Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 80 references

Cyclically sheared colloidal gels: structural change and delayed failure time

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Cyclic shear near the yield point hardens colloidal gels and delays their failure.

desk verdict Solid exp+sim study of cyclic shear coarsening in gels; the delayed-failure claim is shakier than the abstract admits, but the paper handles it honestly enough to be worth serious review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14408 v1 pith:ZWNTPL65 submitted 2025-06-17 cond-mat.soft

Himangsu Bhaumik , James E. Hallett , Tanniemola B. Liverpool , Robert L. Jack , C. Patrick Royall This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords colloidalgelscyclicshearstrainhardeningcreepfailuredelayedtimestructuralcoarseninganisotropyconfocalmicroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Repeatedly shearing a colloidal gel with strain amplitude close to its yield point changes the material on multiple length scales: strands thicken, coordination numbers rise, and pores grow larger. In simulations, this cyclic shear also strain-hardens the gel, so that it survives longer under a constant applied stress before failing. The delay is strongest when the later creep stress is applied in a shear plane different from the cyclic shear plane, revealing that the shear history imprints an anisotropic structure. The paper connects these structural changes, observed in confocal microscopy experiments and Langevin-dynamics simulations, to the mechanical response of the gel.

What carries the argument

The central variable is the strain-hardening regime located near the yield strain, which the paper identifies as the amplitude at which the peak stress in the shear cycle is maximal. The mechanism is that cyclic shear near this amplitude breaks weak strands, the freed particles join the remaining strands, strands coarsen, and the gel descends its energy landscape and becomes less compliant. The anisotropic response is quantified by comparing creep failure in the same shear plane as the cyclic shear (xy) with creep in the orthogonal plane (xz).

