Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Projection effects in cluster catalogues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv astro-ph/9701103 v1 pith:TSSDL27D submitted 1997-01-16 astro-ph

Projection effects in cluster catalogues

classification astro-ph
keywords clustercataloguesclustersdistributiongalaxyprojectionvelocityabell
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We investigate the importance of projection effects in the identification of galaxy clusters in 2D galaxy maps and their effect on the estimation of cluster velocity dispersions. A volume limited galaxy catalogue that was derived from a Standard CDM N-body simulation was used. We select clusters using criteria that match those employed in the construction of real cluster catalogues and find that our mock Abell cluster catalogues are heavily contaminated and incomplete. Over one third (34 per cent) of clusters of richness class R>=1 are miclassifications arising from the projection of one or more clumps onto an intrinsically poor cluster. Conversely, 32 per cent of intrinsically rich clusters are missed from the R>=1 catalogues, mostly because of statistical fluctuations in the background count. Selection by X-ray luminosity rather than optical richness reduces, but does not completely eliminate, these problems. Contamination by unvirialised sub-clumps near a cluster leads to a considerable overestimation of the cluster velocity dispersion, even if the analysis is restricted only to galaxies close to the cluster centre. Thus, the distribution of cluster masses - often used to test cosmological models - is a highly unreliable statistic. However, the median value of the distribution is considerably more robust. Improved estimates of the cluster velocity dispersion distribution require constructing new cluster catalogues in which clusters are defined according to the number of galaxies within a radius about three times smaller than the Abell radius.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.