Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Fourier analysis of equivariant quantum cohomology

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Equivariant quantum cohomology of a space determines the quantum cohomology of its quotients by Fourier transform.

desk verdict A clear, honest conjecture framework that reframes Teleman's conjecture as Fourier duality; the new conjectures are plausible but unproved, and the paper's main evidence is a re-reading of known toric results. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18849 v2 pith:ZXSTYNKK submitted 2025-01-31 math.AG hep-thmath.SG

Hiroshi Iritani This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGhep-thmath.SG MSC 14N3553D4514L24
keywords equivariantquantumcohomologyFourierdualityGITquotientvolumeshiftoperatorsSeidelrepresentationGiventalconetoricmirrorsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that quantum cohomology transforms naturally under symplectic or GIT reduction: the equivariant quantum cohomology of a space with a torus action is Fourier-dual to the quantum cohomology of the quotient. The paper introduces the quantum volume, a period-like invariant built from the J-function, and conjectures that equivariant and reduced quantum volumes are related by Fourier transformation. For the rigorously defined side, it states the reduction conjecture: the I-function of a smooth GIT quotient is a discrete Fourier transform of the equivariant J-function, supported on the dual chamber and landing on the quotient's Givental cone. If true, the whole equivariant quantum D-module of the original space determines the quantum cohomology D-modules of all its GIT quotients.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the shift operator, or Seidel representation, on equivariant quantum cohomology: a family of operators $S_\beta$ that shift equivariant parameters by $-z\beta$. These operators make equivariant quantum cohomology into a difference module, and the Fourier duality replaces them by multiplication by Novikov variables while sending equivariant bulk parameters to covariant derivatives of the quantum connection. The discrete Fourier transform sums $\kappa(S_{-\beta} J_X) S^{\beta}$ over the equivariant lattice, and the Givental cone, the Lagrangian submanifold of descendant Gromov-Witten invariants, is the target that detects whether the transformed series is a genuine quantum cohomology solution. The quantum volume $\Pi_X = \int_X J_X(-z) z^{n-\deg/2} z^{c_1(X)} \hat\Gamma_X$ provides the period-like quantity whose Fourier duality is the quantum analogue of classical volume reduction.

What would settle it

Compute the discrete Fourier transform $I_Y$ for a smooth GIT quotient $Y$ and check two conditions: every coefficient with $\beta$ outside the dual cone $C^{\vee}_{Y,N}$ cancels, and $zI_Y$ lies on the non-equivariant Givental cone $L_Y$; a single nonzero coefficient outside the dual cone or a series leaving $L_Y$ would disprove the reduction conjecture. A direct check in an empty-chamber case would also test the quantum-volume conjecture: the inverse Fourier transform of the equivariant quantum volume should have zero asymptotics for stability parameters with no quotient, as happens for $\mathbb{C}^n$ when $t<0$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a Fourier duality between difference and differential structures. On the equivariant side, shift operators move equivariant parameters by multiples of the loop-rotation variable $z$; on the quotient side, those same operators become Novikov variables while equivariant parameters become quantized derivatives. Concretely, the paper defines the discrete Fourier transform $I_Y = \sum_{[\beta]} \kappa(S_{-\beta} J_X) S^{\beta}$ and conjectures that it is supported on the dual cone $C^{\vee}_{Y,N}$ and that $zI_Y$ lies on the non-equivariant Givental cone $L_Y$. It also conjectures that the equivariant quantum volume, defined through the J-function and the $\hat\Gamma$-class, is Fourier-related to the quantum volume of the reduction after a mirror map. The paper establishes the picture in the projective-bundle and blowup cases through a decomposition of quantum D-modules, and recovers toric mirror symmetry as the special case where the quotient is a point.