What would settle it

Perform a creep test on the same experimental colloid-polymer gel after cyclic shearing at a strain amplitude near the yield strain: if the failure time is not longer than that of an unsheared gel, or does not increase when the creep plane is rotated relative to the shear plane, the central claim is contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that cyclic shear of a colloidal gel acts as an accelerated aging mechanism: it coarsens the gel network, increasing the coordination number Nb and the pore size while raising the population of locally favored clusters, and when the strain amplitude is near the yield strain it strain-hardens the gel. Hardening appears as a non-monotonic evolution of the stress-strain loop area and of the dynamic moduli G' and G'' with cycle number, and it translates into longer failure times in subsequent constant-stress creep. The enhancement of the failure time, up to roughly a factor of three, is much larger when the creep stress is applied in the xz plane, orthogonal to the xy cyclic shear plane, showing that cyclic shear imprints a directional memory that competes with the stabilizing effect of coarsening. The authors argue that shearing both accelerates the gel's descent toward lower-energy states and, at larger amplitudes, accumulates directional damage, and that the balance between these effects determines whether cyclic shear strengthens or weakens the material.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the simulation model behaves like the real gel under cyclic shear even though its parameters are not matched to the experiment and it ignores hydrodynamic interactions, and the delayed-failure and anisotropy conclusions come only from those simulations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cyclic shear can serve as a processing step to strengthen a gel if the strain amplitude is chosen near the yield strain, while larger amplitudes weaken it.
  • The delayed-failure effect is directional: a gel hardened by xy cyclic shear resists xz creep much longer than xy creep, so shear history can tailor anisotropic mechanical responses.
  • Structural markers such as coordination number, bond-orientation order, cluster counts, and pore-size distribution evolve with cycle number and provide observable signatures of how far a gel has been mechanically processed.
  • The hardening benefit is limited to an intermediate number of cycles; beyond that window the gel softens again, so processing time must be controlled.
  • Simulations reproduce the experimental structural trends even without quantitative parameter matching, supporting the model's use for predicting history-dependent gel rheology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the stabilization effect is isotropic while the damage accumulation is directional, sequential or multi-axis cyclic shear protocols could engineer gels with programmable anisotropic mechanical responses, a possibility the paper only gestures toward.
  • The orientation dependence of the delayed failure time is demonstrated only in simulation; an experiment that measures creep lifetime in orthogonal planes after cyclic shear would directly test whether the same anisotropy exists in real gels.
  • Since the model neglects hydrodynamic interactions, a natural extension is to check whether including hydrodynamics preserves the hardening and delayed-failure effects; a change would indicate that the proposed mechanism needs revision.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents experiments and simulations on cyclically sheared depletion colloidal gels, following structural evolution across microscopic and mesoscopic scales. Experiments with confocal microscopy track coordination number, bond-orientational order, TCC clusters, and pore-size distributions as functions of the number of shear cycles, while a polydisperse Morse/Langevin simulation reproduces the qualitative structural trends and additionally probes stress-strain hysteresis, dynamic moduli, and creep failure. The central claims are that cyclic shear promotes coarsening and microstructural densification, and that for strain amplitudes near the yield strain the gel strain-hardens, leading to delayed failure in subsequent constant-stress creep, with a strong orientation dependence of the delay. The mechanical and delayed-failure results are simulation-only, as the authors explicitly decline quantitative parameter matching of the simulation to the experiment.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper offers a useful multi-scale characterization of mechanical-history effects in colloidal gels, combining particle-resolved structural observations with a simulation model that yields testable predictions for delayed failure and anisotropic response. The structural measurements are direct observations, and the simulation study is systematic in varying amplitude, cycle number, and shear direction. The paper is transparent about the lack of quantitative experiment-simulation matching and about the simulation-only nature of the rheological predictions, which is an honest limitation rather than an overclaim. The orientation-dependent creep result is novel and potentially valuable for designing gel processing protocols.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.B and abstract] The xz creep data in Fig. 8(c,d) show that the failure time continues to increase up to ncyc=5000, at which point the xy cyclic response has already entered the shear-softening regime (Fig. 6(c,d) and Sec. IV.B). This undercuts the unqualified abstract claim that 'strain-hardening also increases gel stability': in the xz geometry, the delayed failure cannot be caused by the xy strain-hardening signal, and the paper itself attributes the large-ncyc enhancement to anisotropic structural memory. The hardening-to-stability link is therefore established only for the same-plane (xy) case and is an inferred correlation, not a demonstrated mechanism. Please either restrict the claim to the geometry in which hardening is measured, or provide a direct structural/mechanical measure of hardening in the plane perpendicular to the cyclic shear, and include an unsheared aging control at matched total age to separate aging/coarsening from cyclic-shear effects.
  2. [Sec. III.B, Figs. 2 and 3] No error bars, confidence intervals, or replicate counts are reported for the experimental structural data (Nb, q2, TCC, pore size). The text in Sec. III.B.2 concedes that the pore-size average for the cp=1.5cp* sample is subject to large fluctuations because of a small number of large pores, and Sec. II.A states that the visualisation region moves with time. Without a statement of the number of independent samples or fields and the associated uncertainty, the experimental trends in Figs. 2 and 3 are not statistically supported as presented. Please add error bars (e.g., standard error over fields) and explicitly discuss the effect of the moving imaging window on the pore-size distributions.
  3. [Sec. II.B.1 and Sec. IV] All mechanical results, including strain-hardening and delayed failure, come from a simulation model whose parameters are deliberately not matched to the experiment (Sec. II.B.1). The paper is transparent about this, but the title and abstract present the delayed-failure result as a property of cyclically sheared colloidal gels in general. Since no experimental rheology is shown for the real gel (only structure), the claim that cyclic shear delays failure is a prediction of the model, not an experimental finding. Please make this distinction explicit in the abstract and introduction, or add experimental evidence (e.g., a rheological creep measurement on the same gels) to support the simulation result.
  4. [Sec. IV.B, Eq. (3) and Fig. 8] The failure time is defined as the time for the average strain to reach gamma*=0.4, a threshold taken from Ref. [64]. The creep curves in Fig. 8(a) show that the plateau strain is itself a function of ncyc and can be comparable to gamma_max, so the measured tau_f may depend strongly on this arbitrary threshold. To demonstrate that the non-monotonic dependence of tau_f on ncyc is robust, the authors should test a range of thresholds (e.g., gamma*=0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.6) and show that the qualitative conclusions are unchanged, or justify the threshold from a feature of the creep curves that is independent of ncyc.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 4(d)] The y-axis label reads <ntb> but the panel is described in the caption as pentagonal bipyramids <npb>.
  2. [Sec. III.A] 'As noted abvoe' should read 'As noted above'.
  3. [Sec. I, last paragraph] 'might be harnessed to for prediction' contains a stray 'to'; the phrase should be 'harnessed for prediction'.
  4. [Fig. 7 caption] The panels are labeled (a)-(d) in the figure, but the caption refers to (a) for the example fit and then lists 'for (a) gamma_max=0.01, (b) gamma_max=0.035, and (c) gamma_max=0.07' for the moduli panels, which does not match the panel labels; please renumber or relabel.
  5. [Figs. 8(b,d)] No error bars are shown for tau_f; since the simulations are averaged over roughly 50 independent runs, standard errors should be included to support the comparisons.
  6. [Table I] The column headings are not typeset cleanly; for example, the shear rate is given as 'epsilon gamma_dot (/tau_B^-1)', which is likely a formatting issue that should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: structural and mechanical claims are measured outputs; the few self-citations define protocols, not outcomes.

