pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.19788 · v4 · pith:ZTSA57GOnew · submitted 2025-12-22 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex

J.I. Collar , Ivan Esteban , J.J. Gomez-Cadenas , M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia , L. Ji , L. Larizgoitia , C.M. Lewis , F. Monrabal
show 3 more authors
Jo\~ao Paulo Pinheiro A. Sim\'on S.G. Yoon
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 20:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords CEνNSJ-PARCspallation sourceneutrino scatteringbeyond standard modeldetector sensitivityproton beam
0
0 comments X

The pith

Very-high-statistics CEνNS measurements with sensitivity to particle physics scenarios are feasible at J-PARC within the next few years.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the potential for Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering experiments at the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex. J-PARC's Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility offers the highest neutron yield of any spallation source due to its powerful proton beam. Using examples of detector technologies already funded for construction, the authors project that high-statistics data collection is possible soon. These measurements would provide significant sensitivity to various beyond-standard-model scenarios in neutrino physics. This approach leverages existing infrastructure to advance tests of fundamental interactions without requiring entirely new facilities.

Core claim

J-PARC currently delivers a 1 MW, 3 GeV proton beam to the MLF with plans to increase to 1.3 MW, providing the highest neutron yield among spallation sources. Using detector technologies presently funded for construction, very-high-statistics CEνNS measurements become feasible within the next few years and deliver significant sensitivity to a rich variety of particle physics scenarios.

What carries the argument

Sensitivity projections for CEνNS at the J-PARC MLF spallation source, driven by the proton beam flux and modeled detector performance at 1.3 MW power.

If this is right

  • High-statistics CEνNS data will constrain neutrino non-standard interactions and other beyond-standard-model effects.
  • The measurements can test for sterile neutrinos and related particle physics scenarios with competitive reach.
  • Precise rates will inform nuclear form factors and parameters of the weak interaction.
  • The facility conditions allow very high event yields using detectors already under development.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These results could serve as an independent cross-check on CEνNS measurements performed at reactor sources.
  • Demonstrated sensitivity might encourage similar programs at other high-power spallation facilities.
  • If achieved, the data volume would enable searches for light dark matter or other exotic particles through CEνNS channels.

Load-bearing premise

Detector performance, background levels, and the planned beam power increase to 1.3 MW will match the modeled expectations used in the sensitivity projections.

What would settle it

Significantly lower event rates than projected after several years of detector operation at the upgraded 1.3 MW beam power, due to higher backgrounds or reduced efficiency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.19788 by A. Sim\'on, C.M. Lewis, F. Monrabal, Ivan Esteban, J.I. Collar, J.J. Gomez-Cadenas, Jo\~ao Paulo Pinheiro, L. Ji, L. Larizgoitia, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, S.G. Yoon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison between past and present (black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Rendition of the Geant4 geometry for the cryogenic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Beam-associated (non-subtractable) and sub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Lateral cut of the GanESS detector design, consisting of two symmetrical TPCs with the cathode in the center of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Up: Error on the reconstruction of the z-position of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Predicted event distribution as a function of the reconstructed recoil energy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Expected allowed regions in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the neutron skin thickness for 208Pb, de￾rived from the analysis in Ref. [144] of the results of the Lead Radius Experiment (PREX) experiment [146, 147] on parity-violation in electron scattering which, as men￾tioned above contains certain model dependence. In this figure we also show the best-fit for the neutron skin ob￾tained from its indirect determination from antiprotonic X-ray data for a variet… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Expected allowed regions in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Expected excluded regions in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Expected allowed regions in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Expected excluded regions in the (sin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC) currently delivers a 1 MW, 3 GeV proton beam to the Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility (MLF). Power is expected to increase to 1.3 MW, driven by the needs of Hyper-Kamiokande. As a result, the MLF presently provides the highest neutron yield of any spallation source, while potentially holding the best current and foreseeable conditions for Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CE$\nu$NS) experimentation. We explore this potential, using as examples detector technologies presently funded for construction and under development. We quantify their sensitivity to a rich variety of particle physics scenarios, finding that very-high-statistics CE$\nu$NS measurements with significant sensitivity to relevant scenarios are feasible at this facility within the next few years.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript evaluates the prospects for high-statistics Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CEνNS) measurements at the J-PARC MLF spallation source. It projects that the planned increase in beam power from 1 MW to 1.3 MW, combined with detector technologies already funded for construction, will enable very-high-statistics CEνNS data sets within a few years and deliver meaningful sensitivity to a range of beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.