Load-bearing premise

The definition of quantum volume starts from a path integral over the Floer fundamental cycle that the paper itself says is not yet mathematically rigorous, and the localization formula is adopted as the definition; if that heuristic is invalid, the quantum-volume Fourier duality loses its foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reduction conjecture holds, the equivariant quantum D-module of $X$ determines, by discrete Fourier transform, the quantum D-module of every smooth GIT quotient $Y$, with no further Gromov-Witten computation on $Y$ required.
  • The discrete Fourier transformation maps equivariant Givental cones to quotient Givental cones, giving a solution-level realization of the quantum Kirwan map.
  • For toric varieties, the Fourier transform of the equivariant J-function produces the Landau-Ginzburg mirror potential, so toric mirror symmetry appears as the point-quotient case of the duality.
  • For projective bundles and blowups, the duality yields a decomposition of big quantum cohomology into copies of the base or centre quantum D-modules, with the eigenvalues of quantum multiplication clustering into explicit groups.
  • The construction of a global Kähler moduli space extends the equivariant D-module to a sheaf whose restrictions near cusps are the quantum D-modules of the different GIT chambers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to orbifold or non-abelian GIT quotients; the paper's formalism is stated for smooth manifolds, and the same discrete Fourier transform should produce the orbifold I-function with a stringy correction.
  • The quantum-volume conjecture suggests a new interpretation of empty chambers: the inverse Fourier transform should have zero asymptotics there, smoothing the classical Duistermaat-Heckman measure; this could be probed in noncompact examples beyond $\mathbb{C}^n$.
  • The continuous Fourier transforms attached to fixed components appear to be the same operation as the discrete ones when a fixed component and a GIT quotient coincide; making that coincidence systematic may yield a general decomposition theorem for extremal contractions.
  • The $\hat\Gamma$-integral structure and the conjectural Fourier duality may imply semiorthogonal decompositions of derived categories for the same varieties, a possibility the paper explicitly anticipates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Fourier-duality framework relating the T-equivariant quantum cohomology (and quantum D-module) of a smooth projective variety X with the quantum cohomology of a GIT quotient Y = X//T. Section 1 introduces a heuristic "quantum volume," defined through Givental's path integral, and states a naive Fourier-duality conjecture (Conjecture 11). Section 2 gives rigorous definitions of shift operators, the equivariant Givental cone, and the big equivariant J-function, and states the central Reduction Conjecture 43, which expresses the J-function of Y as a discrete Fourier transform of the equivariant J-function of X. Section 3 summarizes decomposition theorems for quantum D-modules of projective bundles and blowups, with a proof strategy via the master space and continuous Fourier transforms. The paper is partly a research announcement: several central items are conjectural and proof details are deferred to the unpublished joint work [23].