full rationale

The central results are direct observations or simulations: coarsening trends in Nb, q2, TCC counts and pore sizes (Figs. 2-5) are measured; the hardening signatures (loop area, sigma_max, G', G'') and the delayed creep failure times tau_f (Figs. 6-8) are computed quantities, not fitted parameters. The creep protocol and the strain threshold gamma*=0.4 are taken from the authors' prior Ref. [64], but that is a measurement convention: tau_f is then evaluated from the simulated strain curves, and the xy vs xz comparison is an unforced, parameter-free output. The strain-hardening interpretation cites prior glass work [56] as analogy, not as a uniqueness theorem; the paper even reports the xz creep enhancement persisting beyond the xy strain-softening regime, which shows the 'hardening increases stability' link is not enforced by construction. The paper explicitly disclaims quantitative experiment-simulation parameter matching (Sec. II.B.1), which is a generality limitation, not a circularity. No equation defines its input as its output, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. At most there are minor self-citations that are not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a pre-existing simulation model, operational thresholds, and standard boundary-condition and thermostat setups; no new entities, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The main ad hoc element is the failure-strain threshold inherited from Ref. [64].

free parameters (1)
  • failure strain threshold gamma* = 0.4
    Defines failure time tau_f as the time when mean strain reaches 0.4, taken from Ref. [64]; changing this threshold changes reported tau_f values, though relative comparisons between protocols may be robust.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The truncated Morse potential model maps to the Asakura-Oosawa colloid-polymer mixture and captures depletion gel behavior.
    Invoked in Sec. II.B.1 with citations to prior work [9,12,24,59-62]; the mapping is not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic interactions can be neglected for the structural and failure properties studied.
    Acknowledged in Sec. II.B.1: 'our model neglects hydrodynamic interactions.'
  • standard math Overdamped Langevin dynamics with Lees-Edwards boundary conditions adequately represent shear flow of a gel.
    Used in Sec. II.B.2 with friction lambda0=10; this is a standard coarse-grained approach for colloidal dispersions.
  • ad hoc to paper Failure time can be identified by a strain threshold gamma*=0.4.
    Defined in Sec. IV.B 'as explained in Ref. [64]'; it is operational and somewhat arbitrary, taken from the authors' earlier work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cyclically sheared colloidal gels: structural change and delayed failure time." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZWNTPL65