Significance. If the background and efficiency projections hold, the work would establish J-PARC as a competitive or leading site for precision CEνNS physics, providing statistics that could meaningfully constrain neutrino magnetic moments, non-standard interactions, and related parameters. The grounding in presently funded detector projects is a concrete strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2 and Table 3] §4.2 and Table 3: The central claim of 'very-high-statistics' CEνNS within the next few years rests on background rates (spallation neutrons and cosmics) and detector efficiencies that are extrapolated to 1.3 MW operation. The text provides no explicit uncertainty bands or validation against existing 1 MW data for these scalings, so a factor-of-two excursion in background would directly undermine the projected event yields and sensitivity reaches.
  2. [§3.1] §3.1: Quenching factors and veto efficiencies are taken from literature or preliminary measurements; the sensitivity curves do not include a systematic variation of these parameters under the higher beam-power conditions, which is load-bearing for the feasibility timeline.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the beam-power scaling arrow is not numerically labeled, making it difficult to connect the plotted rates to the 1.3 MW assumption used in the text.
  2. [§2] §2: A short paragraph summarizing the current measured background levels at 1 MW would help readers assess the extrapolation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of uncertainties and robustness checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2 and Table 3] §4.2 and Table 3: The central claim of 'very-high-statistics' CEνNS within the next few years rests on background rates (spallation neutrons and cosmics) and detector efficiencies that are extrapolated to 1.3 MW operation. The text provides no explicit uncertainty bands or validation against existing 1 MW data for these scalings, so a factor-of-two excursion in background would directly undermine the projected event yields and sensitivity reaches.

    Authors: We agree that explicit uncertainty quantification strengthens the projections. Background rates scale linearly with beam power, and the underlying Geant4 simulations of neutron production and cosmic-ray backgrounds have been cross-checked against existing 1 MW data from the MLF. In the revised manuscript we will add uncertainty bands (nominal ±30% on spallation neutrons, ±20% on cosmics) to §4.2 and Table 3, together with sensitivity curves for a conservative case in which backgrounds are doubled. These additions will show that the very-high-statistics regime remains accessible within a few years even under pessimistic assumptions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.1] §3.1: Quenching factors and veto efficiencies are taken from literature or preliminary measurements; the sensitivity curves do not include a systematic variation of these parameters under the higher beam-power conditions, which is load-bearing for the feasibility timeline.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Quenching factors and veto efficiencies are detector-intrinsic quantities whose uncertainties are taken from the cited measurements; beam power affects only the neutrino flux. In the revision we will add a systematic variation of these parameters within their reported uncertainties (typically 10–20%) to §3.1 and propagate the variations into the sensitivity curves as shaded bands. This will explicitly demonstrate the robustness of the projected reaches to BSM scenarios. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; sensitivity projections rely on external models and assumptions

full rationale

The paper is a forward-looking sensitivity study that quantifies CEνNS reach at J-PARC/MLF using detector technologies under development and projected beam power increases to 1.3 MW. All load-bearing inputs (beam parameters, background rates, quenching factors, veto efficiencies) are taken from external specifications or Monte Carlo modeling rather than being fitted to the paper's own data and then relabeled as predictions. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input-as-prediction steps, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The central claim of feasible high-statistics measurements is therefore an extrapolation under stated assumptions, not a tautology constructed from the paper's own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to standard assumptions typical of neutrino sensitivity studies; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are explicitly introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard Model CEνNS cross-section formulas
    Used to compute expected event rates from the neutrino flux.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1042 out tokens · 27677 ms · 2026-05-16T20:16:24.798879+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cryogenic pure CsI as a probe for neutrino electromagnetic interactions

    hep-ex 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Cryogenic pure CsI converts the suppression of nuclear recoil ionization into a selective probe for neutrino-electron scattering, enabling better constraints on neutrino electromagnetic couplings at reactor sites.

