RECORD
Accretion disk reversal and the spin-up/spin-down of accreting pulsars
Astrophysics · Submitted 7 Oct 1998
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We thus predict that torque reversals resulting from accretion disk reversals will be accompanied by minima in accretion luminosity.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We numerically investigate the hydrodynamics of accretion disk reversal and relate our findings to the observed spin-rate changes in the accreting X-ray pulsar GX~1+4. In this system, which accretes from a slow wind, the accretion disk contains two dynamically distinct regions. In the inner part viscous forces are dominant and disk evolution occurs on a viscous timescale. In the outer part dynamical mixing of material with opposite angular momentum is more important, and the externally imposed angular momentum reversal timescale governs the flow. In this outer region the disk is split into concentric rings of material with opposite senses of rotation that do not mix completely but instead remain distinct, with a clear gap between them. We thus predict that torque reversals resulting from accretion disk reversals will be accompanied by minima in accretion luminosity.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We numerically investigate the hydrodynamics of accretion disk reversal and relate our findings to the observed spin-rate changes in the accreting X-ray pulsar GX~1+4. | contribution 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.08 | asserted 0.85 |
| s1 | In this system, which accretes from a slow wind, the accretion disk contains two dynamically distinct regions. | result 0.64 | 0.39 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | In the inner part viscous forces are dominant and disk evolution occurs on a viscous timescale. | result 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In the outer part dynamical mixing of material with opposite angular momentum is more important, and the externally imposed angular momentum reversal timescale governs the flow. | result 0.96 | 0.76 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | In this outer region the disk is split into concentric rings of material with opposite senses of rotation that do not mix completely but instead remain distinct, with a clear gap between them. | result 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | We thus predict that torque reversals resulting from accretion disk reversals will be accompanied by minima in accretion luminosity. | interpretation 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.81 | asserted 0.45 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We numerically investigate the hydrodynamics of accretion disk reversal and relate our findings to the observed spin-rate changes in the accreting X-ray pulsar GX~1+4. In this system, which accretes from a slow wind, the accretion disk contains two dynamically distinct regions. In the inner part viscous forces are dominant and disk evolution occurs on a viscous timescale. In the outer part dynamical mixing of material with opposite angular momentum is more important, and the externally imposed angular momentum reversal timescale governs the flow. In this outer region the disk is split into concentric rings of material with opposite senses of rotation that do not mix completely but instead remain distinct, with a clear gap between them. We thus predict that torque reversals resulting from accretion disk reversals will be accompanied by minima in accretion luminosity.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.