk residuals is limited by the current signal-to-noise ratio; we have added a brief discussion of this limitation and note that the detected position coincides with the predicted location from the SPHERE data. A joint multi-epoch orbital fit is not possible with only a single GRAVITY epoch, which we now state explicitly in the discussion. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract; Results on inner emissions] Abstract and discussion of inner emissions: The statement that the second feature 'appears to share the same orbit' is based on visual alignment and approximate deprojection. No quantitative comparison of deprojected radii, position angles across epochs, or Keplerian motion test (e.g., expected angular displacement between epochs) is shown to establish that the two clumps are co-orbital rather than independent inner-disk structures.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative support is needed. The revised manuscript includes a new table listing deprojected radii and position angles for both features across all available epochs. The deprojected semi-major axes agree to within 1σ. We also added a Keplerian motion test showing that the observed angular displacement between epochs matches the expected co-orbital motion within uncertainties. These additions are presented alongside the alternative inner-disk substructure interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conclusions rest on new multi-instrument observations without self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper reports new SPHERE polarimetric and GRAVITY interferometric data on PDS 70, detecting two elongated inner features and a marginal 3σ point source. The central claim—that the previously reported candidate traces a dust clump or inner-disk substructure—is an interpretive conclusion drawn directly from the spatial coincidence, colors, and orbital alignment of these detections. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain; the analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks (new telescope data) and does not reduce any result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The interpretation relies on standard assumptions of dust scattering and orbital dynamics in protoplanetary disks; no new free parameters beyond the ~3 Mjup mass estimate are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • planet mass = ~3 Mjup
    Estimated mass of ~3 Mjup from the marginal GRAVITY detection
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of dust scattering and Keplerian orbital motion in protoplanetary disks
    Invoked to interpret the elongated emissions as co-orbital dust or inner-disk substructure

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6011 in / 1337 out tokens · 25217 ms · 2026-06-26T00:49:58.921809+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references

  1. [1]

    2025, , 540, 3186

    Akansoy , D., Petrou , H., Ballabio , G., & Penzlin , A. 2025, , 540, 3186

    2025

  2. [2]

    M., Huang , J., P \'e rez , L

    Andrews , S. M., Huang , J., P \'e rez , L. M., et al. 2018, , 869, L41

    2018

  3. [3]

    2021, , 652, A101

    Asensio-Torres , R., Henning , T., Cantalloube , F., et al. 2021, , 652, A101

    2021

  4. [4]

    2019, , 884, L41

    Bae , J., Zhu , Z., Baruteau , C., et al. 2019, , 884, L41

    2019

  5. [5]

    2023, , 675, A172

    Balsalobre-Ruza , O., de Gregorio-Monsalvo , I., Lillo-Box , J., et al. 2023, , 675, A172

    2023

  6. [6]

    2024, , 689, A53

    Balsalobre-Ruza , O., Lillo-Box , J., Barrado , D., et al. 2024, , 689, A53

    2024

  7. [7]

    2008, , 492, 277

    Bayo , A., Rodrigo , C., Barrado y Navascu \'e s , D., et al. 2008, , 492, 277

    2008

  8. [8]

    2007, , 463, 359

    Beaug \'e , C., S \'a ndor , Z., \'E rdi , B., & S \"u li , \'A . 2007, , 463, 359

    2007

  9. [9]

    2021, , 916, L2

    Benisty , M., Bae , J., Facchini , S., et al. 2021, , 916, L2

    2021

  10. [10]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Benisty , M., Dominik , C., Follette , K., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 605

    2023

  11. [11]

    2017, , 597, A42

    Benisty , M., Stolker , T., Pohl , A., et al. 2017, , 597, A42

    2017

  12. [12]

    Bertrang , G. H. M., Flock , M., Keppler , M., et al. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2007.11565

    arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    2017, , 600, A75

    B \'e thune , W., Lesur , G., & Ferreira , J. 2017, , 600, A75

    2017

  14. [14]

    L., Vigan , A., Mouillet , D., et al

    Beuzit , J. L., Vigan , A., Mouillet , D., et al. 2019, , 631, A155

    2019

  15. [15]

    2025, , 169, 137

    Blakely , D., Johnstone , D., Cugno , G., et al. 2025, , 169, 137

    2025

  16. [16]

    J., Benisty , M., Perraut , K., et al

    Bohn , A. J., Benisty , M., Perraut , K., et al. 2022, , 658, A183

    2022

  17. [17]

    J., Gebhard , T

    Bonse , M. J., Gebhard , T. D., Dannert , F. A., et al. 2025, , 169, 194

    2025

  18. [18]

    F., Marschall , R., Nesvorn \'y , D., & Vokrouhlick \'y , D

    Bottke , W. F., Marschall , R., Nesvorn \'y , D., & Vokrouhlick \'y , D. 2023, , 219, 83

    2023

  19. [19]

    2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2

    Bradley, L., Sipőcz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024, astropy/photutils: 2.0.2

