Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Supersymmetric quantum mechanics based on higher excited states II: a few examples of isospectral partner potentials

chao-dyn · Submitted 14 Mar 1997

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The generalization is technically almost straightforward but physically quite nontrivial since it yields an infinity of new classes of susy-partner potentials, whose spectra are exactly identical except for the lowest $n+1$ states, if the superpotential is defined in terms of the $(n+1)$-st eigenfunction, with $n=0$ reserved for the ground state.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDchao-dyn/9703006 (version 1)
Pith ID5FV5CJSJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJunxian Liu (CAMTP, Maribor, Marko Robnik, Slovenia), University of Maribor. "Supersymmetric quantum mechanics based on higher excited states II: a few examples of isospectral partner potentials." arXiv:chao-dyn/9703006 (1997). https://pith.science/paper/5FV5CJSJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,707 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.87 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.18 · compares with prior results 0.44 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We apply the generalized formalism and the techniques of the supersymmetric (susy) quantum mechanics to the cases where the superpotential is generated/defined by higher excited eigenstates (Robnik 1997, paper I). The generalization is technically almost straightforward but physically quite nontrivial since it yields an infinity of new classes of susy-partner potentials, whose spectra are exactly identical except for the lowest $n+1$ states, if the superpotential is defined in terms of the $(n+1)$-st eigenfunction, with $n=0$ reserved for the ground state. First we show that there are practically no possibilities for shape invariant potentials based on higher excited states. Then we calculate the isospectral partner potentials for the following 1-dim potentials (after separation of variables where appropriate): (i) 3-dim (spherically symmetric) harmonic oscillator, (ii) 3-dim (isotropic) Kepler problem, (iii) Morse potential, (iv) P\"oschl-Teller type I potential, and (v) the 1-dim box potential. In all cases except in (v) we get new classes of solvable potentials. In (v) the partner potential to the box potential is a special case of P\"oschl-Teller type I potential. potentials. In this paper we present results of a straightforward further application of this formalism to a few most important exactly solvable 1-dim potentials, namely (i) spherically symmetric 3-dim harmonic oscillator, (ii) 3-dim isotropic (spherically symmetric) Kepler potential, (iii) Morse potential, (iv) P\"oschl-Teller type I potential, and (v) 1-dim box potential. PACS numbers: 03.65.-w, 03.65.Ge, 03.65.Sq

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We apply the generalized formalism and the techniques of the supersymmetric (susy) quantum mechanics to the cases where the superpotential is generated/defined by higher excited eigenstates (Robnik 1997, paper I). contribution 0.65 0.86 0.05 asserted 0.99
s1 The generalization is technically almost straightforward but physically quite nontrivial since it yields an infinity of new classes of susy-partner potentials, whose spectra are exactly identical except for the lowest $n+1$ states, if the superpotential is defined in terms of the $(n+1)$-st eigenfunction, with $n=0$ reserved for the ground state. result 0.55 0.71 0.52 asserted 1.00
s2 First we show that there are practically no possibilities for shape invariant potentials based on higher excited states. result 0.95 0.85 0.15 asserted 0.99
s3 Then we calculate the isospectral partner potentials for the following 1-dim potentials (after separation of variables where appropriate): (i) 3-dim (spherically symmetric) harmonic oscillator, (ii) 3-dim (isotropic) Kepler problem, (iii) Morse potential, (iv) P\"oschl-Teller type I potential, and (v) the 1-dim box potential. contribution 0.86 0.92 0.08 asserted 0.98
s4 In all cases except in (v) we get new classes of solvable potentials. result 1.00 0.92 0.23 asserted 1.00
s5 In (v) the partner potential to the box potential is a special case of P\"oschl-Teller type I potential. potentials. result 0.99 0.91 0.09 asserted 1.00
s6 In this paper we present results of a straightforward further application of this formalism to a few most important exactly solvable 1-dim potentials, namely (i) spherically symmetric 3-dim harmonic oscillator, (ii) 3-dim isotropic (spherically symmetric) Kepler potential, (iii) Morse potential, (iv) P\"oschl-Teller type I potential, and (v) 1-dim box potential. contribution 0.98 0.88 0.09 asserted 0.99
s7 PACS numbers: 03.65.-w, 03.65.Ge, 03.65.Sq background 0.87 0.10 0.02 unclear 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.97 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We apply the generalized formalism and the techniques of the supersymmetric (susy) quantum mechanics to the cases where the superpotential is generated/defined by higher excited eigenstates (Robnik 1997, paper I). The generalization is technically almost straightforward but physically quite nontrivial since it yields an infinity of new classes of susy-partner potentials, whose spectra are exactly identical except for the lowest $n+1$ states, if the superpotential is defined in terms of the $(n+1)$-st eigenfunction, with $n=0$ reserved for the ground state. First we show that there are practically no possibilities for shape invariant potentials based on higher excited states. Then we calculate the isospectral partner potentials for the following 1-dim potentials (after separation of variables where appropriate): (i) 3-dim (spherically symmetric) harmonic oscillator, (ii) 3-dim (isotropic) Kepler problem, (iii) Morse potential, (iv) P\"oschl-Teller type I potential, and (v) the 1-dim box potential. In all cases except in (v) we get new classes of solvable potentials. In (v) the partner potential to the box potential is a special case of P\"oschl-Teller type I potential. potentials. In this paper we present results of a straightforward further application of this formalism to a few most important exactly solvable 1-dim potentials, namely (i) spherically symmetric 3-dim harmonic oscillator, (ii) 3-dim isotropic (spherically symmetric) Kepler potential, (iii) Morse potential, (iv) P\"oschl-Teller type I potential, and (v) 1-dim box potential. PACS numbers: 03.65.-w, 03.65.Ge, 03.65.Sq

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.