Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Four-Year COBE Normalization and Large-Scale Structure

Astrophysics · Submitted 12 Jul 1996

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We use the COBE normalization to compute small-scale fluctuation amplitudes for a variety of models and discuss the implications of these results for theories of large-scale structure.

how it is stated · asserted 0.90 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/9607060 (version 2)
Pith IDWYISGZ76, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEmory F. Bunn (U.C. Berkeley), Martin White (Fermilab). "The Four-Year COBE Normalization and Large-Scale Structure." arXiv:astro-ph/9607060 (1996). https://pith.science/paper/WYISGZ76
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,203 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.23 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.96 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present an analysis of the four-year data from the COBE DMR experiment. We use a Karhunen-Loeve expansion of the pixel data to calculate the normalization and goodness-of-fit of a range of models of structure formation. This technique produces unbiased normalization estimates and is capable of determining the normalization of any particular model with a statistical uncertainty of 7%. We present a parameterization of the normalization and likelihood function which summarizes our results for a wide range of models. We use the COBE normalization to compute small-scale fluctuation amplitudes for a variety of models and discuss the implications of these results for theories of large-scale structure.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present an analysis of the four-year data from the COBE DMR experiment. contribution 0.92 0.93 0.03 asserted 0.89
s1 We use a Karhunen-Loeve expansion of the pixel data to calculate the normalization and goodness-of-fit of a range of models of structure formation. method 0.99 0.96 0.04 asserted 0.99
s2 This technique produces unbiased normalization estimates and is capable of determining the normalization of any particular model with a statistical uncertainty of 7%. method 0.71 0.87 0.15 asserted 1.00
s3 We present a parameterization of the normalization and likelihood function which summarizes our results for a wide range of models. contribution 0.92 0.96 0.12 asserted 1.00
s4 We use the COBE normalization to compute small-scale fluctuation amplitudes for a variety of models and discuss the implications of these results for theories of large-scale structure. interpretation 0.73 0.94 0.22 asserted 0.90

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.63 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present an analysis of the four-year data from the COBE DMR experiment. We use a Karhunen-Loeve expansion of the pixel data to calculate the normalization and goodness-of-fit of a range of models of structure formation. This technique produces unbiased normalization estimates and is capable of determining the normalization of any particular model with a statistical uncertainty of 7%. We present a parameterization of the normalization and likelihood function which summarizes our results for a wide range of models. We use the COBE normalization to compute small-scale fluctuation amplitudes for a variety of models and discuss the implications of these results for theories of large-scale structure.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers
  • This problem is related to the “sigma 8 tension” and raises questions concerning the empirical normalisation (based on the abundance of galaxy clusters, e.g. [ref] ) of the power spectrum of perturbations generated during inflation and how this transfers during linear structure growth to the power spectrum of matter at $z_e ≈130$ used to seed cosmological structure formation simulations (e.g. [ref] ).

    The many tensions with dark-matter based models and implications on the nature of the Universe · Tensions between the SMoC and observations · 0.81

  • Most cosmological constraints come from far-away objects such as supernovae [ref] and large scale structures [ref] but nearby objects can be considered as well.

    Jeans Analysis of Bok globules in $f(R)$ gravity · Constraints for $f(R)$ models · 0.90

  • Cosmic microwave background [ref] and supernova observations [ref] lead to the discovery of accelerating expansion of the Universe.

    f(R) gravity constraints from gravitational waves · Introduction · 0.80

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.