Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A census of metals at high and low redshifts and the connection between submillimetre sources and spheroid formation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0210260 v2 pith:L6TCXF2O submitted 2002-10-11 astro-ph

A census of metals at high and low redshifts and the connection between submillimetre sources and spheroid formation

classification astro-ph
keywords metalsdustsurveysformationhightodayuniversedeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Deep surveys in many wavebands have shown that the rate at which stars were forming was at least a factor of 10 higher at z > 1 than today. Heavy elements (metals) are produced by stars, and the star formation history deduced by these surveys implies that a significant fraction of metals in the universe today should already exist at z~2-3. However, only 10% of the total metals expected to exist at this epoch have so far been accounted for (in DLAs and the Lyman forest). In this paper, we use the results of submillimetre surveys of the local and high redshift universe to show that there was much more dust in galaxies in the past. We find that a large proportion of the missing metals are traced by this dust, bringing the metals implied from the star formation history and observations into agreement. We also show that the observed distribution of dust masses at high redshift can be reproduced remarkably well by a simple model for the evolution of dust in spheroids, suggesting that the descendants of the dusty galaxies found in the deep submm surveys are the relatively dust-free spiral bulges and ellipticals in the universe today.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.