RECORD
Flux Measurement at 110 GeV of the Blazar Mrk 501 with CELESTE
Astrophysics · Submitted 25 Oct 2005
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We obtain an excess of 2.9 sigma during this time and of 4.9 sigma during May and June 2000 that we interpret as a gamma-ray signal from Mrk 501, for which we calculate a flux of (6.9 +/- 2.2) * 10^{-7} photons m^{-2} s^{-1}.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The new analysis variable xi, shown to be powerful on the data taken with the final configuration of CELESTE, has been applied to data taken with previous detector configurations. First, the analysis is validated on Crab observations, and then the cuts for the blazar Mrk 501 are optimized using Mrk 421 data since the sources have similar declinations. Data from Mrk 501 was recorded in 2000 and 2001. The old analysis gave a 2.5 sigma excess. We obtain an excess of 2.9 sigma during this time and of 4.9 sigma during May and June 2000 that we interpret as a gamma-ray signal from Mrk 501, for which we calculate a flux of (6.9 +/- 2.2) * 10^{-7} photons m^{-2} s^{-1}. An upper limit from the other data with no signal is determined.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The new analysis variable xi, shown to be powerful on the data taken with the final configuration of CELESTE, has been applied to data taken with previous detector configurations. | method 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | First, the analysis is validated on Crab observations, and then the cuts for the blazar Mrk 501 are optimized using Mrk 421 data since the sources have similar declinations. | method 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.03 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | Data from Mrk 501 was recorded in 2000 and 2001. | method 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | The old analysis gave a 2.5 sigma excess. | background 0.84 | 0.36 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | We obtain an excess of 2.9 sigma during this time and of 4.9 sigma during May and June 2000 that we interpret as a gamma-ray signal from Mrk 501, for which we calculate a flux of (6.9 +/- 2.2) * 10^{-7} photons m^{-2} s^{-1}. | result 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.88 | asserted 0.90 |
| s5 | An upper limit from the other data with no signal is determined. | result 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.04 | asserted 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The new analysis variable xi, shown to be powerful on the data taken with the final configuration of CELESTE, has been applied to data taken with previous detector configurations. First, the analysis is validated on Crab observations, and then the cuts for the blazar Mrk 501 are optimized using Mrk 421 data since the sources have similar declinations. Data from Mrk 501 was recorded in 2000 and 2001. The old analysis gave a 2.5 sigma excess. We obtain an excess of 2.9 sigma during this time and of 4.9 sigma during May and June 2000 that we interpret as a gamma-ray signal from Mrk 501, for which we calculate a flux of (6.9 +/- 2.2) * 10^{-7} photons m^{-2} s^{-1}. An upper limit from the other data with no signal is determined.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.