@misc{pith2026250614408,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cyclically sheared colloidal gels: structural change and delayed failure time},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZWNTPL65}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14408}
}
read the original abstract

We present experiments and simulations on cyclically sheared colloidal gels, and probe their behaviour on several different length scales. The shearing induces structural changes in the experimental gel, changing particles' neighborhoods and reorganizing the mesoscopic pores. These results are mirrored in computer simulations of a model gel-former, which show how the material evolves down the energy landscape under shearing, for small strains. By systematic variation of simulation parameters, we characterise the structural and mechanical changes that take place under shear, including both yielding and strain-hardening. We simulate creeping flow under constant shear stress, for gels that were previously subject to cyclic shear, showing that strain-hardening also increases gel stability. This response depends on the orientation of the applied shear stress, revealing that the cyclic shear imprints anisotropic structural features into the gel.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14408 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (top) shows slices through the experimental system. (Specifically, we visualise particles in a region of size L × L × Z with Z = 8ℓ, for various ncyc.) The cyclic shear changes the gel structure: For ncyc = 0 the pores inside the gel are almost isotropic, but they become elon￾gated as ncyc increases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows the distribution of the pore sizes Dpore, as the shear accumulates, for the gel with ε = 1.25ε ∗ . The distribution shifts towards larger pores as the shear ncyc increases. The maximal Dpore also has an increas￾ing trend with ncyc. The associated mean pore size [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) we identify γ Y max = 0.0350 ± 0.0005. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulation results are shown in Fig. 6 for a range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a), one sees that the enhancements of τf are much stronger when the creep flow is not in the same plane as the cyclic shear. Our interpretation is that the increase of τf due to coarsening and aging effects is dominating this response due to xz-stress, because memory …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [64]

    M. G. Noro and D. Frenkel, Extended corresponding- states behavior for particles with variable range attrac- tions, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 2941 (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [1]

    Model For numerical simulations, we use an established model of a size-polydisperse colloid-polymer mixture [9, 12, 24, 59–61] which has been accurately mapped to the stan- dard two-component Asakura-Oosawa model [59, 62]. The depletion interaction between colloidal particles is modeled by a truncated and shifted Morse potential U (r) = ε e−2α(r−ℓij ) − 2...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Initialisation: Simulations are initialised in ran- dom configurations at volume fraction ϕ = 0.2

    Simulations a. Initialisation: Simulations are initialised in ran- dom configurations at volume fraction ϕ = 0.2. Gels are formed by simulating for a time tw, during which spin- odal decomposition occurs. Unless otherwise stated we simulate tw = 3 × 104τsim (≈ 7 × 104τB) and system size of N = 104 particles; all results are averaged over many independent ...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Microscopic structure To probe microscopic structural changes, we measure several local quantities, which mirror those measured in the simulation study of [64]. Specifically, we consider the coordination number Nb, the two-fold bond-orientation parameter q2, and the average number of different types of clusters in which particles participate, as obtained ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Mesoscopic structure We now consider the mesoscopic structure of the gel by measuring its pore size distribution. We measure the distribution of pore sizes in the gel as defined in [70], the detailed procedure is described in [64]: We select a random point in the gel and we find the largest possible sphere that encompasses that point, without overlapping ...

    work page

  6. [5]

    strain hardening

    Hysteresis loops We consider gels with ε = 3 .22ε∗, as visualised in Fig. 5. Simulation results are shown in Fig. 6 for a range of γmax. Specifically, Fig. 6(a) shows stress-strain curves, obtained from long simulations ( ncyc = 10 4), averaged over the final 200 cycles. For very small γmax and small shear rates ˙γ one expects an elastic response withσxy ...

    work page

  7. [6]

    non- linear moduli

    Dynamic moduli To probe further the strain-hardening phenomena, we investigate dynamic moduli (storage modulus G′, and loss modulus G′′). More specifically, we measure “non- linear moduli” which incorporate the dependence of the stress response on the frequency and amplitude of an os- cillatory (strain-controlled) shear. These quantities are familiar from...

