Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A first Chandra view of the cool core cluster A1668: offset cooling and AGN feedback cycle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.11299 v1 pith:ZT2575PJ submitted 2021-02-22 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

A first Chandra view of the cool core cluster A1668: offset cooling and AGN feedback cycle

classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords coolingoffsetradiotextx-raya1668alphacavity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a multi-wavelength analysis of the galaxy cluster A1668, performed by means of new EVLA and Chandra observations and archival H$\alpha$ data. The radio images exhibit a small central source ($\sim$14 kpc at 1.4 GHz) with L$_{\text{1.4 GHz}}$ $\sim$6 $\cdot$ 10$^{23}$ W Hz$^{-1}$. The mean spectral index between 1.4 GHz and 5 GHz is $\sim$ -1, consistent with the usual indices found in BCGs. The cooling region extends for 40 kpc, with bolometric X-ray luminosity L$_{\text{cool}} = 1.9\pm 0.1 \cdot$ 10$^{43}$ erg s$^{-1}$. We detect an offset of $\sim$ 6 kpc between the cluster BCG and the X-ray peak, and another offset of $\sim$ 7.6 kpc between the H$\alpha$ and the X-ray peaks. We discuss possible causes for these offsets, which suggest that the coolest gas is not condensing directly from the lowest-entropy gas. In particular, we argue that the cool ICM was drawn out from the core by sloshing, whereas the H$\alpha$ filaments were pushed aside from the expanding radio galaxy lobes. We detect two putative X-ray cavities, spatially associated to the west radio lobe (cavity A) and to the east radio lobe (cavity B). The cavity power and age of the system are P$_{\text{cav}} \sim$ 9 $\times$10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and t$_{\text{age}} \sim$5.2 Myr, respectively. Evaluating the position of A1668 in the cooling luminosity-cavity power parameter space, we find that the AGN energy injection is currently consistent within the scatter of the relationship, suggesting that offset cooling is likely not breaking the AGN feedback cycle.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.