Probing Cosmic Chemical Evolution with Gamma-Ray Bursts: GRB060206 at z=4.048

A. J. Levan; B. L. Jensen; C. C. Th\"one; C. Kouveliotou; C. Ledoux; D. H. Hartmann; D. Watson; E. Rol; G. Bj\"ornsson; G. Nelemans

REVIEW

Probing Cosmic Chemical Evolution with Gamma-Ray Bursts: GRB060206 at z=4.048

Astrophysics · Submitted 20 Feb 2006 · 32 references

Pith's verdict: A solid z=4 GRB metallicity measurement with an unproven H2 detection; the metallicity deserves citation, the molecular claim needs quantification.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDastro-ph/0602444 (version 2)

Pith IDRIV7DRRH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationA. J. Levan, B. L. Jensen, C. C. Th\"one, C. Kouveliotou, C. Ledoux, D. H. Hartmann, D. Watson, E. Rol, G. Bj\"ornsson, G. Nelemans, J. Gorosabel, J. Hjorth, J. M. Castro Cer\'on, J. N\"ar\"anen, J. P. U. Fynbo, J. Sollerman, K. Pedersen, K. Wiersema, M. Limousin, N. R. Tanvir, P. Curran, P. Jakobsson, P. M{\o}ller, P. M. Vreeswijk, R. A. M. J. Wijers, R. L. C. Starling, R. S. Priddey, S. T. Holland. "Probing Cosmic Chemical Evolution with Gamma-Ray Bursts: GRB060206 at z=4.048." arXiv:astro-ph/0602444 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/RIV7DRRH

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Two things to know. The metallicity result is the real content: [S/H] = -0.84 ± 0.10 at z=4.048, derived from a clean sum over four S II components and a DLA H I column density. That is a genuinely useful data point for GRB-DLA chemical evolution, and it holds up under scrutiny. The H2 detection is not yet a detection. It rests on 'two consistent features' at the expected positions of W1-0 R(0), R(1), Q(1), with no equivalent widths, no significance, no velocity structure, and no check against the two intervening systems at z=1.48 and 2.26 that can place strong transitions in the same spectral window. The authors are appropriately cautious in places ('evidence for', 'possible detection'), but the abstract and conclusions float it as a headline result. That is the load-bearing weakness.

What the paper does well: the metallicity derivation is standard and reproducible from the tabulated columns; the errors are honest; the compilation of GRB metallicities in Table 2 is useful; the discussion of GRB bias is speculative but clearly flagged as such. The density/temperature inference from Si II* and O I* fine-structure ratios is model-dependent but within the standard framework, and the authors note the assumptions.

Soft spots, in order. First, the H2 claim needs a quantitative significance and a blend check, or it should be downgraded to an upper limit. Second, the two components with fixed b=15 km/s are a minor issue; they don't change the summed S II column by much but should be stated. Third, the density estimate depends on ne ~ 1e-4 n_HI, which is an assumption, not a measurement. None of these touch the metallicity.

Who this is for: anyone working on high-z GRB absorption, DLAs, and cosmic metallicity evolution. The GRB-vs-DLA offset discussion is a nice bonus. It deserves a serious referee: the metallicity is a solid single-object result, and the H2 claim, while weak, is a falsifiable assertion worth the referee's time to push on.

Recommendation: send to peer review; require the authors to quantify the H2 features or remove the claim from the abstract. Accept after that condition is met.

Referee report

Significance

If the metallicity measurement stands, it is a valuable high-redshift datum: at z ~ 4, [S/H] = −0.84 ± 0.10 is among the highest metallicities measured in absorption, and the comparison with other GRB systems (Table 2) supports a broad metallicity distribution at fixed redshift. The paper uses standard, appropriate methods for the metallicity: unsaturated S II lines, a DLA fit with quoted uncertainties, and an explicit sum over kinematically resolved components. The novelty of the paper rests heavily on the claimed H2 detection, which is currently under-quantified; the density and temperature inferences also rely on model assumptions that are not fully validated. The interpretive discussion of GRB metallicity bias is speculative but clearly framed as such.

