Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Southern Infrared Proper Motion Survey II: A sample of low mass stars with \mu > 0.1''/yr

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
N.R. Deacon (1, 2), N.C. Hambly (2) (1. Department of Astrophysics, Radboud University, Nijmegen 2. SUPA, Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Edinburgh)

Astrophysics · Submitted 27 Feb 2007

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Finally we show our survey is incomplete due to many factors, factors which we will take into account when simulating these survey results in the next paper in this series.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/0702692 (version 1)
Pith IDPW6VSJJ2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation2), Institute for Astronomy, N.C. Hambly (2) (1. Department of Astrophysics, Nijmegen 2. SUPA, N.R. Deacon (1, Radboud University, School of Physics, University of Edinburgh). "Southern Infrared Proper Motion Survey II: A sample of low mass stars with \mu > 0.1''/yr." arXiv:astro-ph/0702692 (2007). https://pith.science/paper/PW6VSJJ2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,823 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.96 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.24 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present details of the second part of the Southern Infrared Proper Motion Survey (SIPS). Here accurate relative astrometry allows us to reduce the minimum proper motion to 0.1 arcseconds per year. This yields 6904 objects with proper motions between our minum cut and half an arcsecond a year. A small overspill sample with proper motions greater than this is also included. We examine our sample to identify interesting individual objects such as common proper motion binaries, potential L dwarfs and candidate nearby stars. Finally we show our survey is incomplete due to many factors, factors which we will take into account when simulating these survey results in the next paper in this series.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present details of the second part of the Southern Infrared Proper Motion Survey (SIPS). contribution 0.98 0.74 0.04 asserted 0.94
s1 Here accurate relative astrometry allows us to reduce the minimum proper motion to 0.1 arcseconds per year. method 0.80 0.86 0.12 asserted 1.00
s2 This yields 6904 objects with proper motions between our minum cut and half an arcsecond a year. result 0.99 0.94 0.17 asserted 1.00
s3 A small overspill sample with proper motions greater than this is also included. result 0.62 0.87 0.05 asserted 1.00
s4 We examine our sample to identify interesting individual objects such as common proper motion binaries, potential L dwarfs and candidate nearby stars. contribution 0.83 0.94 0.09 asserted 0.93
s5 Finally we show our survey is incomplete due to many factors, factors which we will take into account when simulating these survey results in the next paper in this series. limitation 0.86 0.80 0.23 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: dataset or benchmark 0.93 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present details of the second part of the Southern Infrared Proper Motion Survey (SIPS). Here accurate relative astrometry allows us to reduce the minimum proper motion to 0.1 arcseconds per year. This yields 6904 objects with proper motions between our minum cut and half an arcsecond a year. A small overspill sample with proper motions greater than this is also included. We examine our sample to identify interesting individual objects such as common proper motion binaries, potential L dwarfs and candidate nearby stars. Finally we show our survey is incomplete due to many factors, factors which we will take into account when simulating these survey results in the next paper in this series.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.