Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Anisotropy and scaling corrections in turbulence

chao-dyn · Submitted 29 Jul 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our observations emphasize the need for more experimental information on crossovers between different subranges.

how it is stated · asserted 0.71 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDchao-dyn/9407016 (version 1)
Pith IDXODUDS7D, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAxel M\"uller-Groeling (2) ((1) The James Franck Institute, Canada), Chicago, Detlef Lohse (1), IL, Ontario, The University of Chicago, Toronto, University of Toronto, USA; (2) Department of Physics. "Anisotropy and scaling corrections in turbulence." arXiv:chao-dyn/9407016 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/XODUDS7D
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,873 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.76 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.22 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Two parametrizations for second order velocity moments, the Batchelor parametrization for the r-space structure function and a common parametrization for the energy spectrum, $E(p)\propto p^{-5/3}\exp(-p/p_d)$, are examined and compared. In particular, we investigate corrections to the local scaling exponents induced by finite size effects. The behavior of local r-- and p--space exponents differs dramatically. The Batchelor type parametrization leads to energy pileups in p-space at the ends of the ISR. These bottleneck effects result in an extended r-space scaling range, comparable to experimental ones for the same Taylor-Reynolds number $\rel$. Shear effects are discussed in terms of (global) apparent scaling correction $\delta\zeta^{app}$ to classical scaling. The scaling properties of $\delta\zeta^{app}(\rel )$ differ not only among the parametrizations considered, but also among r-- and p--space for a {\it given} parametrization. The difference can be traced back to the subtleties of the crossovers in the velocity moments. Our observations emphasize the need for more experimental information on crossovers between different subranges.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Two parametrizations for second order velocity moments, the Batchelor parametrization for the r-space structure function and a common parametrization for the energy spectrum, $E(p)\propto p^{-5/3}\exp(-p/p_d)$, are examined and compared. contribution 0.71 0.67 0.05 asserted 0.88
s1 In particular, we investigate corrections to the local scaling exponents induced by finite size effects. contribution 0.99 0.82 0.06 asserted 0.65
s2 The behavior of local r-- and p--space exponents differs dramatically. result 1.00 0.70 0.21 asserted 1.00
s3 The Batchelor type parametrization leads to energy pileups in p-space at the ends of the ISR. result 1.00 0.74 0.14 asserted 1.00
s4 These bottleneck effects result in an extended r-space scaling range, comparable to experimental ones for the same Taylor-Reynolds number $\rel$. result 0.96 0.79 0.23 asserted 1.00
s5 Shear effects are discussed in terms of (global) apparent scaling correction $\delta\zeta^{app}$ to classical scaling. contribution 0.62 0.49 0.08 asserted 0.91
s6 The scaling properties of $\delta\zeta^{app}(\rel )$ differ not only among the parametrizations considered, but also among r-- and p--space for a {\it given} parametrization. result 0.99 0.78 0.23 asserted 1.00
s7 The difference can be traced back to the subtleties of the crossovers in the velocity moments. interpretation 0.98 0.68 0.13 asserted 0.97
s8 Our observations emphasize the need for more experimental information on crossovers between different subranges. future work 0.96 0.48 0.39 asserted 0.71

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.65 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.41.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Two parametrizations for second order velocity moments, the Batchelor parametrization for the r-space structure function and a common parametrization for the energy spectrum, $E(p)\propto p^{-5/3}\exp(-p/p_d)$, are examined and compared. In particular, we investigate corrections to the local scaling exponents induced by finite size effects. The behavior of local r-- and p--space exponents differs dramatically. The Batchelor type parametrization leads to energy pileups in p-space at the ends of the ISR. These bottleneck effects result in an extended r-space scaling range, comparable to experimental ones for the same Taylor-Reynolds number $\rel$. Shear effects are discussed in terms of (global) apparent scaling correction $\delta\zeta^{app}$ to classical scaling. The scaling properties of $\delta\zeta^{app}(\rel )$ differ not only among the parametrizations considered, but also among r-- and p--space for a {\it given} parametrization. The difference can be traced back to the subtleties of the crossovers in the velocity moments. Our observations emphasize the need for more experimental information on crossovers between different subranges.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.