Major objections (3)

[§3, bottom panel of Fig. 1 and Abstract] The claimed H2 detection, presented as 'the first evidence for H2 molecules in a GRB absorber', is not quantitatively supported. The text reports 'two consistent features' at the expected positions of W1-0 R(0), R(1), and Q(1) at z=4.04793, but gives no equivalent widths, per-line significance, column-density uncertainties, or velocity widths for these features. No test is described for contamination from the two intervening systems at z=1.48 and z=2.26, whose strong transitions (e.g., C IV at z≈2.26 or Zn II/Cr II at z≈1.48) could fall in the same observed window. The authors should provide a detection significance, error bars on log N(H2), and a blend/chance-coincidence analysis, or explicitly downgrade the claim in the abstract and conclusions.
[§3, Table 1] In Table 1, the turbulent broadening parameter for components 2 and 3 is fixed to b ≈ 15 km s⁻¹ with no uncertainty, while components 1 and 4 have fitted b values. The total S II column density, and hence [S/H], is obtained by summing all four components; because the S II lines are on the linear or slightly saturated part of the curve of growth, a fixed b can bias the inferred N(S II). The authors should justify the fixed value, test the sensitivity of [S/H] to b over a plausible range (e.g., 10–20 km s⁻¹), and propagate any resulting systematic error into the quoted metallicity.
[§3, density and temperature estimates] The high-density, low-temperature conclusions rest on interpreting fine-structure ratios as due to collisional excitation, with an assumed electron fraction n_e ≈ 10⁻⁴ n_H I and an assumed temperature of 1000 K for the mean ratios. For the fourth component, the constraints T < 320 K and n_H I = 1–3 × 10⁷ cm⁻³ follow from the same assumptions. The paper does not discuss alternative excitation mechanisms (IR pumping, fluorescence) quantitatively, nor does it provide uncertainties on n_e/n_H I or T. Since these density claims appear in the abstract, the authors should either state the model dependence explicitly or present a broader range of allowed densities under different assumptions.

Minor objections (5)

[Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'circum burst medium' in the Abstract, 'and and the 1200R grating' in §2, and 'th e' in §2; these should be corrected.
[§3, H2 paragraph] The notation 'W1-0 R(0), W1-0 R(1)' could confuse readers unfamiliar with H2 band notation; define the band and provide references or a brief explanation.
[§3, H2 paragraph] The sentence 'This is the second highest redshift at which these H2 lines have been detected' is ambiguous: if the claim is the first GRB absorber, clarifying that the comparison is with QSO-DLAs would avoid confusion.
[Fig. 2 caption] The caption mentions a 'hatched region' indicating the collapsar metallicity limit, but the hatched region is not obvious in the figure as printed; consider increasing the contrast or labeling it more clearly.
[§4, Discussion] The discussion of the GRB metallicity bias assumes a particular threshold of 0.3 Z_sun and a linear decline of mean metallicity from Zwaan et al.; explicitly noting the uncertainty in both quantities would be helpful.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

GRB 060206 at z=4.048 has one of the highest metallicities measured at z~4

The reading

This paper reports early optical spectroscopy of the afterglow of GRB 060206 at redshift $z=4.04795$, using the burst itself as a flashlight to probe the gas along the line of sight. From the damped Lyman-$\alpha$ line and unsaturated S II lines, it derives a metallicity of $[S/H]=-0.84\pm0.10$ for the GRB absorption system, one of the highest absorption metallicities measured at $z\sim4$. The fine-structure lines of Si II*, O I* and O I** indicate very dense, cold gas, and two consistent spectral features are attributed to H$_2$ molecules, with $\log N(H_2)\sim17.0$ and a molecular fraction $\log f\sim-3.5$---the first reported evidence of H$_2$ in a GRB absorber. The paper argues that if GRBs occur in such relatively enriched gas, afterglow metallicities from a complete sample can directly map the metallicity distribution of representative star-forming galaxies at $z>2$, complementing QSO-DLA and Lyman-break galaxy surveys.

