Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Unconditional well-posedness of the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation on the real line

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Stochastic KdV well-posedness cleared of 25-year-old extra regularity assumption

desk verdict Letter on arXiv:2607.07624 read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07624 v1 pith:ZXKQLMJI submitted 2026-07-08 math.AP math.PR

Damiano Greco , Tadahiro Oh , Kotaro Tsugawa This is my paper
classification math.APmath.PR
keywords skdvstochasticwell-posednessargumentequationfourier-lebesguekorteweg-deline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper resolves two open questions about the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries (SKdV) equation on the real line with additive space-time white noise. First, it removes a long-standing extra regularity condition on the noise operator that had been required since 1999, proving global well-posedness in L² under the minimal natural assumption. Second, it proves pathwise unconditional uniqueness: any two solutions in C(R; L²) coincide almost surely, regardless of how they were constructed. The key innovation is the use of Fourier-Lebesgue spaces in time, which allow the temporal parameter b to exceed 1/2 while still capturing the rough regularity of Brownian motion, enabling the bilinear estimates needed for both well-posedness and uniqueness.

What carries the argument

X^{s,b}_q spaces (Fourier restriction norm spaces adapted to Fourier-Lebesgue spaces in time with q > 2); stochastic convolution Ψ; first-order expansion u = Φ + v; bilinear estimates in the spirit of Kenig-Ponce-Vega and Zhou

What would settle it

If the uniform bound on the integral in equation (3.16) fails for the chosen parameters — for instance, if the constant from the cited Lemma 2.3 of Kenig-Ponce-Vega is not uniform — the bilinear estimate (Proposition 3.1) collapses, and both the well-posedness and uniqueness arguments fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central technical contribution is the observation that by working in the X^{s,b}_q spaces with q > 2 and b > 1/2 (subject to (b-1)q < -1), one can simultaneously capture the local-in-time Fourier-Lebesgue regularity of Brownian motion and maintain the bilinear estimate structure needed for the KdV nonlinearity. This removes the artificial homogeneous Sobolev condition on the noise operator and allows Zhou's unconditional uniqueness argument for deterministic KdV to transfer to the stochastic setting via the first-order expansion u = Φ + v, where Φ absorbs the stochastic convolution.

Load-bearing premise

The bilinear estimate (Proposition 3.1) reduces to showing that a certain integral involving the KdV dispersion relation is uniformly bounded, which requires the parameter condition 4b - 2/q' > 1. This holds for the specific choice b = 1/2 + ε, q = 2/(1-3ε) with small ε > 0, but the proof depends on constants from a cited lemma and a Minkowski inequality step being uniform in the relevant parameters, which is not machine-verified.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries (SKdV) equation with additive space-time white noise on the real line. The authors prove two main results: (1) global well-posedness in H^s(R) for s >= 0 under the natural assumption phi in HS(L^2; H^s), removing the homogeneous Sobolev condition H^{-3/8} required in the earlier work of de Bouard, Debussche, and Tsutsumi (1999); and (2) pathwise unconditional uniqueness in L^2(R), the first such result for stochastic dispersive PDEs in a low-regularity setting. The key innovation for well-posedness is the use of Fourier-Lebesgue spaces in time (FL^{b,q} with q > 2), which allow b > 1/2 while still capturing the Brownian regularity of the stochastic convolution. The unconditional uniqueness proof adapts Zhou's (1997) deterministic argument via a first-order expansion u = Phi + v. An appendix proves a useful boundedness result for multiplication by sharp cutoffs in Fourier-Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces.

Significance. The removal of the artificial H^{-3/8} condition on the noise operator is a clean and significant advance, resolving a question open for over two decades. The pathwise unconditional uniqueness result is the first of its kind for stochastic dispersive PDEs and is optimal in L^2. The Fourier-Lebesgue-in-time framework is an elegant solution to the tension between the b < 1/2 requirement of standard X^{s,b} spaces (for Brownian regularity) and the b > 1/2 requirement of the Kenig-Ponce-Vega bilinear estimate. The appendix on sharp cutoff multiplication is a nice, self-contained contribution of independent interest. The proofs follow established patterns (KPV bilinear estimate, Zhou uniqueness) but their adaptation to the stochastic setting is nontrivial, particularly the handling of the stochastic convolution in the unconditional uniqueness argument. The paper provides falsifiable predictions in the sense that the well-posedness and uniqueness claims are concrete and checkable against the stated hypotheses.

