Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Logarithmic Laplacian on General Riemannian Manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces a Bochner integral formula that defines log(−Δ) on any complete Riemannian manifold, unifying the Euclidean, compact, and noncompact cases and yielding explicit pointwise kernels under Ricci lower bounds.

desk verdict A genuinely useful Bochner-integral framework for log(-Delta) on manifolds, but the headline theorems overclaim: they silently fail on compact and finite-volume manifolds because the zero mode makes the time integrals diverge. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19311 v1 pith:ZWZLVCLC submitted 2025-06-24 math.AP

Rui Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35R1158J3547A6058J5053C21
keywords logarithmicLaplacianBochnerintegralheatkernelfractionalRiemannianmanifoldsfunctionalcalculushyperbolicspacestochasticcompleteness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a single Bochner integral formula, $\log(-\Delta)f = \int_0^\infty (e^{-t}f - e^{t\Delta}f)\,dt/t$, as the definition of the logarithmic Laplacian on every complete Riemannian manifold. The same formula recovers the classical pointwise expression on Euclidean space, and under a Ricci lower bound it yields an explicit pointwise kernel representation split into short- and long-time heat-kernel parts. The author further shows that the difference between spectral and heat-kernel definitions of fractional and logarithmic Laplacians is a multiplication operator built from the mass-loss function, so the two definitions coincide precisely when the manifold is stochastically complete. On real hyperbolic space, sharp heat-kernel asymptotics give kernel estimates that support a pointwise theory for weighted integrable functions with Dini continuity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the scalar identity $\log\lambda = \int_0^\infty (e^{-t}-e^{-\lambda t})\,dt/t$, fed through the spectral theorem so that $e^{-\lambda t}$ becomes the heat semigroup $e^{t\Delta}$. This yields the Bochner formula for $\log(-\Delta)$. The argument splits the time integral at $t=1$: the short-time piece pairs the heat kernel with $f(x)-f(y)$ and becomes $K_1$; the long-time piece pairs with $f(y)$ and becomes $K_2$. Convergence is controlled by Gaussian heat-kernel upper bounds and volume comparison estimates, while the spectral-versus-heat-kernel comparison is carried by the mass-loss function; its large-time limit is the non-explosion probability and encodes stochastic completeness.

What would settle it

Take a closed manifold, for instance a round sphere, which satisfies $\mathrm{Ric}_g \ge -(n-1)k$, and apply Theorem 1.10 to the constant function $f \equiv 1$. The spectral logarithmic Laplacian is $0$, but the claimed formula contains $-\int_M K_2(x,y)\,d\mathrm{vol}(y)$, and because $\int_M p_t(x,y)\,d\mathrm{vol}(y)=1$ on a closed manifold, this term equals $\int_1^\infty t^{-1}\,dt = \infty$, so the identity would force $0 = -\infty$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the logarithmic Laplacian can be defined on any complete Riemannian manifold by the Bochner integral $\log(-\Delta)f = \int_0^\infty (e^{-t}f - e^{t\Delta}f)\,dt/t$, converging in $L^2$ for $f$ in the logarithmic Sobolev space $H_{\log}(M)$. Applied inside the spectral calculus, the scalar identity $\log\lambda = \int_0^\infty (e^{-t}-e^{-\lambda t})\,dt/t$ turns this abstract operator into a concrete object controlled by heat-kernel integrals. Under $\mathrm{Ric}_g \ge -(n-1)k$, the paper derives the pointwise representation $\log(-\Delta)_{\mathrm{spec}} f(x) = \int_M K_1(x,y)(f(x)-f(y))\,d\mathrm{vol}(y) - \int_M K_2(x,y)f(y)\,d\mathrm{vol}(y) + \Gamma'(1)f(x)$ for H\"older compactly supported $f$, with $K_1 = \int_0^1 p_t(x,y)\,dt/t$ and $K_2 = \int_1^\infty p_t(x,y)\,dt/t$. The same framework shows that the discrepancy between spectral and heat-kernel definitions is a multiplication operator involving the mass-loss function $r(t,x)=1-\int_M p_t(x,y)\,d\mathrm{vol}(y)$, which vanishes exactly when the manifold is stochastically complete.

