Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Cosmological parameters from large scale structure observations

Astrophysics · Submitted 24 Dec 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using a $\chi^2$ minimization method, assuming $\Omega_{\Lambda}+\Omega_{\rm{matter}} =1 $ and no contribution from gravity waves, we found that a tilted $\Lambda$MDM model with one sort of massive neutrinos and the parameters $n=1.12\pm 0.10$, $\Omega_m=0.41\pm 0.11$ ($\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.59\pm0.11$), $\Omega_{cdm}=0.31\pm 0.15$, $\Omega_{\nu}=0.059\pm 0.028$, $\Omega_b=0.039\pm 0.014$ and $h=0.70\pm 0.12$ matches observational data best.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDastro-ph/9912511 (version 3)
Pith ID6AZACA3R, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB. Novosyadlyj (L'viv Univ.), Moscow), R. Durrer (Geneva Univ.), S. Apunevych (L'viv Univ.), S. Gottloeber (AIP), V.N. Lukash (AstroSpaceCenter. "Cosmological parameters from large scale structure observations." arXiv:astro-ph/9912511 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/6AZACA3R
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,279 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.39 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.28 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The possibility of determining cosmological parameters on the basis of a wide set of observational data including the Abell-ACO cluster power spectrum and mass function, peculiar velocities of galaxies, the distribution of Ly-$\alpha$ clouds and CMB temperature fluctuations is analyzed. Using a $\chi^2$ minimization method, assuming $\Omega_{\Lambda}+\Omega_{\rm{matter}} =1 $ and no contribution from gravity waves, we found that a tilted $\Lambda$MDM model with one sort of massive neutrinos and the parameters $n=1.12\pm 0.10$, $\Omega_m=0.41\pm 0.11$ ($\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.59\pm0.11$), $\Omega_{cdm}=0.31\pm 0.15$, $\Omega_{\nu}=0.059\pm 0.028$, $\Omega_b=0.039\pm 0.014$ and $h=0.70\pm 0.12$ matches observational data best. The 1$\sigma$ (68.3%) confidence limits on each cosmological parameter, which are obtained by marginalizing over the other parameters, are $0.82\le n\le1.39$, $0.19\le\Omega_m\le 1$ ($0\le\Omega_{\Lambda}\le 0.81$), $0\le\Omega_{\nu}\le 0.17$, $0.021\le \Omega_b\le 0.13$ and $0.38\le h\le 0.85$ $1.5\le b_{cl}\le 3.5$. Here $b_{cl}$ is the cluster bias parameter. The best-fit parameters for 31 models which are inside of $1\sigma$ range of the best model are presented. It is shown also that observational data set used here rules out the class of CDM models with $h\ge 0.5$, scale invariant primordial power spectrum, zero cosmological constant and spatial curvature at very high confidence level, $>99.99%$. The corresponding class of MDM models are ruled out at $\sim 95%$ C.L.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The possibility of determining cosmological parameters on the basis of a wide set of observational data including the Abell-ACO cluster power spectrum and mass function, peculiar velocities of galaxies, the distribution of Ly-$\alpha$ clouds and CMB temperature fluctuations is analyzed. contribution 0.64 0.24 0.04 hedged possibility 0.87
s1 Using a $\chi^2$ minimization method, assuming $\Omega_{\Lambda}+\Omega_{\rm{matter}} =1 $ and no contribution from gravity waves, we found that a tilted $\Lambda$MDM model with one sort of massive neutrinos and the parameters $n=1.12\pm 0.10$, $\Omega_m=0.41\pm 0.11$ ($\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.59\pm0.11$), $\Omega_{cdm}=0.31\pm 0.15$, $\Omega_{\nu}=0.059\pm 0.028$, $\Omega_b=0.039\pm 0.014$ and $h=0.70\pm 0.12$ matches observational data best. result 0.95 0.97 0.73 asserted 1.00
s2 The 1$\sigma$ (68.3%) confidence limits on each cosmological parameter, which are obtained by marginalizing over the other parameters, are $0.82\le n\le1.39$, $0.19\le\Omega_m\le 1$ ($0\le\Omega_{\Lambda}\le 0.81$), $0\le\Omega_{\nu}\le 0.17$, $0.021\le \Omega_b\le 0.13$ and $0.38\le h\le 0.85$ $1.5\le b_{cl}\le 3.5$. result 1.00 0.93 0.20 asserted 1.00
s3 Here $b_{cl}$ is the cluster bias parameter. background 0.48 0.24 0.02 asserted 0.97
s4 The best-fit parameters for 31 models which are inside of $1\sigma$ range of the best model are presented. result 0.78 0.89 0.06 asserted 0.98
s5 It is shown also that observational data set used here rules out the class of CDM models with $h\ge 0.5$, scale invariant primordial power spectrum, zero cosmological constant and spatial curvature at very high confidence level, $>99.99%$. result 0.98 0.89 0.40 asserted 1.00
s6 The corresponding class of MDM models are ruled out at $\sim 95%$ C.L. result 0.99 0.88 0.13 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.60 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The possibility of determining cosmological parameters on the basis of a wide set of observational data including the Abell-ACO cluster power spectrum and mass function, peculiar velocities of galaxies, the distribution of Ly-$\alpha$ clouds and CMB temperature fluctuations is analyzed. Using a $\chi^2$ minimization method, assuming $\Omega_{\Lambda}+\Omega_{\rm{matter}} =1 $ and no contribution from gravity waves, we found that a tilted $\Lambda$MDM model with one sort of massive neutrinos and the parameters $n=1.12\pm 0.10$, $\Omega_m=0.41\pm 0.11$ ($\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.59\pm0.11$), $\Omega_{cdm}=0.31\pm 0.15$, $\Omega_{\nu}=0.059\pm 0.028$, $\Omega_b=0.039\pm 0.014$ and $h=0.70\pm 0.12$ matches observational data best. The 1$\sigma$ (68.3%) confidence limits on each cosmological parameter, which are obtained by marginalizing over the other parameters, are $0.82\le n\le1.39$, $0.19\le\Omega_m\le 1$ ($0\le\Omega_{\Lambda}\le 0.81$), $0\le\Omega_{\nu}\le 0.17$, $0.021\le \Omega_b\le 0.13$ and $0.38\le h\le 0.85$ $1.5\le b_{cl}\le 3.5$. Here $b_{cl}$ is the cluster bias parameter. The best-fit parameters for 31 models which are inside of $1\sigma$ range of the best model are presented. It is shown also that observational data set used here rules out the class of CDM models with $h\ge 0.5$, scale invariant primordial power spectrum, zero cosmological constant and spatial curvature at very high confidence level, $>99.99%$. The corresponding class of MDM models are ruled out at $\sim 95%$ C.L.

Human review
How the literature uses it

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

How each label was checked · JSON

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper
  • Using a $\chi^2$ minimization method, assuming $\Omega_{\Lambda}+\Omega_m =1$ and no contribution from gravity waves, we found that a tilted $\Lambda$MDM model with one sort of massive neutrinos and the parameters $n\approx 1.12$, $\Omega_m\approx 0.4$ ($\Omega_{\Lambda}\approx 0.6$), $\Omega_{cdm}\approx 0.3$, $\Omega_{\nu}\approx 0.06$, $\Omega_b\approx 0.04$ and $h\approx 0.7$ matches observational data best.

    Determination of cosmological parameters from large scale structure observations · 0.98

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.