Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Pressure-induced enhancement of two-dimensionality in LaO1-xFxBi(Se/S)2 superconductors

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read High pressure drives LaO1-xFxBi(Se/S)2 into a stacking-faulted orthorhombic phase whose weakened interlayer bonds are tied to a higher Tc.

desk verdict Solid single-crystal diffraction evidence that the SCII phase is orthorhombic with stacking faults, but the superconducting-performance claim is an extrapolation from literature and undoped DFT, not a measured result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05961 v2 pith:ZUONFW5F submitted 2019-08-16 cond-mat.supr-con

V. Svitlyk , A. Krzton-Maziopa , M. Mezouar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords LaO1-xFxBiSe2S2layeredsuperconductorshighpressuretwo-dimensionalitystackingfaultsSCIIphasedensityofstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that compressing the layered superconductors LaO$_{1-x}$F$_x$BiSe$_2$ and LaO$_{1-x}$F$_x$BiS$_2$ first suppresses superconductivity by depleting the electronic states at the Fermi level, then restores and strengthens it through a first-order structural transition that makes the material more two-dimensional. Single-crystal synchrotron diffraction under hydrostatic pressure identifies the high-pressure SCII phase as orthorhombic and stacking-faulted: diffuse rods along $c^*$, twinned Bragg peaks, and a measured negative linear compressibility of the La–Se$_2$ interlayer bond all point to weakened coupling between the Bi(Se/S)$_2$ and LaO/F layers. On the paper's own terms, this structural state, not the previously proposed monoclinic P2$_1$/m model, is what accompanies the reported increase in $T_c$. If right, dimensionality itself is a tunable handle for improving layered superconductors, alongside doping and chemical substitution. The paper itself reports no transport data; the $T_c$ behavior is imported from earlier pressure studies on other crystals of the same family.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $c$-axis stacking of alternating Bi(Se/S)$_2$ conducting layers and LaO/F blocking layers. The decisive observations are pressure-induced diffuse rods along $c^*$ and twinning-split Bragg peaks, which the paper interprets as stacking faults and a tetragonal-to-orthorhombic symmetry lowering; these carry the argument that pressure increases two-dimensionality. The second mechanism is the computed density of states at the Fermi level, which links the pre-transition semimetal-like depletion to the reported $T_c$ decrease.

What would settle it

Take one of the actual crystals studied here, mount it in a diamond-anvil cell with electrical contacts, and track $T_c$ through the SCI–SCII transition; a $T_c$ that does not rise when the $c^*$ diffuse rods and orthorhombic twinning appear would falsify the causal claim. Independently, recompute the density of states with fluorine doping $x = 0.24$ and $x = 0.32$; if a metallic Fermi surface persists, the semimetal explanation of the initial $T_c$ drop also fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On pressure, LaO$_{1-x}$F$_x$BiSe$_2$ undergoes a first-order transition near 4 GPa (1–1.7 GPa in the sulfide) in which the $c$ parameter drops by 5.5%, the unit-cell volume by 5%, and the structure remains metrically orthorhombic ($\alpha = \beta = \gamma = 90^\circ$) up to 55 GPa, ruling out the monoclinic P2$_1$/m space group proposed from powder data. The new reciprocal-space signature is diffuse scattering along $c^*$ plus reflection splitting from twinned orthorhombic domains, read as stacking faults caused by weakening of the interlayer La–(Se/S) bonds while the in-plane bonds stay stiff. Density-functional calculations on the measured structures show that before the transition, compression opens a 0.04 eV gap and nearly empties the Fermi level, matching the reported $T_c$ suppression; after the transition, the enhanced two-dimensionality is claimed to favor superconductivity. The claim about improved superconducting performance is not measured here but rests on earlier $T_c$ determinations for LaO$_{0.5}$F$_{0.5}$Bi(Se/S)$_2$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $T_c$ increases reported in earlier pressure studies on other crystals of LaO$_{0.5}$F$_{0.5}$Bi(Se/S)$_2$ apply to the exact crystals studied here, since the paper itself measures structure and electronic structure, not superconductivity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The SCII phase that appears under pressure in BiCh$_2$ materials should be described as a stacking-faulted orthorhombic structure rather than a monoclinic one.
  • Because the SCI–SCII boundary in the T–P diagram is nearly vertical, reaching the superconducting regime by cooling does not change the structural story.
  • Interlayer bond weakening and negative linear compressibility along $c$ provide concrete structural markers for predicting which layered superconductors will respond favorably to pressure.
  • If the DOS result transfers to doped samples, the initial $T_c$ drop under pressure is an electronic effect — loss of metallic character — distinct from the structural one that follows.
  • Chemical substitutions that mimic pressure's effect on interlayer coupling may be a route to ambient-pressure enhancement of $T_c$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not establish, by its own measurement, that the specific crystals compressed here exhibit the $T_c$ rise; the causal reading would be tested by combining in-situ transport with diffraction on the same sample.
  • If the mechanism generalizes, other layered superconductors with stiff in-plane bonds and soft, negatively compressible interlayer spacings should show a pressure-induced $T_c$ upturn when stacking disorder appears.
  • The sharp growth of the orthorhombic distortion $\delta=(a-b)/(a+b)$ above 30 GPa is an untested regime: correlating $\delta$ with $T_c$ at those pressures, or with spectroscopic probes such as EXAFS, would show whether the trend continues.
  • Earlier powder-diffraction models that assigned the SCII phase a monoclinic cell may have been fitting the projection of diffuse scattering as extra Bragg peaks; re-analysis of archived powder data with the stacking-fault model could resolve the discrepancy without new experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports high-pressure single-crystal synchrotron diffraction experiments (up to 55 GPa at room temperature and up to 24 GPa at 5 K) on fluorine-doped LaOBiSe2 and LaOBiS2, with compositions LaO0.76F0.24BiSe2 and LaO0.68F0.32BiS2. It identifies a pressure-induced transition from a tetragonal P4/nmm phase (SCI) to an orthorhombic, stacking-faulted phase (SCII), evidenced by twinning, diffuse rods along c*, new reflections violating the n-glide, a step decrease in c and volume, and characteristic bond-length trends including negative linear compressibility for the interlayer La-Se2 bond. Equations of state are fitted for both phases. Ab initio DOS calculations for LaOBiSe2 (x=0) at 0 and 3.7 GPa show a small 0.04 eV gap at the higher pressure, which the authors associate with the reported decrease of Tc in the SCI phase. The paper concludes that enhanced structural two-dimensionality in the SCII phase favors superconducting performance.