Load-bearing premise

The pointwise formula in Theorem 1.10 assumes the heat kernel decays rapidly as time goes to infinity, but a Ricci lower bound alone does not force this: on compact or finite-volume manifolds the heat kernel settles at a positive constant, making the long-time term diverge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The logarithmic Laplacian now has a definition on any complete Riemannian manifold, with $H_{\log}(M)$ as its natural domain, so Dirichlet and spectral problems can be posed on curved spaces.
  • On manifolds with Ricci curvature bounded below, the operator has an explicit pointwise integral formula, making it as accessible as the fractional Laplacian for PDE analysis.
  • Spectral and heat-kernel definitions of both fractional and logarithmic Laplacians coincide exactly on stochastically complete manifolds; on non-stochastically complete ones their difference is a multiplication operator determined by the mass-loss function.
  • On hyperbolic space $\mathbb{H}^n$, the pointwise formula extends beyond compactly supported smooth functions to weighted $L^1$ functions that are locally Dini continuous, and $\log(-\Delta_{\mathbb{H}^n})f$ lies in $L^p$ for $1<p\le\infty$ when $f$ is compactly supported and uniformly Dini continuous.
  • The Euclidean formula emerges as a special case: the Bochner definition reproduces the known pointwise kernel for $\log(-\Delta)$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$.
  • The mass-loss potential $V(x)$ could be read as a quantitative invariant of stochastic incompleteness, and comparing its size across manifolds may expose how ends and volume growth control the spectral-versus-heat-kernel discrepancy.
  • Going beyond the paper, the same scalar-logarithm-to-semigroup route should define logarithmic operators for any self-adjoint positive operator with a heat semigroup, such as magnetic Schr\"odinger operators or graph Laplacians.
  • Going beyond the paper, the hyperbolic-space weighted class suggests that on manifolds with slower heat-kernel decay the natural pointwise domain is a weight adapted to the long-time kernel, with local Dini continuity replacing H\"older regularity in the singular part.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a Bochner integral formula for the logarithmic Laplacian on a complete Riemannian manifold, log(-Δ) = ∫_0^∞ (e^{-t} I - e^{tΔ})/t dt, derived from the scalar Frullani identity via the spectral theorem. It shows that on Euclidean space this formula recovers the pointwise kernel representation of Chen–Weth, and under a Ricci lower bound it derives a pointwise representation involving heat-kernel integrals K1 and K2. The paper also compares spectral and heat-kernel definitions of fractional and logarithmic Laplacians, relates their discrepancy to stochastic completeness, and obtains sharp kernel asymptotics and L^p-continuity results on real hyperbolic space. The Euclidean recovery and the hyperbolic-space kernel estimates are the strongest parts of the manuscript.

