Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 96 references

Iterative $C_Z$-gate-based protocol for squeezed Schr\"odinger cat state engineering

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A measurement-assisted CZ gate generates high-fidelity squeezed Schrödinger cat states with controllable size and squeezing.

desk verdict The paper gives a new iterative CZ-homodyne protocol for building squeezed cat states, but the high-fidelity claims rest on idealized QND gates whose practical performance is not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.02201 v1 pith:ZUB7YGNG submitted 2026-06-01 quant-ph

Roman Goncharov , N. G. Veselkova , Alexei D. Kiselev This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords squeezedSchrödingercatstatesQNDentanglinggatehomodynemeasurementstateengineeringmeasurement-basedquantumcomputinghybridnetworksiterativeamplification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a protocol in which an ancilla prepared in a small-amplitude squeezed cat state is subjected to a quantum nondemolition entangling operation with a target oscillator in a squeezed vacuum state, after which a projective homodyne measurement is performed on one mode. The measurement outcome projects the target into a squeezed cat state whose amplitude and squeezing level are set by the chosen inputs and the observed quadrature value. The scheme includes a tunable trade-off between output fidelity and success probability that can be adjusted by varying the ancilla size or the measurement window. An iterative version repeats the conditioned gate to amplify the cat-state amplitude step by step. The resulting states are presented as resources for measurement-based quantum computing and hybrid quantum networks that require non-Gaussian operations.

What carries the argument

The measurement-assisted gate consisting of a quantum nondemolition (QND) entangling operation between an ancilla cat state and the target oscillator, followed by projective homodyne measurement.

What would settle it

An experiment that implements the QND gate at high fidelity yet measures output cat-state fidelity below the value predicted by the protocol for the chosen ancilla amplitude and homodyne outcome would falsify the generation claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The proposed measurement-assisted gate, based on a QND entangling operation between an ancilla squeezed cat state and the target oscillator followed by homodyne measurement, enables generation of high-fidelity squeezed Schrödinger cat states with controllable size and squeezing and a tunable fidelity/success-probability trade-off; an iterative homodyne-conditioned CZ-based protocol is introduced for cat-state amplification.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum nondemolition entangling operation between the ancilla and target can be performed with high precision and without significant loss or decoherence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The amplitude and squeezing parameter of the generated state are set directly by the ancilla preparation and the homodyne result.
  • Fidelity and success probability can be traded against each other by adjusting the acceptance window on the homodyne outcome.
  • Repeated application of the conditioned gate produces successive increases in cat-state amplitude.
  • The generated states are compatible with measurement-based quantum computing circuits that rely on non-Gaussian resources.
  • The protocol applies to hybrid quantum networks that combine continuous-variable and discrete-variable elements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the QND gate overhead is low, the protocol could reduce the total number of operations needed to reach a target cat-state size compared with purely unitary approaches.
  • The same gate structure might be tested with other ancilla states to engineer squeezed versions of different non-Gaussian states.
  • Small-scale circuits could check whether the generated states improve error thresholds in continuous-variable error-correction codes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a measurement-assisted gate for generating squeezed Schrödinger cat states: an ancilla in a small-amplitude (possibly squeezed) cat state is entangled with a target oscillator in a squeezed vacuum via a QND operation, followed by homodyne projection; this yields high-fidelity output states with controllable size and squeezing, plus a tunable fidelity/success-probability trade-off. An iterative, homodyne-conditioned CZ-based protocol is introduced for cat-state amplification, with parameter regimes analyzed for target fidelity and probability.

