Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Cosmic Background Radiation Temperature Anisotropy: Position of First Doppler Peak

Astrophysics · Submitted 8 Jun 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The partial wave $l_1$ corresponding to the first Doppler peak caused by baryon-photon oscillations at the surface of last scattering depends on the present density $\Omega_0$ and the cosmological constant contribution $\Omega_{\Lambda}$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/9806118 (version 1)
Pith IDEESBIQHH, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPaul H. Frampton, Ryan Rohm, Y. Jack Ng. "Cosmic Background Radiation Temperature Anisotropy: Position of First Doppler Peak." arXiv:astro-ph/9806118 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/EESBIQHH
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,944 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The purpose of the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) experiments is to measure the temperature anisotropy via the autocorrelation function. The partial wave $l_1$ corresponding to the first Doppler peak caused by baryon-photon oscillations at the surface of last scattering depends on the present density $\Omega_0$ and the cosmological constant contribution $\Omega_{\Lambda}$. We discuss this dependence on the basis of perspicuous figures.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The purpose of the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) experiments is to measure the temperature anisotropy via the autocorrelation function. background 0.73 0.14 0.05 asserted 1.00
s1 The partial wave $l_1$ corresponding to the first Doppler peak caused by baryon-photon oscillations at the surface of last scattering depends on the present density $\Omega_0$ and the cosmological constant contribution $\Omega_{\Lambda}$. background 0.67 0.15 0.32 asserted 1.00
s2 We discuss this dependence on the basis of perspicuous figures. contribution 0.51 0.74 0.04 asserted 0.72

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.76 · evidence from argument 0.69.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The purpose of the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) experiments is to measure the temperature anisotropy via the autocorrelation function. The partial wave $l_1$ corresponding to the first Doppler peak caused by baryon-photon oscillations at the surface of last scattering depends on the present density $\Omega_0$ and the cosmological constant contribution $\Omega_{\Lambda}$. We discuss this dependence on the basis of perspicuous figures.

Human review
References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.