    work page 2021

  8. [7]

    Zaccarelli, Colloidal gels: equilibrium and non- equilibrium routes, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 19, 323101 (2007)

    E. Zaccarelli, Colloidal gels: equilibrium and non- equilibrium routes, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 19, 323101 (2007)

    2007

Show all 80 references
  1. [8]

    C. P. Royall, M. A. Faers, S. L. Fussell, and J. E. Hal- lett, Real space analysis of colloidal gels: Triumphs, chal- lenges and future directions, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 33, 453002 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    Cipelletti and L

    L. Cipelletti and L. Ramos, Slow dynamics in glassy soft matter, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17, R253 (2005)

    2005

  3. [10]

    Poon, The physics of a model colloid–polymer mix- ture, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, R859 (2002)

    W. Poon, The physics of a model colloid–polymer mix- ture, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, R859 (2002)

    2002

  4. [11]

    P. J. Lu, E. Zaccarelli, F. Ciulla, A. B. Schofield, F. Sciortino, and D. A. Weitz, Gelation of particles with short-range attraction, Nature 453, 499 (2008)

    2008

  5. [12]

    P. J. Lu and D. A. Weitz, Colloidal particles: Crystals, glasses, and gels, Annu. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys. 4, 217 (2013)

    2013

  6. [13]

    Segre, V

    P. Segre, V. Prasad, A. B. Schofield, and D. Weitz, Glasslike kinetic arrest at the colloidal-gelation transi- tion, Physical Review Letters 86, 6042 (2001)

    2001

  7. [14]

    Sedgwick, K

    H. Sedgwick, K. Kroy, A. Salonen, M. Robertson, S. Egel- haaf, and W. Poon, Non-equilibrium behavior of sticky colloidal particles: beads, clusters and gels, The Euro- pean Physical Journal E 16, 77 (2005)

    2005

  8. [15]

    B. J. Landrum, W. B. Russel, and R. N. Zia, Delayed yield in colloidal gels: Creep, flow, and re-entrant solid regimes, Journal of Rheology 60, 783 (2016)

    2016

  9. [16]

    Tsurusawa, M

    H. Tsurusawa, M. Leocmach, J. Russo, and H. Tanaka, Direct link between mechanical stability in gels and percolation of isostatic particles, Sci. Adv. 5, eaav6090 (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    Rouwhorst, C

    J. Rouwhorst, C. Ness, S. Stoyanov, A. Zaccone, and P. Schall, Nonequilibrium continuous phase transition in colloidal gelation with short-range attraction, Nature communications 11, 3558 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    Patrick Royall, S

    C. Patrick Royall, S. R. Williams, T. Ohtsuka, and H. Tanaka, Direct observation of a local structural mech- anism for dynamic arrest, Nature materials7, 556 (2008)

    2008

  12. [19]

    J. M. van Doorn, J. E. Verweij, J. Sprakel, and J. van der Gucht, Strand plasticity governs fatigue in colloidal gels, Physical review letters 120, 208005 (2018)

    2018

  13. [20]

    J. E. Verweij, F. A. Leermakers, J. Sprakel, and J. Van Der Gucht, Plasticity in colloidal gel strands, Soft Matter 15, 6447 (2019)

    2019

  14. [21]

    Thijssen, T

    K. Thijssen, T. B. Liverpool, C. P. Royall, and R. L. Jack, Necking and failure of a particulate gel strand: signatures of yielding on different length scales, Soft Matter19, 7412 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    A. D. Dinsmore, V. Prasad, I. Y. Wong, and D. A. Weitz, Microscopic structure and elasticity of weakly aggregated colloidal gels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 185502 (2006)

    2006

  16. [23]

    L. C. Hsiao, R. S. Newman, S. C. Glotzer, and M. J. Solomon, Role of isostaticity and load-bearing mi- crostructure in the elasticity of yielded colloidal gels, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 16029 (2012)

