A Comment on ``Superconducting-Normal Phase Transition in (Ba1-xKx)BiO3, x = 0.40, 0.47'' by B. F. Woodfield, D. A. Wright, R. A. Fisher, N. E. Phillips and H. Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4622 (1999)

(2) National High Magnetic Field Lab; (3) Louisiana State University); Donavan Hall (2); P. Kumar (1); R. G. Goodrich (3) ((1) University of Florida

arxiv: cond-mat/9912164 · v2 · submitted 1999-12-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

A Comment on ``Superconducting-Normal Phase Transition in (Ba1-xKx)BiO3, x = 0.40, 0.47'' by B. F. Woodfield, D. A. Wright, R. A. Fisher, N. E. Phillips and H. Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4622 (1999)

P. Kumar (1) , Donavan Hall (2) , R. G. Goodrich (3) ((1) University of Florida , (2) National High Magnetic Field Lab , (3) Louisiana State University) This is my paper

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords commentphasetransitionwoodfieldaddressesanomalousba1-xkxba1-xkxbio3

0 comments

read the original abstract

This comment addresses criticisms of our PRL 82 (1999) p. 4532-4535 (cond-mat/9904288) raised by Woodfield et al. in their recent PRL. We find that the critical fields in single crystals of Ba1-xKxBiO3 (x = 0.4) have anomalous temperature dependecies which suggests that the superconducting phase transition in this material is not of order II.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

A Comment on ``Superconducting-Normal Phase Transition in (Ba1-xKx)BiO3, x = 0.40, 0.47'' by B. F. Woodfield, D. A. Wright, R. A. Fisher, N. E. Phillips and H. Y. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4622 (1999)

discussion (0)