  2. Phenomenological implications of the high-precision COHERENT germanium CE$\nu$NS data

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-precision COHERENT germanium CEνNS data yields state-of-the-art constraints on the weak mixing angle, neutrino charge radii, germanium neutron radius, and non-standard neutrino interactions via global analysis wi...

  3. Phenomenological implications of the high-precision COHERENT germanium CE$\nu$NS data

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Analysis of new COHERENT germanium CEνNS data yields updated constraints on the weak mixing angle, neutrino charge radii, germanium neutron rms radius, and bounds on neutrino non-standard interactions via global fits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 149 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 51 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The beam power is assumed to be 1.3 MW and the proton energy 3 GeV, as discussed in Sec. I. We assume 3 years of running time and an exposure of 3,600 hr per calendar year due to periods of main- tenance at the facility [121–123]. Thus Np ≃3.5·10 22 P 1.3 MW 3 GeV Ep trun yr

    work page

  2. [2]

    We assumef π/p = 0.44, as discussed in Sec. II

    work page

  3. [3]

    A number of possible detector locations can be envi- sioned at this distance within the third floor terrace of the MLF [38, 39]

    The detector distance to the target is set to 20 m. A number of possible detector locations can be envi- sioned at this distance within the third floor terrace of the MLF [38, 39]

    work page

  4. [4]

    The detection efficiency is assumed to be a step function at threshold, with a conservative 80% ac- ceptance. In the SM, the differential cross section for CEνNS of να on a nucleus of massMconsisting ofZprotons and Nneutrons reads [1]: dσα dT = G2 F 2π Q2 W,α 2 |F(Q 2)|2M 1− M T 2E2ν − T Eν + T 2 2E2ν , (5.11) whereE ν is the incident neutrino energy,GF i...

    work page

  5. [5]

    hysteresis type phenomenon

    plane at the 90% confidence level (C.L.) for two d.o.f. (∆χ2 2 = 4.61).Left:The different regions correspond to the expected results for the different detectors listed in Table II, as indicated by the legend. In all cases, the simulated data has been generated for the SM, and the results are then fitted assuming arbitrary values of the the two oscillation...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033

  6. [6]

    Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering

    D.Z. Freedman,Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current,Phys. Rev. D 9(1974) 1389. [2]COHERENTcollaboration,Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,Science357 (2017) 1123 [1708.01294]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1974

  7. [7]

    Scholz,First Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Ph.D

    B.J. Scholz,First Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Ph.D. thesis, Chicago U., 2017.1904.01155. 10.1007/978-3-319-99747-6. 20

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99747-6 2017

  8. [8]

    Avignone and Y.V

    F.T. Avignone and Y.V. Efremenko,Neutrino nucleus cross-section measurements at intense, pulsed spallation sources,J. Phys. G29(2003) 2615

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Opportunities for Neutrino Physics at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS)

    Y. Efremenko and W.R. Hix,Opportunities for Neutrino Physics at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS),J. Phys. Conf. Ser.173(2009) 012006 [0807.2801]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering detection with a CsI[Na] scintillator at the SNS spallation source

    J.I. Collar et al.,Coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering detection with a CsI[Na] scintillator at the SNS spallation source,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A773(2015) 56 [1407.7524]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Fields, Ph.D

    N.E. Fields, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, 2014

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Natti, ´E.R.T

    G.T. Natti, ´E.R.T. Natti and P.L. Natti,Industrial Applications of Neutrinos,Braz. J. Phys.54(2024) 241 [2503.11686]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Drukier and L

    A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky,Principles and Applications of a Neutral Current Detector for Neutrino Physics and Astronomy,Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 2295

    work page 1984

  14. [14]

    Colaresi, J

    J. Colaresi, J.I. Collar, T.W. Hossbach, C.M. Lewis and K.M. Yocum,Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering from Reactor Antineutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 211802 [2202.09672]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    First observation of reactor antineutrinos by coherent scattering,