Significance. If the protocol's performance claims hold under realistic conditions, the work supplies a concrete, iterative route to non-Gaussian optical resources that could support measurement-based quantum computing and hybrid networks; the emphasis on tunable trade-offs and amplification distinguishes it from one-shot cat-generation schemes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; QND gate description] The high-fidelity claim for the generated squeezed cat states (abstract) rests on treating the QND entangling unitary between ancilla cat and target squeezed vacuum as ideal; no error model, loss budget, or robustness simulation against photon loss, phase noise, or mode mismatch is supplied, yet any deviation maps the post-selected state outside the claimed fidelity manifold and is compounded by the iterative amplification step.
  2. [Parameter regimes section] The parameter-regime analysis that supports the reported fidelity/success-probability trade-offs (abstract) is presented without explicit derivations, Wigner-function overlap calculations, or Monte-Carlo error propagation; the central claim therefore cannot be verified from the given material.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the ancilla cat amplitude and initial squeezing parameter should be defined once at first use and used consistently.
  2. Figure captions for Wigner functions or fidelity plots should state the exact parameter values used and whether the plotted states include the iterative amplification step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. Below we respond point-by-point to the major concerns and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; QND gate description] The high-fidelity claim for the generated squeezed cat states (abstract) rests on treating the QND entangling unitary between ancilla cat and target squeezed vacuum as ideal; no error model, loss budget, or robustness simulation against photon loss, phase noise, or mode mismatch is supplied, yet any deviation maps the post-selected state outside the claimed fidelity manifold and is compounded by the iterative amplification step.

    Authors: The manuscript presents an ideal theoretical protocol, as is conventional for initial proposals of this type. All fidelity claims refer to the case of a perfect QND interaction. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly states the ideal-gate assumption and qualitatively describes how photon loss or phase noise would degrade the post-selected fidelity and success probability, thereby clarifying the scope of the reported results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Parameter regimes section] The parameter-regime analysis that supports the reported fidelity/success-probability trade-offs (abstract) is presented without explicit derivations, Wigner-function overlap calculations, or Monte-Carlo error propagation; the central claim therefore cannot be verified from the given material.

    Authors: The fidelity and success-probability expressions are obtained from the overlap between the projected state and the target squeezed cat state after the ideal QND-plus-homodyne step; these overlaps are computed analytically in the manuscript. To improve verifiability we will expand the relevant section (or add an appendix) with the explicit overlap integrals, the resulting fidelity formulas, and the numerical procedure used to map the parameter regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: protocol is a new construction with independent physical assumptions

full rationale

The paper proposes a measurement-assisted QND entangling gate followed by homodyne projection and an iterative CZ-based amplification protocol. The abstract presents this as a novel scheme whose fidelity and success probability are analyzed over parameter regimes. No equations are shown that define a quantity in terms of itself, rename a fitted parameter as a prediction, or reduce the central claim to a self-citation chain. The load-bearing precondition (high-precision QND operation) is stated as an external implementation requirement rather than derived from the paper's own outputs. This is the common case of a self-contained proposal whose validity rests on experimental realizability, not internal definitional closure.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum optical assumptions for QND operations and homodyne measurements being feasible, plus tunable parameters for initial states chosen to meet fidelity targets.

free parameters (2)
  • initial squeezing parameter
    Level of squeezing in the target vacuum or coherent state, selected to achieve desired output squeezing and fidelity.
  • ancilla cat amplitude
    Amplitude of the small-amplitude ancilla cat state, tuned for controllable output cat size.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum nondemolition entangling operations and projective homodyne measurements can be performed on optical modes without significant decoherence.
    Invoked in the description of the measurement-assisted gate and iterative protocol.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Iterative $C_Z$-gate-based protocol for squeezed Schr\"odinger cat state engineering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZUB7YGNG

@misc{pith2026260602201,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Iterative $C_Z$-gate-based protocol for squeezed Schr\"odinger cat state engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZUB7YGNG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.02201}
}
abstract