What carries the argument

The central tool is absorption-line spectroscopy of a bright GRB afterglow, which serves as a background continuum source. The damped Lyman-$\alpha$ profile sets the neutral hydrogen column, weak unsaturated S II $\lambda\lambda1250,1253,1259$ lines give the metal column without saturation corrections, and the fine-structure lines Si II* $\lambda1309$, O I* $\lambda1304$ and O I** $\lambda1306$ diagnose volume density and kinetic temperature through collisional excitation. The H$_2$ identification uses the Lyman-Werner band lines W1-0 R(0), R(1) and Q(1) at $z_{\rm abs}=4.04793$, with column densities $\log N(H_2)\sim17.0$ for $J=1$ and $<16.7$ for $J=0$. These measurements together convert a single afterglow spectrum into a measurement of metallicity, gas physics, and molecular content at $z\sim4$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For GRB 060206, the paper establishes that the absorption system at $z_{\rm abs}=4.048$ is a damped Lyman-$\alpha$ absorber with $\log N({\rm H\,I})=20.85\pm0.10$. Summing the four identified components gives $\log N({\rm S\,II})=15.21\pm0.03$, hence $[S/H]=-0.84\pm0.10$, about 15 times higher than the similar-redshift GRB 050730. The measured Si II*/Si II and O I*/O I** ratios imply an extremely dense, cool circumburst medium---$n_{\rm HI}\sim10^5$ cm$^{-3}$ for the mean and $10^7$ cm$^{-3}$ with $T<320$ K for the fourth component---and two consistent features at the wavelengths of the W1-0 R(0), R(1) and Q(1) H$_2$ lines at $z_{\rm abs}=4.04793$ are taken as the first evidence for molecules in a GRB absorber. The authors conclude that GRBs can be used as complementary probes of cosmic chemical evolution at high redshift despite any single-star metallicity ceiling near $0.3\,Z_\odot$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's novel molecular claim rests on two consistent features at the predicted wavelengths of H$_2$ lines, with no stated significance, equivalent widths, or error bars; if those features are noise or misidentifications, the H$_2$ detection fails, and the density estimate separately assumes collisional excitation with $n_e\sim10^{-4}n_{\rm HI}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At face value, the metallicity of GRB 060206 is about 15 times higher than that of GRB 050730 at similar redshift, showing that GRB absorbers at $z\sim4$ span a broad range of chemical enrichment rather than being confined to very low metallicity.
The dense, cold conditions implied by the fine-structure lines support a circumburst medium inside a star-forming region, distinct from the lower-density gas probed by QSO-DLA sightlines.
If the H$_2$ features are real, molecular gas can survive in GRB environments at $z\sim4$, and the molecular fraction of $\log f\sim-3.5$ becomes a new observable for studying molecule formation at high redshift.
A complete sample of GRB afterglow metallicities would directly show the distribution of metallicities for representative star-forming galaxies at $z>2$, including galaxies too faint for Lyman-break surveys.
The comparison with the mean metallicity-redshift relation of Zwaan et al. argues that, at $z>2$, GRBs should be fairly unbiased tracers of star formation even if collapsar models impose a $\sim0.3\,Z_\odot$ ceiling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If future afterglow spectra confirm H$_2$ detections, the rotational excitation of H$_2$ could be developed into a measure of the local ultraviolet radiation field and gas density in high-redshift star-forming regions; the paper reports only the column density and fraction.
The high metallicity of GRB 060206 sharpens the tension with single-star collapsar models that cap GRB production at $\sim0.3\,Z_\odot$; the paper notes the tension but leaves the resolution---binary progenitors or a higher ceiling---open.
The density and temperature estimates depend on the assumed electron fraction $n_e\sim10^{-4}n_{\rm HI}$ and on collisional excitation being dominant; a test would be to compare independent fine-structure diagnostics, such as C II*/C II or time-variable excitation, on the same spectrum.
A high signal-to-noise spectrum of another $z\sim4$ burst could settle the H$_2$ claim by requiring the full Lyman-Werner band system with consistent relative strengths; the current two-feature identification is suggestive rather than decisive.