Significance. If the main results were valid in the stated generality, the Bochner formula would give a unified functional-calculus definition of the logarithmic Laplacian on manifolds and a practical route to pointwise kernel formulas, genuinely useful for PDE and geometric analysis. The paper is self-contained, uses no fitted parameters, and verifies the new definition against the known Euclidean formula. The hyperbolic-space kernel estimates (Propositions 4.6 and 4.8) and the resulting pointwise/L^p theory are substantial contributions. However, the central claims as stated extend to manifolds with an L^2 kernel for Δ, where the construction breaks down; this is a load-bearing gap that must be repaired before the main theorems can be accepted in their current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Theorem 2.12 (Theorem 1.1)] The proof of Theorem 2.12 uses the bound E1(λ) ≤ C(1+|log λ|) for all λ > 0, but this fails at λ = 0, where E1(0) = ∞. For any f with nonzero projection onto ker Δ, e.g. a nonzero constant on a compact manifold, the scalar integrand at λ = 0 is (e^{-t} - 1)/t, whose integral from 1 to ∞ diverges like -∫ t^{-1} dt. Consequently the Bochner integral does not converge for such f, and Theorem 1.1 as stated 'for every f ∈ Hlog(M)' is false. The theorem should be restricted to the spectral subspace orthogonal to ker Δ, and the definition of Hlog in Definition 1.3 must explicitly exclude or separately handle the point λ = 0.
  2. [§3.2, Theorem 3.4 (Theorem 1.10)] The pointwise formula of Theorem 3.4 requires K2(x,y) = ∫_1^∞ p_t(x,y)/t dt to be finite, but the stated hypothesis Ric_g ≥ -(n-1)k does not imply any decay of p_t as t → ∞. It only gives stochastic completeness, i.e. ∫_M p_t dvol = 1. On a compact manifold, or a finite-volume complete manifold with such a curvature bound, p_t(x,y) → 1/Vol(M) > 0, so K2(x,y) = ∞ for all x,y and the formula fails for functions with nonzero mean. The line in the proof saying the long-time interchange is 'justified by rapid decay of p_t(x,y) as t → ∞' is therefore incorrect. The theorem needs an additional assumption, such as the absence of nontrivial L^2-harmonic functions, a positive bottom of the L^2-spectrum, or restriction of f to the mean-zero subspace.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (3.4)] The Li–Yau estimate displayed in (3.4) contains the factor exp(-μ1(M)t) with μ1(M) = inf σ(-Δ) ≥ 0. When μ1(M) = 0, which is the case for Euclidean space and for compact manifolds, this factor provides no decay, so the estimate cannot justify the Fubini interchange needed for the K2 term. The proof of Theorem 3.4 implicitly assumes a spectral gap or heat-kernel decay that is not part of the hypotheses; this is the technical source of the failure described in the previous comment.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, p. 3] The sentence 'On a compact manifold, such as colsed manifold' contains a typo: 'colsed' should be 'closed'.
  2. [§2.3, proof of Lemma 2.13 and Theorem 2.15] The word 'Silimarly' appears in the proof of Lemma 2.13; it should be 'Similarly'.
  3. [§3.1, p. 30] In the display for E({0})f, the integral is written as ∫_M f(x) dvol_Hn(x); since the manifold is a general compact M, this should be dvol(y) (or dvol(x)) and the subscript Hn should be removed.
  4. [§4.4] There are several small typographical errors: 'sufficies' should be 'suffices' in the proof of Proposition 4.19, and 'remind' should be 'remainder' in the proof of Proposition 4.17.
  5. [§3.2] The notation Klog(x,y) = ∫_0^∞ (e^{-t}δ_x(y) - p_t(x,y))/t dt uses δ_x as a distribution; it would be clearer to state that the formula holds in the sense of distributions or to specify the integrability condition (3.3) before using it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Bochner formula follows by spectral calculus from the scalar Frullani identity and is checked against the independent Euclidean formula; the zero-mode decay gap is a correctness issue, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Theorem 2.12 obtains log(-Delta) = integral_0^inf (e^{-t}I - e^{tDelta})/t dt by inserting the scalar Frullani identity log lambda = integral_0^inf (e^{-t} - e^{-lambda t})/t dt (Lemma 2.11) into the spectral measure, with estimates on the exponential integral E1. Theorem 2.15 then re-derives, rather than assumes, the Euclidean pointwise representation and its constants c_n, rho_n from Gamma-function identities, matching the external Chen-Weth formula. Theorem 3.4 derives the pointwise kernel formula by splitting the Bochner integral at t=1 and using Li-Yau and Bishop-Gromov estimates; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no load-bearing claim depends on a self-citation. The one passage that should be flagged is the proof of Theorem 3.4, where the long-time interchange is said to be justified by rapid decay of p_t(x,y) as t goes to infinity; under Ric_g >= -(n-1)k alone, p_t need not decay on compact or finite-volume complete manifolds, so K2 = integral_1^inf p_t/t dt can diverge for nonzero-mean f. This is an unsupported hypothesis or omitted zero-mode restriction in Theorems 1.10 and 3.4, not a circular step: the stated formula does not reduce to its own input by construction. Score 0 for circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard functional calculus and known heat-kernel estimates; the main unstated premise is the decay of the heat kernel at infinity for the pointwise formula, which is not implied by the Ricci lower bound alone.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators (functional calculus)
    Used in Section 2 to define (-Delta)^s and log(-Delta) via the projection-valued measure E(lambda).
  • standard math Frullani integral identity: log lambda = int_0^infty (e^{-t} - e^{-lambda t})/t dt for lambda > 0
    Lemma 2.11; the basis of the Bochner representation.
  • standard math Fubini theorem for spectral measures and time integrals
    Used in the proof of Theorem 2.12 and Theorem 3.4 to interchange integrals.
  • domain assumption Li-Yau Gaussian heat kernel bounds under Ric_g >= -(n-1)k
    Theorem 3.4 relies on (3.4) to justify the pointwise formula.
  • domain assumption Bishop-Gromov volume comparison
    Used for the volume growth estimates in Theorem 3.4.
  • domain assumption Rapid decay of the heat kernel at infinity
    Unstated but needed in the long-time part of Theorem 3.4; fails on compact and finite-volume manifolds.
  • domain assumption Davies-Mandouvalos heat kernel asymptotics on H_n
    Proposition 4.2, used throughout Section 4.
  • standard math Laplace's method for asymptotic integrals
    Used in Lemmas 4.4 and 4.5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Logarithmic Laplacian on General Riemannian Manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZWZLVCLC

@misc{pith2026250619311,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Logarithmic Laplacian on General Riemannian Manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZWZLVCLC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19311}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce, for the first time, a Bochner integral formula for the logarithmic Laplacian on any complete Riemannian manifold. This unified framework recovers the classical pointwise expression on Euclidean space and allows us to define logarithmic Laplacian in both compact and noncompact settings. Under a Ricci lower bound, we derive explicit pointwise integral formulas for logarithmic Laplacian, analogous to those for the fractional Laplacian. We further compare spectral versus heat kernel definitions of both fractional and logarithmic Laplacians, showing that their discrepancy is governed by the mass loss function and hence by stochastic completeness. Finally, on real hyperbolic space we exploit sharp heat kernel asymptotics to obtain precise estimates for the fractional and logarithmic kernels, identify the optimal pointwise domain for logarithmic Laplacian and establish its Lp continuity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere: Yamabe-type problems and Sobolev spaces

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The derivative at zero of the conformal fractional Laplacian yields a conformal logarithmic Laplacian whose spectral, stereographic, and Yamabe-type properties are characterized, including an explicit classification o...

  2. Extension theorems for logarithmic Schr\"odinger and discrete Laplacian operators

    math.CA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Logarithmic operators log L_V and log(−Δ_d) are realized as boundary values of solutions to suitable extension problems, in a more involved way than the fractional Laplacian case.

  3. The Logarithmic Laplacian on General Graphs

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The logarithmic Laplacian on weighted graphs is defined via a Bochner integral, given a kernel formula under stochastic completeness, and shown on Z^d to have sharp kernel bounds and exact diffusion asymptotics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    An extension problem related to the fractional laplacian

    Luis Caffarelli and Luis Silvestre. An extension problem related to the fractional laplacian. Communications in partial differential equations, 32(8):1245–1260, 2007

    2007

  2. [2]

    The dirichlet problem for the fractional lapla- cian: regularity up to the boundary

    Xavier Ros-Oton and Joaquim Serra. The dirichlet problem for the fractional lapla- cian: regularity up to the boundary. Journal de Math´ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ees, 101(3):275–302, 2014

    2014

  3. [3]

    The dirichlet problem for the logarithmic laplacian

    Huyuan Chen and Tobias Weth. The dirichlet problem for the logarithmic laplacian. Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 44(11):1100–1139, 2019

    2019

  4. [4]

    Maximum principles for laplacian and fractional laplacian with critical integrability

    Congming Li and Yingshu L¨ u. Maximum principles for laplacian and fractional laplacian with critical integrability. The Journal of Geometric Analysis , 33(7):203, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Small order asymptotics of the dirichlet eigenvalue problem for the fractional laplacian

    Pierre Aime Feulefack, Sven Jarohs, and Tobias Weth. Small order asymptotics of the dirichlet eigenvalue problem for the fractional laplacian. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, 28(2):18, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    Spectral properties of the logarithmic laplacian.Analysis and Mathematical Physics, 11:1–24, 2021

    Ari Laptev and Tobias Weth. Spectral properties of the logarithmic laplacian.Analysis and Mathematical Physics, 11:1–24, 2021

    2021

  7. [7]

    A fractional yamabe flow and some applications

    Tianling Jin and Jingang Xiong. A fractional yamabe flow and some applications. Journal f¨ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), 2014(696):187– 223, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    L´evy processes and stochastic calculus

    David Applebaum. L´evy processes and stochastic calculus . Cambridge university press, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Anisotropic fractional perimeters

    Monika Ludwig. Anisotropic fractional perimeters. Journal of Differential Geome- try, 96(1):77–93, 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Existence of the least energy sign-changing solutions for fractional brezis-nirenberg problem.Advances in Differential Equations, 30(1/2):69–92, 2025