Squeezed optical Schr\"odinger cat states constitute a key resource for both fundamental tests of quantum theory and up-to-date quantum technologies. We propose a measurement-assisted gate for the generation and manipulation of the cat states. In this scheme, an ancilla in the non-Gaussian small-amplitude (in general, squeezed) Schr\"odinger cat state and the target oscillator initially prepared in a squeezed vacuum (or coherent) state are subjected to a quantum nondemolition (QND) entangling operation followed by projective homodyne measurement. The proposed gate enables generation of high-fidelity squeezed Schr\"odinger cat states with controllable size and squeezing with tunable fidelity/success-probability trade-off. We also introduce an iterative, homodyne-conditioned $C_Z$-based protocol for cat-state amplification. The parameter regimes required to achieve the desired fidelity and the success probability are analyzed. The approach is well suited for applications in measurement-based quantum computing and hybrid quantum networks where non-Gaussian resources enhance computational and communication capabilities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02201 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The scheme for conditional generation of squeezed optical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Wigner functions of the quantum states at the input and output of the investigated gate for parameter values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Wigner functions of the quantum states at the input and output of the investigated gate for parameter values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A series of graphs depicting the probability density ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase diagrams of the probability density for observing the outcome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The probability density of the outcome ym = Gx0, which heralds the appearance of an undistorted SCS in the target output channel, depending on the size a of the even/odd input ancilla SCS with fixed values of the parameters r = 0.5, δ = 2.0, G = 1.2. where the superscr…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase diagrams of fidelity (21) between the “perfect” even or odd squeezed SCS (15) and the position-representation output wave function (13) obtained from an even or odd input SCS, for parameter values G = 1.2, δ = 0.5, r = 1.5; (a) each of the two wave functions is t…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Wigner functions of the input quantum states — the target vacuum state and the ancillary kitten state with the size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Scheme for iterative conditional cat-state engineering. The Wigner functions correspond to three successive gate iterations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Total success probability P(k)(d) within the acceptance window [−d/2, d/2] for an even initial ancillary SCS after k iterations (k = 1, 2, 3) with the parameter values a = √ 2, G = 1.2, δ = 1, r(0) = 1. The graphs are based on the expression (43). 0 1 2 3 4 5 d 0.0 0.…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Total success probability P(k)(d) within the acceptance window [−d/2, d/2] for an odd initial ancillary SCS after k iterations (k = 1, 2, 3) with the parameter values a = √ 2, G = 1.2, δ = 1, r(0) = 1. The graphs are based on the expression (43). the exponent of Wk, n…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Phase diagrams of the total success probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Phase diagrams of the total success probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Post-selected mixed-state fidelity F mix (k) based on Eq. (51) versus the acceptance-window width d for k = 1, 2, 3 number of iterations at fixed coupling G = 1.2, with a = √ 2 and r0 = 1 (vacuum target in each step). Panel (a) corresponds to an even initial SCS, pane…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Phase diagrams of the mixed-state fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Phase diagrams of the mixed-state fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_16.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The resulting output state is an (a) even or (b) odd Schrödinger cat state squeezed in the x-quadrature (γ≈3.12) with an effective size|G|a≈1.70

    The target oscillator is prepared in a vacuum state squeezed along the x-quadrature (δ= 2.0), while the ancillary oscillator is in either (a) an even or (b) odd SCS, both with the amplitudeα=a/ √ 2 = 1 and squeezed along the p-quadrature (r= 0.5). The resulting output state is an (a) even or (b) odd Schrödinger cat state squeezed in the x-quadrature (γ≈3....

  2. [2]

    The resulting output state is an (a) even or (b) odd Schrödinger cat state squeezed in the p-quadrature (γ≈0.78) with an effective size|G|a≈1.70

    The target oscillator is prepared in a vacuum state squeezed along the p-quadrature (δ= 0.5), while the ancillary oscillator is in either (a) an even or (b) odd SCS, both with the amplitudeα=a/ √ 2 = 1 and squeezed along the x-quadrature (r= 2.0). The resulting output state is an (a) even or (b) odd Schrödinger cat state squeezed in the p-quadrature (γ≈0....

  3. [3]

    +” (the “even-even

    — as well as those of the output squeezed even (a) and odd (b) SCSs, obtained for a QND interaction strengthG= 3 . The preparedsqueezedcateffectivesizeis |G|a≈4.243, whilethe quadrature squeezing factor isγ−1= (1 +G 2)−1/2≈0.316. III. ITERATIVE GROWTH OF SQUEEZED CATS Here we describe a protocol for amplifying optical SCSs by the iterative growth of their...