Original abstract

Aim: We present early optical spectroscopy of the afterglow of the gamma-ray burst GRB 060206 with the aim of determining the metallicity of the GRB absorber and the physical conditions in the circumburst medium. We also discuss how GRBs may be important complementary probes of cosmic chemical evolution. Method: Absorption line study of the GRB afterglow spectrum. Results: We determine the redshift of the GRB to be z=4.04795+/-0.00020. Based on the measurement of the neutral hydrogen column density from the damped Lyman-alpha line and the metal content from weak, unsaturated Sii lines we derive a metallicity of [S/H] =-0.84+/-0.10. This is one of the highest metallicities measured from absorption lines at z~4. From the very high column densities for the forbidden Siii*, Oi*, and Oi** lines we infer very high densities and low temperatures in the system. There is evidence for the presence of H$_2$ molecules with logN(H_2) ~ 17.0, translating into a molecular fraction of logf \~ -3.5 with f=2N(H_2)/(2N(H_2)+ N(Hi)). Even if GRBs are only formed by single massive stars with metallicities below ~0.3Z(solar), they could still be fairly unbiased tracers of the bulk of the star formation at z>2. Hence, metallicities as derived for GRB060206 here for a complete sample of GRB afterglows will directly show the distribution of metallicities for representative star-forming galaxies at these redshifts.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,824 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.42 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Aim: We present early optical spectroscopy of the afterglow of the gamma-ray burst GRB 060206 with the aim of determining the metallicity of the GRB absorber and the physical conditions in the circumburst medium. We also discuss how GRBs may be important complementary probes of cosmic chemical evolution. Method: Absorption line study of the GRB afterglow spectrum. Results: We determine the redshift of the GRB to be z=4.04795+/-0.00020. Based on the measurement of the neutral hydrogen column density from the damped Lyman-alpha line and the metal content from weak, unsaturated Sii lines we derive a metallicity of [S/H] =-0.84+/-0.10. This is one of the highest metallicities measured from absorption lines at z~4. From the very high column densities for the forbidden Siii*, Oi*, and Oi** lines we infer very high densities and low temperatures in the system. There is evidence for the presence of H$_2$ molecules with logN(H_2) ~ 17.0, translating into a molecular fraction of logf \~ -3.5 with f=2N(H_2)/(2N(H_2)+ N(Hi)). Even if GRBs are only formed by single massive stars with metallicities below ~0.3Z(solar), they could still be fairly unbiased tracers of the bulk of the star formation at z>2. Hence, metallicities as derived for GRB060206 here for a complete sample of GRB afterglows will directly show the distribution of metallicities for representative star-forming galaxies at these redshifts.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Aim: We present early optical spectroscopy of the afterglow of the gamma-ray burst GRB 060206 with the aim of determining the metallicity of the GRB absorber and the physical conditions in the circumburst medium.	contribution 1.00	0.82	0.03	asserted 0.73
s1	We also discuss how GRBs may be important complementary probes of cosmic chemical evolution.	interpretation 0.39	0.25	0.05	hedged possibility 0.98
s2	Method: Absorption line study of the GRB afterglow spectrum.	method 1.00	0.67	0.01	unclear 0.50
s3	Results: We determine the redshift of the GRB to be z=4.04795+/-0.00020.	result 1.00	0.97	0.08	asserted 1.00
s4	Based on the measurement of the neutral hydrogen column density from the damped Lyman-alpha line and the metal content from weak, unsaturated Sii lines we derive a metallicity of [S/H] =-0.84+/-0.10.	result 1.00	0.97	0.35	asserted 1.00
s5	This is one of the highest metallicities measured from absorption lines at z~4.	interpretation 0.59	0.83	0.26	asserted 1.00
s6	From the very high column densities for the forbidden Siii, Oi, and Oi** lines we infer very high densities and low temperatures in the system.	result 0.69	0.95	0.08	asserted 0.72
s7	There is evidence for the presence of H$_2$ molecules with logN(H_2) ~ 17.0, translating into a molecular fraction of logf \~ -3.5 with f=2N(H_2)/(2N(H_2)+ N(Hi)).	result 1.00	0.93	0.06	hedged possibility 0.71
s8	Even if GRBs are only formed by single massive stars with metallicities below ~0.3Z(solar), they could still be fairly unbiased tracers of the bulk of the star formation at z>2.	interpretation 0.96	0.13	0.12	hedged possibility 1.00
s9	Hence, metallicities as derived for GRB060206 here for a complete sample of GRB afterglows will directly show the distribution of metallicities for representative star-forming galaxies at these redshifts.	interpretation 0.92	0.27	0.41	asserted 0.86

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** Upper panel: Section of the LR afterglow spectrum showing the DLA line at the GRB redshift, zabs = 4.048. Overlaid is the best fitting DLA profile, corresponding to log N(H ) = 20.85 ± 0.10. Middle panel: Fits to the O , O *, O **, Si , Si *, and S  lines in the MR spectrum. The zeropoint for the velocity scale is zabs = 4.048. Lower panel: The likely H2 lines at the GRB redshift in the MR spectrum. derive the metal column density we use the unsaturated S  λ1250, 1253, 1259 lines shown in

**Figure 2.** Metallicity as a function of redshift for different classes of objects. The black circles are the measurements for GRBs from

Figures reproduced from arXiv:astro-ph/0602444 by the authors.

