Pith. Sign in

RECORD

GRB after-glow: Supporting the cosmological fireball model, constraining parameters, and making predictions

Astrophysics · Submitted 13 Apr 1997

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We present several new results regarding the model predictions, and show that X-ray to optical observations of GRB970228 and GRB970402 are naturally explained by the model: The scaling of flux with time and frequency agrees with model predictions and requires a power law distribution of shock accelerated electrons, dlog N/dlog E=2.3+-0.1 (implying, and consistent with the observed, 1/t decline of flux observed at a given frequency); The absolute flux value agrees with that inferred through the model from observed gamma-ray fluence.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/9704116 (version 1)
Pith IDXQCRAS44, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationEli Waxman (IAS, Princeton). "GRB after-glow: Supporting the cosmological fireball model, constraining parameters, and making predictions." arXiv:astro-ph/9704116 (1997). https://pith.science/paper/XQCRAS44
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,016 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.48 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.26 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Cosmological fireball models of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) predict delayed emission, ``after-glow,'' at longer wavelengths. We present several new results regarding the model predictions, and show that X-ray to optical observations of GRB970228 and GRB970402 are naturally explained by the model: The scaling of flux with time and frequency agrees with model predictions and requires a power law distribution of shock accelerated electrons, dlog N/dlog E=2.3+-0.1 (implying, and consistent with the observed, 1/t decline of flux observed at a given frequency); The absolute flux value agrees with that inferred through the model from observed gamma-ray fluence. The future after-glow emission of these bursts is predicted. The observations indicate that the ratio of magnetic field to equipartition value and the fraction F of dissipated kinetic energy carried by electrons are not much smaller than 1. More frequent observations at a fixed wavelength, or a wide spectrum at a fixed time, would put strong constraints on these parameters. We show that inverse-Compton scattering suppresses X-ray/ optical emission at delays t<T=10(F/0.3)^4 hr. Observations therefore imply F<0.3. The strong dependence of T on F implies that T may vary widely from burst to burst, and that frequent X-ray/optical observations at t~T would determine F. For F~0.2, inverse-Compton emission dominates during the first 2hr, producing >1GeV photons and providing a natural explanation to the delayed GeV emission observed in several strong bursts.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Cosmological fireball models of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) predict delayed emission, ``after-glow,'' at longer wavelengths. background 1.00 0.04 0.07 asserted 0.95
s1 We present several new results regarding the model predictions, and show that X-ray to optical observations of GRB970228 and GRB970402 are naturally explained by the model: The scaling of flux with time and frequency agrees with model predictions and requires a power law distribution of shock accelerated electrons, dlog N/dlog E=2.3+-0.1 (implying, and consistent with the observed, 1/t decline of flux observed at a given frequency); The absolute flux value agrees with that inferred through the model from observed gamma-ray fluence. result 0.59 0.92 0.62 asserted 1.00
s2 The future after-glow emission of these bursts is predicted. contribution 0.52 0.73 0.11 asserted 1.00
s3 The observations indicate that the ratio of magnetic field to equipartition value and the fraction F of dissipated kinetic energy carried by electrons are not much smaller than 1. result 0.80 0.84 0.14 hedged possibility 0.83
s4 More frequent observations at a fixed wavelength, or a wide spectrum at a fixed time, would put strong constraints on these parameters. future work 0.99 0.19 0.05 hedged possibility 0.60
s5 We show that inverse-Compton scattering suppresses X-ray/ optical emission at delays t<T=10(F/0.3)^4 hr. result 0.93 0.82 0.08 asserted 1.00
s6 Observations therefore imply F<0.3. result 0.65 0.81 0.17 asserted 0.97
s7 The strong dependence of T on F implies that T may vary widely from burst to burst, and that frequent X-ray/optical observations at t~T would determine F. interpretation 0.77 0.73 0.10 hedged possibility 0.91
s8 For F~0.2, inverse-Compton emission dominates during the first 2hr, producing >1GeV photons and providing a natural explanation to the delayed GeV emission observed in several strong bursts. interpretation 0.79 0.73 0.11 asserted 0.89

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.56 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.80.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Cosmological fireball models of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) predict delayed emission, ``after-glow,'' at longer wavelengths. We present several new results regarding the model predictions, and show that X-ray to optical observations of GRB970228 and GRB970402 are naturally explained by the model: The scaling of flux with time and frequency agrees with model predictions and requires a power law distribution of shock accelerated electrons, dlog N/dlog E=2.3+-0.1 (implying, and consistent with the observed, 1/t decline of flux observed at a given frequency); The absolute flux value agrees with that inferred through the model from observed gamma-ray fluence. The future after-glow emission of these bursts is predicted. The observations indicate that the ratio of magnetic field to equipartition value and the fraction F of dissipated kinetic energy carried by electrons are not much smaller than 1. More frequent observations at a fixed wavelength, or a wide spectrum at a fixed time, would put strong constraints on these parameters. We show that inverse-Compton scattering suppresses X-ray/ optical emission at delays t<T=10(F/0.3)^4 hr. Observations therefore imply F<0.3. The strong dependence of T on F implies that T may vary widely from burst to burst, and that frequent X-ray/optical observations at t~T would determine F. For F~0.2, inverse-Compton emission dominates during the first 2hr, producing >1GeV photons and providing a natural explanation to the delayed GeV emission observed in several strong bursts.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 5 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.