RECORD
Near-Infrared Spectral Classification of late-M and L Dwarfs
Astrophysics · Submitted 12 Dec 2000
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In particular, four indices designed to measure absorption in the wings of the 1.4 and 1.85 micron steam bands exhibit a linear, monotonic correlation with spectral type on the Kirkpatrick et al. (1999) system, allowing consistent calibration from both optical and near-infrared spectroscopy.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present near-infrared (1 to 2.5 micron) low-resolution spectroscopy of eleven ultracool dwarfs with spectral types ranging from M7 to L8. Combining our observations with data published previously by Leggett et al. (2001), we have measured equivalent widths for the strongest atomic features and constructed narrowband indices to gauge the strength of the strongest molecular features. Those measurements show that the behaviourr at near-infrared wavelengths is well correlated with spectral type, where the latter is defined from observations between 6300 and 10000 Angstroms. In particular, four indices designed to measure absorption in the wings of the 1.4 and 1.85 micron steam bands exhibit a linear, monotonic correlation with spectral type on the Kirkpatrick et al. (1999) system, allowing consistent calibration from both optical and near-infrared spectroscopy.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present near-infrared (1 to 2.5 micron) low-resolution spectroscopy of eleven ultracool dwarfs with spectral types ranging from M7 to L8. | contribution 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.05 | asserted 0.97 |
| s1 | Combining our observations with data published previously by Leggett et al. (2001), we have measured equivalent widths for the strongest atomic features and constructed narrowband indices to gauge the strength of the strongest molecular features. | method 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Those measurements show that the behaviourr at near-infrared wavelengths is well correlated with spectral type, where the latter is defined from observations between 6300 and 10000 Angstroms. | result 0.96 | 0.88 | 0.36 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In particular, four indices designed to measure absorption in the wings of the 1.4 and 1.85 micron steam bands exhibit a linear, monotonic correlation with spectral type on the Kirkpatrick et al. (1999) system, allowing consistent calibration from both optical and near-infrared spectroscopy. | result 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.73 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present near-infrared (1 to 2.5 micron) low-resolution spectroscopy of eleven ultracool dwarfs with spectral types ranging from M7 to L8. Combining our observations with data published previously by Leggett et al. (2001), we have measured equivalent widths for the strongest atomic features and constructed narrowband indices to gauge the strength of the strongest molecular features. Those measurements show that the behaviourr at near-infrared wavelengths is well correlated with spectral type, where the latter is defined from observations between 6300 and 10000 Angstroms. In particular, four indices designed to measure absorption in the wings of the 1.4 and 1.85 micron steam bands exhibit a linear, monotonic correlation with spectral type on the Kirkpatrick et al. (1999) system, allowing consistent calibration from both optical and near-infrared spectroscopy.
Human review
References
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.