    N. Ackermann et al.,Direct observation of coherent elastic antineutrino–nucleus scattering,Nature643 (2025) 1229 [2501.05206]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Y. Li, G. Herrera and P. Huber,New Physics versus Quenching Factors in Coherent Neutrino Scattering, 2502.12308

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Collar and C.M

    J.I. Collar and C.M. Lewis,Comments on ”Direct measurement of the ionization quenching factor of nuclear recoils in germanium in the keV energy range”, 2203.00750. [14]XENONcollaboration,First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 191002 [2408.02877]. [15]PandaXcollaborati...

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments,

    V. De Romeri, D.K. Papoulias and C.A. Ternes, Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments,JCAP05 (2025) 012 [2411.11749]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CEνNS,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, N. Mishra and L. Strigari, Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CEνNS,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 055007 [2409.02003]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Baxter et al., Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scat- tering at the European Spallation Source, JHEP 02, 123, arXiv:1911.00762 [physics.ins-det]

    D. Baxter et al.,Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the European Spallation Source,JHEP 02(2020) 123 [1911.00762]. [20]ESSnuSBcollaboration,The ESSnuSB Design Study: Overview and Future Prospects,Universe9(2023) 347 [2303.17356]. [21]https://j-parc.jp/c/en/press-release/2024/05/3 1001348.html

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Abeleet al., Phys

    H. Abele et al.,Particle Physics at the European Spallation Source,Phys. Rept.1023(2023) 1 [2211.10396]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Kelly, P.A.N

    K.J. Kelly, P.A.N. Machado, A. Marchionni and Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez,LEvEL: Low-Energy Neutrino Experiment at the LHC,JHEP08(2021) 087 [2103.00009]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Technical Design Report (TDR): Searching for a Sterile Neutrino at J-PARC MLF (E56, JSNS2)

    K. Scholberg, inhttp://www-kam2.icrr.u-tokyo.ac. jp/indico/event/3/program. [25]JSNS2collaboration,Technical Design Report (TDR): Searching for a Sterile Neutrino at J-PARC MLF (E56, JSNS2),1705.08629

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Bres´ o-Pla, S

    V. Bres´ o-Pla, S. Cruz-Alzaga, M. Gonz´ alez-Alonso and S. Prakash,Muon-Decay Parameters from COHERENT,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 131802 [2502.18175]. [27]JSNS2collaboration,Proposal: A Search for Sterile Neutrino at J-PARC Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility,1310.1437. [28]COHERENTcollaboration,A D 2O detector for flux normalization of a pio...

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Pelowitzet al., 2011 MCNPX User’s Manual Version 2.7.0 LA-CP-11-00438

    D. Pelowitzet al., 2011 MCNPX User’s Manual Version 2.7.0 LA-CP-11-00438. [30]JSNS2collaboration,The first JSNS 2 measurement of electron neutrino flux using 12C(ν e, e−)12Ng.s. reaction,2412.18509. [31]GEANT4collaboration,GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

    work page arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    Gordon, P

    M.S. Gordon, P. Goldhagen, K.P. Rodbell, T.H. Zabel, H.H.K. Tang, J.M. Clem et al.,Measurement of the flux and energy spectrum of cosmic-ray induced neutrons on the ground,IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.51 (2004) 3427

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    Z. Hu, L. Ge, J. Sun, Y. Zhang, Z. Cui, G. Gorini et al.,Measurements of cosmic ray induced background neutrons near the ground using a bonner sphere spectrometer,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 940(2019) 78

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Sato,Analytical Model for Estimating the Zenith Angle Dependence of Terrestrial Cosmic Ray Fluxes, PLoS One11(2016) e0160390

    T. Sato,Analytical Model for Estimating the Zenith Angle Dependence of Terrestrial Cosmic Ray Fluxes, PLoS One11(2016) e0160390

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Malgin,Characteristics of neutrons produced by muons in a standard rock,Phys

