Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

IllusionBench+: A Large-scale and Comprehensive Benchmark for Visual Illusion Understanding in Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.00848 v2 pith:ZTV32QME submitted 2025-01-01 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords illusionsvisualmodelsvlmsclassicalcomprehensivedatasetillusionbench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current Visual Language Models (VLMs) show impressive image understanding but struggle with visual illusions, especially in real-world scenarios. Existing benchmarks focus on classical cognitive illusions, which have been learned by state-of-the-art (SOTA) VLMs, revealing issues such as hallucinations and limited perceptual abilities. To address this gap, we introduce IllusionBench, a comprehensive visual illusion dataset that encompasses not only classic cognitive illusions but also real-world scene illusions. This dataset features 1,051 images, 5,548 question-answer pairs, and 1,051 golden text descriptions that address the presence, causes, and content of the illusions. We evaluate ten SOTA VLMs on this dataset using true-or-false, multiple-choice, and open-ended tasks. In addition to real-world illusions, we design trap illusions that resemble classical patterns but differ in reality, highlighting hallucination issues in SOTA models. The top-performing model, GPT-4o, achieves 80.59% accuracy on true-or-false tasks and 76.75% on multiple-choice questions, but still lags behind human performance. In the semantic description task, GPT-4o's hallucinations on classical illusions result in low scores for trap illusions, even falling behind some open-source models. IllusionBench is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest and most comprehensive benchmark for visual illusions in VLMs to date.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    MVI-Bench supplies the first taxonomy and dataset focused on misleading visual inputs to measure LVLM robustness, with tests on 18 models revealing clear weaknesses.

  2. Hate in Plain Sight: On the Risks of Moderating AI-Generated Hateful Illusions

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hateful optical illusions generated with Stable Diffusion and ControlNet evade current moderation classifiers (best accuracy 0.245) and vision-language models (best accuracy 0.102), with simple image transformations s...

  3. SMSP: A Plug-and-Play Strategy of Multi-Scale Perception for MLLMs to Perceive Visual Illusions

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SMSP, a plug-and-play multi-scale low-pass preprocessing method, lets MLLMs recognize hidden characters in visual illusions by reducing high-frequency background distraction.

Pith tools