REVIEW 2 cited by
Three fermion generations with two unbroken gauge symmetries from the complex sedenions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We show that three generations of leptons and quarks with unbroken Standard Model gauge symmetry $SU(3)_c\times U(1)_{em}$ can be described using the algebra of complexified sedenions $\mathbb{C}\otimes\mathbb{S}$. A primitive idempotent is constructed by selecting a special direction, and the action of this projector on the basis of $\mathbb{C}\otimes\mathbb{S}$ can be used to uniquely split the algebra into three complex octonion subalgebras $\mathbb{C}\otimes \mathbb{O}$. These subalgebras all share a common quaternionic subalgebra. The left adjoint actions of the 8 $\mathbb{C}$-dimensional $\mathbb{C}\otimes \mathbb{O}$ subalgebras on themselves generates three copies of the Clifford algebra $C\ell(6)$. It was previously shown that the minimal left ideals of $C\ell(6)$ describe a single generation of fermions with unbroken $SU(3)_c\times U(1)_{em}$ gauge symmetry. Extending this construction from $\mathbb{C}\otimes\mathbb{O}$ to $\mathbb{C}\otimes\mathbb{S}$ naturally leads to a description of exactly three generations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Unified Standard Model
All Standard Model particle types and the SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) gauge structure are placed inside the matrix algebra M(8,C), built from the octonions, with two leftover states.
-
The Residual $288$ of the $E_8\times\omega E_8$ Program as Adjoint-Lineage Scaffolding Labels: an Ontology, and the Status of the Bifermionic Lagrangian
The residual 288 in the E₈×ωE₈ program is scaffolding labels not particles, with the bifermionic Lagrangian yielding sterile neutrinos and a second composite scalar.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.