    A.S. Malgin,Characteristics of neutrons produced by muons in a standard rock,Phys. Atom. Nucl.78 (2015) 835

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Kluck,Measurement of the Cosmic-Induced Neutron Yield at the Modane Underground Laboratory, Ph.D

    H.M. Kluck,Measurement of the Cosmic-Induced Neutron Yield at the Modane Underground Laboratory, Ph.D. thesis, KIT, Karlsruhe, 2013. 10.1007/978-3-319-18527-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18527-9 2013

  31. [31]

    Lewis,Particle physics in the sub-keV energy regime, Ph.D

    C.M. Lewis,Particle physics in the sub-keV energy regime, Ph.D. thesis, U. Chicago, 2023.2310.01314. 10.6082/uchicago.5730

    work page doi:10.6082/uchicago.5730 2023

  32. [32]

    Lee athttps: //indico.phy.ornl.gov/event/217/contributions/

    Presentation by D. Lee athttps: //indico.phy.ornl.gov/event/217/contributions/

    work page

  33. [33]

    S. Ajimura et al.,On-site background measurements for the J-PARC E56 experiment: A search for the sterile neutrino at J-PARC MLF,Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2015(2015) 63C01

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Gardiner,Simulating low-energy neutrino interactions with MARLEY,Comput

    S. Gardiner,Simulating low-energy neutrino interactions with MARLEY,Comput. Phys. Commun. 269(2021) 108123 [2101.11867]. 21

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Low energy neutrino scattering measurements at future Spallation Source facilities

    R. Lazauskas and C. Volpe,Low energy neutrino scattering measurements at future Spallation Source facilities,J. Phys. G37(2010) 125101 [1004.0310]. [42]COHERENTcollaboration,Measurement of Pbnat(νe,Xn) production with a stopped-pion neutrino source,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 072001 [2212.11295]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Matteucci,Cryogenic sipms for the optical readout of darkside-20k,Journal of Instrumentation20(2025) C06010

    G. Matteucci,Cryogenic sipms for the optical readout of darkside-20k,Journal of Instrumentation20(2025) C06010

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Barbeau et al.Phys

    P.S. Barbeau et al.Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 092005 [2311.13032]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    C. Su, Q. Liu and T. LiangPhys. Sci. Forum8(2023) 19 [2303.13423]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Lewis and J.I

    C.M. Lewis and J.I. Collar,Response of undoped cryogenic CsI to low-energy nuclear recoils,Phys. Rev. C104(2021) 014612 [https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03264]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Collar, C.M

    J.I. Collar, C.M. Lewis, A. Sim´ on and S.G. Yoon, Scintillation response of cryogenic CsI to few-keV and sub-keV nuclear recoils,2512.09820

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    McClish, R

    M. McClish, R. Farrell, F. Olschner, M. Squillante, G. Entine and K. Shah,Characterization of very large silicon avalanche photodiodes, inIEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004., vol. 2, pp. 1270–1273 Vol. 2, 2004, DOI

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Enhancement of Light Yield and Stability of Radio-Pure Tetraphenyl-Butadiene Based Coatings for VUV Light Detection in Cryogenic Environments

    L. Baudis, G. Benato, R. Dressler, F. Piastra, I. Usoltsev and M. Walter,Enhancement of Light Yield and Stability of Radio-Pure Tetraphenyl-Butadiene Based Coatings for VUV Light Detection in Cryogenic Environments,JINST10(2015) P09009 [1503.05349]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Araujo, T

    G.R. Araujo, T. Pollmann and A. Ulrich, Photoluminescence response of acrylic (PMMA) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to ultraviolet light, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 653 [1905.03044]. [51]DarkSide-20kcollaboration,Production of the DarkSide-20k photo-detectors,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1068(2024) 169723

    work page arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SICCAS), 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai 200050, China

    work page

  45. [45]

    Collar, A.R.L

    J.I. Collar, A.R.L. Kavner and C.M. LewisPhys. Rev. D103(2021) 122003 [arXiv:2102.10089]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Large-Mass Ultra-Low Noise Germanium Detectors: Performance and Applications in Neutrino and Astroparticle Physics