major comments (2)
  1. Proposition 3.1 (the bilinear estimate, Eq. (3.2)) is the linchpin of Theorem 1.1. The proof reduces to bounding M_{tau,xi} in (3.11) via a change of variables (3.12)-(3.15) and an application of [34, Lemma 2.3]. The step from (3.11) to (3.16) requires the integral of d mu / <mu>^{4b - 2/q'} * |4tau - xi^3 - 4mu|^{-1/2} to be uniformly bounded, which demands 4b - 2/q' > 1. This is satisfied by the choice b = 1/2 + epsilon, q = 2/(1-3epsilon), but only for small epsilon > 0. The final algebraic bound in (3.16) claims M^2_{tau,xi} lesssim |xi|^{3/2} <tau - xi^3>^{-2b_0} <4tau - xi^3>^{1/2} lesssim 1, for b_0 <= -1/4. Taking tau = xi^3 (so <tau - xi^3> = 1) and |xi| -> infinity gives |xi|^{3/2} * 1 * |3xi^3|^{1/2} ~ |xi|^3 -> infinity, so the bound as written is false. This suggests either (a) the exponent on <4tau - xi^3> should be -1/2 (a sign error), or (b) [34, Lemma 2.3] provides a dec
  2. The power of |xi| in (3.16) also requires scrutiny. The change of variables (3.12)-(3.15) yields d xi_1 = d mu / sqrt{(3xi)(4tau - xi^3 - 4mu)}, which introduces a factor |xi|^{-1/2} from the Jacobian. Combined with the |xi|^2 prefactor in (3.11), this gives |xi|^{3/2}, as stated. However, the integral over mu must then provide a compensating decay in |xi|. The reference to [34, Lemma 2.3, (2.9)] needs to be made more explicit: the reader should be shown exactly how the quadratic structure of the KdV resonance function mu(xi_1) = tau - xi^3 + 3xi*xi_1*(xi - xi_1) yields the claimed bound on the mu-integral, including the role of the discriminant 3xi(4tau - xi^3). As written, the step from the mu-integral to the final bound in (3.16) is not sufficiently justified and may contain a sign error or a missing case-splitting argument. The authors should verify this computation carefully and, if
minor comments (6)
  1. In the proof of Theorem 1.1 (p. 8), the choice of q in (3.3) gives q = 2/(1-3epsilon), so q' = 2/(1+3epsilon). The condition (3.1) requires 1/4 + 1/(2q') < b < 1/q'. With b = 1/2 + epsilon, the left inequality becomes 1/4 + (1+3epsilon)/4 < 1/2 + epsilon, i.e., 1/2 + 3epsilon/4 < 1/2 + epsilon, which holds. The right inequality becomes 1/2 + epsilon < (1+3epsilon)/2, i.e., 1/2 + epsilon < 1/2 + 3epsilon/2, which holds for epsilon > 0. This is correct but the verification is not shown; a brief remark would help.
  2. In (3.16), the condition '4b - 2/q' > 1' is stated. With b = 1/2 + epsilon and q = 2/(1-3epsilon), we get 4(1/2 + epsilon) - (1-3epsilon) = 2 + 4epsilon - 1 + 3epsilon = 1 + 7epsilon > 1. This is satisfied, but the reader would benefit from seeing this substitution explicitly.
  3. The notation sigma = <tau - xi^3> in (3.9) is used throughout Section 3, but in Section 4.2 (e.g., (4.17), (4.20)), sigma, sigma_1, sigma_2 are used with the same definition. A brief reminder of this notation at the start of Section 4.2 would aid readability.
  4. In the proof of Lemma 4.3, Case 1 (p. 13-14), the Holder exponents are stated as '1/2 = 3epsilon/2 + 1/q'. With q = 2/(1-3epsilon), 1/q = (1-3epsilon)/2, so 3epsilon/2 + (1-3epsilon)/2 = 1/2. This is correct. However, the role of the factor |xi|^{sigma_1 - b - 2epsilon} in (4.17) vs. |xi|^{sigma_1 - b} in (3.8) should be clarified: the -2epsilon comes from the Holder decomposition, and the reader should be told that this is where the condition 1 - b - 2epsilon = 1/2 - 3epsilon >= 1/4 (stated after (4.18)) is used.
  5. Reference [23] is cited as a preprint (Greco, Oh, Sosoe, Wang). The authors should update this reference if it has been published or accepted, and otherwise clarify its current status.
  6. The paper would benefit from a remark explaining why the approach does not directly extend to s < 0 (as mentioned in Remark 1.2(i)). Specifically, what is the obstruction: is it the bilinear estimate (Proposition 3.1), the stochastic convolution regularity, or the unconditional uniqueness argument? A brief sentence on where the argument breaks down would be helpful.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying a sign error in the proof of Proposition 3.1. The referee's two major comments both concern the same computation in the proof of Proposition 3.1 (the bilinear estimate), specifically the step from (3.11) to (3.16). We have verified that the referee is correct: there is a sign error in the exponent of ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩ in (3.16). With the corrected sign, the bound holds as claimed. We will revise the manuscript to fix this error and to expand the justification of the μ-integral step, making explicit the role of [34, Lemma 2.3].

