Reply to cond-mat/0211660: Comments on "A model for fatigue in ferroelectric perovskite thin films" published in Appl. Phys. Lett, 76, 1060 (2000); addendum, ibid. p.3655
classification
❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords
replyappliedcommentscond-matcriticismsfatiguelettersphysics
read the original abstract
This is a reply to cond-mat/0211660 by A.K. Taganstev, which consists of a set of criticisms of our publications on polarisation fatigue in Applied Physics Letters. Although his comments were rejected by Applied Physics Letters more than two years ago, Dr Tagantsev has published them in this archive on 29/11/2002. We reply to each of his criticisms here.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.