Significance. The structural characterization is a significant contribution: the single-crystal data resolve the nature of the SCII phase, showing that the previously proposed monoclinic P21/m model is incompatible with the data and that stacking faults rather than a 3D periodic superstructure are responsible for the diffuse scattering. The use of He as a pressure medium, the 5-K experiments, and the explicit reporting of refinement results in the Supplemental Material are strengths. However, the paper does not measure any superconducting property; the entire Tc narrative is imported from literature on other compositions, and the DOS calculation is performed for the undoped parent compound. The central causal claim about superconducting performance is therefore not directly supported, and the published significance lies mainly in the structural results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and discussion (SCI–SCII transition); Conclusions] The paper's central claim that the SCII phase exhibits improved superconducting performance ('enhancement of two-dimensionality ... acts in favor of their superconducting performance') is not established by measurements on the crystals studied here. No transport or magnetic data are reported for LaO0.76F0.24BiSe2 and LaO0.68F0.32BiS2. The increase of Tc in the SCII phase is attributed to refs. [5-7] and [17-20], which were obtained on different compositions such as LaO0.5F0.5BiSe2 and LaO0.5F0.5BiS2, so the structural transition observed at 3.7-4.8 GPa (Se) and 1.0-1.7 GPa (S) is not shown to coincide with a Tc increase in the present samples. The conclusion should be reframed as a hypothesis or supported by transport measurements on these exact crystals.
  2. [Electronic density of states calculations; Fig. 8] The DOS calculations used to explain the decrease of Tc in the SCI phase explicitly take x = 0 ('O/F atomic position was considered as fully occupied solely by oxygen atoms (x = 0)'), whereas the measured Se compound has x = 0.24. The finding of a 0.04 eV gap at 3.7 GPa and the inferred semi-metallic origin of the Tc decrease therefore do not directly apply to the doped samples; electron doping could maintain a finite DOS at EF even at 3.7 GPa. The authors should either compute the doped DOS (e.g., via a supercell or a rigid-band approximation) or explicitly state that the calculation is a qualitative parent-compound result and adjust the causal wording accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Results and discussion (bonding evolution)] The text states that 'a corresponding a/c ratio increases' after describing the decrease of both a and c; rephrase to 'the a/c ratio increases' for clarity, since the ratio is a single quantity.
  2. [Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 captions] The decompression data are described by arrows in the text, but the figures do not appear to identify compression and decompression curves with distinct symbols or a legend; please add explicit labels so the reader can distinguish the two branches.
  3. [Table 1] The EOS fits are reported with parameter uncertainties, but the number of data points and the goodness-of-fit (e.g., R² or residuals) are not given; adding these would allow readers to judge the adequacy of the Murnaghan and Birch-Murnaghan models over the full pressure range.
  4. [Text near ref. [19]] The quoted refinement value appears as 'Rwp = 25,5%' with a comma as the decimal separator; please use '25.5%' for consistency with the rest of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the structural results come from direct diffraction data, and the superconducting-performance link is an external literature comparison, not a fitted or self-referential input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained for its structural claims. The SCI-SCII transition, diffuse rods, orthorhombic metric, and stacking-fault interpretation are based on new single-crystal diffraction measurements; the Murnaghan and Birch-Murnaghan fits are standard descriptions of the measured V-P data and are not used to force the superconducting conclusion. The DOS calculation uses the external WIEN2k code with structural parameters taken from the authors' own diffraction data, and the x = 0 assumption is stated explicitly rather than hidden, so the calculation is not equivalent to the claimed Tc trend by construction. The superconducting-performance claim is imported from literature Tc measurements on other compositions, and the DOS input composition differs from the measured crystals; these are evidentiary limitations, not circular reasoning, because no parameter of the argument was fitted to the target conclusion. The only self-citations, refs. [32,33] for diffuse scattering as a stacking-fault signature, support a standard crystallographic interpretation and are not load-bearing in a definitional sense. No equation reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The appropriate finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard EOS fitting (with fitted coefficients), standard DFT with a specific exchange-correlation functional, and a literature-based correlation between structure and Tc. The most significant assumptions are that the PBE functional captures the relevant electronic structure, that literature Tc data transfer to the measured samples, and that the diffuse scattering indicates stacking faults.