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Proposition 3.1 (the bilinear estimate, Eq. (3.2)) is the linchpin of Theorem 1.1. The proof reduces to bounding M_{tau,xi} in (3.11) via a change of variables (3.12)-(3.15) and an application of [34, Lemma 2.3]. The step from (3.11) to (3.16) requires the integral of d mu / <mu>^{4b - 2/q'} * |4tau - xi^3 - 4mu|^{-1/2} to be uniformly bounded, which demands 4b - 2/q' > 1. This is satisfied by the choice b = 1/2 + epsilon, q = 2/(1-3epsilon), but only for small epsilon > 0. The final algebraic bound in (3.16) claims M^2_{tau,xi} lesssim |xi|^{3/2} <tau - xi^3>^{-2b_0} <4tau - xi^3>^{1/2} lesssim 1, for b_0 <= -1/4. Taking tau = xi^3 (so <tau - xi^3> = 1) and |xi| -> infinity gives |xi|^{3/2} * 1 * |3xi^3|^{1/2} ~ |xi|^3 -> infinity, so the bound as written is false. This suggests either (a) the exponent on <4tau - xi^3> should be -1/2 (a sign error), or (b) [34, Lemma 2.3] provides a dec

    Authors: The referee is correct that there is a sign error in (3.16). The exponent on ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩ should be −1/2, not +1/2. With this correction, the bound in (3.16) reads M²_{τ,ξ} ≲ |ξ|^{3/2} ⟨τ − ξ³⟩^{−2b₀} ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩^{−1/2}, and taking τ = ξ³ gives |ξ|^{3/2} · 1 · |3ξ³|^{−1/2} ~ 1, which is uniformly bounded. We have verified that the application of [34, Lemma 2.3] does yield the factor ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩^{−1/2} (not +1/2): the lemma provides a bound of the form ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩^{−1/2} on the μ-integral, reflecting the fact that the integrand is concentrated near the discriminant and the integral decays as |4τ − ξ³| grows. The condition 4b − 2/q' > 1 ensures the convergence of the remaining ⟨μ⟩-weighted integral. We will correct the sign in (3.16) in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The power of |xi| in (3.16) also requires scrutiny. The change of variables (3.12)-(3.15) yields d xi_1 = d mu / sqrt{(3xi)(4tau - xi^3 - 4mu)}, which introduces a factor |xi|^{-1/2} from the Jacobian. Combined with the |xi|^2 prefactor in (3.11), this gives |xi|^{3/2}, as stated. However, the integral over mu must then provide a compensating decay in |xi|. The reference to [34, Lemma 2.3, (2.9)] needs to be made more explicit: the reader should be shown exactly how the quadratic structure of the KdV resonance function mu(xi_1) = tau - xi^3 + 3xi*xi_1*(xi - xi_1) yields the claimed bound on the mu-integral, including the role of the discriminant 3xi(4tau - xi^3). As written, the step from the mu-integral to the final bound in (3.16) is not sufficiently justified and may contain a sign error or a missing case-splitting argument. The authors should verify this computation carefully and, if