    Qi Li, Shuangjie Peng, and Shixin Wen. Existence of the least energy sign-changing solutions for fractional brezis-nirenberg problem.Advances in Differential Equations, 30(1/2):69–92, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    The brezis-nirenberg result for the fractional laplacian

    Raffaella Servadei and Enrico Valdinoci. The brezis-nirenberg result for the fractional laplacian. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 367(1):67–102, 2015. LOGARITHMIC LAPLACIAN ON GENERAL RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS 55

    2015

  4. [12]

    Nonlocal curvature flows

    Antonin Chambolle, Massimiliano Morini, and Marcello Ponsiglione. Nonlocal curvature flows. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 218:1263–1329, 2015

    2015

  5. [13]

    Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional laplace operator

    Mateusz Kwa ´snicki. Ten equivalent definitions of the fractional laplace operator. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 20(1):7–51, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    The maximum principles for fractional laplacian equations and their applications

    Tingzhi Cheng, Genggeng Huang, and Congming Li. The maximum principles for fractional laplacian equations and their applications. Communications in Contempo- rary Mathematics, 19(06):1750018, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    The neu- mann problem for the fractional laplacian: regularity up to the boundary

    Alessandro Audrito, Juan-Carlos Felipe-Navarro, and Xavier Ros-Oton. The neu- mann problem for the fractional laplacian: regularity up to the boundary. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10026, 2020

    2006 arXiv

  8. [16]

    The eigenvalue problem for the regional fractional laplacian in the small order limit.Potential Analysis, 60(1):285–306, 2024

    Remi Yvant Temgoua and Tobias Weth. The eigenvalue problem for the regional fractional laplacian in the small order limit.Potential Analysis, 60(1):285–306, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    An extension problem for the loga- rithmic laplacian

    Huyuan Chen, Daniel Hauer, and Tobias Weth. An extension problem for the loga- rithmic laplacian. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15689, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Optimal boundary regularity and a hopf-type lemma for dirichlet problems involving the logarithmic laplacian

    V ´ıctor Hern ´andez-Santamar´ıa, Luis Fernando L ´opez R ´ıos, and Alberto Salda ˜na. Optimal boundary regularity and a hopf-type lemma for dirichlet problems involving the logarithmic laplacian. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.18033, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    The cauchy problem associated to the logarithmic laplacian with an application to the fundamental solution

    Huyuan Chen and Laurent V´eron. The cauchy problem associated to the logarithmic laplacian with an application to the fundamental solution. Journal of Functional Analysis, 287(3):110470, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Bounds for eigenvalues of the dirichlet problem for the logarithmic laplacian

    Huyuan Chen and Laurent V ´eron. Bounds for eigenvalues of the dirichlet problem for the logarithmic laplacian. Advances in Calculus of Variations , 16(3):541–558, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Some constructions for the fractional laplacian on noncompact manifolds

    Valeria Banica, Mar´ıa del Mar Gonz´alez, and Mariel S´aez. Some constructions for the fractional laplacian on noncompact manifolds. Revista matem´atica iberoamericana, 31(2):681–712, 2015

    2015

  14. [22]

    Asymptotics as s → 0+ of the fractional perimeter on riemannian manifolds

    Michele Caselli and Luca Gennaioli. Asymptotics as s → 0+ of the fractional perimeter on riemannian manifolds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11590, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Integral representa- tion for fractional laplace–beltrami operators

    Diego Alonso-Or ´an, Antonio C´ordoba, and ´Angel D Mart´ınez. Integral representa- tion for fractional laplace–beltrami operators. Advances in Mathematics, 328:436– 445, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    Fractional cauchy problems on compact manifolds

    Mirko D’Ovidio and Erkan Nane. Fractional cauchy problems on compact manifolds. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 34(2):232–257, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Fractional calder ´on problem on a closed riemannian manifold

    Ali Feizmohammadi. Fractional calder ´on problem on a closed riemannian manifold. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 377(04):2991–3013, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    An inverse problem for the space-time fractional schr \” odinger equation on closed manifolds

    Li Li. An inverse problem for the space-time fractional schr \” odinger equation on closed manifolds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20795, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    An extension problem and hardy’s inequal- ity for the fractional laplace-beltrami operator on riemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type