  4. [4]

    Leonhardt and H

    U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Measuring the quantum state of light, Progress in Quantum Electronics19, 89–130 (1995)

    1995

  5. [5]

    A. J. Leggett, Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: moti- vation, state of play, prospects, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, R415–R451 (2002)

    2002

  6. [6]

    A. I. Lvovsky, R. Ghobadi, A. Chandra, A. S. Prasad, and C. Si- mon,Observationofmicro–macroentanglementoflight,Nature Physics9, 541–544 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    B. C. Sanders, Review of entangled coherent states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 244002 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    A. I. Lvovsky, P. Grangier, A. Ourjoumtsev, V. Parigi, M. Sasaki, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Production and applications of non- gaussian quantum states of light (2020)

    2020

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Brune, E

    M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C. Wunder- lich, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Observing the progressive decoherenceofthe“meter”inaquantummeasurement,Physical Review Letters77, 4887–4890 (1996)

    1996

  2. [10]

    Wenger, M

    J. Wenger, M. Hafezi, F. Grosshans, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Maximal violation of bell inequalities using continuous-variable measurements, Physical Review A67, 012105 (2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    García-Patrón, J

    R. García-Patrón, J. Fiurášek, N. J. Cerf, J. Wenger, R. Tualle- Brouri, and P. Grangier, Proposal for a loophole-free bell test using homodyne detection, Physical Review Letters93, 130409 (2004)

    2004

  4. [12]

    Guillaud, J

    J. Guillaud, J. Cohen, and M. Mirrahimi, Quantum computation with cat qubits, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 72 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy, Quantum computation with optical coherent states, Physical Review A68, 042319 (2003)

    2003

  6. [14]

    Gilchrist, K

    A. Gilchrist, K. Nemoto, W. J. Munro, T. C. Ralph, S. Glancy, S. L. Braunstein, and G. J. Milburn, Schrödinger cats and their power for quantum information processing, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics6, S828–S833 (2004)

    2004

  7. [15]

    A. P. Lund, T. C. Ralph, and H. L. Haselgrove, Fault-tolerant linearopticalquantumcomputingwithsmall-amplitudecoherent states, Physical Review Letters100, 030503 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    J. Joo, W. J. Munro, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum metrology with entangled coherent states, Physical Review Letters107, 083601 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Brune, and S

    A.Facon,E.-K.Dietsche,D.Grosso,S.Haroche,J.-M.Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, A sensitive electrometer based on a rydberg atom in a schrödinger-cat state, Nature535, 262 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    P. A. Knott, T. J. Proctor, A. J. Hayes, J. P. Cooling, and J. A. Dunningham, Practical quantum metrology with large precision gains in the low-photon-number regime, Physical Review A93, 033859 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Duivenvoorden, B

    K. Duivenvoorden, B. M. Terhal, and D. Weigand, Single-mode 15 displacement sensor, Physical Review A95, 012305 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    S. J. van Enk and O. Hirota, Entangled coherent states: Telepor- tation and decoherence, Phys. Rev. A64, 022313 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    Lee and H

    S.-W. Lee and H. Jeong, Near-deterministic quantum teleporta- tion and resource-efficient quantum computation using linear optics and hybrid qubits, Physical Review A87, 022326 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    D. J. Weigand and B. M. Terhal, Generating grid states from schrödinger-cat states without postselection, Phys. Rev. A97, 022341 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Hastrup, J

    J. Hastrup, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Deter- ministic generation of a four-component optical cat state, Optics Letters45, 640 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Bosonic quan- tum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits, Fundamental Research1, 50–67 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Chamberland, K

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Campbell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi- Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brandão, Building a fault-tolerant quantum computer us...

