Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Extended complex scalar field as quintessence

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Yi-Huan Wei

Astrophysics · Submitted 23 Feb 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper, we show the possibility that an extended complex scalar field can be considered as an extended complex quintessence.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.69 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/0402515 (version 1)
Pith IDMPCCMWTJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYi-Huan Wei. "Extended complex scalar field as quintessence." arXiv:astro-ph/0402515 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/MPCCMWTJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,885 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.19 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper, we show the possibility that an extended complex scalar field can be considered as an extended complex quintessence. For this model, we derive the basic equations with a parameter $\eta $ which govern the evolution of the Universe. Our model may contain a complex quintessence model for $\eta =-1$ and a real quitessence model for $\eta =0$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper, we show the possibility that an extended complex scalar field can be considered as an extended complex quintessence. contribution 0.94 0.91 0.78 hedged possibility 0.69
s1 For this model, we derive the basic equations with a parameter $\eta $ which govern the evolution of the Universe. method 0.77 0.95 0.06 asserted 1.00
s2 Our model may contain a complex quintessence model for $\eta =-1$ and a real quitessence model for $\eta =0$. interpretation 0.61 0.69 0.22 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper, we show the possibility that an extended complex scalar field can be considered as an extended complex quintessence. For this model, we derive the basic equations with a parameter $\eta $ which govern the evolution of the Universe. Our model may contain a complex quintessence model for $\eta =-1$ and a real quitessence model for $\eta =0$.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.