    P.S. Barbeau, J.I. Collar and O. Tench,Large-Mass Ultra-Low Noise Germanium Detectors: Performance and Applications in Neutrino and Astroparticle Physics,JCAP09(2007) 009 [https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-ex/0701012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    Colaresi, J

    J. Colaresi, J.I. Collar, T.W. Hossbach, A.R.L. Kavner, C.M. Lewis, A.E. Robinson et al., First results from a search for coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering at a reactor site,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 072003 [2108.02880]. [56]NEXTcollaboration,The NEXT-100 Detector, 2505.17848. [57]NEXTcollaboration,The Next White (NEW) Detector,JINST13(2018) P12010...

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Future perspectives for a weak mixing angle measurement in coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering experiments

    B.C. Ca˜ nas, E.A. Garc´ es, O.G. Miranda and A. Parada,Future perspectives for a weak mixing angle measurement in coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering experiments,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 159 [1806.01310]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Reinterpreting the weak mixing angle from atomic parity violation in view of the Cs neutron rms radius measurement from COHERENT

    M. Cadeddu and F. Dordei,Reinterpreting the weak mixing angle from atomic parity violation in view of the Cs neutron rms radius measurement from COHERENT,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 033010 [1808.10202]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Huang and L.-W

    X.-R. Huang and L.-W. Chen,Neutron Skin in CsI and Low-Energy Effective Weak Mixing Angle from COHERENT Data,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 071301 [1902.07625]

    work page arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Cadeddu, F

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y.F. Li and Y.Y. Zhang,Neutrino, electroweak, and nuclear physics from COHERENT elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering with refined quenching factor,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 033004 [1908.06045]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Cadeddu, F

    M. Cadeddu, F. Dordei, C. Giunti, Y.F. Li, E. Picciau and Y.Y. Zhang,Physics results from the first COHERENT observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in argon and their combination with cesium-iodide data,Phys. Rev. D 102(2020) 015030 [2005.01645]

    work page arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Cadeddu, N

    M. Cadeddu et al.,New insights into nuclear physics and weak mixing angle using electroweak probes,Phys. Rev. C104(2021) 065502 [2102.06153]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, F. Dordei, C. Giunti and G. Masia,Nuclear neutron radius and weak mixing angle measurements from latest COHERENT CsI and atomic parity violation Cs data,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 683 [2303.09360]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Atzori Corona, M

    M. Atzori Corona, M. Cadeddu, N. Cargioli, G. Co’, F. Dordei and C. Giunti,Joint analysis of reactor and accelerator CEnNS data on germanium: implications for the Standard Model and nuclear physics, 2506.13555

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Average CsI neutron density distribution from COHERENT data

    M. Cadeddu, C. Giunti, Y.F. Li and Y.Y. Zhang, Average CsI neutron density distribution from COHERENT data,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 072501 [1710.02730]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Extracting nuclear form factors with coherent neutrino scattering

    E. Ciuffoli, J. Evslin, Q. Fu and J. Tang,Extracting nuclear form factors with coherent neutrino scattering, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 113003 [1801.02166]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Papoulias, T.S

    D.K. Papoulias, T.S. Kosmas, R. Sahu, V.K.B. Kota and M. Hota,Constraining nuclear physics parameters with current and future COHERENT data,Phys. Lett. B800(2020) 135133 [1903.03722]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Coloma, I

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. Menendez,Determining the nuclear neutron distribution from Coherent Elastic neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: current results and future prospects,JHEP 08(2020) 030 [2006.08624]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei

    J. Barranco, O.G. Miranda and T.I. Rashba,Probing new physics with coherent neutrino scattering off nuclei,JHEP12(2005) 021 [hep-ph/0508299]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    Sterile Neutrinos, Coherent Scattering and Oscillometry Measurements with Low-temperature Bolometers

    J.A. Formaggio, E. Figueroa-Feliciano and A.J. Anderson,Sterile neutrinos, coherent scattering and oscillometry measurements with low-temperature bolometers,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 013009 [1107.3512]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  62. [62]