Significance. If the reduction conjecture and the Fourier-duality picture are correct, they would unify Teleman's conjecture, explain toric mirror symmetry through a global Kähler moduli space, and give a conceptual mechanism behind the decomposition of quantum D-modules for projective bundles and blowups. The rigorous infrastructure in Section 2, especially the localization formula for shift operators in Proposition 34 and the intertwining properties, is a genuine strength, as are the worked examples in Examples 47--49 that connect the conjecture to known mirror theorems. The paper is honest in labeling its conjectures and in flagging the heuristic nature of the quantum volume definition. The main caveat is that the load-bearing support condition in Conjecture 43(1) is not proved, and the general proof is deferred to an inaccessible reference.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.6, Conjecture 43(1)] The support statement that I_Y is supported on the dual cone C^∨_{Y,N} is the load-bearing unproved step. Formula (2.7) and Proposition 34 give the localization formula for the shift operator, but the vanishing of κ(Ŝ_{-β}J_X) for β outside the dual cone is precisely the quantum analogue of the Jeffrey–Kirwan residue mentioned in Remark 9, and it is asserted rather than derived. If this vanishing fails, I_Y contains spurious S^β variables and part (2), that zI_Y lies on L_Y, is not well-formed. The examples in Section 2.6 are all in toric or projective-bundle settings where the statement reduces to Givental's mirror theorem or the Coates–Givental quantum Riemann–Roch theorem, so they do not test the general mechanism. The proof is deferred to unpublished joint work [23]. This is not an internal inconsistency, but it is the point where the central conjecture could fail, and the paper should either provide a proof, or state clearly that the conjecture is open and restrict the claims accordingly.
  2. [§1.3, equations (1.9)–(1.10)] The definition of the quantum volume rests on Givental's path integral (1.9), which the paper explicitly says has "currently no mathematically rigorous definition," and the localization computation leading to (1.10) is adopted as the definition. Moreover, Conjecture 11 is admitted in Remark 12 to be imprecise and not correct in general (e.g., when the quotient is empty), and the intended interpretation is only as an asymptotic expansion. Since the abstract and title foreground the Fourier duality of quantum volumes, the manuscript should sharply separate this heuristic part from the rigorously defined reduction conjecture, and should avoid suggesting that Conjecture 11 is a proven or precisely formulated result.
  3. [§3, Theorems 50 and 53] The decomposition theorems for projective bundles and blowups are quoted from the author's previous works [38] and [24], respectively, and the proof outline in §3.3 relies essentially on the reduction conjecture and on the unpublished paper [23]. As presented, this paper does not itself prove these theorems, nor does it prove the reduction conjecture in the needed generality. The manuscript should clarify the provenance of each result and explicitly state which parts are new to this paper, which are conditional on Conjecture 43, and which are already established in the cited references.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.6, Conjecture 43] In the definition of I_Y, the quotient N_T^1(X)/N_1(T) appears to be a typo; it should presumably be N_T^1(X)/N_1(X), since N_1(T) has not been defined and the identification with H_2^T(pt,Z) is via the exact sequence (2.2).
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected in a revision: "Kähler" is misspelled as "Kähelr" in the caption of Figure 3, "complections" in Remark 41, "dicrete" in Remark 45, "semi-infnite" in §2.1, and "mononid" in Remark 37.
  3. [§2.5, Lemma 38] The statement of Lemma 38 cites [23] for the dual-cone identification. Since [23] is listed as "in preparation," the citation is not verifiable; it would be helpful to state which parts of Lemma 38 are proved elsewhere and which are part of the forthcoming joint work.
  4. [§1.4, Example 22] In the heuristic computation of shift operators for vector spaces, the infinite products over c ≤ 0 and c ≤ -k are formal and involve regularization; a short remark explaining the intended regularization would improve readability, especially since the same products are used later in Example 47.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Fourier/reduction conjectures are genuine conjectures, and the proven examples rest on independent mirror theorems.

full rationale

The paper does not fit parameters to data, and its derived statements are not equivalent to their inputs. The quantum-volume Fourier duality (Conjecture 11) is a genuine conjecture: Π_X is defined via J_X and the bΓ-class in (1.10) independently of Π_Y, and Examples 16 and 17 verify it by residue and mirror-integral computations, not by renaming. The reduction conjecture (Conjecture 43) is explicitly presented as a conjecture; its support property is asserted as nontrivial and is not defined into existence, since I_Y is defined for all β and the vanishing outside C^∨_{Y,N} is an unproved statement. The paper's proven results (Examples 47–49, Theorems 50 and 53) are anchored in external results: Givental's mirror theorem [22], the Coates–Givental quantum Riemann–Roch theorem [32], Brown [39], Koto [40], and the prior blowup paper [24]. The main self-citation is to the unpublished companion work [23] for the conjecture itself and for Lemma 38; this affects provenance and completeness, not circularity, because the paper does not present a derivation that reduces to [23] as evidence. Section 1.3 explicitly admits that the Givental path integral (1.9) is not mathematically rigorous and that the localization computation is adopted as the definition of quantum volume; this is a foundational caveat, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data or chosen by hand to make the conjectures work. The mirror map σ_Y(τ) is conjectural but not assigned a fitted value. The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or unexplained physical entities; 'quantum volume' is a mathematically defined quantity and the global moduli space M is constructed from standard monoid rings.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The heuristic path integral (1.9) over the Floer fundamental cycle is valid and localizes to the quantum volume formula (1.10).
    Invoked in §1.3 to define quantum volume; the paper states the integral has no rigorous definition.
  • domain assumption The Fourier integrals in Conjecture 11 make sense, at least as asymptotic expansions, and a mirror map σ_Y(τ) with the stated asymptotics exists.
    Remark 12: the paper admits the conjecture is imprecise and that the analytic meaning of the Fourier integral is subtle.
  • domain assumption The discrete Fourier sum in Conjecture 43 has support on the dual cone C^∨_{Y,N} and defines a point on the non-equivariant Givental cone L_Y.
    This is the unproved content of Reduction Conjecture 43, parts (1) and (2).
  • standard math Virtual localization and the quantum Riemann-Roch theorem of Coates-Givental are used as black boxes for shift operators and D-module decompositions.
    Used throughout §2.3-§3; these are established results in the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fourier analysis of equivariant quantum cohomology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXSTYNKK

@misc{pith2026250118849,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fourier analysis of equivariant quantum cohomology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXSTYNKK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18849}
}
read the original abstract

Equivariant quantum cohomology possesses the structure of a difference module by shift operators (Seidel representation) of equivariant parameters. Teleman's conjecture suggests that shift operators and equivariant parameters acting on QH_T(X) should be identified, respectively, with the Novikov variables and the quantum connection of the GIT quotient X//T. This can be interpreted as a form of Fourier duality between equivariant quantum cohomology (D-module) of X and quantum cohomology (D-module) of the GIT quotient X//T. We introduce the notion of "quantum volume," derived from Givental's path integral over the Floer fundamental cycle, and present a conjectural Fourier duality relationship between the T-equivariant quantum volume of X and the quantum volume of X//T. We also explore the "reduction conjecture," developed in collaboration with Fumihiko Sanda, which expresses the I-function of X//T as a discrete Fourier transform of the equivariant J-function of X. Furthermore, we demonstrate how to use Fourier analysis of equivariant quantum cohomology to observe toric mirror symmetry and prove a decomposition of quantum cohomology D-modules of projective bundles or blowups.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18849 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Global K¨ahler moduli space. We expect that the sheaf QHT (X) over the global K¨ahler moduli space should restrict to QH(X//iT) around each cusp (shaded region) after modification and com￾pletion. implicitly assumed that dim H2(X//T) = dim H2(X)+rank T in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The function t 7→ Πpt(Wτ (e −t )) for τ = −20([0] + [∞]) and z = 1. This smoothes the Duistermaat-Heckman measure µ∗(d volP1 ) supported on [−20, 20]. (such that −τ = [ˆω] = [ω − λµ]) has [τ 1 , −τ 2 ] as the image. The inverse Fourier transform of Πeq P1 (τ ) is Πpt(Wτ (e −t )) = exp(−(e τ 1−t + e τ 2+t )/z). Similarly to Example 16, this function is very small when t is away from [τ 1 , −τ 2 ] (i.e. X//tT is empty… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A decomposition of the T-ample cone CT (X) and the asso￾ciated “toric variety” M (global K¨ahelr moduli space). The torus-fixed point pi ∈ M corresponding to the cone Ci can be interpreted as the large-radius limit point of the GIT quotient Yi = X//iT. Note that C ∨ i,N is generated by NEN(X) := NE(X) ∩ N1(X) and finitely many integral classes in NT 1 (X) (where NEN(X) can be strictly bigger than NEN(X)). Therefore … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Decomposition of quantum cohomology of P(V ) by Euler eigenvalues (with r = 3). Let QDM(P(V ))la, QDM(B) la denote the base changes of the quantum D-modules QDM(P(V )), QDM(B) to the ring C[z]((q −1/r′ ))[[QB]] via the above ring extensions. Theorem 50 ([38]). Let V → …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Decomposition of quantum cohomology of Xe by Euler eigen￾values (with r = 4) when |Q|, |τ˜| ≪ |q|. Theorem 53 ([24]). There exist formal invertible maps H∗ (Xe) → H∗ (X)⊕H∗ (Z) ⊕(r−1) , τ˜ 7→ (τ (˜τ ), σ1(˜τ ), . . . , σr−1(˜τ )) and an isomorphism Ψ: QDM(Xe) la ∼= τ ∗…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The master space W and the moment map µ: W → R. We have X = X × {∞} ⊂ W and Xe is the strict transform of X × {0}. Db ∼= P(NZ/X ⊕1) is the exceptional divisor of W → X×P 1 and D = Db∩Xe is the exceptional divisor of Xe → X. µ Amp(X) 0 ω CXe CX toric variety −−−−−−→ M g…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The toric variety associated with the fan structure on CT (W). Here, FX and FXe denote discrete Fourier transformations associated with the GIT quotients X and Xe, respectively, as considered in Reduction Conjecture 43. The maps F i Z , i = 1, . . . , r −1, represent c…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Iritani and F