    2022

  18. [26]

    van Loock, N

    P. van Loock, N. Lütkenhaus, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, Quantum repeaters using coherent-state communication, Phys. Rev. A78, 062319 (2008)

    2008

  19. [27]

    J. B. Brask, I. Rigas, E. S. Polzik, U. L. Andersen, and A. S. Sørensen, Hybrid long-distance entanglement distribution proto- col, Physical Review Letters105, 160501 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Sangouard, C

    N. Sangouard, C. Simon, N. Gisin, J. Laurat, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Quantum repeaters with entangled coherent states, Journal of the Optical Society of America B27, A137 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Goncharov, A

    R. Goncharov, A. D. Kiselev, E. Moiseev, E. Samsonov, S. Moi- seev, F. Kiselev, and V. Egorov, Quantum repeaters and telepor- tationviaentangledphase-modulatedmultimodecoherentstates, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 044030 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Girvin, M

    P.P.Shankar,M.H.Devoret,M.H.S.Amin,H.G.L.A.G.,S.M. Girvin, M. J. H., S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Realization of a superposition of coherent states, Science332, 782 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    M. S. Kim, W. Son, V. Bužek, and P. L. Knight, Macroscopic superpositions of coherent states, J. Phys. B38, 1077 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    M. P. da Silva, J. M. de Almeida, and S. P. Walborn, Superpo- sitions of squeezed coherent states and their applications, Phys. Rev. A93, 043808 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    T. C. Wei, S. T. Wang, and L. M. Duan, Quantum superpositions of squeezed states, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 183601 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Ourjoumtsev, H

    A. Ourjoumtsev, H. Jeong, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Generation of optical ‘schrödinger cats’ from photon number states, Nature448, 784–786 (2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    Etesse, M

    J. Etesse, M. Bouillard, B. Kanseri, and R. Tualle-Brouri, Ex- perimental generation of squeezed cat states with an operation allowing iterative growth, Physical Review Letters114, 193602 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Huang, H

    K. Huang, H. Le Jeannic, J. Ruaudel, V. B. Verma, M. D. Shaw, F. Marsili, S. W. Nam, E. Wu, H. Zeng, Y.-C. Jeong, R. Filip, O. Morin, and J. Laurat, Optical synthesis of large-amplitude squeezed coherent-state superpositions with minimal resources, Physical Review Letters115, ...

    2015

  29. [37]

    Fedorov,andA.I.Lvovsky,Enlargementofopticalschrödinger’s cat states, Nature Photonics11, 379–382 (2017)

    D.V.Sychev,A.E.Ulanov,A.A.Pushkina,M.W.Richards,I.A. Fedorov,andA.I.Lvovsky,Enlargementofopticalschrödinger’s cat states, Nature Photonics11, 379–382 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    A. P. Lund, H. Jeong, T. C. Ralph, and M. S. Kim, Conditional production of superpositions of coherent states with inefficient photon detection, Physical Review A70, 020101 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    A.Laghaout,J.S.Neergaard-Nielsen,I.Rigas,C.Kragh,A.Tips- mark,andU.L.Andersen,Amplificationofrealisticschrödinger- cat-state-like states by homodyne heralding, Physical Review A 87, 043826 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum informa- tion, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 621–669 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Chabaud, D

    U. Chabaud, D. Markham, and F. Grosshans, Stellar represen- tation of non-gaussian quantum states, Physical Review Letters 124, 063605 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Dakna, T

    M. Dakna, T. Anhut, T. Opatrný, L. Knöll, and D.-G. Welsch, Generating schrödinger-cat-like states by means of conditional measurements on a beam splitter, Physical Review A55, 3184–3194 (1997)

    1997

  35. [43]

    Takahashi, K

    H. Takahashi, K. Wakui, S. Suzuki, M. Takeoka, K. Hayasaka, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Generation of large-amplitude coherent-state superposition via ancilla-assisted photon subtrac- tion, Physical Review Letters101, 233605 (2008)

    2008

  36. [44]

    K.Takase,J.-i.Yoshikawa,W.Asavanant,M.Endo,andA.Furu- sawa,Generationof optical schrödingercatstatesbygeneralized photon subtraction, Physical Review A103, 013710 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Eaton, C

