REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning Locomotion Skills Using DeepRL: Does the Choice of Action Space Matter?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The use of deep reinforcement learning allows for high-dimensional state descriptors, but little is known about how the choice of action representation impacts the learning difficulty and the resulting performance. We compare the impact of four different action parameterizations (torques, muscle-activations, target joint angles, and target joint-angle velocities) in terms of learning time, policy robustness, motion quality, and policy query rates. Our results are evaluated on a gait-cycle imitation task for multiple planar articulated figures and multiple gaits. We demonstrate that the local feedback provided by higher-level action parameterizations can significantly impact the learning, robustness, and quality of the resulting policies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Motion Tracking with Muscles: Predictive Control of a Parametric Musculoskeletal Canine Model
A new musculoskeletal dog model with 133 muscles, a centroid-based muscle line-of-action algorithm, and a differentiable muscle activation model achieves motion capture tracking with qualitative EMG agreement.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.