    Authors: We agree that the step from the μ-integral to (3.16) is insufficiently justified as written. The compensating decay in |ξ| comes from the factor ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩^{−1/2} (with the corrected sign) together with the relationship between the resonance function and the discriminant. Specifically, the change of variables μ = τ − ξ³ + 3ξξ₁(ξ − ξ₁) transforms the integral in (3.11) into an integral over μ involving |4τ − ξ³ − 4μ|^{−1/2} from the Jacobian. An application of [34, Lemma 2.3, (2.9)] then bounds this integral by ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩^{−1/2} times a convergent ⟨μ⟩-weighted integral (convergent when 4b − 2/q' > 1). The key point is that the quadratic structure of the resonance function means the integral is controlled by the discriminant 3ξ(4τ − ξ³), and [34, Lemma 2.3] quantifies this via the ⟨4τ − ξ³⟩^{−1/2} factor. When |4τ − ξ³| is large, this provides the decay that compensates |ξ|^{3/2}; when |4τ − ξ³| is small (comparable to |ξ|³), the factor ⟨τ − ξ³⟩^{−2b₀} with b₀ ≤ −1/4 provides the needed decay since in this regime |τ − ξ³| ~ |ξ|³. We will expand the proof in the revised manuscript to make this computation explicit, including a clear statement of how [34, Lemma 2.3] is applied and the role of the discriminant. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity. The paper's main results are derived from externally established tools (Bourgain X^{s,b}, KPV bilinear estimate, Zhou uniqueness) with self-citations used for context, not load-bearing logical support.

full rationale

The paper proves two main results: (1) global well-posedness of SKdV in L^2 without the homogeneous Sobolev condition (1.9), and (2) pathwise unconditional uniqueness in L^2. The derivation chain is as follows. For Theorem 1.1, the key step is Proposition 3.1 (bilinear estimate in X^{s,b}_q spaces), which is proved from first principles within the paper (Section 3, equations 3.8–3.16) by following the Kenig-Ponce-Vega [34] argument, adapting it to the Fourier-Lebesgue-in-time framework. The stochastic convolution regularity (Lemma 2.2) cites [18, 19, 17, 44] but is a standard result reproducible independently. Global well-posedness follows from the a priori bound (Lemma 2.3, via Ito's lemma) which is standard. For Theorem 1.3, the proof adapts Zhou's [48] deterministic argument to the stochastic setting via the first-order expansion u = Φ + v (4.1), with the key bilinear estimates (Lemmas 4.2, 4.3) proved in Section 4.2 by direct computation following [34]. Self-citations ([9, 19, 23, 44, 45]) appear in remarks and context but are not load-bearing: the bilinear estimates are proved in the paper, the function space framework (X^{s,b}_q) is defined from scratch in (2.3), and the uniqueness argument is self-contained given Zhou [48] and KPV [34], both externally published and independently verified results. The condition (1.9) being removed is a genuine improvement, not a renaming of a known result. No step reduces to its inputs by construction. The skeptic's concern about the algebraic bound in (3.16) is a correctness issue, not a circularity issue — the estimate is either true or false on its own terms, not tautologically forced.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or mathematical entities are postulated. The function spaces (X^{s,b}_q, FL^{b,q}) and the stochastic convolution Ψ are standard constructions. The parameters ε, δ, T are standard analytic smallness parameters, not fitted constants. The axioms are either standard mathematical results (Ito calculus, Hilbert transform bounds, Kenig-Ponce-Vega estimates) or a domain-specific adaptation of Zhou's argument whose validity is argued within the paper.