    M. Eaton, C. González-Arciniegas, R. N. Alexander, N. C. Menicucci, and O. Pfister, Measurement-based generation and preservation of cat and grid states within a continuous-variable cluster state, Quantum6, 769 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Marek and R

    P. Marek and R. Filip, Coherent-state superpositions and their squeezing, Physical Review A81, 022108 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    Ourjoumtsev, H

    A. Ourjoumtsev, H. Jeong, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Generation of optical ‘schrödinger cats’ from photon number states, Nature448, 784 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    A. I. Lvovsky and B. C. Sanders, Squeezed states and cat states in quantum optics, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 116001 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Liuet al., Generation of large-scale optical schrödinger cat states via photon subtraction from squeezed light, Physical Re- view Letters125, 033602 (2020)

    Y. Liuet al., Generation of large-scale optical schrödinger cat states via photon subtraction from squeezed light, Physical Re- view Letters125, 033602 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Mazzarellaet al., Heralded generation of optical schrödinger cat states with enhanced size and fidelity, Optica8, 447 (2021)

    L. Mazzarellaet al., Heralded generation of optical schrödinger cat states with enhanced size and fidelity, Optica8, 447 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Wanget al., Generation of macroscopic quantum superposi- tions from squeezed states in nonlinear optical cavities, Nature Photonics16, 274 (2022)

    S. Wanget al., Generation of macroscopic quantum superposi- tions from squeezed states in nonlinear optical cavities, Nature Photonics16, 274 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Zhanget al., Generation of large-amplitude schrödinger cat states from squeezed light via photon catalysis, Physical Review Letters130, 023601 (2023)

    J. Zhanget al., Generation of large-amplitude schrödinger cat states from squeezed light via photon catalysis, Physical Review Letters130, 023601 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Chen and A

    J. Chen and A. I. Lvovsky, Progress in generating non-gaussian states of light, Nature Reviews Physics4, 241 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Yurke and D

    B. Yurke and D. Stoler, Generating quantum mechanical super- positionsofmacroscopicallydistinguishablestatesviaamplitude dispersion, Physical Review Letters57, 13–16 (1986)

    1986

  47. [55]

    M. K. Olsen, M. P. W. Adams, and D. F. Walls, Squeezing and quantum superpositions in kerr media, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B22, 2815 (2005)

    2005

  48. [56]

    Takeda and et al., Generation of squeezed schrödinger cat states with kerr nonlinearity, Physical Review Letters123, 123604 (2019)

    S. Takeda and et al., Generation of squeezed schrödinger cat states with kerr nonlinearity, Physical Review Letters123, 123604 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Takagi, Y

    R. Takagi, Y. Kwon, W. J. Munro, Y. Takada, T. P. Spiller, and Y. Takeuchi, Deterministic generation of a hyper-entangled pho- tonic cluster state, Physical Review Letters121, 130502 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Jeong and M

    H. Jeong and M. S. Kim, Efficient quantum computation using coherent states, Physical Review A65, 042305 (2002)

    2002

  51. [59]

    Ourjoumtsev, H

    A. Ourjoumtsev, H. Jeong, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, Generation of large optical schrödinger cat states from squeezed vacuum, Physical Review Letters116, 030502 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    J. I. Yoshikawa, T. S. Nakayama, T. S. Ugajin, T. M. Endo, J. K. K. H. Lee, and S. M. Takeuchi, Generation of large- 16 scale optical schrödinger cat states from squeezed vacuum with photon-number-resolving detectors, Physical Review X8, 031022 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Takahashi, S

    H. Takahashi, S. Tanaka, T. Satoh, K. Okada, H. Yonezawa, and A. Furusawa, Generation of large-amplitude coherent-state superposition via photon subtraction, Physical Review Letters 105, 053604 (2010)

    2010

  54. [62]

    Ourjoumtsev, R

    A. Ourjoumtsev, R. Tualle-Brouri, J. Laurat, and P. Grangier, Generating optical schrödinger kittens for quantum information processing, Nature Photonics7, 189 (2013)