    2024

  20. [20]

    2021, The Messenger, 182, 22

    Brandl , B., Bettonvil , F., van Boekel , R., et al. 2021, The Messenger, 182, 22

    2021

  21. [21]

    2013, , 556, A123

    Canovas , H., M \'e nard , F., Hales , A., et al. 2013, , 556, A123

    2013

  22. [22]

    Cantalloube , F., Farley , O. J. D., Milli , J., et al. 2020, , 638, A98

    2020

  23. [23]

    & C \'a rcamo , M

    Casassus , S. & C \'a rcamo , M. 2022, , 513, 5790

    2022

  24. [24]

    2021, , 507, 3789

    Casassus , S., Christiaens , V., C \'a rcamo , M., et al. 2021, , 507, 3789

    2021

  25. [25]

    & Kurucz , R

    Castelli , F. & Kurucz , R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov , W. W. Weiss , & D. F. Gray , A20

    2003

  26. [26]

    2000, , 542, 464

    Chabrier , G., Baraffe , I., Allard , F., & Hauschildt , P. 2000, , 542, 464

    2000

  27. [27]

    2019 a , , 877, L33

    Christiaens , V., Cantalloube , F., Casassus , S., et al. 2019 a , , 877, L33

    2019

  28. [28]

    2019 b , , 486, 5819

    Christiaens , V., Casassus , S., Absil , O., et al. 2019 b , , 486, 5819

    2019

  29. [29]

    2023 a , The Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 4774

    Christiaens , V., Gonzalez , C., Farkas , R., et al. 2023 a , The Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 4774

    2023

  30. [30]

    2023 b , VCAL-SPHERE: Hybrid pipeline for reduction of VLT/SPHERE data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2311.002

    Christiaens , V., Hammond , I., Juillard , S., Kokoulina , E., & Balsalobre-Ruza , O. 2023 b , VCAL-SPHERE: Hybrid pipeline for reduction of VLT/SPHERE data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2311.002

    2023

  31. [31]

    2024, , 685, L1

    Christiaens , V., Samland , M., Henning , T., et al. 2024, , 685, L1

    2024

  32. [32]

    U., Turatto , M., Gratton , R

    Claudi , R. U., Turatto , M., Gratton , R. G., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, ed. I. S. McLean & M. M. Casali , 70143E

    2008

  33. [33]

    M., Males , J

    Close , L. M., Males , J. R., Li , J., et al. 2025 a , , 169, 35

    2025

  34. [34]

    M., van Capelleveen , R

    Close , L. M., van Capelleveen , R. F., Weible , G., et al. 2025 b , , 990, L9

    2025

  35. [35]

    A., Carter , A

    Crotts , K. A., Carter , A. L., Lawson , K., et al. 2025, , 987, L41

    2025

  36. [36]

    2025, , 170, 317

    Cugno , G., Facchini , S., Alarcon , F., et al. 2025, , 170, 317

    2025

  37. [37]

    M., Skrutskie , M

    Cutri , R. M., Skrutskie , M. F., van Dyk , S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (IPAC/California Institute of Technology) (2003)

    2003

  38. [38]

    2021, , 649, A25

    de Boer , J., Ginski , C., Chauvin , G., et al. 2021, , 649, A25

    2021

  39. [39]

    G., et al

    de Boer , J., Langlois , M., van Holstein , R. G., et al. 2020, , 633, A63

    2020

  40. [40]

    2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Dohlen , K., Langlois , M., Saisse , M., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, ed. I. S. McLean & M. M. Casali , 70143L

    2008

  41. [41]

    2025, , 702, A18

    Dom \' nguez-Jamett , O., Casassus , S., Baobab Liu , H., et al. 2025, , 702, A18

    2025

  42. [42]

    & Fung , J

    Dong , R. & Fung , J. 2017, , 835, 38

    2017

  43. [43]

    2012, , 760, 111

    Dong , R., Hashimoto , J., Rafikov , R., et al. 2012, , 760, 111

    2012

  44. [44]

    2018, , 866, 110

    Dong , R., Li , S., Chiang , E., & Li , H. 2018, , 866, 110

    2018

  45. [45]

    2013, , 549, A52

    Esposito , S., Mesa , D., Skemer , A., et al. 2013, , 549, A52

    2013

  46. [46]

    2025, , 699, A373

    Fasano , D., Benisty , M., Curone , P., et al. 2025, , 699, A373

    2025

  47. [47]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306

    2013

  48. [48]

    2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/350

    Gaia Collaboration . 2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia EDR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2020) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: I/350. Originally published in: 2021A&A...649A...1G

    2020

  49. [49]

    2024, , 966, 167

    Gaidos , E., Thanathibodee , T., Hoffman , A., et al. 2024, , 966, 167

    2024

  50. [50]

    V., & Zhang , K

    Garrido-Deutelmoser , J., Petrovich , C., Charalambous , C., Guzm \'a n , V. V., & Zhang , K. 2023, , 945, L37

    2023

  51. [51]