    Measuring Active-to-Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with Neutral Current Coherent Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering

    A.J. Anderson et al.,Measuring active-to-sterile neutrino oscillations with neutral current coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 013004 [1201.3805]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Sensitivity to oscillation with a sterile fourth generation neutrino from ultra-low threshold neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering

    B. Dutta, Y. Gao, R. Mahapatra, N. Mirabolfathi, L.E. Strigari and J.W. Walker,Sensitivity to oscillation with a sterile fourth generation neutrino 22 from ultra-low threshold neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 093002 [1511.02834]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments

    D.G. Cerde˜ no, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P.A.N. Machado, A.C. Vincent and C. Bœhm,Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments,JHEP05(2016) 118 [1604.01025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    J.B. Dent, B. Dutta, S. Liao, J.L. Newstead, L.E. Strigari and J.W. Walker,Probing light mediators at ultralow threshold energies with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 095007 [1612.06350]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  66. [66]

    Curtailing the Dark Side in Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions

    P. Coloma, P.B. Denton, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz,Curtailing the dark side in non-standard neutrino interactions,JHEP04(2017) 116 [1701.04828]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    Probing light sterile neutrino signatures at reactor and Spallation Neutron Source neutrino experiments

    T.S. Kosmas, D.K. Papoulias, M. T´ ortola and J.W.F. Valle,Probing light sterile neutrino signatures at reactor and spallation neutron source neutrino experiments,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 063013 [1703.00054]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    Constraining Photon Portal Dark Matter with Texono and Coherent Data

    S.-F. Ge and I.M. Shoemaker,Constraining photon portal dark matter with TEXONO and COHERENT data,JHEP11(2018) 066 [1710.10889]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    A COHERENT Search Strategy for Beyond Standard Model Neutrino Interactions

    I.M. Shoemaker,COHERENT search strategy for beyond standard model neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 115028 [1703.05774]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    A COHERENT enlightenment of the neutrino Dark Side

    P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz,COHERENT enlightenment of the neutrino dark side,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 115007 [1708.02899]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    COHERENT constraints on nonstandard neutrino interactions

    J. Liao and D. Marfatia,COHERENT constraints on nonstandard neutrino interactions,Phys. Lett. B775 (2017) 54 [1708.04255]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Ca˜ nas, E.A

    B.C. Ca˜ nas, E.A. Garc´ es, O.G. Miranda and A. Parada,The reactor antineutrino anomaly and low energy threshold neutrino experiments,Phys. Lett. B 776(2018) 451 [1708.09518]

    work page arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    J.B. Dent, B. Dutta, S. Liao, J.L. Newstead, L.E. Strigari and J.W. Walker,Accelerator and reactor complementarity in coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 035009 [1711.03521]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    COHERENT constraints to conventional and exotic neutrino physics

    D.K. Papoulias and T.S. Kosmas,COHERENT constraints to conventional and exotic neutrino physics,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 033003 [1711.09773]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Probing neutrino coupling to a light scalar with coherent neutrino scattering

    Y. Farzan, M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu, Probing neutrino coupling to a light scalar with coherent neutrino scattering,JHEP05(2018) 066 [1802.05171]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Prospects for exploring New Physics in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering

    J. Billard, J. Johnston and B.J. Kavanagh,Prospects for exploring new physics in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering,JCAP11(2018) 016 [1805.01798]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Coloma, I

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,Improved global fit to non-standard neutrino interactions using COHERENT energy and timing data,JHEP02(2020) 023 [1911.09109]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Chaves and T

    M. Chaves and T. Schwetz,Resolving the LMA-dark NSI degeneracy with coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering,JHEP05(2021) 042 [2102.11981]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    COHERENT analysis of neutrino generalized interactions

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri and N. Rojas, COHERENT analysis of neutrino generalized interactions,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 075018 [1806.07424]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Producing a new Fermion in Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering: from Neutrino Mass to Dark Matter

    V. Brdar, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu,Producing a new fermion in coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: from neutrino mass to dark matter,JHEP 12(2018) 024 [1810.03626]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.