    2013

  55. [63]

    Jeong, T

    H. Jeong, T. C. Ralph, and M. S. Kim, Generation of optical schrödinger-cat states by photon subtraction, Physical Review Letters102, 060403 (2009)

    2009

  56. [64]

    Ourjoumtsev, R

    A. Ourjoumtsev, R. Tualle-Brouri, J. Laurat, and P. Grangier, Generating optical schrödinger kittens for quantum information processing, Science312, 83–86 (2006)

    2006

  57. [65]

    J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, M. Takeuchi, K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, K. Hayasaka, M. Takeoka, and M. Sasaki, Optical continuous- variable qubit, Physical Review Letters105, 053602 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    I. A. Walmsley, Quantum optics: Science and technology in a new light, Science348, 525–530 (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    2001

  60. [68]

    encoding a qubit in an oscillator

    H. M. Vasconcelos, L. Sanz, and S. Glancy, All-optical gener- ation of states for “encoding a qubit in an oscillator”, Optics Letters35, 3261 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Macroscopi- cally distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping, Physical Review A59, 2631–2634 (1999)

    1999

  62. [70]

    Mareket al., Generation of large optical schrödinger cat states via breeding, Physical Review A97, 043810 (2018)

    P. Mareket al., Generation of large optical schrödinger cat states via breeding, Physical Review A97, 043810 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Y.Wang,Y.Zhang,J.Liu,Q.He,Q.Chen,S.Yang,andY.Peng, Quantum amplification of schrödinger cat states, Nature Photon- ics14, 770 (2020)

    2020

  64. [72]

    Miranowicz, Y.-x

    A. Miranowicz, Y.-x. Liu, W. Liu, and F. Nori, Generation and amplification of schrödinger’s cat states, Physical Review A102, 043720 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    Biagi, S

    N. Biagi, S. Francesconi, A. Zavatta, and M. Bellini, Photon-by- photon quantum light state engineering, Progress in Quantum Electronics84, 100414 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    M.S.Winnel,J.J.Guanzon,D.Singh,andT.C.Ralph,Determin- istic preparation of optical squeezed cat and gottesman-kitaev- preskill states, Physical Review Letters132, 230602 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Cohen, A

    H.Hutin,P.Bilous,C.Ye,S.Abdollahi,L.Cros,T.Dvir,T.Shah, Y. Cohen, A. Bienfait, F. Marquardt, and B. Huard, Preparing schrödinger cat states in a microwave cavity using a neural net- work, PRX Quantum6, 010321 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Z.Zhang,L.Shao,W.Lu,andX.Wang,All-opticalgenerationof deterministic squeezed schrödinger-cat states, Physical Review A106, 043721 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    Solodovnikova, U

    O. Solodovnikova, U. L. Andersen, and J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, The loss tolerance of cat breeding for fault-tolerant grid-state generation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06193 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Vlastakis, G

    B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, S. E. Nigg, A. J. Hoffman, S. M. Girvin,M.H.Devoret,andL.Jiang,Deterministicallygenerating and stabilizing schrödinger cat states, Science342, 607 (2013)

    2013

  71. [79]

    H. Song, G. Zhang, X. Wang, H. Yonezawa, and K. Fan, Ampli- fication of optical schrödinger cat states with an implementation protocol based on a frequency comb, Physical Review A105, 043713 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    Zhang, C

    L. Zhang, C. C. W. Lim, K. Nemoto, and T. C. Ralph, Photon- catalysis as noiseless linear amplification, Physical Review A97, 043830 (2018)

    2018

  73. [81]

    W.Gao,L.Zhang,X.Lu,L.Peng,andZ.Wang,Noiselesslinear amplification tailored for coherent-state superpositions: scalable design, Physical Review A108, 032411 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, B. M. Nielsen, C. Hettich, K. Mølmer, and E. S. Polzik, Generation of a superposition of odd photon numberstatesforquantuminformationnetworks,Phys.Rev.Lett. 97, 083604 (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    Wakui, H

