Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A distorted radio shell in the young supernova SN1986J

Astrophysics · Submitted 28 Feb 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Thus, the supernova progenitor must have kept intact most of its hydrogen-rich envelope by the time of explosion, which favours a single, massive star progenitor scenario.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.68 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/0202514 (version 2)
Pith IDEF3PAZMH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Alberdi, E. Ros, F. Mantovani, J.C. Guirado, J.M. Marcaide, K. Weiler, L. Lara, M.A. Perez-Torres. "A distorted radio shell in the young supernova SN1986J." arXiv:astro-ph/0202514 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/EF3PAZMH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,221 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.67 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.45 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We report here on 5 GHz global very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations of SN 1986J, 16 yr after its explosion. We obtained a high-resolution image of the supernova, which shows a distorted shell of radio emission, indicative of a deformation of the shock front. The angular size of the shell is $\sim4.7 {\rm mas}$, corresponding to a linear size of $\sim6.8 \times 10^{17} {\rm cm}$ for a distance of 9.6 Mpc to NGC 891. The average speed of the shell has decreased from $\sim$7400 \kms in 1988.74 down to about $6300 {\rm km s^{-1}}$ in 1999.14, indicative of a mild deceleration in the expansion of SN 1986J. Assuming a standard density profile for the progenitor wind ($\rho_{\rm cs} \propto r^{-s}, s=2$), the swept-up mass by the shock front is $\sim$2.2\Ms. This large swept-up mass, coupled with the mild deceleration suffered by the supernova, suggests that the mass of the hydrogen-rich envelope ejected at explosion was $\ga12$ \Ms. Thus, the supernova progenitor must have kept intact most of its hydrogen-rich envelope by the time of explosion, which favours a single, massive star progenitor scenario. We find a flux density for SN 1986J of $\sim$7.2 mJy at the observing frequency of 5 GHz, which results in a radio luminosity of $\sim1.4 \times 10^{37} {\rm erg s^{-1}}$ for the frequency range $10^7$--$10^{10}$ Hz ($\alpha =-0.69; S_\nu \propto \nu^{\alpha})$. We detect four bright knots that delineate the shell structure, and an absolute minimum of emission, which we tentatively identify with the centre of the supernova explosion. If this is the case, SN 1986J has then suffered an asymmetric expansion. We suggest that this asymmetry is due to the collision of the supernova ejecta with an anisotropic, clumpy (or filamentary) medium.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We report here on 5 GHz global very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations of SN 1986J, 16 yr after its explosion. contribution 0.82 0.96 0.02 asserted 0.99
s1 We obtained a high-resolution image of the supernova, which shows a distorted shell of radio emission, indicative of a deformation of the shock front. result 0.93 0.96 0.11 asserted 0.59
s2 The angular size of the shell is $\sim4.7 {\rm mas}$, corresponding to a linear size of $\sim6.8 \times 10^{17} {\rm cm}$ for a distance of 9.6 Mpc to NGC 891. result 1.00 0.92 0.04 asserted 0.99
s3 The average speed of the shell has decreased from $\sim$7400 \kms in 1988.74 down to about $6300 {\rm km s^{-1}}$ in 1999.14, indicative of a mild deceleration in the expansion of SN 1986J. Assuming a standard density profile for the progenitor wind ($\rho_{\rm cs} \propto r^{-s}, s=2$), the swept-up mass by the shock front is $\sim$2.2\Ms. result 0.98 0.93 0.09 asserted 0.84
s4 This large swept-up mass, coupled with the mild deceleration suffered by the supernova, suggests that the mass of the hydrogen-rich envelope ejected at explosion was $\ga12$ \Ms. interpretation 0.99 0.83 0.30 hedged possibility 0.99
s5 Thus, the supernova progenitor must have kept intact most of its hydrogen-rich envelope by the time of explosion, which favours a single, massive star progenitor scenario. interpretation 1.00 0.68 0.63 hedged possibility 0.68
s6 We find a flux density for SN 1986J of $\sim$7.2 mJy at the observing frequency of 5 GHz, which results in a radio luminosity of $\sim1.4 \times 10^{37} {\rm erg s^{-1}}$ for the frequency range $10^7$--$10^{10}$ Hz ($\alpha =-0.69; S_\nu \propto \nu^{\alpha})$. result 1.00 0.97 0.04 asserted 1.00
s7 We detect four bright knots that delineate the shell structure, and an absolute minimum of emission, which we tentatively identify with the centre of the supernova explosion. result 1.00 0.97 0.05 asserted 0.82
s8 If this is the case, SN 1986J has then suffered an asymmetric expansion. interpretation 0.94 0.58 0.09 hedged possibility 0.79
s9 We suggest that this asymmetry is due to the collision of the supernova ejecta with an anisotropic, clumpy (or filamentary) medium. interpretation 1.00 0.59 0.24 hedged possibility 0.51

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We report here on 5 GHz global very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations of SN 1986J, 16 yr after its explosion. We obtained a high-resolution image of the supernova, which shows a distorted shell of radio emission, indicative of a deformation of the shock front. The angular size of the shell is $\sim4.7 {\rm mas}$, corresponding to a linear size of $\sim6.8 \times 10^{17} {\rm cm}$ for a distance of 9.6 Mpc to NGC 891. The average speed of the shell has decreased from $\sim$7400 \kms in 1988.74 down to about $6300 {\rm km s^{-1}}$ in 1999.14, indicative of a mild deceleration in the expansion of SN 1986J. Assuming a standard density profile for the progenitor wind ($\rho_{\rm cs} \propto r^{-s}, s=2$), the swept-up mass by the shock front is $\sim$2.2\Ms. This large swept-up mass, coupled with the mild deceleration suffered by the supernova, suggests that the mass of the hydrogen-rich envelope ejected at explosion was $\ga12$ \Ms. Thus, the supernova progenitor must have kept intact most of its hydrogen-rich envelope by the time of explosion, which favours a single, massive star progenitor scenario. We find a flux density for SN 1986J of $\sim$7.2 mJy at the observing frequency of 5 GHz, which results in a radio luminosity of $\sim1.4 \times 10^{37} {\rm erg s^{-1}}$ for the frequency range $10^7$--$10^{10}$ Hz ($\alpha =-0.69; S_\nu \propto \nu^{\alpha})$. We detect four bright knots that delineate the shell structure, and an absolute minimum of emission, which we tentatively identify with the centre of the supernova explosion. If this is the case, SN 1986J has then suffered an asymmetric expansion. We suggest that this asymmetry is due to the collision of the supernova ejecta with an anisotropic, clumpy (or filamentary) medium.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.