    H. Iritani and F. Sanda in preparation

    work page

  2. [38]

    Iritani and Y

    H. Iritani and Y. Koto, Quantum cohomology of projective bundles (2023). arXiv:2307.03696

    arXiv 2023

  3. [24]

    H. Iritani. Quantum cohomology of blowups. arXiv:2307.13555[math.AG] (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  4. [1]

    C. Teleman. Gauge theory and mirror symmetry. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Seoul 2014. Vol. II , pp. 1309–1332, Kyung Moon Sa, Seoul (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [2]

    Pomerleano and C

    D. Pomerleano and C. Teleman. Quantization commutes with reduction again: quantum GIT conjecture I. arXiv:2405.20301[math.AG] (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  6. [3]

    A. B. Givental, Homological geometry. I. Projective hypersurfaces, Selecta Math. (N.S.) . 1(2), 325–345 (1995). ISSN 1022-1824

    work page 1995

  7. [4]

    Cassia, P

    L. Cassia, P. Longhi, and M. Zabzine, Symplectic cuts and open/closed strings I, Comm. Math. Phys. 406(1), Paper No. 15, 50 (2025). ISSN 0010-3616,1432-0916

    work page 2025

  8. [5]

    Okounkov and R

    A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande, The quantum differential equation of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane, Transform. Groups. 15(4), 965–982 (2010). ISSN 1083-4362

    work page 2010

Show all 51 references
  1. [6]

    Braverman, D

    A. Braverman, D. Maulik, and A. Okounkov, Quantum cohomology of the Springer resolution, Adv. Math. 227(1), 421–458 (2011). ISSN 0001-8708

    2011

  2. [7]

    Maulik and A

    D. Maulik and A. Okounkov, Quantum groups and quantum cohomology, Ast´ erisque. (408), ix+209 (2019). ISSN 0303-1179. arXiv:1211.1287[math.AG]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Seidel, π1 of symplectic automorphism groups and invertibles in quantum homology rings, Geom

    P. Seidel, π1 of symplectic automorphism groups and invertibles in quantum homology rings, Geom. Funct. Anal. 7(6), 1046–1095 (1997). ISSN 1016-443X. FOURIER ANALYSIS OF EQUIV ARIANT QUANTUM COHOMOLOGY 41

    1997

  4. [9]

    Gonz´ alez, C

    E. Gonz´ alez, C. Y. Mak, and D. Pomerleano. Affine nil-Hecke algebras and quantum cohomology. arXiv:2202.05785 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  5. [10]

    C. T. Woodward, Quantum Kirwan morphism and Gromov-Witten invariants of quotients I, II, III, Transform. Groups . 20(2,3,4), 507–556,881–920,1155–1193 (2015). ISSN 1083-4362. arXiv:1204.1765

    2015 arXiv

  6. [11]

    K. Fukaya. Unobstructed immersed Lagrangian correspondence and filtered A∞ functor. arXiv:1706.02131[math.AG] (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Lau, N.-C

    S.-C. Lau, N.-C. C. Leung, and Y.-L. L. Li. Equivariant Lagrangian correspondence and a con- jecture of Teleman. arXiv:2312.13926[math.AG] (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Iritani, Shift operators and toric mirror theorem, Geom

    H. Iritani, Shift operators and toric mirror theorem, Geom. Topol. 21(1), 315–343 (2017). ISSN 1465-3060. arXiv:1411.6840 [math.AG]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [14]

    F. C. Kirwan, Cohomology of quotients in symplectic and algebraic geometry. vol. 31, Mathematical Notes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1984). ISBN 0-691-08370-3

    1984

  10. [15]

    L. C. Jeffrey and F. C. Kirwan, Localization for nonabelian group actions, Topology. 34(2), 291–327 (1995). ISSN 0040-9383

