Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Dipole of the luminosity distance: a direct measure of H(z)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/0603240 v3 pith:2EVEXZUC submitted 2006-03-09 astro-ph

classification astro-ph
keywords dipoledeterminedistanceluminositysupernovaeachieveallowsanalyse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that the dipole of the luminosity distance is a useful observational tool which allows us to determine the Hubble parameter as a function of the redshift H(z). We determine the number of supernovae needed to achieve a given precision for H(z) and to distinguish between different models for dark energy. We analyse a sample of nearby supernovae and find a dipole consistent with the cosmic microwave background at a significance of more than 2 sigma.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. New constraints on cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters using an improved dipole fitting method

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Galaxy cluster observations yield two preferred directions with cosmic anisotropy amplitude of about 5.3 times 10 to the minus 4 at roughly 1 sigma overall significance, though higher in the XMM-Newton subsample.

  2. Cosmic Bulk Flow Analysis in Modified Gravity Theories: $f(R)$ and Perturbed $f(R)$ Models with Neutrino Coupling

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Bulk flow speeds and directions are fitted to supernova data, and the neutrino-coupled f(R) model gives the largest fitted velocities, but the claim is a comparison of fit parameters rather than a prediction.

Pith tools