RECORD
A Binary Lensing Event Toward the LMC: Observations and Dark Matter Implications
Astrophysics · Submitted 4 Jun 1996
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Thus, while the binary lens may indeed reside in the LMC, there is no indication that most of the lenses reside in the LMC.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The MACHO collaboration has recently analyzed 2.1 years of photometric data for about 8.5 million stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). This analysis has revealed 8 candidate microlensing events and a total microlensing optical depth of $\tau_{meas} = 2.9 +1.4/-0.9 \times 10^{-7}$. This significantly exceeds the number of events (1.1) and the microlensing optical depth predicted from known stellar populations: $\tau_{back} = 5.4\times 10^{-8}$, but it is consistent with models in which about half of the standard dark halo mass is composed of Machos of mass $\sim 0.5 \msun$. One of these 8 events appears to be a binary lensing event with a caustic crossing that is partially resolved which allows us to estimate the distance to the lenses. If the source star is not a short period binary star, then we show that the lens system is very likely to reside in the LMC. However, if we assume that the optical depth for LMC-LMC lensing is large enough to account for our entire lensing signal, then the binary event does not appear to be consistent with lensing of a single LMC source star by a binary residing in the LMC. Thus, while the binary lens may indeed reside in the LMC, there is no indication that most of the lenses reside in the LMC.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The MACHO collaboration has recently analyzed 2.1 years of photometric data for about 8.5 million stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). | method 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | This analysis has revealed 8 candidate microlensing events and a total microlensing optical depth of $\tau_{meas} = 2.9 +1.4/-0.9 \times 10^{-7}$. | result 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | This significantly exceeds the number of events (1.1) and the microlensing optical depth predicted from known stellar populations: $\tau_{back} = 5.4\times 10^{-8}$, but it is consistent with models in which about half of the standard dark halo mass is composed of Machos of mass $\sim 0.5 \msun$. | interpretation 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.49 | asserted 0.54 |
| s3 | One of these 8 events appears to be a binary lensing event with a caustic crossing that is partially resolved which allows us to estimate the distance to the lenses. | result 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.06 | asserted 0.93 |
| s4 | If the source star is not a short period binary star, then we show that the lens system is very likely to reside in the LMC. | result 0.50 | 0.83 | 0.08 | hedged possibility 0.80 |
| s5 | However, if we assume that the optical depth for LMC-LMC lensing is large enough to account for our entire lensing signal, then the binary event does not appear to be consistent with lensing of a single LMC source star by a binary residing in the LMC. | interpretation 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.10 | hedged possibility 0.51 |
| s6 | Thus, while the binary lens may indeed reside in the LMC, there is no indication that most of the lenses reside in the LMC. | interpretation 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.51 | hedged possibility 0.64 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The MACHO collaboration has recently analyzed 2.1 years of photometric data for about 8.5 million stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). This analysis has revealed 8 candidate microlensing events and a total microlensing optical depth of $\tau_{meas} = 2.9 +1.4/-0.9 \times 10^{-7}$. This significantly exceeds the number of events (1.1) and the microlensing optical depth predicted from known stellar populations: $\tau_{back} = 5.4\times 10^{-8}$, but it is consistent with models in which about half of the standard dark halo mass is composed of Machos of mass $\sim 0.5 \msun$. One of these 8 events appears to be a binary lensing event with a caustic crossing that is partially resolved which allows us to estimate the distance to the lenses. If the source star is not a short period binary star, then we show that the lens system is very likely to reside in the LMC. However, if we assume that the optical depth for LMC-LMC lensing is large enough to account for our entire lensing signal, then the binary event does not appear to be consistent with lensing of a single LMC source star by a binary residing in the LMC. Thus, while the binary lens may indeed reside in the LMC, there is no indication that most of the lenses reside in the LMC.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.