free parameters (3)
  • ε (regularity parameter) = small, positive
    A small ε > 0 is chosen to set b = 1/2 + ε and q = 2/(1−3ε). This is a standard analytic parameter, not fitted to data, but it is a free choice that must be sufficiently small.
  • δ (smallness parameter for uniqueness) = small, positive
    A small δ > 0 is chosen in Section 4.1 to ensure the contraction constant C₀C₁δ < 1 in (4.32). Standard analytic parameter.
  • T (local time interval) = almost surely positive, depending on ω, δ, ‖u₀‖, ‖ϕ‖
    The local time T is chosen sufficiently small depending on the solution and parameters. This is standard in local well-posedness theory.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The stochastic convolution Ψ (1.6) is well-defined as a Wiener integral against a cylindrical Wiener process on L²(R), with regularity properties as stated in Lemma 2.2.
    This is standard stochastic analysis; the construction via orthonormal basis {eₙ} and independent Brownian motions {Bₙ} is classical (Da Prato-Zabczyk [14]).
  • standard math The L² a priori bound (Lemma 2.3) holds for solutions to SKdV, justified by Ito's lemma and the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality via an approximation argument.
    Stated in Section 2.3 with reference to [17, Subsection 3.2] and [15, Proposition 3.2]. The approximation argument is standard but omitted.
  • standard math The Kenig-Ponce-Vega bilinear estimate [34, Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.4] holds as stated, including the resonance estimate used in (3.16).
    These are published, peer-reviewed results from [34] (J. Amer. Math. Soc. 1996). The paper applies them in (3.11)–(3.16) and (4.21).
  • domain assumption Zhou's interpolation argument [48] for the X^{-3/2θ−ε,θ} bound transfers to the stochastic setting via the decomposition u = Φ + v.
    This is the main adaptation. The deterministic argument uses the equation pointwise in time; the stochastic adaptation requires the first-order expansion (4.1)–(4.3) and careful handling of the ∂ₜη_T term in (4.6)–(4.8). The adaptation is justified within the paper but is a domain-specific assumption, not a standard result.
  • standard math The Hilbert transform is bounded on L^q(R, w_{b,q}) when w_{b,q} = |τ|^{bq} is an A_q weight, i.e., when −1/q < b < 1/q'.
    Used in Appendix A (Lemma A.1). This is a standard result in harmonic analysis (Grafakos [22, Theorem 7.4.6 and Example 7.17]).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unconditional well-posedness of the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation on the real line." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXKQLMJI

@misc{pith2026260707624,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unconditional well-posedness of the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation on the real line},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXKQLMJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07624}
}
abstract

We study well-posedness issues of the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation (SKdV) with an additive noise, posed on the real line. By using the Fourier restriction norm method adapted to the Fourier-Lebesgue space in time, we first prove global well-posedness of SKdV in $L^2(\mathbb R)$ without assuming the homogenous Sobolev regularity, which was imposed in a work by de Bouard, Debussche, and Tsutsumi (1999). Then, by adapting the argument by Zhou (1997) to the stochastic setting, we prove optimal pathwise unconditional uniqueness for SKdV in $L^2(\mathbb R)$. In the appendix, we present a short argument for proving boundedness of the multiplication by a sharp cutoff function in the Fourier-Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces, which is of interest in its own right.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Greco, T

    D. Greco, T. Oh, P. Sosoe, Y. Wang,Normal form approach to unconditional well-posedness of the periodic stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation with an additive noise, preprint

    work page

  2. [1]

    Babin, A

    A. Babin, A. Ilyin, E. Edriss,On the regularization mechanism for the periodic Korteweg-de Vries equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 64 (2011), no. 5, 591–648

    work page 2011

  3. [2]

    Sharp unconditional well-posedness of the 2-$d$ periodic cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation

    E. Ba¸ sako˘ glu, T. Oh, Y. Wang,Sharp unconditional well-posedness of the 2-d periodic cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, arXiv:2509.01650 [math.AP]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [3]

    B´ enyi, T

    ´A. B´ enyi, T. Oh,Modulation spaces, Wiener amalgam spaces, and Brownian motions, Adv. Math. 228 (2011), no. 5, 2943–2981

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    Bergh, J

    J. Bergh, J. L¨ ofstr¨ om,Interpolation spaces. An introduction, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wis- senschaften, No. 223. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976. x+207 pp

    work page 1976

  6. [5]

    Bourgain,Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to non- linear evolution equations

    J. Bourgain,Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to non- linear evolution equations. II. The KdV equation,Geom. Funct. Anal. 3 (1993), no. 3, 209–262

    work page 1993

  7. [6]

    Bourgain,Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm

    J. Bourgain,Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 176 (1996), no. 2, 421–445

    work page 1996

  8. [7]

    Chapouto, G

    A. Chapouto, G. Li, T. Oh, T. Zhao,Shallow-water convergence of the intermediate long wave equation inL 2, arXiv:2511.15905 [math.AP]

    work page arXiv

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    X. Chen, J. Holmer,The derivation of theT 3 energy-critical NLS from quantum many-body dynamics, Invent. Math. 217 (2019), no. 2, 433–547

    2019

  2. [9]

    Cheung, G

    K. Cheung, G. Li, T. Oh,Almost conservation laws for stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, J. Evol. Equ. 21 (2021), no. 2, 1865–1894

    2021

  3. [10]

    Chung, Z

    J. Chung, Z. Guo, S. Kwon,T. Oh,Normal form approach to global well-posedness of the quadratic deriv- ative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on the circle, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 34 (2017), 1273–1297