    K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, A. Furusawa, and M. Sasaki, Photon subtracted squeezed states generated with periodically poled KTiOPO4, Optics Express15, 3568 (2007)

    2007

  76. [84]

    R. Dong, A. Tipsmark, A. Laghaout, L. A. Krivitsky, M. Ježek, and U. L. Andersen, Generation of picosecond pulsed coherent state superpositions, Journal of the Optical Society of America B31, 1192 (2014)

    2014

  77. [85]

    Gerrits, S

    T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, T. S. Clement, B. Calkins, A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, A. L. Migdall, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and E. Knill, Generation of optical coherent-state superpositions by number- resolvedphotonsubtractionfromthesqueezedvacuum,Physical Review A82, 031802 (2010)

    2010

  78. [86]

    M. Wang, M. Zhang, Z. Qin, Q. Zhang, L. Zeng, X. Su, C. Xie, and K. Peng, Experimental preparation and manipulation of squeezed cat states via an all-optical in-line squeezer, Laser & Photonics Reviews16, 2200336 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    X. Pan, J. Schwinger, N.-N. Huang, P. Song, W. Chua, F. Hana- mura, A. Joshi, F. Valadares, R. Filip, and Y. Y. Gao, Protecting the quantum interference of cat states by phase-space compres- sion, Physical Review X13, 021004 (2023)

    2023

  80. [88]

    M.-F.Wang,N.-Q.Jiang,Q.-L.Jin,andY.-Z.Zheng,Continuous- variable controlled-z gate using an atomic ensemble, Physical Review A83, 062339 (2011)

    2011

  81. [89]

    R. N. Alexander, N. C. Gabay, P. P. Rohde, and N. C. Menicucci, Measurement-based linear optics, Physical Review Letters118, 110503 (2017)

    2017

  82. [90]

    Ogawa, P

    A.Sakaguchi, S.Konno, F.Hanamura, W.Asavanant, K.Takase, H. Ogawa, P. Marek, R. Filip, J.-i. Yoshikawa, E. Huntington, H. Yonezawa, and A. Furusawa, Nonlinear feedforward enabling quantum computation, Nature Communications14, 3817 (2023)

    2023

  83. [91]

    V. G. Matsos, C. H. Valahu, M. J. Millican, T. Navickas, X. C. Kolesnikow,M.J.Biercuk,andT.R.Tan,Universalquantumgate set for gottesman–kitaev–preskill logical qubits, Nature Physics 21, 1664 (2025)

    2025

  84. [92]

    D. F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature306, 141 (1983)

    1983

  85. [93]

    Within the semiclassical description, where a bipartite SCS is represented by two points in phase space, one can conclude that for a horizontally oriented SCS (i.e., extended along the x-axis), the measurement outcome of the ancillary oscillator’s momen- tum may correspond to ...

  86. [94]

    Semiclassically, the two branches of a horizontally oriented ancillary SCS are centered near(xA,p A) = (±a,0)

    For a pure state with coordinate wave functionψ(x)we plot the Wigner function W(x,p) = 1 π ∫ dzψ∗(x+z)ψ(x−z)e2ipz,(54) with ℏ= 1 . Semiclassically, the two branches of a horizontally oriented ancillary SCS are centered near(xA,p A) = (±a,0). The QND gate obeysˆC† Z ˆpT ˆCZ = ˆ...

  87. [95]

    Sokolov, Schrödinger cat states in continuous variable non- gaussian networks, Physics Letters A384, 126762 (2020)

    I. Sokolov, Schrödinger cat states in continuous variable non- gaussian networks, Physics Letters A384, 126762 (2020)

    2020

  88. [96]

    Veselkova, R

    N. Veselkova, R. Goncharov, and A. Kiselev, Creation and ma- nipulation of schrödinger cat states based on semiclassical pre- dictions, Frontiers of Physics21, 23200 (2026). Appendix A: Joint probability density after iterations In this Appendix we derive a closed-form express...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.