free parameters (6)
  • V0 (SCI LaO1-xFxBiSe2) = 241.5(3) Å3
    Zero-pressure volume from Murnaghan EOS fit to V-P data (Table 1). Used to describe compressibility, not directly to derive the central claim.
  • B0 (SCI LaO1-xFxBiSe2) = 44(5) GPa
    Bulk modulus from Murnaghan EOS fit (Table 1). Standard fitting parameter.
  • B0' (SCI LaO1-xFxBiSe2) = 8(3)
    Pressure derivative of bulk modulus from Murnaghan EOS fit (Table 1). Standard fitting parameter.
  • V0 (SCII LaO1-xFxBiSe2) = 231.3(7) Å3
    Zero-pressure volume from Birch-Murnaghan EOS fit to V-P data (Table 1). Describes compressibility of the SCII phase.
  • B0 (SCII LaO1-xFxBiSe2) = 67(3) GPa
    Bulk modulus from Birch-Murnaghan EOS fit (Table 1). Standard fitting parameter.
  • B0' (SCII LaO1-xFxBiSe2) = 4.3(2)
    Pressure derivative of bulk modulus from Birch-Murnaghan EOS fit (Table 1). Standard fitting parameter.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The PBE-GGA exchange-correlation approximation gives reliable electronic structure at the Fermi level for LaOBiSe2.
    The DOS calculations use Wien2k with PBE-GGA (ref [36]); the accuracy of this functional for Fermi-surface details and band gaps in this material is assumed, not benchmarked in this paper.
  • domain assumption The pressure-dependent Tc values reported in refs [5,6,17-20] for LaO1-xFxBi(Se/S)2 apply to the crystals studied here.
    The paper does not measure Tc under pressure. The central claim about enhanced superconducting performance in the SCII phase relies on literature transport data measured on different samples, which may have different stoichiometries and disorder.
  • domain assumption Diffuse scattering along c* is a reliable signature of stacking faults.
    The paper interprets the diffuse rods as stacking faults citing refs [32,33]. This is a standard interpretation in layered systems, but it is a modeling assumption about the origin of the diffuse scattering.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pressure-induced enhancement of two-dimensionality in LaO1-xFxBi(Se/S)2 superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZUONFW5F

@misc{pith2026190805961,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pressure-induced enhancement of two-dimensionality in LaO1-xFxBi(Se/S)2 superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZUONFW5F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05961}
}
read the original abstract