    2017

  4. [11]

    Colliander, M

    J. Colliander, M. Keel, G. Staffilani, H. Takaoka, T. Tao,Sharp global well-posedness for KdV and modified KdV onRandT, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), no. 3, 705–749

    2003

  5. [12]

    Colliander, T

    J. Colliander, T. Oh,Almost sure well-posedness of the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation belowL 2(T), Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), no. 3, 367–414

    2012

  6. [13]

    Da Prato, A

    G. Da Prato, A. Debussche,Strong solutions to the stochastic quantization equations, Ann. Probab. 31 (2003), no. 4, 1900–1916

    2003

  7. [14]

    Da Prato, J

    G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk,Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions,Second edition. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 152. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014. xviii+493 pp

    2014

  8. [15]

    de Bouard, A

    A. de Bouard, A. Debussche,The stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation inH1, Stochastic Anal. Appl. 21 (2003), no. 1, 97–126

    2003

  9. [16]

    de Bouard, A

    A. de Bouard, A. Debussche,The Korteweg-de Vries equation with multiplicative homogeneous noise, Stochastic differential equations: theory and applications, Interdiscip. Math. Sci., 2, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ (2007), 113–133

    2007

  10. [17]

    de Bouard, A

    A. de Bouard, A. Debussche, Y. Tsutsumi,White noise driven Korteweg-de Vries equation, J. Funct. Anal. 169 (1999), no. 2, 532–558

    1999

  11. [18]

    de Bouard, A

    A. de Bouard, A. Debussche, Y. Tsutsumi,Periodic solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries equation driven by white noise, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 36 (2004/05), no. 3, 815–855

    2004

  12. [19]

    Forlano, T

    J. Forlano, T. Oh, Y. Wang,Stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with almost space-time white noise, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 109 (2020), no. 1, 44–67

    2020

  13. [20]

    Furioli, F

    G. Furioli, F. Planchon, E. Terraneo,Unconditional well-posedness for semilinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equations inH s, Harmonic analysis at Mount Holyoke (South Hadley, MA, 2001), 147–156, Contemp. Math., 320, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003

    2001

  14. [21]

    Ginibre, Y

    J. Ginibre, Y. Tsutsumi, G. Velo,On the Cauchy problem for the Zakharov system, J. Funct. Anal. 151 (1997), no. 2, 384–436

    1997

  15. [22]

    Grafakos,Classical Fourier analysis, Third edition

    L. Grafakos,Classical Fourier analysis, Third edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 249. Springer, New York, 2014. xviii+638 pp

    2014

  16. [24]

    Gr¨ unrock,An improved local well-posedness result for the modified KdV equation, Int

    A. Gr¨ unrock,An improved local well-posedness result for the modified KdV equation, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2004, no. 61, 3287–3308

    2004

  17. [25]

    Gr¨ unrock,Bi- and trilinear Schr¨ odinger estimates in one space dimension with applications to cubic NLS and DNLS, Int

    A. Gr¨ unrock,Bi- and trilinear Schr¨ odinger estimates in one space dimension with applications to cubic NLS and DNLS, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2005, no. 41, 2525–2558. UU FOR SKDV ONR19

    2005

  18. [26]

    Gr¨ unrock, S

    A. Gr¨ unrock, S. Herr,Low regularity local well-posedness of the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with periodic initial data, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39 (2008), no. 6, 1890–1920

    2008

  19. [27]

    Guo,Global well-posedness of Korteweg-de Vries equation inH −3/4(R), J

    Z. Guo,Global well-posedness of Korteweg-de Vries equation inH −3/4(R), J. Math. Pures Appl. 91 (2009), no. 6, 583–597

    2009

  20. [28]

    Z. Guo, S. Kwon, T. Oh,Poincar´ e-Dulac normal form reduction for unconditional well-posedness of the periodic cubic NLS, Commun. Math. Phys. 322 (2013), no. 1, 19–48

    2013

  21. [29]

    S. Herr, V. Sohinger,Unconditional uniqueness results for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Commun. Contemp. Math. 21 (2019), no. 7, 28 pp

    2019

  22. [30]

    Kato,On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    T. Kato,On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. II.H s-solutions and unconditional well-posedness,J. Anal. Math. 67 (1995), 281–306

    1995

  23. [31]