    2012

  17. [24]

    Bouzid, J

    M. Bouzid, J. Colombo, L. V. Barbosa, and E. Del Gado, Elastically driven intermittent microscopic dynamics in soft solids, Nature communications 8, 15846 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    Nabizadeh, F

    M. Nabizadeh, F. Nasirian, X. Li, Y. Saraswat, R. Wa- heibi, L. C. Hsiao, D. Bi, B. Ravandi, and S. Jamali, Network physics of attractive colloidal gels: Resilience, rigidity, and phase diagram, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2316394121 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    Mangal, M

    D. Mangal, M. Nabizadeh, and S. Jamali, Predicting yielding in attractive colloidal gels, Phys. Rev. E 109, 014602 (2024)

    2024

  20. [27]

    S. M. Fielding, P. Sollich, and M. E. Cates, Aging and 11 rheology in soft materials, Journal of Rheology 44, 323 (2000)

    2000

  21. [28]

    Trappe, V

    V. Trappe, V. Prasad, L. Cipelletti, P. Segre, and D. A. Weitz, Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles, Nature 411, 772 (2001)

    2001

  22. [29]

    Cipelletti, S

    L. Cipelletti, S. Manley, R. C. Ball, and D. A. Weitz, Universal aging features in the restructuring of fractal colloidal gels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2275 (2000)

    2000

  23. [30]

    R. N. Zia, B. J. Landrum, and W. B. Russel, A micro- mechanical study of coarsening and rheology of colloidal gels: Cage building, cage hopping, and smoluchowski’s ratchet, Journal of Rheology 58, 1121 (2014)

    2014

  24. [31]

    Nabizadeh and S

    M. Nabizadeh and S. Jamali, Life and death of colloidal bonds control the rate-dependent rheology of gels, Nature Communications 12, 4274 (2021)

    2021

  25. [32]

    Bartlett, L

    P. Bartlett, L. J. Teece, and M. A. Faers, Sudden collapse of a colloidal gel, Physical Review E 85, 021404 (2012)

    2012

  26. [33]

    Patinet, D

    S. Patinet, D. Vandembroucq, and M. L. Falk, Connect- ing local yield stresses with plastic activity in amorphous solids, Physical review letters 117, 045501 (2016)

    2016

  27. [34]

    J. T. Parley, S. M. Fielding, and P. Sollich, Aging in a mean field elastoplastic model of amorphous solids, Physics of Fluids 32, 127104 (2020)

    2020

  28. [35]

    Pollard and S

    J. Pollard and S. M. Fielding, Yielding, shear banding, and brittle failure of amorphous materials, Physical Re- view Research 4, 043037 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    H.-N. Lee, K. Paeng, S. F. Swallen, and M. D. Ediger, Direct measurement of molecular mobility in actively de- formed polymer glasses, Science 323, 231 (2009)

    2009

  30. [37]

    Deng and C

    C. Deng and C. A. Schuh, Atomistic mechanisms of cyclic hardening in metallic glass, Applied Physics Letters 100, 251909 (2012)

    2012

  31. [38]

    Leishangthem, A

    P. Leishangthem, A. D. S. Parmar, and S. Sastry, The yielding transition in amorphous solids under oscillatory shear deformation, Nature Communications 8, 14653 (2017)

    2017

  32. [39]

    S. Kim, I. Svetlizky, D. A. Weitz, and F. Spaepen, Work hardening in colloidal crystals, Nature 630, 648 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    Gisler, R

    T. Gisler, R. C. Ball, and D. A. Weitz, Strain hardening of fractal colloidal gels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1064 (1999)

    1999

  34. [41]

    Pouzot, T

    M. Pouzot, T. Nicolai, L. Benyahia, and D. Durand, Strain hardening and fracture of heat-set fractal globu- lar protein gels, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 293, 376 (2006)

    2006

  35. [42]

    K. M. Schmoller, P. Fern´ andez, R. C. Arevalo, D. L. Blair, and A. R. Bausch, Cyclic hardening in bundled actin networks, Nature Communications 1, 134 (2010)

    2010

  36. [43]

    de Oliveira Reis, T

    G. de Oliveira Reis, T. Gibaud, B. Saint-Michel, S. Man- neville, M. Leocmach, L. Vaysse, F. Bonfils, C. Sanchez, and P. Menut, Irreversible hardening of a colloidal gel under shear: The smart response of natural rubber latex gels, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 539,...