    1995

  11. [16]

    Galkin and H

    S. Galkin and H. Iritani. Gamma conjecture via mirror symmetry. In Primitive forms and related subjects—Kavli IPMU 2014, vol. 83, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pp. 55–115. Math. Soc. Japan, [Tokyo] ([2019] ©2019). ISBN 978-4-86497-085-3

    2014

  12. [17]

    Barannikov, Quantum periods, I: semi-infinite variations of Hodge structures, International Mathematics Research Notices

    S. Barannikov, Quantum periods, I: semi-infinite variations of Hodge structures, International Mathematics Research Notices . 2001(23), 1243–1264 (01, 2001). ISSN 1073-7928. doi: 10.1155/ S1073792801000599. URL https://doi.org/10.1155/S1073792801000599

    2001 doi

  13. [18]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. Corti, S. Galkin, V. Golyshev, and A. Kasprzyk. Mirror symmetry and Fano manifolds. In European Congress of Mathematics , pp. 285–300. Eur. Math. Soc., Z¨ urich (2013). ISBN 978-3-03719-120-0

    2013

  14. [19]

    Iritani, An integral structure in quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry for toric orbifolds, Adv

    H. Iritani, An integral structure in quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry for toric orbifolds, Adv. Math. 222(3), 1016–1079 (2009). ISSN 0001-8708

    2009

  15. [20]

    Aleshkin, B

    K. Aleshkin, B. Fang, and J. Wang. Mirror symmetric gamma conjecture for toric GIT quotients via Fourier transform. arXiv:2501.14222[math.AG] (2025)

    2025

  16. [21]

    Galkin, V

    S. Galkin, V. Golyshev, and H. Iritani, Gamma classes and quantum cohomology of Fano man- ifolds: gamma conjectures, Duke Math. J. 165(11), 2005–2077 (2016). ISSN 0012-7094. doi: 10.1215/00127094-3476593. URL https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-3476593

    2016 doi

  17. [22]

    A. B. Givental. A mirror theorem for toric complete intersections. In Topological field theory, primitive forms and related topics (Kyoto, 1996) , vol. 160, Progr. Math., pp. 141–175. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA (1998)

    1998

  18. [25]

    D. A. Cox and S. Katz, Mirror symmetry and algebraic geometry . vol. 68, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1999). ISBN 0-8218-1059-6

    1999

  19. [26]

    A. B. Givental, Equivariant Gromov-Witten invariants, Internat. Math. Res. Notices . (13), 613– 663 (1996). ISSN 1073-7928

    1996

  20. [27]

    McDuff and S

    D. McDuff and S. Tolman, Topological properties of Hamiltonian circle actions, IMRP Int. Math. Res. Pap. pp. 72826, 1–77 (2006). ISSN 1687-3017

    2006

  21. [28]

    Dubrovin, Geometry of 2D topological field theories

    B. Dubrovin, Geometry of 2D topological field theories. 1620, 120–348 (1996)

    1996

  22. [29]

    Graber and R

    T. Graber and R. Pandharipande, Localization of virtual classes, Invent. Math. 135(2), 487–518 (1999). ISSN 0020-9910

    1999

  23. [30]

    Pandharipande, Rational curves on hypersurfaces (after A

    R. Pandharipande, Rational curves on hypersurfaces (after A. Givental), Ast´ erisque. (252), Exp. No. 848, 5, 307–340 (1998). ISSN 0303-1179. S´ eminaire Bourbaki. Vol. 1997/98

    1998

  24. [31]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. Corti, H. Iritani, and H.-H. Tseng, Hodge-theoretic mirror symmetry for toric stacks, J. Differential Geom. 114(1), 41–115 (2020). ISSN 0022-040X

    2020

  25. [32]

    Coates and A

    T. Coates and A. Givental, Quantum Riemann-Roch, Lefschetz and Serre, Ann. of Math. (2) . 165(1), 15–53 (2007). ISSN 0003-486X. 42 H. IRITANI

    2007

  26. [33]

