RECORD
Gravitational lensing statistics with extragalactic surveys. III. Joint constraints on lambda_0 and Omega_0 from lensing statistics and the m-z relation for type Ia supernovae
Astrophysics · Submitted 22 Apr 1999
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim This is perfectly consistent with the current `standard cosmological model' with lambda_0 approximately 0.7 and Omega_0 approximately 0.3 and is consistent with a flat universe but, neglecting other cosmological tests, does not require it.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
I present constraints on cosmological parameters in the lambda_0-Omega_0 plane from a joint analysis of gravitational lensing statistics (astro-ph/9904175) and the magnitude-redshift relation for Type Ia supernovae (astro-ph/9812133 and astro-ph/9805201). I discuss reasons why this particular combination of tests is important and how the constraints can be improved in the future. The lensing statistics and supernova results are not inconsistent, thus it is meaningful to determine joint constraints on lambda_0 and Omega_0 by combining the results from both tests. The quantity measured by the lens statistics and the m-z relation for type Ia supernovae discussed here is approximately lambda_0 - Omega_0. At 95% confidence, the upper limit on lambda_0 - Omega_0 from lensing statistics alone is 0.45 and from supernovae alone is in the range 0.65--0.81 (depending on the data set). For joint constraints, the upper limit on lambda_0 - Omega_0 is in the range 0.55--0.60 (again depending on the data set). For a flat universe with lambda_0 + Omega_0 = 1, this corresponds to upper limits on lambda_0, taking the top of the range from different data sets, of 0.72, 0.90 and 0.80 for lensing statistics alone, supernovae alone and the joint analysis, respectively. This is perfectly consistent with the current `standard cosmological model' with lambda_0 approximately 0.7 and Omega_0 approximately 0.3 and is consistent with a flat universe but, neglecting other cosmological tests, does not require it.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | I present constraints on cosmological parameters in the lambda_0-Omega_0 plane from a joint analysis of gravitational lensing statistics (astro-ph/9904175) and the magnitude-redshift relation for Type Ia supernovae (astro-ph/9812133 and astro-ph/9805201). | contribution 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.22 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | I discuss reasons why this particular combination of tests is important and how the constraints can be improved in the future. | future work 0.85 | 0.41 | 0.02 | unclear 0.63 |
| s2 | The lensing statistics and supernova results are not inconsistent, thus it is meaningful to determine joint constraints on lambda_0 and Omega_0 by combining the results from both tests. | interpretation 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.09 | asserted 0.96 |
| s3 | The quantity measured by the lens statistics and the m-z relation for type Ia supernovae discussed here is approximately lambda_0 - Omega_0. | interpretation 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.09 | asserted 0.93 |
| s4 | At 95% confidence, the upper limit on lambda_0 - Omega_0 from lensing statistics alone is 0.45 and from supernovae alone is in the range 0.65--0.81 (depending on the data set). | result 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | For joint constraints, the upper limit on lambda_0 - Omega_0 is in the range 0.55--0.60 (again depending on the data set). | result 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.30 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | For a flat universe with lambda_0 + Omega_0 = 1, this corresponds to upper limits on lambda_0, taking the top of the range from different data sets, of 0.72, 0.90 and 0.80 for lensing statistics alone, supernovae alone and the joint analysis, respectively. | result 0.98 | 0.87 | 0.13 | asserted 0.99 |
| s7 | This is perfectly consistent with the current `standard cosmological model' with lambda_0 approximately 0.7 and Omega_0 approximately 0.3 and is consistent with a flat universe but, neglecting other cosmological tests, does not require it. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.51 | hedged possibility 0.69 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
I present constraints on cosmological parameters in the lambda_0-Omega_0 plane from a joint analysis of gravitational lensing statistics (astro-ph/9904175) and the magnitude-redshift relation for Type Ia supernovae (astro-ph/9812133 and astro-ph/9805201). I discuss reasons why this particular combination of tests is important and how the constraints can be improved in the future. The lensing statistics and supernova results are not inconsistent, thus it is meaningful to determine joint constraints on lambda_0 and Omega_0 by combining the results from both tests. The quantity measured by the lens statistics and the m-z relation for type Ia supernovae discussed here is approximately lambda_0 - Omega_0. At 95% confidence, the upper limit on lambda_0 - Omega_0 from lensing statistics alone is 0.45 and from supernovae alone is in the range 0.65--0.81 (depending on the data set). For joint constraints, the upper limit on lambda_0 - Omega_0 is in the range 0.55--0.60 (again depending on the data set). For a flat universe with lambda_0 + Omega_0 = 1, this corresponds to upper limits on lambda_0, taking the top of the range from different data sets, of 0.72, 0.90 and 0.80 for lensing statistics alone, supernovae alone and the joint analysis, respectively. This is perfectly consistent with the current `standard cosmological model' with lambda_0 approximately 0.7 and Omega_0 approximately 0.3 and is consistent with a flat universe but, neglecting other cosmological tests, does not require it.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.