    T. Kato, K. Tsugawa,Cancellation properties and unconditional well-posedness for the fifth order KdV type equations with periodic boundary condition, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. 5 (2024), no. 3, Paper No. 18, 55 pp

    2024

  24. [32]

    T. Kato, K. Tsugawa,Cancellation properties and unconditional well-posedness for fifth order modified KdV type equations with periodic boundary conditions, J. Differential Equations 450 (2026), Paper No. 113736, 70 pp

    2026

  25. [33]

    Kenig, G

    C.E. Kenig, G. Ponce, L. Vega,The Cauchy problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation in Sobolev spaces of negative indices, Duke Math. J. 71 (1993), no. 1, 1–21

    1993

  26. [34]

    Kenig, G

    C.E. Kenig, G. Ponce, L. Vega,A bilinear estimate with applications to the KdV equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1996), no. 2, 573–603

    1996

  27. [35]

    Killip, O

    R. Killip, O. Pocovnicu, T. Oh, M. Vi¸ san,Global well-posedness of the Gross-Pitaevskii and cubic-quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with non-vanishing boundary conditions, Math. Res. Lett. 19 (2012), no. 5, 969–986

    2012

  28. [36]

    Killip, M

    R. Killip, M. Vi¸ san,KdV is well-posed inH −1, Ann. of Math. 190 (2019), no. 1, 249–305

    2019

  29. [37]

    Kishimoto,Well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation at the critical regularity, Differential Integral Equations 22 (2009), no

    N. Kishimoto,Well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation at the critical regularity, Differential Integral Equations 22 (2009), no. 5-6, 447–464

    2009

  30. [38]

    Kishimoto,Unconditional local well-posedness for periodic NLS, J

    N. Kishimoto,Unconditional local well-posedness for periodic NLS, J. Differential Equations 274 (2021), 766–787

    2021

  31. [39]

    S. Kwon, T. Oh,On unconditional well-posedness of modified KdV, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2012), no. 15, 3509–3534

    2012

  32. [40]

    Maz’ya, T

    V. Maz’ya, T. Shaposhnikova,Theory of Sobolev multipliers. With applications to differential and integral operators, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 337. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009. xiv+609 pp

    2009

  33. [41]

    Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schr¨ odinger

    H. P. McKean,Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schr¨ odinger, Comm. Math. Phys. 168 (1995), no. 3, 479–491.Erratum: “Statistical mechanics of nonlinear wave equations. IV. Cubic Schr¨ odinger”, Comm. Math. Phys. 173 (1995), no. 3, 675

    1995

  34. [42]

    Molinet,A note on ill posedness for the KdV equation, Differential Integral Equations 24 (2011), no

    L. Molinet,A note on ill posedness for the KdV equation, Differential Integral Equations 24 (2011), no. 7-8, 759–765

    2011

  35. [43]

    Nakanishi, H

    K. Nakanishi, H. Takaoka, Y. Tsutsumi,Counterexamples to bilinear estimates related with the KdV equa- tion and the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, IMS Conference on Differential Equations from Mechanics (Hong Kong, 1999). Methods Appl. Anal. 8 (2001), no. 4, 569–578

    1999

  36. [44]

    Oh,Periodic stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation with additive space-time white noise, Anal

    T. Oh,Periodic stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation with additive space-time white noise, Anal. PDE 2 (2009), no. 3, 281–304

    2009

  37. [45]

    T. Oh, J. Quastel, P. Sosoe,Global dynamics for the stochastic KdV equation with white noise as initial data, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B 11 (2024), 420–460

    2024

  38. [46]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang,Normal form approach to the one-dimensional periodic cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in almost critical Fourier–Lebesgue spaces, J. Anal. Math. 143 (2021), no. 2, 723–762

    2021

  39. [47]

    Tsugawa,Global well-posedness for the KdV equations on the real line with low regularity forcing terms, Commun

    K. Tsugawa,Global well-posedness for the KdV equations on the real line with low regularity forcing terms, Commun. Contemp. Math. 8 (2006), no. 5, 681–713

    2006

  40. [48]

    Zhou,Uniqueness of weak solution of the KdV equation, Internat

    Y. Zhou,Uniqueness of weak solution of the KdV equation, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 1997, no. 6, 271–283. Damiano Greco, School of Mathematics, The University of Edinburgh, and The Maxwell Institute for the Mathematical Sciences, James Clerk Maxwell Building, The King’s Buil...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.