    A. B. Givental. Symplectic geometry of Frobenius structures. In Frobenius manifolds, Aspects Math., E36, pp. 91–112. Friedr. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2004)

    2004

  27. [34]

    Coates, A

    T. Coates, A. Corti, H. Iritani, and H.-H. Tseng, Computing genus-zero twisted Gromov-Witten invariants, Duke Math. J. 147(3), 377–438 (2009). ISSN 0012-7094

    2009

  28. [35]

    I. V. Dolgachev and Y. Hu, Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients, Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (87), 5–56 (1998). ISSN 0073-8301. With an appendix by Nicolas Ressayre

    1998

  29. [36]

    Thaddeus, Geometric invariant theory and flips, J

    M. Thaddeus, Geometric invariant theory and flips, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9(3), 691–723 (1996). ISSN 0894-0347

    1996

  30. [37]

    Saito, Period mapping associated to a primitive form, Publ

    K. Saito, Period mapping associated to a primitive form, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 19(3), 1231–1264 (1983). ISSN 0034-5318. doi: 10.2977/prims/1195182028. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2977/prims/1195182028

    1983

  31. [39]

    J. S. Brown, Gromov-Witten invariants of toric fibrations, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN . (19), 5437–5482 (2014). ISSN 1073-7928

    2014

  32. [40]

    Koto, A mirror theorem for non-split toric bundles (2023)

    Y. Koto, A mirror theorem for non-split toric bundles (2023). arXiv:2310.09888[math.AG]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Galkin, J

    S. Galkin, J. Hu, H. Iritani, K. Huazhong, C. Li, and Z. Su. Revisiting Gamma conjecture I: counterexamples and modifications. arXiv:2405.16979[math.AG] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Iritani, Global mirrors and discrepant transformations for toric Deligne-Mumford stacks, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom

    H. Iritani, Global mirrors and discrepant transformations for toric Deligne-Mumford stacks, SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl. 16, Paper No. 032, 111 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    H. Iritani. Gamma classes and quantum cohomology. In ICM—International Congress of Mathe- maticians. Vol. 4. Sections 5–8 , pp. 2552–2574. EMS Press, Berlin ([2023] ©2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Kontsevich, Birational invariants from Gromov-Witten theory (2022)

    M. Kontsevich, Birational invariants from Gromov-Witten theory (2022). Lecture Series at Institut des Hautes ´Etudes Scientifiques, 2023, videos available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= YQzltmJ0hN8&list=PLx5f8IelFRgHd0gjoolTDXakXQvLbVQPv

    2022

  37. [45]

    Hinault, T

    T. Hinault, T. Y. Yu, C. Zhang, and S. Zhang. Decomposition and framing of F -bundles and applications to quantum cohomology. arXiv:2411.02266[math.AG] (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Fan and Y.-P

    H. Fan and Y.-P. Lee, On Gromov-Witten theory of projective bundles, Michigan Math. J. 69 (1), 153–178 (2020). ISSN 0026-2285

    2020

  39. [47]

    Hori and M

    K. Hori and M. Romo. Exact Results In Two-Dimensional (2 , 2) Supersymmetric Gauge Theories With Boundary. arXiv:1308.2438[hep-th] (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    H. Iritani. Quantum cohomology and Fourier transformation. Lecture series at Kansu-Hoteishiki- Ron Summer Seminar on 7-8 August 2023, held at Kurobe, Toyama, Japan (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    H. Iritani. Fourier analysis of equivariant quantum cohomology. Talk at Banff International Re- search Station on 19 October 2023, a video available at https://www.birs.ca/events/2023/ 5-day-workshops/23w5068/videos/watch/202310191401-Iritani.html (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    H. Iritani. Fourier analysis of equivariant quantum cohomology. Lecture series at the Chinese Uni- versity of Hong-Kong, on 21-24 November 2023, Greater Bay Area Geometry and Mathematical Physics Conference - MIST 2023 Workshop (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    H. Iritani. Fourier analysis of equivariant quantum cohomology. Lecture series at the Institute of the Mathematical Sciences of the Americas at the University of Miami, on 26-28 January 2024, Homological Mirror Symmetry, videos available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= CaB...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.