    2019

  37. [44]

    D. Bonn, M. M. Denn, L. Berthier, T. Divoux, and S. Manneville, Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035005 (2017)

    2017

  38. [45]

    Colombo and E

    J. Colombo and E. Del Gado, Stress localization, stiff- ening, and yielding in a model colloidal gel, Journal of rheology 58, 1089 (2014)

    2014

  39. [46]

    Bouzid and E

    M. Bouzid and E. Del Gado, Network topology in soft gels: Hardening and softening materials, Langmuir 34, 773 (2018)

    2018

  40. [47]

    H. A. Lockwood, M. H. Agar, and S. M. Fielding, Power law creep and delayed failure of gels and fibrous materials under stress, Soft Matter 20, 2474 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    Mizuno, A

    H. Mizuno, A. Ikeda, T. Kawasaki, and K. Miyazaki, Universal mechanism of shear thinning in supercooled liquids, Communications Physics 7, 199 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    C. P. Royall, P. Charbonneau, M. Dijkstra, J. Russo, F. Smallenburg, T. Speck, and C. Valeriani, Colloidal hard spheres: Triumphs, challenges and mysteries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 045003 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    Besseling, E

    R. Besseling, E. R. Weeks, A. B. Schofield, and W. C. Poon, Three-dimensional imaging of colloidal glasses un- der steady shear, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 028301 (2007)

    2007

  44. [51]

    Schall, D

    P. Schall, D. A. Weitz, and F. Spaepen, Structural rear- rangements that govern flow in colloidal glasses, Science 318, 1895 (2007)

    2007

  45. [52]

    Ballesta, N

    P. Ballesta, N. Koumakis, R. Besseling, W. C. K. Poon, and G. Petekidis, Slip of gels in colloid–polymer mixtures under shear, Soft Matter 9, 3237 (2013)

    2013

  46. [53]

    J. C. Conrad and J. A. Lewis, Structure of colloidal gels during microchannel flow, Langmuir 24, 7628 (2008)

    2008

  47. [54]

    Koumakis, E

    N. Koumakis, E. Moghimi, R. Besseling, W. C. Poon, J. F. Brady, and G. Petekidis, Tuning colloidal gels by shear, Soft Matter 11, 4640 (2015)

    2015

  48. [55]

    Moghimi, A

    E. Moghimi, A. R. Jacob, and G. Petekidis, Residual stresses in colloidal gels, Soft Matter 13, 7824 (2017)

    2017

  49. [56]

    Rajaram and A

    B. Rajaram and A. Mohraz, Microstructural response of dilute colloidal gels to nonlinear shear deformation, Soft Matter 6, 2246 (2010)

    2010

  50. [57]

    Koumakis and G

    N. Koumakis and G. Petekidis, Two step yielding in attractive colloids: transition from gels to attractive glasses, Soft Matter 7, 2456 (2011)

    2011

  51. [58]

    Perge, N

    C. Perge, N. Taberlet, T. Gibaud, and S. Manneville, Time dependence in large amplitude oscillatory shear: A rheo- ultrasonic study of fatigue dynamics in a colloidal gel, J. Rheol. 58, 1331 (2014)

    2014

  52. [59]

    Moghimi, A

    E. Moghimi, A. R. Jacob, N. Koumakis, and G. Petekidis, Colloidal gels tuned by oscillatory shear, Soft Matter 13, 2371 (2017)

    2017

  53. [60]