Application of high pressure (HP) induces evolution from metallic to semi-metallic state in the layered superconducting LaO1-xFxBiSe2 phase, as concluded from ab initio calculations based on experimental P-dependent structural data. These changes in conduction properties are associated with a reported decrease in the superconducting transition temperature, Tc. However, further increase in pressure induces structural transformation in LaO1-xFxBiSe2 which results in a strong enhancement of its two-dimensionality with a related improvement in superconducting performance. In addition, the HP structural anisotropy induces a loss of long-range order correlations along the stacking direction of the LaO/F and BiSe2 layers yielding formation of stacking faults. Similar but even more pronounced structural transition was observed in the related LaO1-xFxBiS2 phase which is also accompanied by an increase in Tc. This demonstrates that enhancement of two-dimensionality in layered superconducting systems acts in favor of their superconducting performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05961 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. P-induced evolution of the SCI phase and formation of the SCII phase of LaO1- xFxBiSe2. Rotation arrows (right) schematically indicate decoupling between the BiSe2 bilayers and the reference LaO1-xFx framework resulting in P-induced stacking faults. The SCII phase was reported to crystallize in a monoclinic structure (P21/m), as concluded from P-dependent powder diffraction data [19]. The proposed HP model for the S… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Slices of the reciprocal space of LaO1-xFxBiSe2 before (left, SCI phase) and after the P-induced transition (right, SCII phase). Reflections marked with green circles are not commensurate with the reciprocal lattice of LaO1-xFxBiSe2 and originate from sample environment (diamonds, ruby spheres). Red circles (right) highlight a splitting of Bragg reflections resulting from twinning in the SCII phase induced by a tetr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Slices of the reciprocal space of LaO1-xFxBiS2 before (top, SCI phase) and after the P-induced transition (bottom, SCII phase) showing appearance of diffuse rods in SCII [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: P-dependent behavior of the a and c parameters of SCI LaO1-xFxBiSe2 and a corresponding a/c ratio. Arrows pointing to the right indicate data curves obtained on compression and the ones pointing to the left indicate decompression lines connecting maximum and ambient pr…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bonding evolution in LaO1-xFxBiSe2 as a function of pressure. Arrows pointing to the right indicate data curves obtained on compression and the ones pointing to the left indicate decompression lines connecting maximum and ambient pressure datapoints (right figure). Ano…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: P-dependent behavior of the a, b (left), c (right) structural parameters and unit-cell volume (right) of LaO1-xFxBiSe2 up to P = 55 GPa. Although structure of the diffuse rods of LaO1-xFxBiSe2 is not regular ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic T-P phase diagram of LaO1-xFxBiSe2 and LaO1-xFxBiS2. The Laue mmm class is indicated for the orthorhombic SCII phase. Conduction properties refer to the LaO1- xFxBiSe2 phase and have been obtained from ab initio calculations based on experimental P￾dependent …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Calculated DOS for the LaO1-xFxBiSe2 structures at 0 (left) and 3.7 GPa (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mizuguchi, H

    Y. Mizuguchi, H. Fujihisa, Y. Gotoh, K. Suzuki, H. Usui, K. Kuroki, S. Demura, Y. Takano, H. Izawa, and O. Miura, Phys. Rev. B 86, 220510 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    S. K. Singh, A. Kumar, B. Gahtori, Shruti, G. Sharma, S. Patnaik, and V. P. S. Awana, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Mizuguchi, J

    Y. Mizuguchi, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 88, 041001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Krzton-Maziopa, Z

    A. Krzton-Maziopa, Z. Guguchia, E. Pomjakushina, V. Pomjakushin, R. Khasanov, H. Luetkens, P. K. Biswas, A. Amato, H. Keller, and K. Conder, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 26, 215702 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    J. Liu, S. Li, Y. Li, X. Zhu, and H.-H. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 90, 094507 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Jha and V

    R. Jha and V. P. S. Awana, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28, 2229 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Fujioka, M

    M. Fujioka, M. Tanaka, S. J. Denholme, T. Yamaki, H. Takeya, T. Yamaguchi, and Y. Takano, EPL 108, 47007 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Tanaka, M

    M. Tanaka, M. Nagao, R. Matsumoto, N. Kataoka, I. Ueta, H. Tanaka, S. Watauchi, I. Tanaka, and Y. Takano, J. Alloys Compd. 722, 467 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    C. T. Wolowiec, B. D. White, I. Jeon, D. Yazici, K. Huang, and M. B. Maple, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 25, 422201 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Fujioka, M

