REVIEW 3 cited by
Insights into Dark Energy: Interplay Between Theory and Observation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The nature of Dark Energy is still very much a mystery, and the combination of a variety of experimental tests, sensitive to different potential Dark Energy properties, will help elucidate its origins. This white paper briefly surveys the array of theoretical approaches to the Dark Energy problem and their relation to experimental questions.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Neutrino mass constraints in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter black-hole dark energy model with ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 data
SdSDE dark energy yields a ~0.16–0.21 eV positive neutrino-mass preference with DESI+ACT data, but χ² strongly favors extended ΛCDM and the shift is likely compensation.
-
Alleviating the $H_0$ tension through the interacting dark energy model from quantum gravitational field theory in light of DESI DR2
With DESI DR2 BAO plus CMB and a SH0ES prior, the two-parameter eeΛCDM model gives δΛ=-0.41±0.14 and H0=71.9±1.0, easing the Hubble tension to 0.8σ, but SN datasets erase the signal.
-
Quantifying the impacts of future gravitational-wave data on constraining interacting dark energy
Adding 1000 simulated Einstein Telescope standard sirens to current CMB, BAO, and supernova data would tighten H0 and matter density constraints by factors of 2 to 3 in four interacting dark energy models, with modest...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.