Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A New Criterion for Bar-Forming Instability in Rapidly Rotating Gaseous and Stellar Systems. I. Axisymmetric Form

Astrophysics · Submitted 7 Nov 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that the new stability criterion holds equally well for all these previously published axisymmetric models.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/9411031 (version 1)
Pith IDOQ4TJX3S, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD.M. Christodoulou, I. Shlosman, J.E. Tohline. "A New Criterion for Bar-Forming Instability in Rapidly Rotating Gaseous and Stellar Systems. I. Axisymmetric Form." arXiv:astro-ph/9411031 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/OQ4TJX3S
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,161 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.13 · states limitation 0.28 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We analyze previous results on the stability of uniformly and differentially rotating, self-gravitating, gaseous and stellar, axisymmetric systems to derive a new stability criterion for the appearance of toroidal, m=2 Intermediate (I) and bar modes. In the process, we demonstrate that the bar modes in stellar systems and the m=2 I-modes in gaseous systems have many common physical characteristics and only one substantial difference: because of the anisotropy of the stress tensor, dynamical instability sets in at lower rotation in stellar systems. This difference is reflected also in the new stability criterion. The new stability parameter "alpha" is formulated first for uniformly rotating systems and is based on the angular momentum content rather than on the energy content of a system. For stability of stellar systems "alpha" = 0.254-0.258, while it is in the range of 0.341-0.354 for gaseous systems. For uniform rotation, one can write "alpha" as a function of the total (rotational) kinetic and gravitational energies, and of a parameter which is characteristic of the topology/connectedness and the geometric shape of a system. "Alpha" can be extended to and calculated for a variety of differentially rotating, gaseous and stellar, axisymmetric disk and spheroidal models whose equilibrium structures and stability characteristics are known. We also estimate "alpha" for gaseous toroidal models and for stellar disk systems embedded in an inert or responsive "halo". We find that the new stability criterion holds equally well for all these previously published axisymmetric models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We analyze previous results on the stability of uniformly and differentially rotating, self-gravitating, gaseous and stellar, axisymmetric systems to derive a new stability criterion for the appearance of toroidal, m=2 Intermediate (I) and bar modes. contribution 0.99 0.88 0.22 asserted 0.99
s1 In the process, we demonstrate that the bar modes in stellar systems and the m=2 I-modes in gaseous systems have many common physical characteristics and only one substantial difference: because of the anisotropy of the stress tensor, dynamical instability sets in at lower rotation in stellar systems. result 0.89 0.87 0.35 asserted 1.00
s2 This difference is reflected also in the new stability criterion. interpretation 0.89 0.63 0.09 asserted 1.00
s3 The new stability parameter "alpha" is formulated first for uniformly rotating systems and is based on the angular momentum content rather than on the energy content of a system. contribution 0.70 0.93 0.20 asserted 1.00
s4 For stability of stellar systems "alpha" = 0.254-0.258, while it is in the range of 0.341-0.354 for gaseous systems. result 1.00 0.83 0.25 asserted 1.00
s5 For uniform rotation, one can write "alpha" as a function of the total (rotational) kinetic and gravitational energies, and of a parameter which is characteristic of the topology/connectedness and the geometric shape of a system. method 0.79 0.84 0.07 asserted 0.68
s6 "Alpha" can be extended to and calculated for a variety of differentially rotating, gaseous and stellar, axisymmetric disk and spheroidal models whose equilibrium structures and stability characteristics are known. method 0.67 0.84 0.08 asserted 0.80
s7 We also estimate "alpha" for gaseous toroidal models and for stellar disk systems embedded in an inert or responsive "halo". contribution 0.72 0.94 0.05 asserted 0.91
s8 We find that the new stability criterion holds equally well for all these previously published axisymmetric models. result 0.98 0.92 0.55 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.47.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We analyze previous results on the stability of uniformly and differentially rotating, self-gravitating, gaseous and stellar, axisymmetric systems to derive a new stability criterion for the appearance of toroidal, m=2 Intermediate (I) and bar modes. In the process, we demonstrate that the bar modes in stellar systems and the m=2 I-modes in gaseous systems have many common physical characteristics and only one substantial difference: because of the anisotropy of the stress tensor, dynamical instability sets in at lower rotation in stellar systems. This difference is reflected also in the new stability criterion. The new stability parameter "alpha" is formulated first for uniformly rotating systems and is based on the angular momentum content rather than on the energy content of a system. For stability of stellar systems "alpha" = 0.254-0.258, while it is in the range of 0.341-0.354 for gaseous systems. For uniform rotation, one can write "alpha" as a function of the total (rotational) kinetic and gravitational energies, and of a parameter which is characteristic of the topology/connectedness and the geometric shape of a system. "Alpha" can be extended to and calculated for a variety of differentially rotating, gaseous and stellar, axisymmetric disk and spheroidal models whose equilibrium structures and stability characteristics are known. We also estimate "alpha" for gaseous toroidal models and for stellar disk systems embedded in an inert or responsive "halo". We find that the new stability criterion holds equally well for all these previously published axisymmetric models.

Human review
How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.