Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Magnetic monopole bibliography

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
G. Giacomelli, M. Giorgini, T. Lari, M. Ouchrif, L. Patrizii, V. Popa, P. Spada, V. Togo

High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 26 May 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We present a bibliography compilation on magnetic monopoles updated to include references till the end of year 1999.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ex/0005041 (version 1)
Pith IDGIUKPQ6B, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationG. Giacomelli, L. Patrizii, M. Giorgini, M. Ouchrif, P. Spada, T. Lari, V. Popa, V. Togo. "Magnetic monopole bibliography." arXiv:hep-ex/0005041 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/GIUKPQ6B
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,223 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.79 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.11 · compares with prior results 0.03 · mentions code or data availability 0.08.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present a bibliography compilation on magnetic monopoles updated to include references till the end of year 1999. It is intended to contain nearly all the experimental papers on the subject and only the theoretical papers which have some specific experimental implications.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present a bibliography compilation on magnetic monopoles updated to include references till the end of year 1999. contribution 1.00 0.82 0.16 asserted 0.99
s1 It is intended to contain nearly all the experimental papers on the subject and only the theoretical papers which have some specific experimental implications. contribution 0.42 0.36 0.10 asserted 0.87

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: dataset or benchmark 0.61 · evidence from literature 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present a bibliography compilation on magnetic monopoles updated to include references till the end of year 1999. It is intended to contain nearly all the experimental papers on the subject and only the theoretical papers which have some specific experimental implications.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • The present paper gives a bibliography of most recent publications on monopoles recalling also the most significant early papers; it is an update of the 2000 magnetic monopole bibliography [ref] .

    Magnetic Monopole Bibliography-II · Introduction · 0.85

Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.