    E. M. Schwen, M. Ramaswamy, C.-M. Cheng, L. Jan, and I. Cohen, Embedding orthogonal memories in a col- loidal gel through oscillatory shear, Soft Matter 16, 3746 (2020)

    2020

  54. [61]

    Maity, H

    S. Maity, H. Bhaumik, S. Athani, and S. Sastry, Fa- tigue failure in glasses under cyclic shear deformation, arXiv:2409.17384 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Bhaumik, G

    H. Bhaumik, G. Foffi, and S. Sastry, The role of anneal- ing in determining the yielding behavior of glasses un- der cyclic shear deformation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2100227118 (2021)

    2021

  56. [63]

    Malins, S

    A. Malins, S. R. Williams, J. Eggers, and C. P. Roy- all, Identification of structure in condensed matter with the topological cluster classification, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 234506 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    Taffs, A

    J. Taffs, A. Malins, S. R. Williams, and C. P. Royall, A structural comparison of models of colloid-polymer mix- tures, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 104119 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    Razali, C

    A. Razali, C. J. Fullerton, F. Turci, J. E. Hallett, R. L. Jack, and C. P. Royall, Effects of vertical confinement on gelation and sedimentation of colloids, Soft Matter 13, 3230 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Griffiths, F

    S. Griffiths, F. Turci, and C. P. Royall, Local structure of percolating gels at very low volume fractions, J. Chem. 12 Phys. 146, 014905 (2017)

    2017

  60. [68]

    Asakura and F

    S. Asakura and F. Oosawa, On interaction between 2 bodies immersed in a solution of macromolecules, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1255 (1954)

    1954

  61. [69]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based mat...

    2022

  62. [70]

    Bhaumik, T

    H. Bhaumik, T. B. Liverpool, C. P. Royall, and R. L. Jack, Yielding in colloidal gels: From local structure to mesoscale strand breakage and macroscopic failure, Phys. Rev. E 111, 055412 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    C. P. Royall, J. Eggers, A. Furukawa, and H. Tanaka, Probing colloidal gels at multiple length scales: The role of hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 258302 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    de Graaf, W

    J. de Graaf, W. C. K. Poon, M. J. Haughey, and M. Her- mes, Hydrodynamics strongly affect the dynamics of col- loidal gelation but not gel structure, Soft Matter 15, 10 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    T. A. Vezirov, S. Gerloff, and S. H. L. Klapp, Manipulat- ing shear-induced non-equilibrium transitions in colloidal films by feedback control, Soft Matter 11, 406 (2015)

    2015

  66. [74]

    Cabriolu, J

    R. Cabriolu, J. Horbach, P. Chaudhuri, and K. Martens, Precursors of fluidisation in the creep response of a soft glass, Soft Matter 15, 415 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    P. J. Steinhardt, D. R. Nelson, and M. Ronchetti, Bond- orientational order in liquids and glasses, Phys. Rev. B 28, 784 (1983)

    1983

  68. [76]

    L. D. Gelb and K. E. Gubbins, Pore size distributions in porous glasses: A computer simulation study, Langmuir 15, 305 (1999)

    1999

  69. [77]

    K. Hyun, M. Wilhelm, C. Klein, K. Cho, J. Nam, K. Ahn, S. Lee, R. Ewoldt, and G. McKinley, A review of non- linear oscillatory shear tests: Analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS), Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford) , 1697 (2011)

    2011

  70. [78]

    W.-T. Yeh, M. Ozawa, K. Miyazaki, T. Kawasaki, and L. Berthier, Glass stability changes the nature of yield- ing under oscillatory shear, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 225502 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    N. C. Keim, J. D. Paulsen, Z. Zeravcic, S. Sastry, and S. R. Nagel, Memory formation in matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035002 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    B. P. Bhowmik, H. G. E. Hentschel, and I. Procaccia, Scaling theory for w¨ ohler plots in amorphous solids under cyclic forcing, Phys. Rev. E 105, 015001 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.