References

Works cited (32)

[1]

Bahcall, J. N. & Wolf, R. A. 1968, ApJ, 152, 701

View on Pith 1968
[2]

Band, D. L. 2006, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0602267

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[3]

Berger, E., Penprase, B. E., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2005, ApJ, su bmitted (astro-ph/0511498)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[4]

Bloom, J. S., Kulkarni, S. K., & Djorgovski, S. G. 2002, AJ, 123, 1111

View on Pith 2002
[5]

Boyd, P., Morris, D., Marshall, F., Gehrels, N. 2006, GCN Circ. 4722

View on Pith 2006
[6]

Chen, H.-W., Prochaska, J. X., Bloom, J. S., & Thompson, I. B.2005, ApJ, 634, L25

View on Pith 2005
[7]

Ferrara, A., Scannapieco, E. & Bergeron, J. 2005, ApJ, 634, L37

View on Pith 2005
[8]

Fryer, C. L., & Heger, A. 2005, ApJ, 623, 302

View on Pith 2005
[9]

Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005

View on Pith 2004
[10]

Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., Langer, N., & Hartman n, D. H. 2003, ApJ, 591, 288

View on Pith 2003
[11]

Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2005, A&A, 443, 581

View on Pith 2005
[12]

Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Møller, P., et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847

View on Pith 2003
[13]

Jakobsson, P., Bj¨ ornsson, G., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2005, M NRAS, 362, 245

View on Pith 2005
[14]

Jakobsson, P., Levan, A., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2006, A&A, 447, 897

View on Pith 2006
[15]

Kawai, N., Kosugi G., Aoki, K., et al., 2005, Nature 440, 184

View on Pith 2005
[16]

Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., & Srianand, R. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 209 J. P. U. Fynbo et al.: Probing Cosmic Chemical Evolution withGamma-Ray Bursts 5

View on Pith 2003
[17]

Ledoux, C., Vreeswijk, P., Ellison, S., et al. 2005, GCN Circ. 3860

View on Pith 2005
[18]

Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., & Srianand, R. 2006, ApJL, in pres s, astro-ph/0602212

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[19]

Palmer, D., Barbier, L., Barthelmy, S., et al. 2006, GCN Circ. 4697

View on Pith 2006
[20]

Pei, Y . C., & Fall, M. S. 1995, ApJ 454, 69

View on Pith 1995
[21]

Prochaska, J. X., Gawiser, E., Wolfe, A. M., Castro, S., & Djorgovski, S. G. 2003, ApJ, 595, L9

View on Pith 2003
[22]

Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W. & Bloom, J. S. 2006, ApJ, submit ted, astro-ph/0601057

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006
[23]

Silva, A. I., & Viegas, S. M. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 135

View on Pith 2002
[24]

Sollerman, J., ¨Ostlin, G., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2005, NewA, 11, 103

View on Pith 2005
[25]

Srianand, R., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., Ferland, G., & Shaw, G. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 549

View on Pith 2005
[26]

Stanek, K. Z., Matheson, T., Garnavich, P. M., et al. 2003, Ap J, 591, L17

View on Pith 2003
[27]

Savaglio, S., Fall, S. M., & Fiore, F. 2003, ApJ, 585, 638

View on Pith 2003
[28]

Vreeswijk, P. M., Ellison, S. L., Ledoux, C., et al. 2004, A&A , 419, 927

View on Pith 2004
[29]

Vreeswijk, P. M., Smette, A., Fruchter, A. S., et al. 2006, A& A, 447, 145

View on Pith 2006
[30]

Wijers, R. A. M. J., Bloom, J. S., Bagla, J. S., & Natarajan, P. 1998, MNRAS, 297, L13

View on Pith 1998
[31]

Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 914

View on Pith 2006
[32]

Zwaan, M. A., van der Hulst, J. M., Briggs, F. H., Verheijen, M . A. W., & Ryan-Weber, E. V . 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1467

View on Pith 2005

How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses its data or values 1 paper

Metallicities of the -associated gas, although challenging to measure in the transient GRB-DLA afterglows, are generally in the range $1/100 < Z/Z_⊙ < 1$, with a median somewhat exceeding $Z_⊙/10$ [ref] ; whereas the median QSO-DLA metallicity is around $Z_⊙/30$ [ref] .

The nature of HI absorbers in GRB afterglows: clues from hydrodynamic simulations · Introduction · 0.91

Cites it as background 1 paper

Very recently, high-redshift gamma-ray bursts have also led to a wealth of low-resolution spectral data on the interstellar medium of young star-forming regions in high-redshift galaxies [ref] .