    Mithun Bhowmik and Sanjoy Pusti. An extension problem and hardy’s inequal- ity for the fractional laplace-beltrami operator on riemannian symmetric spaces of noncompact type. Journal of Functional Analysis, 282(9):109413, 2022. 56 RUI CHEN

    2022

  20. [28]

    Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the extension problem for the fractional laplacian on noncompact symmetric spaces

    Effie Papageorgiou. Asymptotic behavior of solutions to the extension problem for the fractional laplacian on noncompact symmetric spaces. Journal of Evolution Equations, 24(2):34, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Table of integrals, series, and products

    Izrail Solomonovich Gradshteyn and Iosif Moiseevich Ryzhik. Table of integrals, series, and products. Academic press, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    Anisotropic calder \’{o} n problem of a nearly laplace-beltrami operator of order 2+

    Susovan Pramanik. Anisotropic calder \’{o} n problem of a nearly laplace-beltrami operator of order 2+. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12535, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional sobolev spaces.Bulletin des sciences math´ematiques, 136(5):521–573, 2012

    Eleonora Di Nezza, Giampiero Palatucci, and Enrico Valdinoci. Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional sobolev spaces.Bulletin des sciences math´ematiques, 136(5):521–573, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Gerald B. Folland. Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications , volume 117 of Pure and Applied Mathematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1999

    1999

  25. [33]

    I: Functional analysis, volume 1

    Michael Reed and Barry Simon. I: Functional analysis, volume 1. Academic press, 1981

    1981

  26. [34]

    Springer, 2021

    Matthias Keller, Daniel Lenz, and Radoslaw K Wojciechowski.Graphs and discrete Dirichlet spaces, volume 358. Springer, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    The heat equation method of milgram and rosenbloom for open riemannian manifolds

    Matthew P Gaffney. The heat equation method of milgram and rosenbloom for open riemannian manifolds. Annals of Mathematics, 60(3):458–466, 1954

    1954

  28. [36]

    Essential self-adjointness of powers of generators of hyperbolic equations

    Paul R Chernoff. Essential self-adjointness of powers of generators of hyperbolic equations. Journal of Functional Analysis, 12(4):401–414, 1973

    1973

  29. [37]

    Heat kernel and analysis on manifolds, volume 47

    Alexander Grigoryan. Heat kernel and analysis on manifolds, volume 47. American Mathematical Soc., 2009

    2009

  30. [38]

    Fractional sobolev spaces on riemannian manifolds

    Michele Caselli, Enric Florit-Simon, and Joaquim Serra. Fractional sobolev spaces on riemannian manifolds. Mathematische Annalen, 390(4):6249–6314, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Some function-theoretic properties of complete riemannian man- ifold and their applications to geometry

    Shing-Tung Yau. Some function-theoretic properties of complete riemannian man- ifold and their applications to geometry. Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 25(7):659–670, 1976

    1976

  32. [40]

    Geometric analysis, volume 134

    Peter Li. Geometric analysis, volume 134. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    Riemannian geometry, volume 171

    Peter Petersen. Riemannian geometry, volume 171. Springer, 2006

    2006

  34. [42]

    The heat kernel on hyperbolic space

    Alexander Grigor’yan and Masakazu Noguchi. The heat kernel on hyperbolic space. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 30(6):643–650, 1998

    1998

  35. [43]

    Heat kernel bounds on hyperbolic space and kleinian groups

    Edward B Davies and Nikolaos Mandouvalos. Heat kernel bounds on hyperbolic space and kleinian groups. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , 3(1):182–208, 1988

    1988

  36. [44]

    NIST handbook of mathematical functions hardback and CD-ROM

    Frank WJ Olver. NIST handbook of mathematical functions hardback and CD-ROM. Cambridge university press, 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    Asymptotic analysis, volume 48

    James Dickson Murray. Asymptotic analysis, volume 48. Springer Science & Busi- ness Media, 2012

    2012

  38. [46]

    Sobolev spaces, volume 140

    Robert A Adams and John JF Fournier. Sobolev spaces, volume 140. Elsevier, 2003. LOGARITHMIC LAPLACIAN ON GENERAL RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS 57 School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University , Shanghai 200433, China. Email address: chenrui23@m.fudan.edu.cn

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.