Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comparison between methods for the determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal profile of atmospheric cascades

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0507543 v2 pith:Q7I76VNB submitted 2005-07-22 astro-ph

Comparison between methods for the determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal profile of atmospheric cascades

classification astro-ph
keywords analysislongitudinalmethodsatmosphericcascadescompositioncosmicdetermination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The determination of the primary cosmic ray mass composition from the longitudinal development of atmospheric cascades is still a debated issue. In this work we discuss several data analysis methods and show that if the entire information contained in the longitudinal profile is exploited, reliable results may be obtained. Among the proposed methods FCC ('Fit of the Cascade Curve'), MTA ('Multiparametric Topological Analysis') and NNA ('Neural Net Analysis') with conjugate gradient optimization algorithm give the best accuracy.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prospects for Deep-Learning-Based Mass Reconstruction of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays using Simulated Air-Shower Profiles

    astro-ph.HE 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    A CNN predicts ln A from longitudinal shower profiles with bias under 0.4, resolution 1-1.5, and proton-iron merit factor 2.19, outperforming simpler ML models on shape parameters and remaining robust to hadronic mode...