    M. Fujioka, M. Nagao, S. J. Denholme, M. Tanaka, H. Takeya, T. Yamaguchi, and Y. Takano, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 052601 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    C. Y. Guo, Y. Chen, M. Smidman, S. A. Chen, W. B. Jiang, H. F. Zhai, Y. F. Wang, G. H. Cao, J. M. Chen, X. Lu, and H. Q. Yuan, Phys. Rev. B 91, 214512 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    G. S. Thakur, R. Jha, Z. Haque, V. P. S. Awana, L. C. Gupta, and A. K. Ganguli, Supercond. Sci. Tech. 28, 115010 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Luo, H.-F

    Y. Luo, H.-F. Zhai, P. Zhang, Z.-A. Xu, G.-H. Cao, and J. D. Thompson, Phys. Rev. B 90, 220510 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Y. Fang, D. Yazici, I. Jeon, and M. B. Maple, Phys. Rev. B 96, 214505 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Y. Fang, D. Yazici, B. D. White, and M. B. Maple, Phys. Rev. B 92, 094507 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Kalai Selvan, G

    G. Kalai Selvan, G. S. Thakur, K. Manikandan, A. Banerjee, Z. Haque, L. C. Gupta, A. K. Ganguli, and S. Arumugam, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 275002 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    R. Jha, H. Kishan, and V. P. S. Awana, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 84, 17 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    C. T. Wolowiec, D. Yazici, B. D. White, K. Huang, and M. B. Maple, Phys. Rev. B 88, 064503 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Tomita, M

    T. Tomita, M. Ebata, H. Soeda, H. Takahashi, H. Fujihisa, Y. Gotoh, Y. Mizuguchi, H. Izawa, O. Miura, S. Demura, K. Deguchi, and Y. Takano, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 83, 063704 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Y. Fang, C. T. Wolowiec, A. J. Breindel, D. Yazici, P. C. Ho, and M. B. Maple, Supercond. Sci. Tech. 30, 115004 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Kajitani, T

    J. Kajitani, T. Hiroi, A. Omachi, O. Miura, and Y. Mizuguchi, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28, 1129 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Deguchi, Y

    K. Deguchi, Y. Mizuguchi, S. Demura, H. Hara, T. Watanabe, S. J. Denholme, M. Fujioka, H. Okazaki, T. Ozaki, H. Takeya, T. Yamaguchi, O. Miura, and Y. Takano, EPL 101, 17004 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Pallecchi, G

    I. Pallecchi, G. Lamura, M. Putti, J. Kajitani, Y. Mizuguchi, O. Miura, S. Demura, K. Deguchi, and Y. Takano, Phys. Rev. B 89, 214513 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Kajitani, K

    J. Kajitani, K. Deguchi, A. Omachi, T. Hiroi, Y. Takano, H. Takatsu, H. Kadowaki, O. Miura, and Y. Mizuguchi, Solid State Commun. 181, 1 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    Kajitani, K

    J. Kajitani, K. Deguchi, T. Hiroi, A. Omachi, S. Demura, Y. Takano, O. Miura, and Y. Mizuguchi, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 83, 065002 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Takemura, J

    K. Takemura, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 662 (2001)

    2001

  19. [27]

    Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, (2016), CrysAlisPro Software system, version 1.171.38.43, Rigaku Corporation, Oxford, UK

    2016

  20. [28]

    Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr

    G. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. A 71, 3 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Athauda, C

    A. Athauda, C. Hoffmann, S. Aswartham, J. Terzic, G. Cao, X. Zhu, Y. Ren, and D. Louca, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 86, 054701 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Sagayama, H

    R. Sagayama, H. Sagayama, R. Kumai, Y. Murakami, T. Asano, J. Kajitani, R. Higashinaka, T. D. Matsuda, and Y. Aoki, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 84, 123703 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Q. Liu, X. Zhang, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 93, 174119 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Svitlyk, B

    V. Svitlyk, B. J. Campbell, and Y. Mozharivskyj, Inorg. Chem. 48, 10364 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Svitlyk, J

    V. Svitlyk, J. Y. Y. Cheung, and Y. Mozharivskyj, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 322, 2558 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org for results of structural refinement for all the datapoints presented on Figs. 4 and 5

  27. [35]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. K. H. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, J. Luitz, R. Laskowski, F. Tran, and L. D. Marks, WIEN2k, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universitat Wien, Austria), 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    I. R. Shein and A. L. Ivanovskii, JETP Lett. 96, 769 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.