Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Constraints on Omega_m, Omega_L, and Sigma₈, from Galaxy Cluster Redshift Distributions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0105396 v2 pith:EEGMWZX3 submitted 2001-05-22 astro-ph

Constraints on Omega_m, Omega_L, and Sigma₈, from Galaxy Cluster Redshift Distributions

classification astro-ph
keywords omegaredshiftsurveysclusterconstraintsinformationsigmaangle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that the counts of galaxy clusters in future deep cluster surveys can place strong constraints on the matter density, Omega_m, the vacuum energy density, Omega_L, and the normalization of the matter power spectrum, sigma_8. Degeneracies between these parameters are different from those in studies of either high--redshift type Ia Supernovae (SNe), or cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. Using a mass threshold for cluster detection expected to be typical for upcoming SZE surveys, we find that constraints on Omega_m and sigma_8 at the level of roughly 5% or better can be expected, assuming redshift information is known at least to z=0.5 and in the absence of significant systematic errors. Without information past this redshift, Omega_L is constrained to 25%. With complete redshift information, deep (M_{lim}= 10^{14}h^{-1}{M_sun}), relatively small solid angle (roughly 12 {deg}^2) surveys can further constrain Omega_L to an accuracy of 15%, while large solid angle surveys with ground-based large-format bolometer arrays could measure Omega_L to a precision of 4% or better.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cluster Mass Inference from Galaxy Kinematics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Simulation-based Deep Sets model with neural posterior estimation halves scatter in cluster mass estimates from galaxy kinematics compared to the M-sigma relation.

  2. Impact of projection-induced optical selection bias on the weak lensing mass calibration of galaxy clusters

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Projection-induced selection bias causes 20-50% overestimation of weak lensing masses for optically selected galaxy clusters, larger on scales >3 Mpc.