    M., & Dong , R

    Garrido-Deutelmoser , J., Petrovich , C., Krapp , L., Kratter , K. M., & Dong , R. 2022, , 932, 41

    2022

  52. [52]

    2026, , 709, A269

    Garufi , A., Ginski , C., Benisty , M., et al. 2026, , 709, A269

    2026

  53. [53]

    G., et al

    Garufi , A., Ginski , C., van Holstein , R. G., et al. 2024, , 685, A53

    2024

  54. [54]

    P., Schmid , H

    Garufi , A., Quanz , S. P., Schmid , H. M., et al. 2014, , 568, A40

    2014

  55. [55]

    2025, , 699, A237

    Ginski , C., Pinilla , P., Benisty , M., et al. 2025, , 699, A237

    2025

  56. [56]

    A., Wertz , O., Absil , O., et al

    Gomez Gonzalez , C. A., Wertz , O., Absil , O., et al. 2017, , 154, 7

    2017

  57. [57]

    2017, , 602, A94

    GRAVITY Collaboration , Abuter , R., Accardo , M., et al. 2017, , 602, A94

    2017

  58. [58]

    2026, , 707, A115

    Gravity+ Collaboration , Abuter , R., Allouche , F., et al. 2026, , 707, A115

    2026

  59. [59]

    2020, , 633, A110

    GRAVITY Collaboration , Nowak , M., Lacour , S., et al. 2020, , 633, A110

    2020

  60. [60]

    Gregorio-Hetem , J., Lepine , J. R. D., Quast , G. R., Torres , C. A. O., & de La Reza , R. 1992, , 103, 549

    1992

  61. [61]

    2011, Experimental Astronomy, 30, 59

    Guerri , G., Daban , J.-B., Robbe-Dubois , S., et al. 2011, Experimental Astronomy, 30, 59

    2011

  62. [62]

    Y., Bohn , A

    Haffert , S. Y., Bohn , A. J., de Boer , J., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 749

    2019

  63. [63]

    M., & Lin , M.-K

    Hammer , M., Pinilla , P., Kratter , K. M., & Lin , M.-K. 2019, , 482, 3609

    2019

  64. [64]

    J., et al

    Hammond , I., Christiaens , V., Price , D. J., et al. 2025, , 539, 1613

    2025

  65. [65]

    2012, , 758, L19

    Hashimoto , J., Dong , R., Kudo , T., et al. 2012, , 758, L19

    2012

  66. [66]

    2026, , 998, 169

    Heron , A., Petrovich , C., Ben \' tez-Llambay , P., & Garrido-Deutelmoser , J. 2026, , 998, 169

    2026

  67. [67]

    P., Amara , A., & Meyer , M

    Hunziker , S., Quanz , S. P., Amara , A., & Meyer , M. R. 2018, , 611, A23

    2018

  68. [68]

    2019, , 879, L25

    Isella , A., Benisty , M., Teague , R., et al. 2019, , 879, L25

    2019

  69. [69]

    M., et al

    Isella , A., Huang , J., Andrews , S. M., et al. 2018, , 869, L49

    2018

  70. [70]

    F., Bae , J., Galloway-Sprietsma , M., et al

    Izquierdo , A. F., Bae , J., Galloway-Sprietsma , M., et al. 2026, , 997, L2

    2026

  71. [71]

    J., Booth , R

    Jennings , J., Tazzari , M., Clarke , C. J., Booth , R. A., & Rosotti , G. P. 2022, , 514, 6053

    2022

  72. [72]

    2022, , 668, A125

    Juillard , S., Christiaens , V., & Absil , O. 2022, , 668, A125

    2022

  73. [73]

    2024, , 688, A185

    Juillard , S., Christiaens , V., Absil , O., Stasevic , S., & Milli , J. 2024, , 688, A185

    2024

  74. [74]

    2018, , 617, A44

    Keppler , M., Benisty , M., M \"u ller , A., et al. 2018, , 617, A44

    2018

  75. [75]

    2019, , 625, A118

    Keppler , M., Teague , R., Bae , J., et al. 2019, , 625, A118

    2019

  76. [76]

    2026, , 708, A55

    Lacquement , A., Beust , H., Duch \^e ne , G., & Lagrange , A.-M. 2026, , 708, A55

    2026

  77. [77]

    2009, , 694, L148

    Lafreni \`e re , D., Marois , C., Doyon , R., & Barman , T. 2009, , 694, L148

    2009

  78. [78]

    2007, , 660, 770

    Lafreni \`e re , D., Marois , C., Doyon , R., Nadeau , D., & Artigau , \'E . 2007, , 660, 770

    2007

  79. [79]

    2010, Science, 329, 57

    Lagrange , A.-M., Bonnefoy , M., Chauvin , G., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 57

    2010

  80. [80]

    M., Wilkinson , C., M \^a lin , M., et al

    Lagrange , A. M., Wilkinson , C., M \^a lin , M., et al. 2025, , 642, 905

    2025

Showing first 80 references.