Reply to Comment on "Superfluid stability in the BEC-BCS crossover" by Sheehy and Radzihovsky
classification
❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
cond-mat.str-el
keywords
commentradzihovskysheehybec-bcsbehindclaimedcontrastcrossover
read the original abstract
The reason behind the discrepancy between the phase diagrams of our earlier work [1] and the comment of Sheehy and Radzihovsky [2] is discussed. We show that, in contrast to what is claimed in [2], the requirement of positive susceptibility is sufficient to rule out states that are local maximum of the free energy (as a function of the order parameter $\Delta$
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.