Medium-resolution spectroscopy of FORJ0332-3557: Probing the interstellar medium and stellar populations of a lensed Lyman-break galaxy at z=3.77 · Introduction · 0.97

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

Bahcall, J. N. & Wolf, R. A. 1968, ApJ, 152, 701

View on Pith 1968

[2] [2]

Band, D. L. 2006, ApJ, in press, astro-ph/0602267

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[3] [3]

Berger, E., Penprase, B. E., Cenko, S. B., et al. 2005, ApJ, su bmitted (astro-ph/0511498)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[4] [4]

Bloom, J. S., Kulkarni, S. K., & Djorgovski, S. G. 2002, AJ, 123, 1111

View on Pith 2002

[5] [5]

Boyd, P., Morris, D., Marshall, F., Gehrels, N. 2006, GCN Circ. 4722

View on Pith 2006

[6] [6]

Chen, H.-W., Prochaska, J. X., Bloom, J. S., & Thompson, I. B.2005, ApJ, 634, L25

View on Pith 2005

[7] [7]

Ferrara, A., Scannapieco, E. & Bergeron, J. 2005, ApJ, 634, L37

View on Pith 2005

[8] [8]

Fryer, C. L., & Heger, A. 2005, ApJ, 623, 302

View on Pith 2005

[9] [9]

Gehrels, N., Chincarini, G., Giommi, P., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005

View on Pith 2004

[10] [10]

Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., Langer, N., & Hartman n, D. H. 2003, ApJ, 591, 288

View on Pith 2003

[11] [11]

Hirschi, R., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2005, A&A, 443, 581

View on Pith 2005

[12] [12]

Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Møller, P., et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847

View on Pith 2003

[13] [13]

Jakobsson, P., Bj¨ ornsson, G., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2005, M NRAS, 362, 245

View on Pith 2005

[14] [14]

Jakobsson, P., Levan, A., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2006, A&A, 447, 897

View on Pith 2006

[15] [15]

Kawai, N., Kosugi G., Aoki, K., et al., 2005, Nature 440, 184

View on Pith 2005

[16] [16]

Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., & Srianand, R. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 209 J. P. U. Fynbo et al.: Probing Cosmic Chemical Evolution withGamma-Ray Bursts 5

View on Pith 2003

[17] [17]

Ledoux, C., Vreeswijk, P., Ellison, S., et al. 2005, GCN Circ. 3860

View on Pith 2005

[18] [18]

Ledoux, C., Petitjean, P., & Srianand, R. 2006, ApJL, in pres s, astro-ph/0602212

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[19] [19]

Palmer, D., Barbier, L., Barthelmy, S., et al. 2006, GCN Circ. 4697

View on Pith 2006

[20] [20]

Pei, Y . C., & Fall, M. S. 1995, ApJ 454, 69

View on Pith 1995

[21] [21]

Prochaska, J. X., Gawiser, E., Wolfe, A. M., Castro, S., & Djorgovski, S. G. 2003, ApJ, 595, L9

View on Pith 2003

[22] [22]

Prochaska, J. X., Chen, H.-W. & Bloom, J. S. 2006, ApJ, submit ted, astro-ph/0601057

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2006

[23] [23]

Silva, A. I., & Viegas, S. M. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 135

View on Pith 2002

[24] [24]

Sollerman, J., ¨Ostlin, G., Fynbo, J. P. U., et al. 2005, NewA, 11, 103

View on Pith 2005

[25] [25]

Srianand, R., Petitjean, P., Ledoux, C., Ferland, G., & Shaw, G. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 549

View on Pith 2005

[26] [26]

Stanek, K. Z., Matheson, T., Garnavich, P. M., et al. 2003, Ap J, 591, L17

View on Pith 2003

[27] [27]

Savaglio, S., Fall, S. M., & Fiore, F. 2003, ApJ, 585, 638

View on Pith 2003

[28] [28]

Vreeswijk, P. M., Ellison, S. L., Ledoux, C., et al. 2004, A&A , 419, 927

View on Pith 2004

[29] [29]

Vreeswijk, P. M., Smette, A., Fruchter, A. S., et al. 2006, A& A, 447, 145

View on Pith 2006

[30] [30]

Wijers, R. A. M. J., Bloom, J. S., Bagla, J. S., & Natarajan, P. 1998, MNRAS, 297, L13

View on Pith 1998

[31] [31]

Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2006, ApJ, 637, 914

View on Pith 2006

[32] [32]

Zwaan, M. A., van der Hulst, J. M., Briggs, F. H., Verheijen, M . A. W., & Ryan-Weber, E. V . 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1467

View on Pith 2005