Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Active Learning with Statistical Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cs/9603104 v1 pith:4ZDJOSAD submitted 1996-03-01 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords datalearningtechniquesgaussianslocallymixturesnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For many types of machine learning algorithms, one can compute the statistically `optimal' way to select training data. In this paper, we review how optimal data selection techniques have been used with feedforward neural networks. We then show how the same principles may be used to select data for two alternative, statistically-based learning architectures: mixtures of Gaussians and locally weighted regression. While the techniques for neural networks are computationally expensive and approximate, the techniques for mixtures of Gaussians and locally weighted regression are both efficient and accurate. Empirically, we observe that the optimality criterion sharply decreases the number of training examples the learner needs in order to achieve good performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Human Preference aligned Tabular Similarity

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Downstream prediction metrics do not certify human-aligned tabular similarity rankings; a pairwise preference workflow and pilot show user-specific embedding quality gaps.

Pith tools